Research-Methodology

Types of Literature Review

There are many types of literature review. The choice of a specific type depends on your research approach and design. The following types of literature review are the most popular in business studies:

Narrative literature review , also referred to as traditional literature review, critiques literature and summarizes the body of a literature. Narrative review also draws conclusions about the topic and identifies gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge. You need to have a sufficiently focused research question to conduct a narrative literature review

Systematic literature review requires more rigorous and well-defined approach compared to most other types of literature review. Systematic literature review is comprehensive and details the timeframe within which the literature was selected. Systematic literature review can be divided into two categories: meta-analysis and meta-synthesis.

When you conduct meta-analysis you take findings from several studies on the same subject and analyze these using standardized statistical procedures. In meta-analysis patterns and relationships are detected and conclusions are drawn. Meta-analysis is associated with deductive research approach.

Meta-synthesis, on the other hand, is based on non-statistical techniques. This technique integrates, evaluates and interprets findings of multiple qualitative research studies. Meta-synthesis literature review is conducted usually when following inductive research approach.

Scoping literature review , as implied by its name is used to identify the scope or coverage of a body of literature on a given topic. It has been noted that “scoping reviews are useful for examining emerging evidence when it is still unclear what other, more specific questions can be posed and valuably addressed by a more precise systematic review.” [1] The main difference between systematic and scoping types of literature review is that, systematic literature review is conducted to find answer to more specific research questions, whereas scoping literature review is conducted to explore more general research question.

Argumentative literature review , as the name implies, examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. It should be noted that a potential for bias is a major shortcoming associated with argumentative literature review.

Integrative literature review reviews , critiques, and synthesizes secondary data about research topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. If your research does not involve primary data collection and data analysis, then using integrative literature review will be your only option.

Theoretical literature review focuses on a pool of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. Theoretical literature reviews play an instrumental role in establishing what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested.

At the earlier parts of the literature review chapter, you need to specify the type of your literature review your chose and justify your choice. Your choice of a specific type of literature review should be based upon your research area, research problem and research methods.  Also, you can briefly discuss other most popular types of literature review mentioned above, to illustrate your awareness of them.

[1] Munn, A. et. al. (2018) “Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach” BMC Medical Research Methodology

Types of Literature Review

  John Dudovskiy

  • Locations and Hours
  • UCLA Library
  • Research Guides
  • Biomedical Library Guides

Systematic Reviews

  • Types of Literature Reviews

What Makes a Systematic Review Different from Other Types of Reviews?

  • Planning Your Systematic Review
  • Database Searching
  • Creating the Search
  • Search Filters and Hedges
  • Grey Literature
  • Managing and Appraising Results
  • Further Resources

Reproduced from Grant, M. J. and Booth, A. (2009), A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26: 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Aims to demonstrate writer has extensively researched literature and critically evaluated its quality. Goes beyond mere description to include degree of analysis and conceptual innovation. Typically results in hypothesis or mode Seeks to identify most significant items in the field No formal quality assessment. Attempts to evaluate according to contribution Typically narrative, perhaps conceptual or chronological Significant component: seeks to identify conceptual contribution to embody existing or derive new theory
Generic term: published materials that provide examination of recent or current literature. Can cover wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness. May include research findings May or may not include comprehensive searching May or may not include quality assessment Typically narrative Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc.
Mapping review/ systematic map Map out and categorize existing literature from which to commission further reviews and/or primary research by identifying gaps in research literature Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints No formal quality assessment May be graphical and tabular Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. May identify need for primary or secondary research
Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching. May use funnel plot to assess completeness Quality assessment may determine inclusion/ exclusion and/or sensitivity analyses Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary Numerical analysis of measures of effect assuming absence of heterogeneity
Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies Requires either very sensitive search to retrieve all studies or separately conceived quantitative and qualitative strategies Requires either a generic appraisal instrument or separate appraisal processes with corresponding checklists Typically both components will be presented as narrative and in tables. May also employ graphical means of integrating quantitative and qualitative studies Analysis may characterise both literatures and look for correlations between characteristics or use gap analysis to identify aspects absent in one literature but missing in the other
Generic term: summary of the [medical] literature that attempts to survey the literature and describe its characteristics May or may not include comprehensive searching (depends whether systematic overview or not) May or may not include quality assessment (depends whether systematic overview or not) Synthesis depends on whether systematic or not. Typically narrative but may include tabular features Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc.
Method for integrating or comparing the findings from qualitative studies. It looks for ‘themes’ or ‘constructs’ that lie in or across individual qualitative studies May employ selective or purposive sampling Quality assessment typically used to mediate messages not for inclusion/exclusion Qualitative, narrative synthesis Thematic analysis, may include conceptual models
Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research Completeness of searching determined by time constraints Time-limited formal quality assessment Typically narrative and tabular Quantities of literature and overall quality/direction of effect of literature
Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research) Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. May include research in progress No formal quality assessment Typically tabular with some narrative commentary Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. Attempts to specify a viable review
Tend to address more current matters in contrast to other combined retrospective and current approaches. May offer new perspectives Aims for comprehensive searching of current literature No formal quality assessment Typically narrative, may have tabular accompaniment Current state of knowledge and priorities for future investigation and research
Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion Typically narrative with tabular accompaniment What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; uncertainty around findings, recommendations for future research
Combines strengths of critical review with a comprehensive search process. Typically addresses broad questions to produce ‘best evidence synthesis’ Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching May or may not include quality assessment Minimal narrative, tabular summary of studies What is known; recommendations for practice. Limitations
Attempt to include elements of systematic review process while stopping short of systematic review. Typically conducted as postgraduate student assignment May or may not include comprehensive searching May or may not include quality assessment Typically narrative with tabular accompaniment What is known; uncertainty around findings; limitations of methodology
Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. Focuses on broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results Identification of component reviews, but no search for primary studies Quality assessment of studies within component reviews and/or of reviews themselves Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; recommendations for future research
  • << Previous: Home
  • Next: Planning Your Systematic Review >>
  • Last Updated: Jul 23, 2024 3:40 PM
  • URL: https://guides.library.ucla.edu/systematicreviews

Charles Sturt University

Literature Review: Types of literature reviews

  • Traditional or narrative literature reviews
  • Scoping Reviews
  • Systematic literature reviews
  • Annotated bibliography
  • Keeping up to date with literature
  • Finding a thesis
  • Evaluating sources and critical appraisal of literature
  • Managing and analysing your literature
  • Further reading and resources

Types of literature reviews

types of research literature review

The type of literature review you write will depend on your discipline and whether you are a researcher writing your PhD, publishing a study in a journal or completing an assessment task in your undergraduate study.

