Best MSW Programs

30 of the World’s Most Impressive Social Housing Projects

lead

Image Source

As populations burgeon and urban centers face increasing density, the provision of affordable housing emerges as a pivotal concern for governments worldwide. Gone are the days of monotonous concrete blocks; today’s focus often centers on delivering residential asphalt roofing solutions that balance cost-effectiveness with the provision of well-crafted and individualized homes, preserving the dignity of those in need.

As populations grow and cities become more crowded than ever, public housing has become an increasingly important issue for governments around the world. However, social housing is no longer limited to characterless blocks of concrete. These days, the aim is often to provide low-cost housing to individuals and families who need it – while still affording them the dignity of well-designed and distinctive homes. In the realm of real estate, understanding the importance of certain processes is crucial, and title searches stand out in this regard. And this article explains what it is, and why it is important , shedding light on the critical role title searches play in ensuring a smooth and secure real estate transaction. Just as well-designed and distinctive homes contribute to the dignity of individuals in need, a thorough title search contributes to the integrity and security of property transactions, safeguarding the interests of both buyers and sellers alike.

These modern public housing projects frequently incorporate eco-conscious designs and elements, as efficient energy usage tends to be a priority. Here we look at 30 of the world’s social housing developments that break the mold, undoing negative stereotypes and serving as remarkable works of architecture in their own right. Contact the installers that are certifiedhome automation atlanta ga to help adding high tech in your home.

30. Mirador Housing Project – Madrid, Spain

30. Mirador Housing Project GÇô Madrid, Spain

The Mirador housing project in Madrid’s Sanchinarro quarter is more than just a block of flats. It’s closer to a vertical collection of mini neighborhoods. Dutch architectural firm MVRDV created slits between the blocks in the construction imagined as upright alleyways, and the large open space near the top has been dubbed the “sky plaza.” This “semi-public” area provides residents with a communal meeting place and features a garden with stunning views of the nearby Guadarrama Mountains. The project won the Madrid municipality’s Best Design in Housing prize in 2005, even though it wasn’t completed until 2012. It contains 165 apartments.

29. Torre Plaça Europa – Barcelona, Spain

29. Torre Plac¦ºa Europa GÇô Barcelona, Spain

This stunning eco-friendly tower in Barcelona’s relatively new Plaça Europa (Europa Square) zone completely shatters the idea of the boring, gray public housing block. Designed by local architects Roldán + Berengué, it is part of a project that includes another 25 other tower blocks, most of them social housing. The naturally ventilated building is an interesting mix of surfaces in varying shades of gray and black, giving it a decidedly futuristic look. Both recycled and 100 percent recyclable materials were used in the building’s construction, which began in 2005 and was finished in 2010. The 20-story tower contains 75 units.

28. Poljane Community Housing – Maribor, Slovenia

bevkperovic arhitekti housing maribor slo

Due to the fact that the Poljane Community Housing project in Maribor is located next to a busy intersection, award-winning Slovenian studio Bevk Perović architects faced spatial limitations when designing the complex. The limited exterior space prompted the company to create large community spaces, either inside the buildings, or on top of them in the form of roof gardens. The designers were also able to incorporate distinctive orange balconies, adding color and character to the otherwise somewhat plain looking walls. Completed in 2007, the four-building complex on the outskirts of the city contains 130 separate apartments.

27. Harold Housing Project – Paris, France

27. Harold Housing Project GÇô Paris, France

Local architectural studio Jakob + Macfarlane faced a rather tricky environment when designing the Harold Housing Project in Paris, France. Faced with strict land rules, building restrictions and tree preservation orders, the project was divided into three separate apartment blocks, which are connected by a network of pathways. Completed in 2008, the eco-conscious buildings house 100 separate apartments. The complex also features ground-level shopping areas as well as wheelchair-friendly first-floor apartments. And all three blocks have green roof elements, plus rooftop solar-powered heating systems that provide the buildings with more than half of their hot water.

26. Les Nids – Courbevoie, France

26. Les Nids GÇô Courbevoie, France

The brief for this social housing project in the relatively new urban development zone that is Les Fauvelles in Courbevoie, France was that it should “present new approaches for social housing in densely occupied urban settings.” Paris-based KOZ Architects responded with Les Nids, a two-block complex that includes innovative features such as different shaped apartments, large landings and lots of external spaces, offering residents airy views of nearby western Paris. Completed in 2010, the project was commissioned by the Courbevoie Town Council, which collaborated with social housing organization Groupe 3F to initiate a design competition and thus fill the final spot in the area. The complex includes 28 four-room social housing units.

25. Sa Pobla Social Housing – Mallorca, Spain

25. Sa Pobla Social Housing GÇô Mallorca, Spain

Locally based architectural studio Ripoll Tizon designed the Sa Pobla social housing project in Mallorca, Spain to be both unified in its simplicity and adaptable to the needs of individual occupants. The result? This white-fronted complex, which almost looks more like a holiday resort than the kind of public housing we’re used to. The project was completed in 2012 and won first prize in the Best Residential Architecture Project category at the 2013 Architecture Plus Awards. In addition, the 19-unit project was a FAD Architecture Awards 2013 and XII Spanish Biennale of Architecture and Urbanism 2013 finalist.

24. Carabanchel Social Housing – Madrid, Spain

24. Carabanchel Social Housing GÇô Madrid, Spain

This intriguing looking public housing project in Madrid’s Carabanchel district was designed by now-defunct London-based Foreign Office Architects, using what the design studio called “advanced ecological technology.” The exterior is clad with bamboo louvers, which provide environmentally sound climate control by keeping heat in during the winter months and offering respite from the searing Spanish sunshine in the summer. The project also includes a hollow “Air Tree” that is built from recycled materials and features solar panels, ivy plants, fans and water sprays, providing residents with shade and clean air much as a real tree would. The development, which was completed in 2007, is five stories high and contains 100 apartments, making it one of Europe’s biggest social housing schemes.

23. L’Astrolarbre – Paris, France

23. LGÇÖAstrolarbre GÇô Paris, France

When architects from locally based design studio KOZ Architects first saw this location in Paris, France, their attention was drawn to an old maple tree growing on site. The architects decided to incorporate the sprawling tree into the design of the 12-unit L’Astrolarbre social housing project, infusing the urban residential development with nature. “We just couldn’t imagine to cut it down,” explained an architect from the studio. KOZ Architects also added front gardens to the ground floor and certain first floor apartments as well as an eco-friendly rainwater harvesting system for the entire development. Construction was completed in 2007.

22. Tetris Apartments – Ljubljana, Slovenia

22. Tetris Apartments GÇô Ljubljana, Slovenia

Observing its irregular design, it’s easy to see how this block containing social housing in Ljubljana, Slovenia earned its “Tetris” name. Local firm OFIS Architects built the Tetris Apartments building utilizing cost-effective but good-quality materials like granite tiles and oak flooring. Completed in 2007, the four-story structure is situated looking in the direction of a busy highway. To compensate, the balconies and windows were angled 30 degrees away from the highway, and rather impressively, none of the windows and balconies look directly onto another apartment. What’s more, to allow for individual customization, only the main walls of the units are structural; the rest can be repositioned as desired.

21. Social Housing in Parla – Parla, Spain

21. Social Housing In Parla GÇô Parla, Spain

Madrid-based architectural firm Arquitecnica faced the common concerns tied up with developing projects of this nature when designing this social housing scheme in Parla, Spain. The architects had to consider the size and cost of the individual apartments as well as the land that was available to them, and the result was these attractively colored blocks. The design fits the specified purpose and – thanks to the green-patterned façade – blends in smoothly with the surrounding natural landscape. Construction began in 2006, and the project was completed in 2010. Altogether, 120 low-cost units with stylish modern interiors were built with young renters in mind.

20. Hayrack Apartments – Cerklje, Slovenia

20. Hayrack Apartments GÇô Cerklje, Slovenia

To make the most of the scenic location in the Slovenian town of Cerklje, OFIS Architects designed the Hayrack Apartments social housing project so that most of the units look out onto the neighboring mountains and fields. The crisscross motif at the front of the building was inspired by the traditional hayracks in the area – hence the name. Meanwhile, the structure’s L-shape design was built to preserve a 300-year-old lime tree on the property, such that the building and the tree are nicely integrated. The project was completed in 2007 and houses 56 low-cost apartments.

19. Angers Social Housing – Maine-et-Loire, France

19. Angers Social Housing GÇô Maine-et-Loire, France

French architectural firm Studio Bellecour designed the Angers social housing project in France’s Maine-et-Loire department, aiming to break the mold of the stereotypically negative “concrete block” synonymous with schemes of this nature. Hence, the studio came up with a dynamic design that is both unified and intimate yet still clearly separated and defined for the different units and structures – each of which has an asymmetrical rooftop over an attic. The idea was to create a close-knit and positive environment that retains residents’ privacy, and the development was completed in 2010.

18. Vivazz, Mieres Social Housing – Asturias, Spain

18. Vivazz, Mieres Social Housing GÇô Asturias, Spain

For its Vivazz, Mieres project in Asturias, Spain, French/Belgian design studio Zigzag Architects aimed to create a housing development that maintains a connection to nature. While the outward-facing sections of the structure are made of corrugated steel, their inward-facing counterparts feature a “double skin” comprising sizable windows and movable wooden shutters. The open spaces in the design allow natural light to enter and air to circulate. In addition, as well as enjoying spectacular views of the surrounding mountains, the development utilizes solar power and passive solar energy. Completed in 2010, in 2011 it was honored as a highly commended project at the AR+D Awards for Emerging Architecture.

17. Monterrey Housing – Nuevo León, Mexico

17. Monterrey Housing GÇô Nuevo Leo¦ün, Mexico

The Monterrey Housing project won Chilean architectural studio Elemental a 2011 INDEX design prize. Located in Monterrey in the Mexican state of Nuevo León, the reinforced concrete units were created with the idea that occupants could modify their particular spaces themselves, depending on their personal finances. For example, the empty spaces between the units provide space for future expansion. Only the essential parts of the houses, such as the kitchens and bathrooms, are ready built. Individual adaptability seems to be an important aspect of many modern social housing projects, giving residents the feeling that they really own and have control over their living spaces.

16. Social Housing for Mine Workers – Asturias, Spain

16. Social Housing for Mine Workers GÇô Asturias, Spain

Before this state-subsidized housing development project was constructed in the Spanish mining town of Cerredo, Asturias, it had been a quarter of century since any new homes had been built in the area. Designed by Spanish architectural studio Zon-e and completed in 2009, the two perpendicular blocks were intended to complement the colors of the surrounding countryside. Each apartment has a different floor plan, and all benefit from cross ventilation. The windows also afford stunning views of the surrounding Cantabrian Mountains.

15. Honeycomb Apartments – Izola, Slovenia

15. Honeycomb Apartments GÇô Izola, Slovenia

This bright, eclectic and unusual social housing project is situated in Izola in the southwestern part of Slovenia. The distinctive design ensured Ljubljana-based architects OFIS won a Slovenia Housing Fund award in a competition that involved designing inexpensive housing for young families. Dubbed the Honeycomb Apartments, the two blocks enjoy a view of Izola Bay on one flank and look out onto the neighboring hills on the other. Shade and open-air access are important in this part of the world, so each unit has its own well-ventilated balcony area. Residents can also customize the interior of their apartments, while the colored fabric shades above the outdoor spaces provide privacy. Completed in 2006, the project contains 30 apartments in each block.

