systematic literature review pdf

Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synthesising scientific evidence to answer a particular research question in a way that is transparent and reproducible, while seeking to...

Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synthesising scientific evidence to answer a particular research question in a way that is transparent and reproducible, while seeking to include all published evidence on the topic and appraising the quality of this evidence.

A guide to the methods and challenges of systematic reviews in stroke research, with examples and resources. Learn how to identify, appraise, synthesize and interpret evidence from primary studies using explicit and reproducible methods.

This research uses a qualitative research method, the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) model with the PRISMA approach with stages Identification, Screening, Eligibility, Included.

This guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information.

In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature reviews in planning education and research.

A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure .

The systematic review is a rigorous method of collating and synthesizing evidence from multiple studies, producing a whole greater than the sum of parts. This textbook is an authoritative and accessible guide to an activity that is often found overwhelming.

Because they use the entire body of literature, systematic reviews are widely regarded as the highest form of evidence by the scientific community. Rigour and replication are the bedrocks of science. In this regard, review methodologies have undergone enormous change in recent years, indeed during the period over which

Systematic review searches and identifies, evaluates and synthesises original studies on a particular topic in an unbiased and reproducible manner to provide evidence for practice. Additionally, systematic review projects are cost-effective as they are typically completed in a shorter time