A literature review for a subject in an undergraduate degree will not be as comprehensive as the literature review required for a PhD thesis.

An undergraduate literature review may be in the form of an annotated bibliography or a narrative review of a small selection of literature, for example ten relevant articles. If you are asked to write a literature review, and you are an undergraduate student, be guided by your subject coordinator or lecturer.

The common types of literature reviews will be explained in the pages of this section.

  • Narrative or traditional literature reviews
  • Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)
  • Scoping reviews
  • Annotated bibliographies

These are not the only types of reviews of literature that can be conducted. Often the term "review" and "literature" can be confusing and used in the wrong context. Grant and Booth (2009) attempt to clear up this confusion by discussing 14 review types and the associated methodology, and advantages and disadvantages associated with each review.

Grant, M. J. and Booth, A. (2009), A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies . Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26 , 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

What's the difference between reviews?

Researchers, academics, and librarians all use various terms to describe different types of literature reviews, and there is often inconsistency in the ways the types are discussed. Here are a couple of simple explanations.

  • The image below describes common review types in terms of speed, detail, risk of bias, and comprehensiveness:

Description of the differences between review types in image form

"Schematic of the main differences between the types of literature review" by Brennan, M. L., Arlt, S. P., Belshaw, Z., Buckley, L., Corah, L., Doit, H., Fajt, V. R., Grindlay, D., Moberly, H. K., Morrow, L. D., Stavisky, J., & White, C. (2020). Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in veterinary medicine: Applying evidence in clinical practice. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7 , 314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00314 is licensed under CC BY 3.0

  • The table below lists four of the most common types of review , as adapted from a widely used typology of fourteen types of reviews (Grant & Booth, 2009).  
Identifies and reviews published literature on a topic, which may be broad. Typically employs a narrative approach to reporting the review findings. Can include a wide range of related subjects. 1 - 4 weeks 1
Assesses what is known about an issue by using a systematic review method to search and appraise research and determine best practice. 2 - 6 months 2
Assesses the potential scope of the research literature on a particular topic. Helps determine gaps in the research. (See the page in this guide on  .) 1 - 4 weeks 1 - 2
Seeks to systematically search for, appraise, and synthesise research evidence so as to aid decision-making and determine best practice. Can vary in approach, and is often specific to the type of study, which include studies of effectiveness, qualitative research, economic evaluation, prevalence, aetiology, or diagnostic test accuracy. 8 months to 2 years 2 or more

Grant, M.J. & Booth, A. (2009).  A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26 (2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

See also the Library's  Literature Review guide.

Critical Appraised Topic (CAT)

For information on conducting a Critically Appraised Topic or CAT

Callander, J., Anstey, A. V., Ingram, J. R., Limpens, J., Flohr, C., & Spuls, P. I. (2017).  How to write a Critically Appraised Topic: evidence to underpin routine clinical practice.  British Journal of Dermatology (1951), 177(4), 1007-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15873 

Books on Literature Reviews

Cover Art

  • << Previous: Home
  • Next: Traditional or narrative literature reviews >>
  • Last Updated: Jul 30, 2024 12:52 PM
  • URL: https://libguides.csu.edu.au/review

Acknowledgement of Country

Charles Sturt University is an Australian University, TEQSA Provider Identification: PRV12018. CRICOS Provider: 00005F.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

  • Knowledge Base

Methodology

  • How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

  • Search for relevant literature
  • Evaluate sources
  • Identify themes, debates, and gaps
  • Outline the structure
  • Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

upload-your-document-ai-proofreader

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

  • Quick Run-through
  • Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

  • Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
  • Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
  • Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
  • Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
  • Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Literature review guide

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

  • Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
  • Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
  • Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
  • Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

  • Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
  • Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
  • Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

  • Your university’s library catalogue
  • Google Scholar
  • Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
  • Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
  • EconLit (economics)
  • Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

  • What question or problem is the author addressing?
  • What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
  • What are the key theories, models, and methods?
  • Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
  • What are the results and conclusions of the study?
  • How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

  • Academic style
  • Vague sentences
  • Style consistency

See an example

types of research literature review

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

  • Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
  • Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
  • Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
  • Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
  • Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

  • Most research has focused on young women.
  • There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
  • But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

  • Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
  • Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
  • Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

  • Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
  • Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
  • Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
  • Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

  • Sampling methods
  • Simple random sampling
  • Stratified sampling
  • Cluster sampling
  • Likert scales
  • Reproducibility

 Statistics

  • Null hypothesis
  • Statistical power
  • Probability distribution
  • Effect size
  • Poisson distribution

Research bias

  • Optimism bias
  • Cognitive bias
  • Implicit bias
  • Hawthorne effect
  • Anchoring bias
  • Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

  • To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
  • To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
  • To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
  • To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
  • To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved August 5, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Lau F, Kuziemsky C, editors. Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach [Internet]. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27.

Cover of Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach

Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach [Internet].

Chapter 9 methods for literature reviews.

Guy Paré and Spyros Kitsiou .

9.1. Introduction

Literature reviews play a critical role in scholarship because science remains, first and foremost, a cumulative endeavour ( vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). As in any academic discipline, rigorous knowledge syntheses are becoming indispensable in keeping up with an exponentially growing eHealth literature, assisting practitioners, academics, and graduate students in finding, evaluating, and synthesizing the contents of many empirical and conceptual papers. Among other methods, literature reviews are essential for: (a) identifying what has been written on a subject or topic; (b) determining the extent to which a specific research area reveals any interpretable trends or patterns; (c) aggregating empirical findings related to a narrow research question to support evidence-based practice; (d) generating new frameworks and theories; and (e) identifying topics or questions requiring more investigation ( Paré, Trudel, Jaana, & Kitsiou, 2015 ).

Literature reviews can take two major forms. The most prevalent one is the “literature review” or “background” section within a journal paper or a chapter in a graduate thesis. This section synthesizes the extant literature and usually identifies the gaps in knowledge that the empirical study addresses ( Sylvester, Tate, & Johnstone, 2013 ). It may also provide a theoretical foundation for the proposed study, substantiate the presence of the research problem, justify the research as one that contributes something new to the cumulated knowledge, or validate the methods and approaches for the proposed study ( Hart, 1998 ; Levy & Ellis, 2006 ).