14. Pearcedale Parade – Melbourne, Australia

14. Pearcedale Parade GÇô Melbourne, Australia

The bright, cheerful colors and quirky architecture of Pearcedale Parade in the Melbourne suburb of Broadmeadows makes it quite an eye-catching development. It was designed by the Victoria-based branch of CH Architects and was funded by the Brumby Labor government and Yarra Community Housing, a non-profit body dedicated to providing affordable accommodation to Victorians who need it. Completed in 2010, Pearcedale Parade contains 88 cross-ventilated units, and the development also boasts solar-powered hot water and heating. They also hired Wills Plumbing plumber in Adelaide to ensure reliable plumbing. The dignity of occupants was an important factor in the design process, and the hope was that the finished project would change the way people think about community housing.

13. Bondy Social Housing – Paris, France

13. Bondy Social Housing GÇô Paris, France

Thirty-four families were relocated into this stylish and energy efficient social housing building in the suburban municipality of Bondy in northeastern Paris. The units were designed by Parisian architectural studio Atelier du Pont. Built in a U-shape around a centralized courtyard, the development features a high-ceilinged roof which may have been installed by professionals who may know that metal roofing needs specialist paint , and the units benefit from ample natural light, balconies, and passive solar design – while rainwater is also used to provide eco-conscious cooling. However, the disadvantages of poor vents in the attic could include issues such as poor air circulation, increased humidity levels leading to mold growth, and potential damage to the roof structure due to moisture accumulation.

12. Salburúa Social Housing – Álava, Spain

12. Salburu¦üa Social Housing GÇô A¦ülava, Spain

This housing development designed by international architectural firm ACXT proves that social housing blocks don’t have to be limited to the dull brown and grey shades often associated with them. The bright red color of the building leaps out from its much less vibrant surroundings, and the facility features a 21-story tower and a lower block of differing levels. Located in the Salburúa district of Vitoria, in the Álav province of northern Spain’s Basque Country, the apartments were built with consideration given to both energy efficiency and the comfort of residents. In Salburúa, social welfare is a matter of pride for the city council, which regards decent housing as the right of all citizens, no matter their economic status.

11. Hollande Social Housing – Pas-de-Calais, France

The influence of the 1970s architecture that surrounds this building is obvious. As for the structure itself, well while its shape may be somewhat conventional, there is actually little that’s boring about this housing project in Béthune in the French department of Pas-de-Calais. The opaque black bricks of the exterior contrast with the light-colored wood used for the window frames and fencing, while the asymmetrical window placement adds a certain quirkiness to the otherwise slightly plain looking walls. Paris- and Geneva-based designers FRES Architectes developed the project for social housing specialists Pas-de-Calais Habitat, and the building was completed in 2012.

10. Savonnerie Heymans – Brussels, Belgium

10. Savonnerie Heymans GÇô Brussels, Belgium

The Savonnerie Heymans social housing project is an attempt to create an entire environmentally friendly neighborhood consisting of public housing. Designed by local firm MDW Architecture, the development offers various apartment types, including lofts, maisonettes and duplexes, all of which incorporate energy-efficient qualities. Solar power and rainwater harvesting are just two of the eco-conscious features of the complex, which is built on the site of an old soap factory and utilizes the original structural elements where possible. You can see the old chimney for yourself. The 42-unit complex, which was completed in 2011, won a 2012 Prix Bruxelles Horta Award and earned a special mention at the 2012 Belgian Building Awards.

9. Les Loggias – Paris, France

9. Les Loggias GÇô Paris, France

The timber façade and bright green paint of the Les Loggias housing project in Paris’ arrondissement de Reuilly sets it apart from its noticeably less vibrant neighbors. Paris-based agency KOZ Architects designed the building, giving consideration to both the environment and the needs of its inhabitants. Completed in 2011, the block is clad in neat looking ash timber, which is at once durable and cost effective. The interiors were designed to receive as much natural light as possible, and the building also features exterior insulation as well as eco-conscious solar panels.

8. Elmas Social Housing – Sardinia, Italy

8. Elmas Social Housing GÇô Sardinia, Italy

The colors of the Mediterranean were incorporated into the sunny white and yellow design of this social housing project in Elmas, Sardinia. According to Italian architects 2+1 Officina Architettura, the differently spaced and sized windows “create a vibrant and binomial play of open/closed.” The development has a walkway balcony with brise-soleil screening used as a form of climate control, and shutters on the north side of the structure shield against chilly winds. Materials were chosen to be both affordably priced and long-lasting, and the development, which was completed in 2010, includes a courtyard as well as ground floor duplexes.

7. Pormetxeta Social Housing – Baracaldo, Spain

7. Pormetxeta Social Housing GÇô Baracaldo, Spain

Completed in 2007, Spanish architects ACXT’s state-subsidized housing development in Pormetxeta, Baracaldo, in the north of Spain, was spearheaded by the local Basque government. Although the complex is made of prefabricated concrete, its sharp angles and modern, two-toned color scheme prevent it from resembling traditional public housing blocks. Forty-six units are housed within two separate buildings, and parking space is also provided. The plan won first prize in a scheme design competition.

6. Parc Central Social Housing – Valencia, Spain

6. Parc Central Social Housing GÇô Valencia, Spain

The Parc Central Social Housing Building in Valencia, Spain is made up of a large number of units shared among three non-identical towers built around a central courtyard. Two Spanish agencies, Office of Architecture in Barcelona and Peñín Architects, were involved in the design of the modern looking, aesthetically pleasing white buildings, which are situated in a landscaped park space. The project was completed in 2010.

5. Hatert Housing – Nijmegen, Netherlands

5. Hatert Housing GÇô Nijmegen, Netherlands

Tower Hatert in the Dutch city of Nijmegen is part of the local government’s plan to invigorate its housing. The rippling, sculpture-like 13-story building was designed by Rotterdam-based studio 24H Architecture, and it houses 72 apartments as well as a health care center on the ground floor. The timber used throughout the construction is FSC certified. And the non-aligned balconies – with the railings apparently inspired by leaf patterns – ensure that each unit gets enough natural light, while also offering residents uninterrupted views of their surroundings. This futuristic looking tower was finished in 2011.

4. Zabalgana Social Housing – Álava, Spain

4. Zabalgana Social Housing GÇô A¦ülava, Spain

In Zabalgana, Vitoria, in northern Spain’s Basque province of Álava, Spanish architects ACXT developed this striking social housing project, which contains 65 residential units. Completed in 2006, the building incorporates wood on the balconies and in the foyer area, providing aesthetic warmth and complementing the building’s colder, stylish metal cladding. Despite strict affordable housing guidelines, ACXT stuck to their aim and achieved what the company describes as “a deep environmental and landscaping sensibility.” The project was pushed forward by the VISESA group, which is financed by the Basque government.

3. Tête en l’air Social Housing – Paris, France

3. Te¦éte en l'air Social Housing GÇô Paris, France

This wooden structure may look more like an ancient fort than a modern complex in a busy metropolis, but Paris’ Tête en l’air (meaning “head in the clouds”) social housing project is definitely the latter. Designed by Paris-based agency KOZ Architects, the complex, which includes thirty units – 15 brand new and another 15 rehabilitated from the pre-existing structure – was completed in 2012. The project was undertaken for social housing organization SIEMP, a group committed to sustainable architecture, including the renovation of older buildings.

2. Sint-Agatha-Berchem Housing Project – Brussels, Belgium

2. Sint-Agatha-Berchem Housing Project GÇô Brussels, Belgium

This project in the Brussels municipality of Sint-Agatha-Berchem may be new, but the district it is located in has been dedicated to social housing since the early 1920s. Architect Victor Bourgeois created the original district, and Belgian architectural firm Buro II & Archi+I designed these new units, which were completed in 2012, to complement Bourgeois’ cubist style. They are also low-energy units that incorporate solar panels, rainwater retrieval systems and eco-friendly materials – a far cry from the gray tower blocks many picture when they think about social housing.

1. Le Lorrain – Brussels, Belgium

1. Le Lorrain GÇô Brussels, Belgium

Designed by Belgian agency MDW Architecture, the Le Lorrain social housing project is actually a repurposed old iron dealer facility located in Belgium’s capital, Brussels. Completed in 2011, the new complex consists of a multi-unit apartment building and three terraced maisonette homes, each of which has its own private garden. Originally, a high wall surrounded the eastern side of the site, but this was lowered to allow in more light, and the complex has a large, open communal space for residents to use. The design of Le Lorrain is contemporary, yet it still retains a vestige of the site’s industrial heritage.

Previous Post: Top 25 Scholarships for Social Work Students

Next Post: How Do I Become a Social Worker?

  • Architects in your City
  • Famous Architects
  • Ancient / Historical
  • Corporates/offices
  • Cultural/Religious
  • Green/Sustainable Architecture
  • High-rise/Skyscraper
  • Hotel and Cafe
  • Institutional
  • Mixed-use Buildings
  • Recreational
  • Landscape Architecture
  • Public Buildings
  • Residential
  • Top in the field
  • Tech in Architecture
  • Career Path
  • Sign in / Join

housing complex case study

Norman Foster and his High-tech Architecture

Diebedo francis kere- first african to win pritzker architecture prize, thomas heatherwick – fascinating architect, oscar niemeyer- hero of the modern architecture, chichu art museum: portrayal of japanese brutalism, biomimicry architecture: eastgate centre – harare, zimbabwe, vastu direction for home, top 10 fabulous wooden structures in the world, 10 upcoming futuristic projects in the world: a glimpse into architecture…, architecture of indian cities: top 10 cities for architects., are the skins of larger buildings prefabricated, what is 3d printing technology how it is used in architecture, the best designing software that every architect must use, best laptop for architecture students in 2021, 5 representations of technology in the world of architecture, unveiling the essence of architecture: a comprehensive exploration, architecture juries – 10 things to remember before them, top 20 architecture colleges in the world, top 20 architecture colleges in india, top 20 architecture colleges in canada, sheikh sarai housing by raj rewal, new delhi.

Sheikh Sarai Housing

The Sheikh Sarai Housing is a complex of 550 units in South Delhi. Which is a low-rise, high-density scheme that combines the diversity in the units with axial pedestrian networks for a range of spatial and visual experiences. Also, that is based on the Self-Financing Scheme (SFS) for the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). Since the 1970s, there was an increasing need to cater to the housing of the citizens in Delhi. Also in Delhi, with the increasing strength of the professional and the trading classes in the cities along with migration from two and three-tier cities, housing strategies had to be considered for the needs of the middle-class group.

Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

The Mass Housing Project

The Sheikh Sarai Housing is located in the Sheikh Sarai neighbourhood in New Delhi. And the site is about 35 acres. So the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) commissioned the architect Raj Rewal to design a residential housing scheme for the middle and lower-income group of people. Raj Rewal experimented with the Sheikh Sarai Housing Complex as one of the earliest experiment on the topic of social housing applied to a big scale site. It fits into an environment defined by the absence of symbolic features that characterize the site, which is located on the outskirts of New Delhi.

Construction of Units

The housing complex’s development began in 1978 and was completed in 1982. Subsequently, the Sheikh Sarai site was originally intended for the development of a combination of LIG, MIG, and HIG housing units. However, due to financial constraints, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) introduced a new category of housing known as the Self-Financing Scheme (SFS). Within this scheme, the allottees had to pay for their units in 5 installments over the period of the construction of the units.  As a result, people who signed up for a unit were entered into a lottery and had the option of specifying their preferences for unit type, layout, and location. The entire mass housing scheme is completely economically viable because of the subsidized housing units and also because of the use of local materials for construction. Finally, this increased the affordability of the apartments.

For the sake of completing the project, the housing units were classified into types. The break-up of the units was as follows –

  • Category 1 – 48 units (1 Bedroom).
  • Category 2 – 557 units (2 and 3 Bedrooms) and MIG – 192 units (3 Bedrooms).

Categories 1 and 2 were under the Self-Financing Scheme (SFS). Raj Rewal was the architect of the units in Sector D only, which consisted of the Category 2 units only.

Design Concept

Taking inspiration and connection with the historical cities like Udaipur and Jaisalmer in Rajasthan. Also, the Sheikh Sarai Housing is the characteristic of the urban fabric of India. And the design plans establish a clear concept of the close relationship between public and private spaces. As a result, the design arranges the open spaces in a methodical hierarchy throughout.

Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

The mass housing clearly is based on the Haveli Typology inculcating the traditional patterns of urban space. On the other hand, these patterns are refined and perfected into ideal ensembles of collective dwellings. Raj Rewal has masterfully taken advantage of the irregularities on the site as every element offers a harmonious physical entity for living and working.

Urban Fabric

Built form of sheikh sarai housing by raj rewal, new delhi.

To imitate a traditional urban settlement, low-rise high-density walk-up flats are packed to form interior shaded streets linked by gateways and open courtyards (traditional Indian architectural components) for public use, and as an expression of style of the architect. The gateways, a common feature throughout the project, enabled a high level of transparency despite the fact that it was a high-density development, making it legible for the users.

Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

Movement and Flow

Clear demarcation of vehicular and pedestrian streets, limiting vehicular flow to the road’s periphery with few access points along the road It improves pedestrian flow by puncturing the built solids along the central spine. So that is defined as the parking spaces and flow of traffic outside of the housing clusters. Moreover, there is a clear pattern connecting the movement to space, from person to neighborhood, also pedestrian to vehicular. The movement zones flow from the outer margins to the inner areas of the housing scheme, overlapping accordingly to create access points along the periphery.

Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

Community Spaces at Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

Moreover creating intimate courtyards connected to one another, embodying traditional components of Indian architecture, to foster common areas for the community. The scale of these courtyards manipulates to encourage more social activities and interaction among the resident community, in addition to acting as social facilitators. So the individual to community equation structures through a progression of private spaces to squares of various sizes with shaded paths running throughout. Because every open space is meticulously controlled and organized, there is no room for neglected green spaces. Thus, the open greens are at the strategic places because they facilitate the orientation for the pedestrians.

Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

Clusters and Units

The massing of building blocks creates clusters with inner courts and inside shaded streets. Also, the blocks of units connected. On the other hand, maintain the proper spacing between them and creates a system of covered pedestrian streets and internal courts. The organization of the blocks at Sheikh Sarai housing are also similar to the traditional medieval cities of Rajasthan.

Six different types of units ranging from 70-120 Sq.m. (70 Sq.m., 95 Sq.m., 110 Sq.m. and 120 Sq.m.), organized in two different clusters, 3 and 4 story high. The units come in a variety of sizes and types, ranging from studios to three-bedroom apartments. While the differences are slight, the necessity for economy and design is evident throughout the interior. Consequently, the apartments are tight, with no ambiguity of space caused by larger floor spaces to negotiate from. Despite the closeness and clustering of both units, each room is well-ventilated and well-lit, with an adjoining patio for each apartment. However, all the units are provided with courtyards or rooftop terraces.

housing complex case study

Areas of Spaces of Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

  • Area of Intervention – 38195 Sq.m. ~ 3.82 Ha.
  • Built Up – 12740 Sq.m. ~ 1.2 Ha.
  • Surface Parking – 6622 Sq.m. ~ 0.66 Ha.
  • Green Areas – 3931 Sq.m. ~ 0.39 Ha.

housing complex case study

Urban-scape at the site level, the architect developed the project by employing urban strategies of articulated flows, segregated spaces and applied the same on the site level. Therefore in a structured urban settlement. Raj Rewal designed the layout density at Sheikh Sarai as 100 DU/ha which comprised about 11% greater than the master plan applications. For instance, the compact dense development both on the ground floor and above maximized the use of space.

In conclusion, the Sheikh Sarai Project resembles the morphology of medieval Indian cities and its white composition, intentionally modern, is reminiscent of Udaipur. Most importantly, the housing scheme stands as yet another landmark in Delhi housing chronology and is responsible for the DDA’s middle-income housing to reach the limelight once again.

housing complex case study

Also read: The Interlace in Singapore by Ole Scheeren

Brian Brace Taylor, M. P. (1992). Sheikh Sarai Housing – New Delhi . Retrieved from Raj Rewal Associates: https://rajrewal.in/portfolio/sheikh-sarai-housing-new-delhi/

Gupta, S. (June, 1991). Housing with Authority : The role of public and private architects in public housing in Delhi. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Kit, S. (2018, November 6). Research Project – Low-Cost Housing Issues (Solution) . Retrieved from Blogspot.com: https://samkit-education.blogspot.com/2018/11/research-project-low-cost-housing.html

SiddhikaChichani. (March 26, 2018). POST INDEPENDENCE ARCHITECTURE IN INDIASHEIKH SARAI HOUSING COMPLEX, NEW DELHI. Slideshare.net.

Singh, H. (August 12, 2015). SHEIKH SARAI HOUSING COMPLEX. Slideshare.net.

housing complex case study

Don’t miss the latest case study!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

You’ve been successfully subscribed to our newsletter!

Share this:

  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Discover more from archEstudy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Type your email…

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

Udaan: low-cost housing project by sameep padora and associates, aranya low-cost housing by bv doshi.

[…] Also Read: Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi […]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Most viewed posts, the history of chinese civilization.

  • archEstudy Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

raj rewal asiad village housing

Profile image of Ashna Gupta

Related Papers

Katarzyna Kapusta

One could hardly imagine a time more exciting for an Indian architect to start a career than at the close of the 1940s, when India had just gained freedom from colonial rule. In many places around the world this was the time when enormous funds were invested in new and often very novel urban developments that were to provide, for better or worse, the model of metropolitan life for the generations to come. By that time, it was generally believed that architecture and urban planning have the power to shape human habits and inspire worldviews. This was also true for India, and at this particular moment it was crucial for decision makers and for the designers to decide on what style and what planning philosophy should they stake. What should the background image of the new Republic of India be, what values should be put through, what goals should be proclaimed? In my presentation, I am going to focus on these decisive years of modern architecture in India and on its major figures.

housing complex case study

L Architecture D Aujourd Hui Aa

Pierre Frey

IDC international journal

pankaj chhabra

Sarbjit Bahga

Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret: The Indian Architecture Authors: Sarbjit Bahga and Surinder Bahga The book, though a modest addition to the voluminous publications, mostly descriptive, on these legendry architects, hope to throw light on some features hitherto not dealt with in earlier existing literature. The present book discusses almost all the works of Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret in India including some lesser-known ones as well as some projects which were not realized. Indeed some of these have been written about for the first time. In Particular Pierre Jeanneret’s works which were not so well-known earlier but find a befitting coverage in this book. Published after more than six decades of Chandigarh’s inception, this work portrays the up-to-date scenario of the built-environment vis-à-vis the inhabitants’ views on it. The reaction of the ultimate recipients of any delivery system, naturally based on their felt needs, is a most critical aspect for any in-depth analysis.

Ar. Asif Rizowan

In this paper we address the role of architectural criticism in the conception and practice of modernism in India – since post-independence till the present. India has witnessed a vast difference in the culture of the built environment. And as Modern Style of architecture arose from enormous transformations in the west during the late 19th, and flourished to India, Architectural Criticism says, it’s about time, that a new style of architecture, a style that describes the ‘Indianness’, originates, takes over, describes, and flourishes to bring a new face to the context of Architecture in India.

Dr. Shaji K. Panicker

Between the mid-1980s and late-1990s, an unprecedented tide of new publications on contem-porary architects and architecture in India appeared in print. These included several mono-graphs as well as more comprehensive surveys, exhibition catalogues, and a new “journal” of In-dian architecture, Architecture + Design (A+D) launched in 1984. Using Bourdieuean tools of analysis, this paper examines these architectural discourses about Indian architecture as a “field of restricted production” to better understand the context and dynamics of the conspicuous ur-gency to publish Indian architects and their work at that particular time. In so doing, the paper highlights inherent problems with the representation and historiography of ‘postcolonial’ archi-tecture in the context of the hegemonic discourses of modernity and its ‘postmodern’ critiques.

IAEME PUBLICATION

IAEME Publication

Generally, architecture can be termed as a field of art in building, a structure designed by human beings. Therefore, the grandeur and the height of a civilization is measured by the buildings it left behind which include religious buildings. This can be seen through Indian architecture that appeared as a result of the emergence of Buddhism and Hinduism. Between the main objectives of this study is to discuss the concept, goals and philosophy found in the architecture of India. In addition, the study also discusses the characteristics and elements of Indian architecture made up of Buddhist and Hindu architecture that has influenced some of the architecture of other buildings in the world. In this writing, the authors used qualitative methodology focusing on research on the analysis of documents and observations. The finding shows that the concept and philosophy of Indian architecture has been largely influenced by nation and world civilization. The study also identified the characters and elements. system along the western coast of India.

Thakur Manoj Singh

Indian architecture isone of the most famous in the world. Its architecture was based on the concept of religious plurality. One might notice that the architecture of Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic and colonial or Indo-saracenic were distinct. Based on these styles four historical eraswere classified i.e., the ancient Indian, pre-Islamic, and colonial periods. This article seeks to reassess the general perception of Indian Architecture and its relation to the formation of Indian identities. It focusses in particular on the interpretation of the concept of plurality n the academic world by western art-historians. The socioeconomic factorsplays determining role in defining the architectural styles of south Asia.