The second form of literature review, which is the focus of this chapter, constitutes an original and valuable work of research in and of itself ( Paré et al., 2015 ). Rather than providing a base for a researcher’s own work, it creates a solid starting point for all members of the community interested in a particular area or topic ( Mulrow, 1987 ). The so-called “review article” is a journal-length paper which has an overarching purpose to synthesize the literature in a field, without collecting or analyzing any primary data ( Green, Johnson, & Adams, 2006 ).

When appropriately conducted, review articles represent powerful information sources for practitioners looking for state-of-the art evidence to guide their decision-making and work practices ( Paré et al., 2015 ). Further, high-quality reviews become frequently cited pieces of work which researchers seek out as a first clear outline of the literature when undertaking empirical studies ( Cooper, 1988 ; Rowe, 2014 ). Scholars who track and gauge the impact of articles have found that review papers are cited and downloaded more often than any other type of published article ( Cronin, Ryan, & Coughlan, 2008 ; Montori, Wilczynski, Morgan, Haynes, & Hedges, 2003 ; Patsopoulos, Analatos, & Ioannidis, 2005 ). The reason for their popularity may be the fact that reading the review enables one to have an overview, if not a detailed knowledge of the area in question, as well as references to the most useful primary sources ( Cronin et al., 2008 ). Although they are not easy to conduct, the commitment to complete a review article provides a tremendous service to one’s academic community ( Paré et al., 2015 ; Petticrew & Roberts, 2006 ). Most, if not all, peer-reviewed journals in the fields of medical informatics publish review articles of some type.

The main objectives of this chapter are fourfold: (a) to provide an overview of the major steps and activities involved in conducting a stand-alone literature review; (b) to describe and contrast the different types of review articles that can contribute to the eHealth knowledge base; (c) to illustrate each review type with one or two examples from the eHealth literature; and (d) to provide a series of recommendations for prospective authors of review articles in this domain.

9.2. Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps

As explained in Templier and Paré (2015) , there are six generic steps involved in conducting a review article:

  • formulating the research question(s) and objective(s),
  • searching the extant literature,
  • screening for inclusion,
  • assessing the quality of primary studies,
  • extracting data, and
  • analyzing data.

Although these steps are presented here in sequential order, one must keep in mind that the review process can be iterative and that many activities can be initiated during the planning stage and later refined during subsequent phases ( Finfgeld-Connett & Johnson, 2013 ; Kitchenham & Charters, 2007 ).

Formulating the research question(s) and objective(s): As a first step, members of the review team must appropriately justify the need for the review itself ( Petticrew & Roberts, 2006 ), identify the review’s main objective(s) ( Okoli & Schabram, 2010 ), and define the concepts or variables at the heart of their synthesis ( Cooper & Hedges, 2009 ; Webster & Watson, 2002 ). Importantly, they also need to articulate the research question(s) they propose to investigate ( Kitchenham & Charters, 2007 ). In this regard, we concur with Jesson, Matheson, and Lacey (2011) that clearly articulated research questions are key ingredients that guide the entire review methodology; they underscore the type of information that is needed, inform the search for and selection of relevant literature, and guide or orient the subsequent analysis. Searching the extant literature: The next step consists of searching the literature and making decisions about the suitability of material to be considered in the review ( Cooper, 1988 ). There exist three main coverage strategies. First, exhaustive coverage means an effort is made to be as comprehensive as possible in order to ensure that all relevant studies, published and unpublished, are included in the review and, thus, conclusions are based on this all-inclusive knowledge base. The second type of coverage consists of presenting materials that are representative of most other works in a given field or area. Often authors who adopt this strategy will search for relevant articles in a small number of top-tier journals in a field ( Paré et al., 2015 ). In the third strategy, the review team concentrates on prior works that have been central or pivotal to a particular topic. This may include empirical studies or conceptual papers that initiated a line of investigation, changed how problems or questions were framed, introduced new methods or concepts, or engendered important debate ( Cooper, 1988 ). Screening for inclusion: The following step consists of evaluating the applicability of the material identified in the preceding step ( Levy & Ellis, 2006 ; vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). Once a group of potential studies has been identified, members of the review team must screen them to determine their relevance ( Petticrew & Roberts, 2006 ). A set of predetermined rules provides a basis for including or excluding certain studies. This exercise requires a significant investment on the part of researchers, who must ensure enhanced objectivity and avoid biases or mistakes. As discussed later in this chapter, for certain types of reviews there must be at least two independent reviewers involved in the screening process and a procedure to resolve disagreements must also be in place ( Liberati et al., 2009 ; Shea et al., 2009 ). Assessing the quality of primary studies: In addition to screening material for inclusion, members of the review team may need to assess the scientific quality of the selected studies, that is, appraise the rigour of the research design and methods. Such formal assessment, which is usually conducted independently by at least two coders, helps members of the review team refine which studies to include in the final sample, determine whether or not the differences in quality may affect their conclusions, or guide how they analyze the data and interpret the findings ( Petticrew & Roberts, 2006 ). Ascribing quality scores to each primary study or considering through domain-based evaluations which study components have or have not been designed and executed appropriately makes it possible to reflect on the extent to which the selected study addresses possible biases and maximizes validity ( Shea et al., 2009 ). Extracting data: The following step involves gathering or extracting applicable information from each primary study included in the sample and deciding what is relevant to the problem of interest ( Cooper & Hedges, 2009 ). Indeed, the type of data that should be recorded mainly depends on the initial research questions ( Okoli & Schabram, 2010 ). However, important information may also be gathered about how, when, where and by whom the primary study was conducted, the research design and methods, or qualitative/quantitative results ( Cooper & Hedges, 2009 ). Analyzing and synthesizing data : As a final step, members of the review team must collate, summarize, aggregate, organize, and compare the evidence extracted from the included studies. The extracted data must be presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the extant literature ( Jesson et al., 2011 ). Webster and Watson (2002) warn researchers that literature reviews should be much more than lists of papers and should provide a coherent lens to make sense of extant knowledge on a given topic. There exist several methods and techniques for synthesizing quantitative (e.g., frequency analysis, meta-analysis) and qualitative (e.g., grounded theory, narrative analysis, meta-ethnography) evidence ( Dixon-Woods, Agarwal, Jones, Young, & Sutton, 2005 ; Thomas & Harden, 2008 ).