National Conference: Cultural Identities - Manifestation through Architecture (CIMA) 2020

Priyanka Gayen

Modern architectural heritage has various tangible & intangible values associated with them. It is the cultural significance of and the association of these values, which makes it heritage. Like ancient architectural heritage, the post-independence architecture of India has a potential association of values of cultural transformation, social & technological development, innovation, tradition & lifestyle. This paper attempts to explore the various values of the post-independence architecture of India, which makes it an integral part of the nation's cultural heritage. The period under consideration is five decades after independence (1947 to 2000)for this research. Cultural significance of the architecture of this period has been explored through the history of modern architecture of India and the significant modern architecture in the broader setting. For a comprehensive understanding of the cultural significance from a global perspective, there is a brief discussion of the values considered by major organisations involved in the recognition & protection of 20th-century heritage. In light of the broader spectrum of values associated with the architecture of this period and the cultural significance of the post-independence architecture of India, the values associated with the significant modern public buildings of this period have been identified.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

SHODHKOSH : Journal and visual performimg arts

Dr GAURAV GANGWAR

Kiran S A T Y A B O D H Kalamdani

Paarija Saxena

IRJET Journal

Vandana Baweja

Proceedings of DARCH 2021- 1st International Conference on Architecture & Design

Neha Thunga

Peter Scriver

Ajinkya S Umbarkar

Oxford Bibliographies in Architecture, Planning and Preservation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021)

Pushkar Sohoni

Daniele Vadalà

Ahmad Jawad NIAZI

Samia Gallouzi

Rajiv Mandal

Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand Conference 2012

Prajakta Sane

Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi

Art of the Orient

Anna Rynkowska-Sachse

Subhankar Nag

International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology

IJRASET Publication

Shaymaa Esmail

Indo Nordic Author's collective

Dr. Uday Dokras

internation conference- sources of architecturl forms: theory and practice, Kuwait

Deepika Shetty

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

RTF | Rethinking The Future

Incremental Housing at Belapur: Exceptional Examples of Housing Designs in India

housing complex case study

Incremental Housing at Belapur –  Housing Design in India

In the ever-evolving landscape of Indian architecture, Incremental Housing at Belapur emerges as a trailblazer in redefining affordable living. This article explores the nuanced details of this exceptional housing design, delving into its innovative features and design principles that have transformed it into a beacon of progressive urban development.

Architectural Brilliance at Belapur

Pioneering affordable housing solutions.

Incremental Housing at Belapur stands as a pioneer in providing affordable housing solutions in the dynamic urban environment of India. Located in Belapur, Navi Mumbai, this architectural marvel challenges the traditional notions of housing design, offering a scalable and adaptable model for urban living.

Adaptive Design Philosophy

The design philosophy behind Incremental Housing revolves around adaptability. Architects envisioned a structure that could evolve alongside the changing needs of its residents, allowing for incremental growth and ensuring that the housing complex remains relevant and functional over time.

Innovative Spatial Planning for Flexibility

Scalable living spaces.

One of the standout features of Incremental Housing is its scalable living spaces. The design allows for gradual expansion, enabling residents to start with a basic structure and incrementally add additional rooms or features as their needs and family size grow. This approach ensures that the housing remains accessible to a broad demographic.

Modular Construction Techniques

Modular construction techniques play a pivotal role in the spatial planning of Incremental Housing. The use of prefabricated and modular components allows for efficient construction, reducing costs and providing a framework for residents to customize their living spaces as per their requirements.

Community-Centric Living

Shared amenities and open spaces.

Incremental Housing fosters a sense of community through shared amenities and open spaces. Common areas, playgrounds, and recreational zones are strategically integrated into the design, encouraging residents to interact and create a vibrant community within the housing complex.

Community Participation in Design

The design of Incremental Housing emphasizes community participation. Residents have a say in the development and evolution of the housing complex, creating a collaborative environment where the community actively contributes to shaping its living spaces.

Sustainable Practices and Environmental Sensitivity

Green building materials and energy efficiency.

Environmental sustainability is a core focus of Incremental Housing. The use of green building materials, energy-efficient systems, and sustainable construction practices align with global efforts towards eco-friendly urban development.

Rainwater Harvesting and Waste Management

To minimize the environmental impact, Incremental Housing incorporates rainwater harvesting systems and efficient waste management practices. These initiatives contribute to resource conservation and create a more sustainable living environment.

Technological Integration for Modern Comfort

Smart infrastructure and connectivity.

While prioritizing affordability, Incremental Housing does not compromise on modern comforts. The housing complex integrates smart infrastructure, providing residents with connectivity solutions, efficient energy management, and digital services that enhance the overall quality of life.

Digital Inclusion for Residents

The design also focuses on digital inclusion, ensuring that residents have access to technology that can improve their daily lives. From digital communication platforms to online community services, Incremental Housing embraces technology as a tool for empowerment and convenience.

Architectural Aesthetics and Cultural Integration

Adaptive façade and aesthetic appeal.

The adaptive façade of Incremental Housing adds to its aesthetic appeal. Architects have carefully designed the exterior to be visually pleasing while allowing for modifications and expansions. This adaptability ensures that the housing complex maintains a cohesive and attractive appearance.

Integration with Local Culture and Context

Incremental Housing seamlessly integrates with the local culture and context of Belapur. The architectural elements draw inspiration from the surrounding environment, creating a housing complex that feels rooted in its cultural context while embracing modern design principles.

Challenges and Adaptive Solutions

Urban planning constraints.

Navigating urban planning constraints posed challenges during the development of Incremental Housing. Architects collaborated with local authorities to find adaptive solutions that met regulatory requirements while staying true to the vision of creating affordable and scalable living spaces.

Infrastructure and Connectivity Challenges

Addressing infrastructure and connectivity challenges required innovative solutions. Incremental Housing incorporates infrastructure improvements, such as efficient transport links and enhanced connectivity, to overcome initial challenges and create a well-integrated community.

Impact on Urban Development and Future Prospects

Model for affordable housing initiatives.

Incremental Housing at Belapur serves as a model for affordable housing initiatives across India. Its success demonstrates that affordable living and architectural innovation can coexist, setting a precedent for future urban development projects aimed at addressing the housing needs of diverse populations.

Potential for Replication in Urban Centers

The scalable and adaptable nature of Incremental Housing makes it a potential solution for replication in various urban centers. The housing model can be customized to suit the unique challenges and opportunities presented by different cities, offering a flexible approach to urban development.

housing complex case study

Rethinking The Future (RTF) is a Global Platform for Architecture and Design. RTF through more than 100 countries around the world provides an interactive platform of highest standard acknowledging the projects among creative and influential industry professionals.

housing complex case study

Lee Ha Jun: Architectural Alchemy in Set Design Mastery

housing complex case study

Es Devlin: Transforming Spaces into Theatrical Canvases

Related posts.

housing complex case study

Wingsweep: A Masterpiece by Kendrick Bangs Kellogg

housing complex case study

Fernandez Architecture: Crafting Elegance and Minimalism in Architectural Excellence

housing complex case study

Christ Hospital Joint and Spine Center, USA: Revolutionizing Healthcare Architecture

housing complex case study

Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care, USA: Elevating Pediatric Healthcare Architecture

housing complex case study

The New Hospital Tower at Rush University Medical Center, USA: Redefining Healthcare Architecture Excellence

housing complex case study

Teletón Infant Oncology Clinic, Mexico: A Paradigm of Healing Architecture

  • Architectural Community
  • Architectural Facts
  • RTF Architectural Reviews
  • Architectural styles
  • City and Architecture
  • Fun & Architecture
  • History of Architecture
  • Design Studio Portfolios
  • Designing for typologies
  • RTF Design Inspiration
  • Architecture News
  • Career Advice
  • Case Studies
  • Construction & Materials
  • Covid and Architecture
  • Interior Design
  • Know Your Architects
  • Landscape Architecture
  • Materials & Construction
  • Product Design
  • RTF Fresh Perspectives
  • Sustainable Architecture
  • Top Architects
  • Travel and Architecture
  • Rethinking The Future Awards 2022
  • RTF Awards 2021 | Results
  • GADA 2021 | Results
  • RTF Awards 2020 | Results
  • ACD Awards 2020 | Results
  • GADA 2019 | Results
  • ACD Awards 2018 | Results
  • GADA 2018 | Results
  • RTF Awards 2017 | Results
  • RTF Sustainability Awards 2017 | Results
  • RTF Sustainability Awards 2016 | Results
  • RTF Sustainability Awards 2015 | Results
  • RTF Awards 2014 | Results
  • RTF Architectural Visualization Competition 2020 – Results
  • Architectural Photography Competition 2020 – Results
  • Designer’s Days of Quarantine Contest – Results
  • Urban Sketching Competition May 2020 – Results
  • RTF Essay Writing Competition April 2020 – Results
  • Architectural Photography Competition 2019 – Finalists
  • The Ultimate Thesis Guide
  • Introduction to Landscape Architecture
  • Perfect Guide to Architecting Your Career
  • How to Design Architecture Portfolio
  • How to Design Streets
  • Introduction to Urban Design
  • Introduction to Product Design
  • Complete Guide to Dissertation Writing
  • Introduction to Skyscraper Design
  • Educational
  • Hospitality
  • Institutional
  • Office Buildings
  • Public Building
  • Residential
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Temporary Structure
  • Commercial Interior Design
  • Corporate Interior Design
  • Healthcare Interior Design
  • Hospitality Interior Design
  • Residential Interior Design
  • Sustainability
  • Transportation
  • Urban Design
  • Host your Course with RTF
  • Architectural Writing Training Programme | WFH
  • Editorial Internship | In-office
  • Graphic Design Internship
  • Research Internship | WFH
  • Research Internship | New Delhi
  • RTF | About RTF
  • Submit Your Story

housing complex case study

Institutional

Exhibitions

Sheikh Sarai Housing - New Delhi

Year : 1970-1982

Location : New Delhi

housing complex case study

Project Details

The Sheikh Sarai Housing, a complex of 550 units in South Delhi, is a low-rise, high density scheme that combines diversity in units with axial pedestrian networks for a range of spatial and visual experiences and is based on self-financing scheme for Delhi Development Authority.

The design evolved from a specific area based programme for the Lower Income Group (LIG) and Middle Income Group (MIG) detailed by the DDA. With peripheral parking, the plan strings together a series of variable housing types with pedestrian squares, streets and pathways.

The design is based on clear pattern: connecting movement to space, from person to neighbourhood and pedestrian to vehicular. The individual-to-community equation was structured through a progression of private spaces to squares of varying sizes with shaded paths running throughout. The vehicular to pedestrian zones flow from the outer margins to the inner areas of the scheme, overlapping accordingly to create access points along the periphery. All the units have been provided with courtyards or roof top terraces.

“The mass housing that Rewal built at Sheikh Sarai based on the haveli typology and traditional patterns of urban space has been refined, purified and perfected into ideal ensembles of collective dwellings. Masterfully taking advantage of the irregularities of the site, the Laboratories and the dwellings, with walkways, courtyards and terraces offer a harmonious physical entity for living and working.”