9.3. Types of Review Articles and Brief Illustrations

EHealth researchers have at their disposal a number of approaches and methods for making sense out of existing literature, all with the purpose of casting current research findings into historical contexts or explaining contradictions that might exist among a set of primary research studies conducted on a particular topic. Our classification scheme is largely inspired from Paré and colleagues’ (2015) typology. Below we present and illustrate those review types that we feel are central to the growth and development of the eHealth domain.

9.3.1. Narrative Reviews

The narrative review is the “traditional” way of reviewing the extant literature and is skewed towards a qualitative interpretation of prior knowledge ( Sylvester et al., 2013 ). Put simply, a narrative review attempts to summarize or synthesize what has been written on a particular topic but does not seek generalization or cumulative knowledge from what is reviewed ( Davies, 2000 ; Green et al., 2006 ). Instead, the review team often undertakes the task of accumulating and synthesizing the literature to demonstrate the value of a particular point of view ( Baumeister & Leary, 1997 ). As such, reviewers may selectively ignore or limit the attention paid to certain studies in order to make a point. In this rather unsystematic approach, the selection of information from primary articles is subjective, lacks explicit criteria for inclusion and can lead to biased interpretations or inferences ( Green et al., 2006 ). There are several narrative reviews in the particular eHealth domain, as in all fields, which follow such an unstructured approach ( Silva et al., 2015 ; Paul et al., 2015 ).

Despite these criticisms, this type of review can be very useful in gathering together a volume of literature in a specific subject area and synthesizing it. As mentioned above, its primary purpose is to provide the reader with a comprehensive background for understanding current knowledge and highlighting the significance of new research ( Cronin et al., 2008 ). Faculty like to use narrative reviews in the classroom because they are often more up to date than textbooks, provide a single source for students to reference, and expose students to peer-reviewed literature ( Green et al., 2006 ). For researchers, narrative reviews can inspire research ideas by identifying gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge, thus helping researchers to determine research questions or formulate hypotheses. Importantly, narrative reviews can also be used as educational articles to bring practitioners up to date with certain topics of issues ( Green et al., 2006 ).

Recently, there have been several efforts to introduce more rigour in narrative reviews that will elucidate common pitfalls and bring changes into their publication standards. Information systems researchers, among others, have contributed to advancing knowledge on how to structure a “traditional” review. For instance, Levy and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for conducting such reviews. Their model follows the systematic data processing approach comprised of three steps, namely: (a) literature search and screening; (b) data extraction and analysis; and (c) writing the literature review. They provide detailed and very helpful instructions on how to conduct each step of the review process. As another methodological contribution, vom Brocke et al. (2009) offered a series of guidelines for conducting literature reviews, with a particular focus on how to search and extract the relevant body of knowledge. Last, Bandara, Miskon, and Fielt (2011) proposed a structured, predefined and tool-supported method to identify primary studies within a feasible scope, extract relevant content from identified articles, synthesize and analyze the findings, and effectively write and present the results of the literature review. We highly recommend that prospective authors of narrative reviews consult these useful sources before embarking on their work.

Darlow and Wen (2015) provide a good example of a highly structured narrative review in the eHealth field. These authors synthesized published articles that describe the development process of mobile health ( m-health ) interventions for patients’ cancer care self-management. As in most narrative reviews, the scope of the research questions being investigated is broad: (a) how development of these systems are carried out; (b) which methods are used to investigate these systems; and (c) what conclusions can be drawn as a result of the development of these systems. To provide clear answers to these questions, a literature search was conducted on six electronic databases and Google Scholar . The search was performed using several terms and free text words, combining them in an appropriate manner. Four inclusion and three exclusion criteria were utilized during the screening process. Both authors independently reviewed each of the identified articles to determine eligibility and extract study information. A flow diagram shows the number of studies identified, screened, and included or excluded at each stage of study selection. In terms of contributions, this review provides a series of practical recommendations for m-health intervention development.

9.3.2. Descriptive or Mapping Reviews

The primary goal of a descriptive review is to determine the extent to which a body of knowledge in a particular research topic reveals any interpretable pattern or trend with respect to pre-existing propositions, theories, methodologies or findings ( King & He, 2005 ; Paré et al., 2015 ). In contrast with narrative reviews, descriptive reviews follow a systematic and transparent procedure, including searching, screening and classifying studies ( Petersen, Vakkalanka, & Kuzniarz, 2015 ). Indeed, structured search methods are used to form a representative sample of a larger group of published works ( Paré et al., 2015 ). Further, authors of descriptive reviews extract from each study certain characteristics of interest, such as publication year, research methods, data collection techniques, and direction or strength of research outcomes (e.g., positive, negative, or non-significant) in the form of frequency analysis to produce quantitative results ( Sylvester et al., 2013 ). In essence, each study included in a descriptive review is treated as the unit of analysis and the published literature as a whole provides a database from which the authors attempt to identify any interpretable trends or draw overall conclusions about the merits of existing conceptualizations, propositions, methods or findings ( Paré et al., 2015 ). In doing so, a descriptive review may claim that its findings represent the state of the art in a particular domain ( King & He, 2005 ).

In the fields of health sciences and medical informatics, reviews that focus on examining the range, nature and evolution of a topic area are described by Anderson, Allen, Peckham, and Goodwin (2008) as mapping reviews . Like descriptive reviews, the research questions are generic and usually relate to publication patterns and trends. There is no preconceived plan to systematically review all of the literature although this can be done. Instead, researchers often present studies that are representative of most works published in a particular area and they consider a specific time frame to be mapped.

An example of this approach in the eHealth domain is offered by DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). The purpose of this descriptive or mapping review was to characterize publication trends in the medical informatics literature over a 20-year period (1987 to 2006). To achieve this ambitious objective, the authors performed a bibliometric analysis of medical informatics citations indexed in medline using publication trends, journal frequencies, impact factors, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term frequencies, and characteristics of citations. Findings revealed that there were over 77,000 medical informatics articles published during the covered period in numerous journals and that the average annual growth rate was 12%. The MeSH term analysis also suggested a strong interdisciplinary trend. Finally, average impact scores increased over time with two notable growth periods. Overall, patterns in research outputs that seem to characterize the historic trends and current components of the field of medical informatics suggest it may be a maturing discipline (DeShazo et al., 2009).