Brian Brace Taylor

Monograph on Raj Rewal 1992 by Mimar Publications

View Gallery

housing complex case study

Advertisement

Advertisement

Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and social cohesion of its residents: case study from Kolkata, India

  • Published: 12 March 2021
  • Volume 36 , pages 781–820, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

housing complex case study

  • Soumi Muhuri   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1224-936X 1 &
  • Sanghamitra Basu 2  

1129 Accesses

8 Citations

Explore all metrics

A Correction to this article was published on 28 April 2021

This article has been updated

From concerns of mental health problems and behavioural issues of residents of high-rises, this research tries to explore the association of interactional spaces (the spaces of interaction in a high-rise housing) with dimensions of social cohesion (the social relations) of the residents. Presuming social cohesion is an important determinant of their mental health. To have both the researchers’ and users’ perspectives while an investigation, this research incorporates perception of the residents, analysis of layout plan, behaviour observation and space syntax analysis. Later, with the help of hierarchical linear regression model it identifies the significant attributes and uses of interactional spaces (both at outdoor and indoor) that facilitate or inhibit social cohesion. The finding indicates that the arrangement and use of the streets and tot-lots within a housing complex have a significant contribution in strengthening social cohesion of the residents. Further, more than actual use, the opportunities of a chance encounter and opportunities of use of the spaces appear to be more effective. The findings of the research would have a wider application not only in high-rise group housing but other instances as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

housing complex case study

Similar content being viewed by others

housing complex case study

Common space as a tool for social sustainability

housing complex case study

Socio-spatial structure of urban communities and the distribution of crime in Makurdi, Nigeria

housing complex case study

Research on Co-housing Model—Experience and Applicability to Housing Design for Low-Income People in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Change history, 28 april 2021.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09842-z

It encompasses the terms of high-rise (ten-storeyed or more than ten storied high building), group housing and residential complex. Group housing is ‘Housing for more than one dwelling unit, where land is owned jointly….and the construction is undertaken by one Agency’ (National Building Code of India, 2016, part 3, p.11). A residential complex means a building or buildings with more than twelve residential units (place of residence in the form of house or apartment) with a common area and one or more facilities or services within “a premises” (p.17); the entire layout is approved by any legal authority but not intended for personal use of an individual (Ministry of Finance, Government of India, 2016).

Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M. (1999). Housinglayout, social interaction, and the place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 41–73.

Google Scholar  

Aggarwal, M. (2001). Outdoor Play Areas for Children in High-Density Housing in Montreal . Master of Architecture Dissertation. Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, School of Architecture, McGill University, Montreal.

Al-Kodmany, K. (2018). The sustainability of tall building developments: A conceptual framework. Buildings, 8 (7), 1–31.

Barros, P., Ng Fat, L., Garcia, L. M. T., Slovic, A. D., Thomopoulos, N., de Sá, T. H., Morais, P., & Mindell, J. S. (2019). Social consequences and mental health outcomes of living in high-rise residential buildings and the influence of planning, urban design and architectural decisions: A systematic review. Cities, 93, 263–272.

Batty, M. (2001). Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 123–150.

Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6, 47–65.

Can, I., & Heath, T. (2016). In-between spaces and social interaction: a morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31, 31–49.

Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T. & Oc T. (2010). Public Places Urban Spaces : The Dimensions of Urban Design. (Elsevier).

Chatterjee, M. (2018). A study on loneliness and social interaction pattern among the high rise dwellers of Kolkata city. The Research Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 26–32.

Chattopadhyay, S. (2000). Residential Satisfaction in Public Housing-A study. PhD Dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur.

Chen, D. (2006). Shared outdoor spaces and community life: Assessing the relationship between design and social interaction . Master of Landscape Architecture Dissertation, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Guelph.

Clark, D. L. C. (2007). Viewing the Liturgy: A space syntax study of changing visibility and accessibility in the development of the Byzantine Church in Jordan. World Archaeology, 39 (1), 84–104.

Dave, S. (2011). Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries. Sustainable Development, 19, 189–205.

Dawson, C. T., Wu, W., Fennie, K. P., Ibanez, G., Cano, M. A., Pettit, J. W., & Trepka, M. J. (2019). Perceived neighborhood social cohesion moderates the relationship between neighborhood structural disadvantage and adolescent depressive symptoms. Health and Place, 56, 88–98.

Dempsey, N. (2009). Are good-quality environments socially cohesive?: Measuring quality and cohesion in urban neighbourhoods. Town Planning Review, 80 (3), 315–345.

Domènech-Abella, J., Mundó, J., Haro, J. M., & Rubio-Valera, M. (2019). Anxiety, depression, loneliness and social network in the elderly: Longitudinal associations from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA). Journal of Affective Disorders , 246 , 82–88.

Evans, G. W., Wells, N. M., & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59 (3), 475–500.

Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14 (1), 65–84.

Fisher, K. D. (2009). Placing social interaction: An integrative approach to analyzing past built environments. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 439–457.

Fone, D., Dunstan, F., Lloyd, K., Williams, G., & Watkins, J., & Palmer, S. (2007). Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental health? A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 338–345.

Franz, G., & Wiener, J. M. (2008). From space syntax to space semantics: a behaviorally and perceptually oriented methodology for the efficient description of the geometry and topology of environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35, 574–592.

Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space . Island Press.

Gifford, R. (2007). The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural Science Review, 50, 1–16.

Ginsberg, Y., & Churchman, A. (1985). The pattern and meaning of neighbor relations in high-rise housing in Israel. Human Ecology, 13, 467–484.

Grange, A. L. (2011). Neighbourhood and class: A study of three neighbourhoods in Hong Kong. Urban Studies, 46, 1181–1200.

Ha, S. (2010). Housing, social capital and community development in Seoul. Cities, 27, S35–S42.

Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension . Doubleday.

Hillier, B. (2005). The art of place and the science of space. World Architecture , 185, Beijing, Special Issue on Space Syntax, pp 96–102.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space . Cambridge University Press.

Ho, D. C., Chau, K., Cheung, A. K., Yau, Y., Wong, S., Leunga, H., Laub, S. S., & Wong, W. (2008). A survey of the health and safety conditions of apartment buildings in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43, 764–775.

Hochschild Jr., T. R. (2011). Neighbors by Design: Determinants and Effects of Residential Social Cohesion . PhD Dissertation, University of Connecticut.

Hoogland, C. (2000). Semi-private Zones as a Facilitator of Social Cohesion . Nijmegen University.

Huang, S. L. (2006). A study of outdoor interactional spaces in high-rise housing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 193–204.

Karuppannan, S., & Sivam, A. (2011). Social sustainability and neighbourhood design: an investigation of residents’ satisfaction in Delhi. Local Environment, 16 (9), 849–870.

Keane, C. (1991). Socioenvironmental determinants of community formation. Environment and Behavior., 23 (1), 27–46.

Kearns, A., Whitley, E., Mason, P., & Bond, L. (2012). ‘Living the high life’? Residential, social and psychosocial outcomes for high-rise occupants in a deprived context. Housing Studies, 27, 97–126.

Kim, J. Y., & Kim, Y. O. (2020). The association of spatial configuration with social network for elderly in social housing. Indoor and Built Environment, 29 (3), 405–416.

Koo, Terry K., & Mae, Y. Li. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine , 15 (2), 155–163.

Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R. L., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26 (6), 823–851.

Kweon, B., Sullivan, W. C., & Wiley, A. R. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior, 30 (6), 832–858.

Lee, J. (2011). Quality of life and semipublic spaces in high-rise mixed-use housing complexes in South Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 10 (1), 149–156.

Lee, S. (2005). Spatial Order and Sense of Community in High-Rise Apartment Developments in Bundang, the Metropolitan area of Seoul, Korea . Master of Architecture Dissertation, The University of New South Wales Faculty of Built Environment.

Lee, Y., Kyoungyeon, K., & Lee, S. (2010). Study on building plan for enhancing the social health of public apartments. Building and Environment, 45, 1551–1564.

Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (1967). Territoriality: A neglected sociological dimension. Social Problems, 15, 236–249.

Mak, W. W. S., Cheung, R. Y. M., & Law, L. S. C. (2009). Sense of Community in Hong Kong: Relations with community-level characteristics and residents’ well-being. Americal Journal of Community Psychology, 44, 80–92.

Mousavinia, S. F., Pourdeihimi, S., & Madani, R. (2019). Housing layout, perceived density and social interactions in gated communities: Mediational role of territoriality. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51 (101699), 1–14.

Muhuri, S., & Basu, S. (2018). Developing residential social cohesion index for high-rise group housing complexes in India. Social Indicators Research , 137 (3), 923–947.

Nicoll, G. (2007). Spatial measures associated with stair use. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21 (4), 346–352.

Ong, B. L. (2003). Green plot ratio: an ecological measure for architecture and urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 197–211.

Osmond, P. (2011). The convex space as the 'Atom' of urban analysis. The Journal of Space Syntax, 2 (1), 97–114.

Park, G., & Evans, G. W. (2016). Environmental stressors, urban design and planning: implications for human behaviour and health. Journal of Urban Design, 21 (4), 453–470.

Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Rashid, M., Hong Kim, S., & Bafna, S. (1997). On the description of shape and spatial configuration inside buildings: convex partitions and their local properties. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 761–781.

Pomeroy, J. (2008). Sky courts as transitional space: Using Space syntax as predictive theory . Conference Proceedings, CTBUH 8th World Congress, 1–8.

Reddy, K. N. (1996). Urban Redevelopment: A Study of High-Rise Buildings . Concept Publishing Company.

Ridwana, R., Prayitno, B., & Hatmoko, A. U. (2018). The relationship between spatial configuration and social interaction in high-rise flats: A case study on the Jatinegara Barat in Jakarta. SHS Web of Conferences, 41, 1–7.

Shim, J., Park, S. & Park, E. (2004). Public Space Planning of Mixed-use High-rise Buildings—Focusing on the Use and Impact of Deck Structure in an Urban Development in Seoul . Conference Proceedings, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Seoul, Korea, pp 764–771.

Skjaeveland, O., & Garling, T. (1997). Effects of interactional space on neighbouring. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 17 (3), 181–198.

Skjaeveland, O., Gilding, T., & Maeland, J. G. (1996). A multidimensional measure of neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 413–435.

Talen, E. (2016). Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies , 36 (8), 1361–1379.

Turner, A. (2004). Depthmap 4- A Researcher’s Handbook (electronic version) . Bartlett School of Graduate Studies.

Turner, A., & Penn, A. (1999). Making isovists syntactic: isovist integration analysis . (Paper presented in the 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Universidad de Brasilia, Brazil)

Urzua, C. B., Ruiz, M. A., Pajak, A., Kozela, M., Kubinova, R., Malyutina, S., Peasey, A., Pikhart, H., Marmot, M., & Bobak, M. (2019). The prospective relationship between social cohesion and depressive symptoms among older adults from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, 73, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-211063

Article   Google Scholar  

Yau, Y. (2010). Sense of community and homeowner participation in housing management: A study of Hong Kong. Urbani izziv, 21, 126–135.

Zhang, W., & Lawson, G. (2009). Meeting and greeting: Activities in public outdoor spaces outside high-density urban residential communities. Urban Design International, 14 (4), 207–214.

Zhang, W., Liu, S., Zhang, K., & Wu, B. (2019). Neighborhood Social Cohesion, Resilience, and Psychological Well-Being Among Chinese Older Adults in Hawai’i. Gerontologist , pp 1–10.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kharagpur for providing us with the necessary support and facilities for the research that was funded by the Ministry of Human Resource and Development (MHRD), India.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Planning and Architecture, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha, 769008, India

Soumi Muhuri

Department of Architecture and Regional Planning, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, India

Sanghamitra Basu

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumi Muhuri .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The heading of the Table 1 was incorrectly published as “Sense of belonging to a group (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.889, composite reliability = 0.890)”. However, it is intended only for the first nine entries. The correct heading of the table 1 is "Dimensions/Subdimensions”.