9.3.3. Scoping Reviews

Scoping reviews attempt to provide an initial indication of the potential size and nature of the extant literature on an emergent topic (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Daudt, van Mossel, & Scott, 2013 ; Levac, Colquhoun, & O’Brien, 2010). A scoping review may be conducted to examine the extent, range and nature of research activities in a particular area, determine the value of undertaking a full systematic review (discussed next), or identify research gaps in the extant literature ( Paré et al., 2015 ). In line with their main objective, scoping reviews usually conclude with the presentation of a detailed research agenda for future works along with potential implications for both practice and research.

Unlike narrative and descriptive reviews, the whole point of scoping the field is to be as comprehensive as possible, including grey literature (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005). Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to help researchers eliminate studies that are not aligned with the research questions. It is also recommended that at least two independent coders review abstracts yielded from the search strategy and then the full articles for study selection ( Daudt et al., 2013 ). The synthesized evidence from content or thematic analysis is relatively easy to present in tabular form (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Thomas & Harden, 2008 ).

One of the most highly cited scoping reviews in the eHealth domain was published by Archer, Fevrier-Thomas, Lokker, McKibbon, and Straus (2011) . These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr ) systems including design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. Seven databases were searched from 1985 to March 2010. Several search terms relating to phr s were used during this process. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts to determine inclusion status. A second screen of full-text articles, again by two independent members of the research team, ensured that the studies described phr s. All in all, 130 articles met the criteria and their data were extracted manually into a database. The authors concluded that although there is a large amount of survey, observational, cohort/panel, and anecdotal evidence of phr benefits and satisfaction for patients, more research is needed to evaluate the results of phr implementations. Their in-depth analysis of the literature signalled that there is little solid evidence from randomized controlled trials or other studies through the use of phr s. Hence, they suggested that more research is needed that addresses the current lack of understanding of optimal functionality and usability of these systems, and how they can play a beneficial role in supporting patient self-management ( Archer et al., 2011 ).

9.3.4. Forms of Aggregative Reviews

Healthcare providers, practitioners, and policy-makers are nowadays overwhelmed with large volumes of information, including research-based evidence from numerous clinical trials and evaluation studies, assessing the effectiveness of health information technologies and interventions ( Ammenwerth & de Keizer, 2004 ; Deshazo et al., 2009 ). It is unrealistic to expect that all these disparate actors will have the time, skills, and necessary resources to identify the available evidence in the area of their expertise and consider it when making decisions. Systematic reviews that involve the rigorous application of scientific strategies aimed at limiting subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic and random errors) can respond to this challenge.

Systematic reviews attempt to aggregate, appraise, and synthesize in a single source all empirical evidence that meet a set of previously specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a clearly formulated and often narrow research question on a particular topic of interest to support evidence-based practice ( Liberati et al., 2009 ). They adhere closely to explicit scientific principles ( Liberati et al., 2009 ) and rigorous methodological guidelines (Higgins & Green, 2008) aimed at reducing random and systematic errors that can lead to deviations from the truth in results or inferences. The use of explicit methods allows systematic reviews to aggregate a large body of research evidence, assess whether effects or relationships are in the same direction and of the same general magnitude, explain possible inconsistencies between study results, and determine the strength of the overall evidence for every outcome of interest based on the quality of included studies and the general consistency among them ( Cook, Mulrow, & Haynes, 1997 ). The main procedures of a systematic review involve:

  • Formulating a review question and developing a search strategy based on explicit inclusion criteria for the identification of eligible studies (usually described in the context of a detailed review protocol).
  • Searching for eligible studies using multiple databases and information sources, including grey literature sources, without any language restrictions.
  • Selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing risk of bias in a duplicate manner using two independent reviewers to avoid random or systematic errors in the process.
  • Analyzing data using quantitative or qualitative methods.
  • Presenting results in summary of findings tables.
  • Interpreting results and drawing conclusions.

Many systematic reviews, but not all, use statistical methods to combine the results of independent studies into a single quantitative estimate or summary effect size. Known as meta-analyses , these reviews use specific data extraction and statistical techniques (e.g., network, frequentist, or Bayesian meta-analyses) to calculate from each study by outcome of interest an effect size along with a confidence interval that reflects the degree of uncertainty behind the point estimate of effect ( Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, & Rothstein, 2009 ; Deeks, Higgins, & Altman, 2008 ). Subsequently, they use fixed or random-effects analysis models to combine the results of the included studies, assess statistical heterogeneity, and calculate a weighted average of the effect estimates from the different studies, taking into account their sample sizes. The summary effect size is a value that reflects the average magnitude of the intervention effect for a particular outcome of interest or, more generally, the strength of a relationship between two variables across all studies included in the systematic review. By statistically combining data from multiple studies, meta-analyses can create more precise and reliable estimates of intervention effects than those derived from individual studies alone, when these are examined independently as discrete sources of information.

The review by Gurol-Urganci, de Jongh, Vodopivec-Jamsek, Atun, and Car (2013) on the effects of mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments is an illustrative example of a high-quality systematic review with meta-analysis. Missed appointments are a major cause of inefficiency in healthcare delivery with substantial monetary costs to health systems. These authors sought to assess whether mobile phone-based appointment reminders delivered through Short Message Service ( sms ) or Multimedia Messaging Service ( mms ) are effective in improving rates of patient attendance and reducing overall costs. To this end, they conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases using highly sensitive search strategies without language or publication-type restrictions to identify all rct s that are eligible for inclusion. In order to minimize the risk of omitting eligible studies not captured by the original search, they supplemented all electronic searches with manual screening of trial registers and references contained in the included studies. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were performed inde­­pen­dently by two coders using standardized methods to ensure consistency and to eliminate potential errors. Findings from eight rct s involving 6,615 participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the magnitude of effects that mobile text message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare appointments compared to no reminders and phone call reminders.