Appendix A: Details of characteristics of residents

Characteristics of respondents

Number

Percentage

Mother tongue

  

Bengali

469

71.9

Other

183

28.1

Age

  

 18–24

6

0.9

 25–29

23

3.5

 30–34

51

7.8

 35–39

98

15.0

 40–44

78

12.0

 45–49

84

12.9

 50–54

78

12.0

 55–59

72

11.0

 60–64

70

10.7

 65 and more

92

14.1

Gender

  

 Female

261

40

 Male

391

60

Marital status

  

 Single

18

2.8

 Married

602

92.3

 Widowed/widower

29

4.4

 Separated

3

0.5

Education

  

 10th standard (school level education)

3

0.5

 12th standard (school level education with a specialisation)

15

2.3

 Diploma/certificate

5

0.8

 Graduate

137

21.0

 Post graduate

187

28.7

 Professional

280

42.9

 PhD

25

3.9

Occupation

  

 Student

8

1.2

 Home maker

176

27.0

 Retired

129

19.8

 Service

245

37.6

 Self-employed

54

8.3

 Business

40

6.1

Total

652

100.0

Characteristics of households

Number

Percentage

Mean (Median)

SD

Min

Max

Household size

  

3.22 (3)

1.29

1

11

Number of Earning member

  

1.41 (1)

0.61

0

4

Average income of an earning member

   

 Rs.10000/- to Rs.14999/-

1

0.2

 

 Rs.15000/- to Rs.24999/-

17

2.6

 

 Rs.25000/- to Rs.49999/-

151

23.2

 

 above Rs.50000/-

483

74.1

 

Children ≤ 12 years

   

 Absence

464

71.2

 

 Presence

188

28.8

 

Present apartment type

   

 2Bedroom

202

31.0

 

 3Bedroom

410

62.9

 

  ≥ 4Bedroom

40

6.1

 

Super built up area

   

 up to 1000

119

18.3

 

 1100–1500

401

61.5

 

 1600–2000

100

15.3

 

 2000 + 

32

4.9

 

Present tenure type

   

 Rented

53

8.1

 

 Owned

599

91.9

 

Duration of stay

   

  < 1 year

36

5.5

 

 1–4 years

343

52.6

 

 5–10 years

262

40.2

 

  > 10 years

11

1.7

 

Past location

   

 Outside the country

11

1.7

 

 Outside the state but same country

92

14.1

 

 Outside the city but same state

113

17.3

 

 Same city

436

66.9

 

Past type of residence

   

 Other

18

2.8

 

 Independent house

238

36.5

 

 5 storey apartment

312

47.9

 

 More than 5 storey apartment

84

12.9

 

Past tenure type

   

 Other

44

6.7

 

 Rented

174

26.7

 

 Owned

434

66.6

 

Total

652

100.0

 

Appendix B: Details of attributes of the physical environment

Objective attributes of contextual environment

Valid cases

Percentage

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

SD

Development types

      

 Government

4

26.67

    

 Private

8

53.33

    

 Joint venture

3

20.00

    

Site area (acre)

15

 

0.74

18.40

6.11

4.65

Total dwelling units

15

 

95.00

1000.00

430.00

285.07

Maximum building height

      

  < 20 storeyed

11

73.33

    

 20 storeyed and more

4

26.67

    

Housing layout typology

      

 Molecular

2

13.33

    

 Linear

4

26.67

    

 Courtyard

6

40.00

    

 Linear cum courtyard

3

20.00

    

Dwelling units/hectare

15

 

89.00

317.00

200.60

68.63

Dwelling units/50 m length of street

15

 

19.00

41.00

28.07

6.79

Dwelling units/building

15

 

30.00

154.00

68.80

36.81

Dwelling units/floor lobby and corridor

15

 

3.00

8.00

5.40

1.40

Dwelling units/entrance door

15

 

19.00

77.00

42.87

15.69

Average number of floors per building

15

 

8.00

23.00

13.73

4.60

Ground coverage (%)

15

 

15.00

41.00

27.20

8.46

Location of dwellings

      

 Up to 5th floor

256

39.26

    

 6–10th floor

231

35.43

    

 11–15th floor

113

17.33

    

 16–20th floor

37

5.67

    

 21–25th floor

15

2.30

    

Provision of park–playground–common terrace

      

 Presence

11

73.33

    

 Absence

4

26.67

    

Provision of tot-lot

      

 Presence

13

86.67

    

 Absence

2

13.33

    

Facilities in housing complex

      

 Basic

6

40.00

    

 Abundant

9

60.00

    

      

Adjacent building height

15

 

10.00

24.00

14.00

3.87

Active frontage (%)

15

 

20.00

50.00

35.20

7.76

Bench or inbuilt seating along street

      

 Presence

5

33.33

    

 Absence

10

66.67

    

Extent of greenery along the street (weightage)

15

 

0.00

10.00

7.33

3.46

      

Total area (square meter)

13

 

103.9

1436.00

581.78

407.59

Area/DU

13

 

0.4

6.4

1.59

1.71

Convexity

13

 

0.41

1.00

0.67

0.21

Adjacent building height

13

 

0.00

23.00

11.85

6.50

Active frontage (%)

13

 

3.00

100.00

36.31

26.44

Bench or inbuilt seating

      

 Absence

7

53.85

    

 Presence

6

46.15

    

Trees/flower/shrub/grass in tot-lot

      

 Presence

11

84.62

    

 Absence

2

15.38

    

Mound

      

 Presence

2

15.38

    

 Absence

11

84.62

    

      

Total area (square meter)

11

 

883.30

13,200.00

5333.25

4209.77

Area/DU

11

 

3.40

20.90

10.71

5.59

Convexity of park

11

 

0.32

0.7700

0.5555

0.15

Adjacent building height (storey)

11

 

10.00

24.00

14.55

4.20

Active frontage

11

 

13.00

41.00

23.27

9.53

Visual focus in park

11

     

 Presence

10

90.90

    

 Absence

1

9.09

    

      

Total area (square meter)

15

 

4.70

13.1

8.07

2.17

Area/DU

15

 

46.80

680.48

46.80

197.01

Active frontage (%)

15

 

6.00

16.00

11.73

2.52

View towards outdoor

15

     

 Presence

9

60.00

    

 Absence

6

40.00

    

      

Total area (square meter)

  

52.60

9059

917.69

2264.13

Area/DU

  

0.30

1.30

0.77

0.28

      

Seating area

15

     

 Presence

3

20.00

    

 Absence

12

80.00

    

View towards outdoor

15

     

 Presence

8

53.33

    

 Absence

7

46.67

    

Visibility and accessibility

Street

Tot-lot

Park-playground-common terrace

Floor lobby and corridor

Ground floor lobby

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Mean

(SD)

Connectivity

4.20

(1.12)

7.06

(4.23)

4.68

(1.17)

2.87

(0.77)

2.80

(0.56)

Global integration(Rn)

1.08

(0.25)

1.36

(0.56)

1.20

(0.25)

1.52

(0.76)

1.52

(0.53)

Local integration (R3)

1.72

(0.28)

2.11

(0.57)

1.88

(0.27)

-

-

Control

1.72

(0.52)

3.14

(1.67)

1.87

(0.51)

2.45

(0.87)

2.09

(0.86)

Controllability

0.34

(0.05)

0.39

(0.08)

0.32

(0.09)

0.60

(0.23)

0.54

(0.20)

Spaciousness

5374.39

(4283.90)

5934.81

(4784.21)

7392.57

(4319.68)

44.20

(14.64)

43.73

(14.32)

Openness

90.23

(31.63)

79.02

(30.49)

94.77

(35.40)

87.74

(41.31)

70.47

(28.09)

Complexity

0.0132

(0.00)

0.02

(0.01)

0.01

(0.01)

0.01

(0.01)

0.02

(0.01)

Occlusivity

352.08

(243.15)

338.55

(247.00)

443.00

(241.46)

23.78

(14.37)

20.87

(9.39)

Compactness

0.17

(0.06)

0.1938

(0.08)

0.16

(0.08)

0.17

(0.08)

0.21

(0.07)

Perceived attributes

Valid cases

Minimum

Maximum

Median

(Values based on group mean)

Convenience of use of interactional spaces

15

1.00

5.00

5.00

Visual appearance

15

3.06

4.73

4.00

Comfortable microclimatic condition or protection from sun and wind

15

3.25

4.88

4.00

Safety and security of children

15

3.58

4.79

4.00

Opportunity of passive contact with nature

15

3.67

5.00

5.00

Quietness

15

3.61

4.75

4.00

Maintenance and management

15

3.34

4.64

4.00

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Muhuri, S., Basu, S. Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and social cohesion of its residents: case study from Kolkata, India. J Hous and the Built Environ 36 , 781–820 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09830-3

Download citation

Received : 26 March 2020

Accepted : 23 February 2021

Published : 12 March 2021

Issue Date : June 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09830-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Attributes of physical environment
  • Group housing
  • Interactional space
  • Residential social cohesion
  • Use of space
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

housing complex case study

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Home

Bronx, New York: Innovative Design of Via Verde’s Affordable Housing Development

Anchor institutions.

  • U.S. Virgin Islands Nonprofit Helps Community Focus on Disaster Recovery and Resiliency
  • A Model for Community-Based Policing in Pittsburgh
  • Achieving Lead Safe Housing in Cleveland
  • Click here for more

Community Development

  • Commodore Place Preserves Historic Affordable Housing in Vibrant Cleveland Neighborhood
  • In Broomfield, Colorado, New Development Breaks an Affordable Housing Drought

Healthy Housing

  • BRIGHT Study Finds Improved Health at Boston Housing Authority’s Old Colony Homes
  • Southwest Alaska: Improving the Respiratory Health of Alaska Native Children

Senior Housing

  • Washington, D.C.: City Incentives Spur Affordable Senior Housing and Preserve a Historic Structure
  • Creating Urgently Needed Affordable Senior Housing for Suburban Rockland County, New York

Supportive Housing

  • Yakima, Washington: An Adaptive Reuse Project Provides Supportive Housing for Formerly Homeless Veterans
  • Village on Mercy Provides Supportive Housing in Orlando, Florida

Sustainable Housing

  • Innovative Solar Technology Powers Affordable Housing in River Falls, Wisconsin
  • Greenville, Mississippi: Reserves at Gray Park Adds Affordable, Energy-Efficient Housing on Underutilized City Land

Zoning for Affordable Housing

  • San Francisco, California: Inclusionary Zoning Expands the Below-Market-Rate Housing Stock
  • Addressing Homelessness with a Tiny-Home Village in Olympia, Washington

Prosperity Playbook

  • The Atlanta BeltLine
  • Urban Land Institute MN Regional Council of Mayors

Case Studies

Home > Case Studies > Bronx, New York: Innovative Design of Via Verde’s Affordable Housing Development

Via Verde (“the green way”) is a 222-unit mixed-income and tenure housing development in the South Bronx area of New York City. The winner of the New Housing New York Legacy Project (NHNY) design competition, Via Verde is an incubator of sustainable design features that promote resource efficiency and a healthy, active lifestyle for residents. The LEED Gold-certified building includes many innovations in design and construction technology that offer important lessons for affordable housing developments across the country.