Meta-analyses are regarded as powerful tools for deriving meaningful conclusions. However, there are situations in which it is neither reasonable nor appropriate to pool studies together using meta-analytic methods simply because there is extensive clinical heterogeneity between the included studies or variation in measurement tools, comparisons, or outcomes of interest. In these cases, systematic reviews can use qualitative synthesis methods such as vote counting, content analysis, classification schemes and tabulations, as an alternative approach to narratively synthesize the results of the independent studies included in the review. This form of review is known as qualitative systematic review.

A rigorous example of one such review in the eHealth domain is presented by Mickan, Atherton, Roberts, Heneghan, and Tilson (2014) on the use of handheld computers by healthcare professionals and their impact on access to information and clinical decision-making. In line with the methodological guide­lines for systematic reviews, these authors: (a) developed and registered with prospero ( www.crd.york.ac.uk/ prospero / ) an a priori review protocol; (b) conducted comprehensive searches for eligible studies using multiple databases and other supplementary strategies (e.g., forward searches); and (c) subsequently carried out study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments in a duplicate manner to eliminate potential errors in the review process. Heterogeneity between the included studies in terms of reported outcomes and measures precluded the use of meta-analytic methods. To this end, the authors resorted to using narrative analysis and synthesis to describe the effectiveness of handheld computers on accessing information for clinical knowledge, adherence to safety and clinical quality guidelines, and diagnostic decision-making.

In recent years, the number of systematic reviews in the field of health informatics has increased considerably. Systematic reviews with discordant findings can cause great confusion and make it difficult for decision-makers to interpret the review-level evidence ( Moher, 2013 ). Therefore, there is a growing need for appraisal and synthesis of prior systematic reviews to ensure that decision-making is constantly informed by the best available accumulated evidence. Umbrella reviews , also known as overviews of systematic reviews, are tertiary types of evidence synthesis that aim to accomplish this; that is, they aim to compare and contrast findings from multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses ( Becker & Oxman, 2008 ). Umbrella reviews generally adhere to the same principles and rigorous methodological guidelines used in systematic reviews. However, the unit of analysis in umbrella reviews is the systematic review rather than the primary study ( Becker & Oxman, 2008 ). Unlike systematic reviews that have a narrow focus of inquiry, umbrella reviews focus on broader research topics for which there are several potential interventions ( Smith, Devane, Begley, & Clarke, 2011 ). A recent umbrella review on the effects of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with heart failure critically appraised, compared, and synthesized evidence from 15 systematic reviews to investigate which types of home telemonitoring technologies and forms of interventions are more effective in reducing mortality and hospital admissions ( Kitsiou, Paré, & Jaana, 2015 ).

9.3.5. Realist Reviews

Realist reviews are theory-driven interpretative reviews developed to inform, enhance, or supplement conventional systematic reviews by making sense of heterogeneous evidence about complex interventions applied in diverse contexts in a way that informs policy decision-making ( Greenhalgh, Wong, Westhorp, & Pawson, 2011 ). They originated from criticisms of positivist systematic reviews which centre on their “simplistic” underlying assumptions ( Oates, 2011 ). As explained above, systematic reviews seek to identify causation. Such logic is appropriate for fields like medicine and education where findings of randomized controlled trials can be aggregated to see whether a new treatment or intervention does improve outcomes. However, many argue that it is not possible to establish such direct causal links between interventions and outcomes in fields such as social policy, management, and information systems where for any intervention there is unlikely to be a regular or consistent outcome ( Oates, 2011 ; Pawson, 2006 ; Rousseau, Manning, & Denyer, 2008 ).

To circumvent these limitations, Pawson, Greenhalgh, Harvey, and Walshe (2005) have proposed a new approach for synthesizing knowledge that seeks to unpack the mechanism of how “complex interventions” work in particular contexts. The basic research question — what works? — which is usually associated with systematic reviews changes to: what is it about this intervention that works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and why? Realist reviews have no particular preference for either quantitative or qualitative evidence. As a theory-building approach, a realist review usually starts by articulating likely underlying mechanisms and then scrutinizes available evidence to find out whether and where these mechanisms are applicable ( Shepperd et al., 2009 ). Primary studies found in the extant literature are viewed as case studies which can test and modify the initial theories ( Rousseau et al., 2008 ).

The main objective pursued in the realist review conducted by Otte-Trojel, de Bont, Rundall, and van de Klundert (2014) was to examine how patient portals contribute to health service delivery and patient outcomes. The specific goals were to investigate how outcomes are produced and, most importantly, how variations in outcomes can be explained. The research team started with an exploratory review of background documents and research studies to identify ways in which patient portals may contribute to health service delivery and patient outcomes. The authors identified six main ways which represent “educated guesses” to be tested against the data in the evaluation studies. These studies were identified through a formal and systematic search in four databases between 2003 and 2013. Two members of the research team selected the articles using a pre-established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria and following a two-step procedure. The authors then extracted data from the selected articles and created several tables, one for each outcome category. They organized information to bring forward those mechanisms where patient portals contribute to outcomes and the variation in outcomes across different contexts.

9.3.6. Critical Reviews

Lastly, critical reviews aim to provide a critical evaluation and interpretive analysis of existing literature on a particular topic of interest to reveal strengths, weaknesses, contradictions, controversies, inconsistencies, and/or other important issues with respect to theories, hypotheses, research methods or results ( Baumeister & Leary, 1997 ; Kirkevold, 1997 ). Unlike other review types, critical reviews attempt to take a reflective account of the research that has been done in a particular area of interest, and assess its credibility by using appraisal instruments or critical interpretive methods. In this way, critical reviews attempt to constructively inform other scholars about the weaknesses of prior research and strengthen knowledge development by giving focus and direction to studies for further improvement ( Kirkevold, 1997 ).

Kitsiou, Paré, and Jaana (2013) provide an example of a critical review that assessed the methodological quality of prior systematic reviews of home telemonitoring studies for chronic patients. The authors conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases to identify eligible reviews and subsequently used a validated instrument to conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. Results indicate that the majority of systematic reviews in this particular area suffer from important methodological flaws and biases that impair their internal validity and limit their usefulness for clinical and decision-making purposes. To this end, they provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring.

9.4. Summary

Table 9.1 outlines the main types of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and summarizes the main characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. It also includes key references to methodological guidelines and useful sources that can be used by eHealth scholars and researchers for planning and developing reviews.

Table 9.1. Typology of Literature Reviews (adapted from Paré et al., 2015).