Background and Context

In 2003, the city of New York announced the New Housing Marketplace Plan (Housing Plan) in a mayoral-led response to the citywide shortage of affordable housing. The $7.5 billion plan responded to the city’s rapid population growth during the 1990s and early 2000s (between 1990 and 2010, the city added more than 850,000 new residents) and subsequent housing shortage with a comprehensive strategy to create and preserve 165,000 units of affordable housing over a period of 10 years (2004–2013). 1 The city’s commitment to increase the housing supply has been supported by efforts to improve its quality with respect to design, environmental sustainability, and long-term affordability. In 2006, the city’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), in partnership with the American Institute of Architects (AIA), New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, (NYSERDA), Enterprise Community Partners, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, sponsored the NHNY design competition in an effort to “…raise the bar for design excellence and innovation in affordable housing in New York City and beyond” through a juried design competition. 2 The competition was more than a conceptual exercise to solicit bold ideas; the winning interdisciplinary team of architects and developers was charged with executing their design proposal to create a new standard for excellence in affordable housing.

The competition centered on a narrow, triangular-shaped lot adjacent to the Melrose Commons neighborhood in the South Bronx. Comprised of 40,000 square feet of land and an additional 20,000 square feet of air rights, the dimensional constraints of the site were exacerbated by soil contamination, which led to the property’s designation as a brownfield. After years of public investment in the South Bronx — including the creation of thousands of housing units in the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Area — the property was one of the few remaining vacant city-owned parcels. 3 The characteristics of the site necessitated bold, creative ideas and the residents of the adjacent Melrose Commons neighborhood have a long history of advancing innovative concepts. In the 1990s, the community helped craft an inclusive, forward thinking revitalization plan for the neighborhood grounded in principles of sustainability. The goals of the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Plan included a mixed-income, mixed-use neighborhood with a housing density that could support public transportation and with architecturally significant and resource-efficient buildings. Notably, the plan supplanted city-led renewal efforts for lower-density development patterns that many longtime Melrose residents feared would result in their displacement and forever change the character of the neighborhood. 4

Many of the goals of the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Plan were included in the parameters of the NHNY design competition. The city requested proposals that served a range of income groups and that integrated an environmentally sustainable and innovative design with strategies that promote active, healthy living for residents. The focus on healthy living was a direct response to community concerns over asthma and public health in the neighborhood. 5 The winning proposal, Via Verde, was submitted by a project team consisting of Grimshaw Architects and Dattner Architects, together with developers Jonathan Rose Companies and Phipps Houses of New York.

Innovative Design and Program

Via Verde’s design includes many building form, programming, and technology innovations that create a model for the next generation of sustainable, affordable housing. Several of these innovations are realized through building massing and the ascending, “tendril-inspired” form, which responds to the narrow, triangular shape of the site as well as the neighborhood context. 6 The project consists of three building types that wrap around the perimeter of the site. From the site’s south side, the height of the buildings rise, from 2- to 4-story townhouses, to a 6- to 13-story mid-rise building that steps up to meet a 20-story tower on the north side, which serves as the project’s apex. The wrapping, terraced form gives rise to a vertical network of rooftop gardens that provides the physical and social organizing elements of Via Verde. Totaling approximately 40,000 square feet of open space, the gardens ascend from a ground level courtyard to a 7th floor fitness garden, with a rooftop dining terrace above the tower’s 20th floor. The gardens connect through a series of stairways and include a variety of uses to both engage residents and incorporate green building technologies: an amphitheater (2nd floor), a grove of conifer trees (3rd floor), a fruit tree orchard (4th floor), community gardens (5th floor), and a fitness garden (7th floor). These open spaces are designed to promote physical activity and create dynamic community spaces that encourage both passive and active recreation. The garden on the seventh floor includes access to an indoor fitness center that offers commanding views of the Bronx and Manhattan to the south. 7 The upper floors include six additional gardens that are planted with native vegetation. Although not accessible to residents, these areas provide building insulation and advanced stormwater management; the rainwater is harvested to irrigate the rooftop plantings. To ensure the success of the community gardens, the developers partnered with GrowNYC , a local nonprofit organization, to manage and operate the gardens during Via Verde’s first two years of operation. The objective is to educate and train residents so that the gardens are managed and maintained entirely by the Via Verde community after this initial start-up period. 8



17

<30% AMI

$23,040

13

<40% AMI

$30,720

120

<60% AMI

$46,080

# of Units


5

<80% AMI

$61,450

39

<150% AMI

$115,200

26

<175% AMI

$134,400


The innovations at Via Verde extend to the façade where advanced building technologies are used to further the goals of environmental sustainability and affordability. The terraced, south-facing walls harness the unobstructed southern exposure with six arrays of photovoltaic (PV) panels mounted to the building’s exterior. 9 Combined with additional arrays on the roofs of the fifth and seventh floors, the project includes a total of 288 photovoltaic panels capable of producing 66kw of electricity, or the equivalent of $12,000 in electricity savings annually, based on the energy model developed for the building. 10 In addition to the wall mounted solar panels, the building envelope includes technology to prevent water damage and promote building longevity. Via Verde’s exterior includes a prefabricated rainscreen cladding that is engineered to minimize water from infiltrating the exterior wall and damaging the building materials. 11

housing complex case study

Efforts to promote healthy, active living extend from the vertical gardens to the interior of the buildings. A pilot of the New York City Active Design Guidelines, Via Verde is designed to achieve a LEED Innovation Credit for incorporating design elements that promote a more active lifestyle for residents. For example, the use of stairs is encouraged by locating stairwells in highly visible and accessible areas and by placing windows in stairwells to bring in natural light. Signage encourages the use of stairs and highlights the health benefits (calories burned) of residents’ daily climbs. Centralized bicycle storage facilitates encourage the use of active modes of transportation and a medical clinic on the first floor provides health services for residents. 16

Financing and Planning

The successful completion of the $99 million project would not have been possible without the strong support of both city and state government. The project’s affordable rental component was financed with a combination of local, state, and federal resources totaling over $66 million dollars. The financing package included $25 million generated through the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program and $7 million from the New York State Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (SLIHC) program . HPD contributed an addition $12 million in financing through the HOME Investment Partnership Program and City Capital funds. The Federal Home Loan Bank of New York provided $1.9 million through its affordable housing program. 17

Via Verde benefitted from state programs designed to facilitate investments in brownfields, energy efficiency, and clean energy production. The developer invested $2.6 million in site remediation, supported by tax credits provided by the state’s Brownfield Cleanup Program. 18 The project also received over $500,000 through its participation in the NYSERDA Multi-Family Performance Program, which provides technical assistance and financing to owners of multifamily properties to implement an energy savings plan that targets a 15 percent improvement in building efficiency. 19 In addition to the various funding sources that made Via Verde possible, the project’s financial viability was strengthened by an exemption from providing the 36 parking spaces required by zoning code. 20 The mayor’s office granted this exemption, in part, because of the availability of parking throughout the neighborhood and Via Verde’s proximity to public transit. This exemption eliminated the need for a subsurface parking structure that would have significantly increased project costs. 21

Experience Gained

Via Verde includes many innovations in the design and programming of affordable housing that provide important lessons for future projects. The development is rooted in a community-based planning process that dates to the early 1990s, when local residents helped establish a revitalization plan for a mixed-income community that promotes environmental and social sustainability. These same principles have informed Via Verde’s planning process, in that the NHNY design competition relied on community input to help shape the project’s design.

For those involved in the development of Via Verde, the project includes many lessons that can be applied to future efforts. As a result of the competition, HPD has placed a greater emphasis on sustainability in their RFP process for new projects, and the Department is using the design competition platform to solicit proposals to meet other housing needs. 22 The project has enabled the designers and developers to explore innovative design and program ideas, including the prefabricated rainscreen technology, wall-mounted PV panels, and the vertical open space network that serves as both a community and a natural resource amenity. The incorporation of rooftop community gardens and the nonprofit start-up management model is being used in other projects involving the Via Verde development team. Via Verde’s sustainable design is expected to help maintain housing affordability while providing immediate savings in utility costs, when the project is compared to a baseline development without similar green features. Total savings are expected to exceed $115,000 annually, representing a 27 percent reduction compared with a baseline building. 23

The success of Via Verde is symbolic of the transformation of Melrose Commons, and the partnership between members of the community and the city. Subsequent to adoption of the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Plan in the early 1990s, more than 2,800 new residential units have been constructed in an area that once stood as an infamous symbol of urban decline. When the redevelopment of city-owned land in Melrose is complete, approximately 3,700 new units will be built across the 66 properties once owned by the city. The resulting combination of public and private investment in the Bronx now stands at $5.9 billion dollars, and the city estimates that for every $1 of public funding, $3.41 in private investment has been leveraged. 24 The Housing Plan has been instrumental in rebuilding the Melrose neighborhood and in using public dollars to leverage private investment.

City of New York, Department of Housing Preservation and Development. 2004. “The New Housing Marketplace: Creating Housing for the Next Generation.”

New Housing New York Legacy Project, Request for Proposals. June 2006. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, 13.

Ibid; Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. 2010. “Highlighting the Drivers of Community Development: Via Verde/The Green Way.” Community Investment News ; Email Correspondence with Eric Bederman, Press Secretary, City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, 18 July 2012.

Eddie Bautista, Yolanda Garcia, and Peter Stand. 1996. “ Melrose Commons: A Case Study for Sustainable Community Design ,” prepared for the 1996 Planners Network Conference.

New Housing New York Legacy Project, Request for Proposals. June 2006. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development; Where is New York? Affordability at Via Verde. Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Columbia University. 26 March 2012.

Where is New York? Affordability at Via Verde . 2012 .

Ibid; Via Verde Floor Plan. Dattner, Grimshaw, Phipps, and Rose

Project documents provided by Andrew McNamara, Vice President of New Construction, Bright Power, Inc, 10 July 2012

Association for Affordability, Inc. 2011, “NYSERDA Multifamily Performance Program Case Study: Via Verde,” presentation

Via Verde/The Green Way: Press Pack.

Via Verde Floor Plan.

Center for Active Design. Case Studies: Via Verde . Accessed 27 June 2012.

City of New York, Office of the Mayor, Via Verde press release, 18 June 2012. (website content has changed and this document is no longer available)

Association for Affordability, Inc. 2011.

City of New York, City Planning Commission Report C 080522 HAX, 7 October 2008. Accessed 27 June 2012; Interview with William Stein, Principal, Dattner Architects 26 June 2012. (website content has changed and this document is no longer available)

City of New York, City Planning Commission Report C 080522 HAX; Interview with William Stein, Principal, Dattner Architects 26 June 2012; Interview with Michaell Wadman, Vice President, Phipps Houses 29 June 2012. (website content has changed and this document is no longer available)

Interview with Bea De La Torre, Assistant Commissioner Planning, Marketing, and Sustainability, New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development 27 June 2012.

Email correspondence with Eric Bederman.

The contents of this article are the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government.

  • Hispanoamérica
  • Work at ArchDaily
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 1 of 50

  • Written by Maria-Cristina Florian
  • Published on May 30, 2022

This week’s curated selection of Best Unbuilt Architecture highlights residential projects submitted by the ArchDaily community . From a small community-dwelling in Ghana to a villa tucked under a hillside in Portugal , this roundup of unbuilt projects explores how architects react to various site topographies, cultures, and material availability when designing spaces that provide more than shelter to their users. The article also includes projects from India , Iran , Ireland , Latvia , Georgia , and Saudi Arabia.

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 30 of 50

Read on to discover eight residential projects along with their descriptions from the architects.