Typology of Literature Reviews (adapted from Paré et al., 2015).

As shown in Table 9.1 , each review type addresses different kinds of research questions or objectives, which subsequently define and dictate the methods and approaches that need to be used to achieve the overarching goal(s) of the review. For example, in the case of narrative reviews, there is greater flexibility in searching and synthesizing articles ( Green et al., 2006 ). Researchers are often relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to search, identify, and select relevant scientific articles, describe their operational characteristics, present how the individual studies fit together, and formulate conclusions. On the other hand, systematic reviews are characterized by their high level of systematicity, rigour, and use of explicit methods, based on an “a priori” review plan that aims to minimize bias in the analysis and synthesis process (Higgins & Green, 2008). Some reviews are exploratory in nature (e.g., scoping/mapping reviews), whereas others may be conducted to discover patterns (e.g., descriptive reviews) or involve a synthesis approach that may include the critical analysis of prior research ( Paré et al., 2015 ). Hence, in order to select the most appropriate type of review, it is critical to know before embarking on a review project, why the research synthesis is conducted and what type of methods are best aligned with the pursued goals.

9.5. Concluding Remarks

In light of the increased use of evidence-based practice and research generating stronger evidence ( Grady et al., 2011 ; Lyden et al., 2013 ), review articles have become essential tools for summarizing, synthesizing, integrating or critically appraising prior knowledge in the eHealth field. As mentioned earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles represent powerful information sources for eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-the-art evidence. The typology of literature reviews we used herein will allow eHealth researchers, graduate students and practitioners to gain a better understanding of the similarities and differences between review types.

We must stress that this classification scheme does not privilege any specific type of review as being of higher quality than another ( Paré et al., 2015 ). As explained above, each type of review has its own strengths and limitations. Having said that, we realize that the methodological rigour of any review — be it qualitative, quantitative or mixed — is a critical aspect that should be considered seriously by prospective authors. In the present context, the notion of rigour refers to the reliability and validity of the review process described in section 9.2. For one thing, reliability is related to the reproducibility of the review process and steps, which is facilitated by a comprehensive documentation of the literature search process, extraction, coding and analysis performed in the review. Whether the search is comprehensive or not, whether it involves a methodical approach for data extraction and synthesis or not, it is important that the review documents in an explicit and transparent manner the steps and approach that were used in the process of its development. Next, validity characterizes the degree to which the review process was conducted appropriately. It goes beyond documentation and reflects decisions related to the selection of the sources, the search terms used, the period of time covered, the articles selected in the search, and the application of backward and forward searches ( vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). In short, the rigour of any review article is reflected by the explicitness of its methods (i.e., transparency) and the soundness of the approach used. We refer those interested in the concepts of rigour and quality to the work of Templier and Paré (2015) which offers a detailed set of methodological guidelines for conducting and evaluating various types of review articles.

To conclude, our main objective in this chapter was to demystify the various types of literature reviews that are central to the continuous development of the eHealth field. It is our hope that our descriptive account will serve as a valuable source for those conducting, evaluating or using reviews in this important and growing domain.