Samya Awas - Affordable Housing from Sustainable Interlocking Blocks

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 6 of 50

A simple rectilinear vault load-bearing structure is chosen as a design module. The idea is to use the Silica Plastic Blocks (The Interlocking Block) in order for easy and fast construction. The advantage of using the SPB block is that it uses no cement mortar and hence reduced the total cost of construction. The blocks can be built without any expertise on construction. One module uses a mere 1500 bricks which is equal to the cost of clay bricks when accounted for the time taken to construct.

Ev Design Office

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 10 of 50

Although a hot and dry climate prevails in most parts of Iran , the southern coast of the Caspian Sea has climatic advantages of this region. The findings show that design strategies based on traditional architecture are still applicable in the temperate humid climate of the region and can lead to low-energy buildings. Construction of small buildings In the past, this climate was common in the warehouse of agricultural products. Our project was formed by adapting to the local architecture and the needs of the client.

Cross Avenue

Urban Agency

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 13 of 50

The design for Cross Avenue, a new residential project, has grown out of the existing qualities of the site, melding the architecture harmoniously with its surrounds. Taking the treehouse as an initial concept, the design seeks to emulate the immersive capacity of this primary architectural structure. Three buildings are submerged in the ‘forest’, instilling a similar sense of escapism. Capturing the genius loci, the design envisages the project as a ‘growing organism’, invoking a symbiosis between nature and architecture.

Tamale Mini-living

Magdalena Gorecka modelsoffbeauty

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 19 of 50

Tamale, Ghana ’s third-largest urban center and one of the fastest-growing cities in West Africa, is characterized by its horizontality and urban sprawl. It is situated in the Tree Savannah climate zone, however, very much impacted by Sahel culture. Tamale Mini-living balances the densification and compression of the urban tissue. It provides three different types of living units, that could be assembled in various ways creating an almost vernacular, typology of an island.

Villa in Jurmala

Kerimov Architects

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 24 of 50

A three-story villa of 780 sq. m is located in Jurmala, Latvia , on the banks of the river, on a fairly small site surrounded by trees that need to be preserved as much as possible. The task was to make a compact middle-rise building within a given area easy to perceive, so-scaled to the environment, and not bulky. Three elements should be embodied in the architecture of the house: nature (forest), water, and the city.

Casa do Passadiço

PAULO MERLINI architects

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 32 of 50

When we arrived at the plot where the clients wanted us to design a single-family house that they wanted to be unpretentious, private, and timeless, we found a beautiful landscape of bucolic character. The presence of a small pre-existing building largely defined the creative process. With the premise of respecting the original natural landscape, we proposed a single-story house that integrates with the terrain in such a way that it becomes invisible from the visual axis of the entrance.

Mirage Dream

Studio Makal

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 37 of 50

A mirage is a phenomenon often experienced by weary travelers who seek refuge from the arid desert. It is seen as an oasis, a destination, and a safe place, but as they journey toward it, the mirage keeps going further, merely not there. It is an illusion, an intangible reality. Like the mirage, dreams are intangible. It is until we interpret dreams, that it becomes a reality, it becomes part of us, not just a figment in our mind. The aim is to make dreams tangible. To make the journey through the desert worthwhile. To make dreams a reality through architecture.

Fillet Edge House

Laboratory of Architecture #3

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 46 of 50

On a hillside near Tbilisi, in Georgia , laboratory of architecture #3 has designed a distinctive geometric residence, divided into an arrangement of stadium forms. To fully assimilate a rather steep slope, the building was divided into four spaces and levels, which allowed us to fully absorb the area and create separate open and closed terraces, loaded with different functions. House contains four bedrooms, two courtyards, a wine cellar, a pool, a sauna, and multiple big terraces and has an amazing view of the Tbilisi landscape.

HOW TO SUBMIT AN UNBUILT PROJECT

We highly appreciate the input from our readers and are always happy to see more projects designed by them. If you have an Unbuilt project to submit, click here and follow the guidelines. Our curators will review your submission and get back to you in case it is selected for a feature.

Image gallery

A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A Secluded Cliff House in Iran: 8 Unbuilt Residential Projects Submitted to ArchDaily - Image 1 of 50

  • Sustainability

世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!

想浏览archdaily中国吗, you've started following your first account, did you know.

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.

IMAGES

  1. Case Study Housing

    housing complex case study

  2. Case Study V: Housing Complex in Pune by Gangotree

    housing complex case study

  3. Yamuna Apartments Case Study

    housing complex case study

  4. Housing Case Study

    housing complex case study

  5. Case study Housing (Sem-VIth)

    housing complex case study

  6. Rokko Housing analysis in 2021

    housing complex case study

VIDEO

  1. NEW HOUSING COMPLEX IN PEACEFUL AREA, LONDON

  2. Controversial project sparks debate over affordable housing in Vancouver

  3. Housing Complex Presentation & Walkthrough

  4. Housing Focused Case Management, Session 2

  5. CASE STUDY: Palletizing Time-Sensitive Food Product in an Extreme Climate

  6. Developing a housing society is a complex but rewarding endeavor that requires careful planning

COMMENTS

  1. Oranje Castle Group Housing / MVRDV + Studio Archohm

    Completed in 2022 in Lucknow, India. Images by Noughts & Crosses LLP. The Oranje castle is a housing project on which Archohm collaborated with the globally-renowned Dutch architectural firm MVRDV.

  2. 30 of the World's Most Impressive Social Housing Projects

    19. Angers Social Housing - Maine-et-Loire, France. Image Source. French architectural firm Studio Bellecour designed the Angers social housing project in France's Maine-et-Loire department, aiming to break the mold of the stereotypically negative "concrete block" synonymous with schemes of this nature.

  3. Case Study V: Housing Complex in Pune by Gangotree

    Case Study V: Housing Complex in Pune by Gangotree. This housing project finds its great relevance in the fact that it attempts to integrate simple passive design features in the real estate market development without compromising neither financial mechanisms nor altering regular construction practices. The architects tried to implement passive ...

  4. Sheikh Sarai Housing by Raj Rewal, New Delhi

    12694. The Sheikh Sarai Housing is a complex of 550 units in South Delhi. Which is a low-rise, high-density scheme that combines the diversity in the units with axial pedestrian networks for a range of spatial and visual experiences. Also, that is based on the Self-Financing Scheme (SFS) for the Delhi Development Authority (DDA).

  5. Mixed-Use Housing: A Tool for Urban Activation

    Mixed-use developments are a vital strategy in revitalizing urban areas and breathing new life into neglected neighborhoods. By repurposing existing buildings or integrating new ones, architecture ...

  6. Sheikh Sarai Housing Complex, New Delhi: Redefining Affordable ...

    Sheikh Sarai Housing Complex's Genesis and Vision. The Sheikh Sarai Housing Complex finds its roots in the historical context of New Delhi's growing urban population. The visionaries behind this project aimed not only to provide housing but to create a model for sustainable and inclusive urban development. ... In Case Studies Project in ...

  7. Housing

    Broydenborg Housing Block / archipelago + NU architectuuratelier Ookayama Housing Complex / Tomoyuki Kurokawa Architects Cap. 1 Three Fig Trees / OSPA Arquitetura e Urbanismo

  8. (PDF) raj rewal asiad village housing

    The study also identified the characters and elements. system along the western coast of India. Download Free PDF View PDF. ... New Delhi Sheikh Sarai Housing Complex, New Delhi Zakir Hussain Co-operative Housing, New Delhi Asian Games Village, New Delhi EXHIBITION AND LARGE SPAN Nehru Memorial Pavilion, New Delhi Hall Of Nations and Hall Of ...

  9. Case Studies

    Waterloo Heights Housing | Koning Eizenberg Architects. Case Study PDF. 28th Street Apartments | Koning Eizenberg. Case Study PDF. The Flow House | William McDonough + Partners. Case Study PDF. Davis Residence | Erik Mehlman. Case Study PDF. Thornton Place | Mithun & Solomon.

  10. Rokko Housing I, II, III, Kobe: A Triumph of Modern Architecture by

    Rokko Housing I, II, III, Kobe - 15 Projects by Tadao Ando Rokko Housing I, II, III, located in Kobe, stands as an exemplary testament to the genius of Tadao Ando, a prominent figure in the realm of architecture. This residential complex, comprising three distinct phases, not only showcases a unique architectural style but also

  11. (PDF) Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and

    Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and social cohesion of its residents: case study from Kolkata, India. June 2021; Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 36(7)

  12. Incremental Housing at Belapur: Exceptional Examples of Housing ...

    Incremental Housing at Belapur - Housing Design in India In the ever-evolving landscape of Indian architecture, Incremental Housing at Belapur emerges as a trailblazer in redefining affordable living. This article explores the nuanced details of this exceptional housing design, delving into its innovative features and design principles that have transformed it into a beacon of progressive

  13. Sheikh Sarai Housing

    The Sheikh Sarai Housing, a complex of 550 units in South Delhi, is a low-rise, high density scheme that combines diversity in units with axial pedestrian networks for a range of spatial and visual experiences and is based on self-financing scheme for Delhi Development Authority. The design evolved from a specific area based programme for the ...

  14. Citylife Apartments / Zaha Hadid Architects

    Text description provided by the architects. The skyline of Zaha Hadid's CityLifeMilano housing complex is defined and characterized by a sinuous fluid line. Residences are comprised of seven ...

  15. PDF VRF Case Study

    VRF Case Study Finch Cambridge Housing Complex GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT OVERVIEW Building Owner: Homeowner's Rehab, Inc. (HRI) - A local non-profit affordable housing developer in Cambridge Location: 671-675 Concord Ave Cambridge, MA 02138 Year Built: 2018 - 2020 Square Footage: 125,000 Gross Square Feet Building Characteristics: A ...

  16. Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and social

    2.1 Study area. For the empirical research, a total of fifteen high-rise housing complexes (only where permission from owners' association could be arranged) was identified from Kolkata Municipal Corporation area (Fig. 1), a city located in the eastern part of India.The selected group housing complexes are 10-28 storeyed, consisting of 95-1000 dwelling units in each complex.

  17. Housing in India

    Top architecture projects recently published on ArchDaily. The most inspiring residential architecture, interior design, landscaping, urbanism, and more from the world's best architects. Find ...

  18. Case Study III: TZED homes in Bangalore by BCIL

    Outcomes of the study undertaken in 2007. Case Study IV: Inspiration Office in Cochin, by Jaygopals. Case Study V: Housing Complex in Pune by Gangotree; Case Study III: TZED homes in Bangalore by BCIL; Lessons in Sustainable Hydrology from an Old Indian Empire; Case Study II: The Torrent Research Centre in Ahmedabad, by Abhikram.

  19. Bronx, New York: Innovative Design of Via Verde's Affordable Housing

    Via Verde ("the green way") is a 222-unit mixed-income and tenure housing development in the South Bronx area of New York City. The winner of the New Housing New York Legacy Project (NHNY) design competition, Via Verde is an incubator of sustainable design features that promote resource efficiency and a healthy, active lifestyle for residents.

  20. A Recyclable and Modular Housing Complex in India and A ...

    + 45. Although a hot and dry climate prevails in most parts of Iran, the southern coast of the Caspian Sea has climatic advantages of this region.The findings show that design strategies based on ...