  • Ammenwerth E., de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care. Trends in evaluation research, 1982-2002. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2004; 44 (1):44–56. [ PubMed : 15778794 ]
  • Anderson S., Allen P., Peckham S., Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2008; 6 (7):1–12. [ PMC free article : PMC2500008 ] [ PubMed : 18613961 ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Archer N., Fevrier-Thomas U., Lokker C., McKibbon K. A., Straus S.E. Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association. 2011; 18 (4):515–522. [ PMC free article : PMC3128401 ] [ PubMed : 21672914 ]
  • Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8 (1):19–32.
  • A systematic, tool-supported method for conducting literature reviews in information systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems ( ecis 2011); June 9 to 11; Helsinki, Finland. 2011.
  • Baumeister R. F., Leary M.R. Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology. 1997; 1 (3):311–320.
  • Becker L. A., Oxman A.D. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Higgins J. P. T., Green S., editors. Hoboken, nj : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008. Overviews of reviews; pp. 607–631.
  • Borenstein M., Hedges L., Higgins J., Rothstein H. Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, nj : John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2009.
  • Cook D. J., Mulrow C. D., Haynes B. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997; 126 (5):376–380. [ PubMed : 9054282 ]
  • Cooper H., Hedges L.V. In: The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. Cooper H., Hedges L. V., Valentine J. C., editors. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. Research synthesis as a scientific process; pp. 3–17.
  • Cooper H. M. Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society. 1988; 1 (1):104–126.
  • Cronin P., Ryan F., Coughlan M. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing. 2008; 17 (1):38–43. [ PubMed : 18399395 ]
  • Darlow S., Wen K.Y. Development testing of mobile health interventions for cancer patient self-management: A review. Health Informatics Journal. 2015 (online before print). [ PubMed : 25916831 ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Daudt H. M., van Mossel C., Scott S.J. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. bmc Medical Research Methodology. 2013; 13 :48. [ PMC free article : PMC3614526 ] [ PubMed : 23522333 ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Davies P. The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education. 2000; 26 (3-4):365–378.
  • Deeks J. J., Higgins J. P. T., Altman D.G. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Higgins J. P. T., Green S., editors. Hoboken, nj : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses; pp. 243–296.
  • Deshazo J. P., Lavallie D. L., Wolf F.M. Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of “Medical Informatics” in mesh . bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2009; 9 :7. [ PMC free article : PMC2652453 ] [ PubMed : 19159472 ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dixon-Woods M., Agarwal S., Jones D., Young B., Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2005; 10 (1):45–53. [ PubMed : 15667704 ]
  • Finfgeld-Connett D., Johnson E.D. Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013; 69 (1):194–204. [ PMC free article : PMC3424349 ] [ PubMed : 22591030 ]
  • Grady B., Myers K. M., Nelson E. L., Belz N., Bennett L., Carnahan L. … Guidelines Working Group. Evidence-based practice for telemental health. Telemedicine Journal and E Health. 2011; 17 (2):131–148. [ PubMed : 21385026 ]
  • Green B. N., Johnson C. D., Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2006; 5 (3):101–117. [ PMC free article : PMC2647067 ] [ PubMed : 19674681 ]
  • Greenhalgh T., Wong G., Westhorp G., Pawson R. Protocol–realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards ( rameses ). bmc Medical Research Methodology. 2011; 11 :115. [ PMC free article : PMC3173389 ] [ PubMed : 21843376 ]
  • Gurol-Urganci I., de Jongh T., Vodopivec-Jamsek V., Atun R., Car J. Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments. Cochrane Database System Review. 2013; 12 cd 007458. [ PMC free article : PMC6485985 ] [ PubMed : 24310741 ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hart C. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: SAGE Publications; 1998.
  • Higgins J. P. T., Green S., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. Hoboken, nj : Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
  • Jesson J., Matheson L., Lacey F.M. Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. Los Angeles & London: SAGE Publications; 2011.
  • King W. R., He J. Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2005; 16 :1.
  • Kirkevold M. Integrative nursing research — an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1997; 25 (5):977–984. [ PubMed : 9147203 ]
  • Kitchenham B., Charters S. ebse Technical Report Version 2.3. Keele & Durham. uk : Keele University & University of Durham; 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.
  • Kitsiou S., Paré G., Jaana M. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013; 15 (7):e150. [ PMC free article : PMC3785977 ] [ PubMed : 23880072 ]
  • Kitsiou S., Paré G., Jaana M. Effects of home telemonitoring interventions on patients with chronic heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17 (3):e63. [ PMC free article : PMC4376138 ] [ PubMed : 25768664 ]
  • Levac D., Colquhoun H., O’Brien K. K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010; 5 (1):69. [ PMC free article : PMC2954944 ] [ PubMed : 20854677 ]
  • Levy Y., Ellis T.J. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science. 2006; 9 :181–211.
  • Liberati A., Altman D. G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P. C., Ioannidis J. P. A. et al. Moher D. The prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009; 151 (4):W-65. [ PubMed : 19622512 ]
  • Lyden J. R., Zickmund S. L., Bhargava T. D., Bryce C. L., Conroy M. B., Fischer G. S. et al. McTigue K. M. Implementing health information technology in a patient-centered manner: Patient experiences with an online evidence-based lifestyle intervention. Journal for Healthcare Quality. 2013; 35 (5):47–57. [ PubMed : 24004039 ]
  • Mickan S., Atherton H., Roberts N. W., Heneghan C., Tilson J.K. Use of handheld computers in clinical practice: a systematic review. bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2014; 14 :56. [ PMC free article : PMC4099138 ] [ PubMed : 24998515 ]
  • Moher D. The problem of duplicate systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2013; 347 (5040) [ PubMed : 23945367 ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Montori V. M., Wilczynski N. L., Morgan D., Haynes R. B., Hedges T. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. bmc Medicine. 2003; 1 :2. [ PMC free article : PMC281591 ] [ PubMed : 14633274 ]
  • Mulrow C. D. The medical review article: state of the science. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1987; 106 (3):485–488. [ PubMed : 3813259 ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Evidence-based information systems: A decade later. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems ; 2011. Retrieved from http://aisel ​.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent ​.cgi?article ​=1221&context ​=ecis2011 .
  • Okoli C., Schabram K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. ssrn Electronic Journal. 2010
  • Otte-Trojel T., de Bont A., Rundall T. G., van de Klundert J. How outcomes are achieved through patient portals: a realist review. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association. 2014; 21 (4):751–757. [ PMC free article : PMC4078283 ] [ PubMed : 24503882 ]
  • Paré G., Trudel M.-C., Jaana M., Kitsiou S. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management. 2015; 52 (2):183–199.
  • Patsopoulos N. A., Analatos A. A., Ioannidis J.P. A. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005; 293 (19):2362–2366. [ PubMed : 15900006 ]
  • Paul M. M., Greene C. M., Newton-Dame R., Thorpe L. E., Perlman S. E., McVeigh K. H., Gourevitch M.N. The state of population health surveillance using electronic health records: A narrative review. Population Health Management. 2015; 18 (3):209–216. [ PubMed : 25608033 ]
  • Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: SAGE Publications; 2006.
  • Pawson R., Greenhalgh T., Harvey G., Walshe K. Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2005; 10 (Suppl 1):21–34. [ PubMed : 16053581 ]
  • Petersen K., Vakkalanka S., Kuzniarz L. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology. 2015; 64 :1–18.
  • Petticrew M., Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, ma : Blackwell Publishing Co; 2006.
  • Rousseau D. M., Manning J., Denyer D. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. The Academy of Management Annals. 2008; 2 (1):475–515.
  • Rowe F. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems. 2014; 23 (3):241–255.
  • Shea B. J., Hamel C., Wells G. A., Bouter L. M., Kristjansson E., Grimshaw J. et al. Boers M. amstar is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009; 62 (10):1013–1020. [ PubMed : 19230606 ]
  • Shepperd S., Lewin S., Straus S., Clarke M., Eccles M. P., Fitzpatrick R. et al. Sheikh A. Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Medicine. 2009; 6 (8):e1000086. [ PMC free article : PMC2717209 ] [ PubMed : 19668360 ]
  • Silva B. M., Rodrigues J. J., de la Torre Díez I., López-Coronado M., Saleem K. Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2015; 56 :265–272. [ PubMed : 26071682 ]
  • Smith V., Devane D., Begley C., Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. bmc Medical Research Methodology. 2011; 11 (1):15. [ PMC free article : PMC3039637 ] [ PubMed : 21291558 ]
  • Sylvester A., Tate M., Johnstone D. Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2013; 32 (12):1199–1215.
  • Templier M., Paré G. A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2015; 37 (6):112–137.
  • Thomas J., Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. bmc Medical Research Methodology. 2008; 8 (1):45. [ PMC free article : PMC2478656 ] [ PubMed : 18616818 ]
  • Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems ( ecis 2009); Verona, Italy. 2009.
  • Webster J., Watson R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 2002; 26 (2):11.
  • Whitlock E. P., Lin J. S., Chou R., Shekelle P., Robinson K.A. Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008; 148 (10):776–782. [ PubMed : 18490690 ]

This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0): see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

  • Cite this Page Paré G, Kitsiou S. Chapter 9 Methods for Literature Reviews. In: Lau F, Kuziemsky C, editors. Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach [Internet]. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27.
  • PDF version of this title (4.5M)
  • Disable Glossary Links

In this Page

  • Introduction
  • Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps
  • Types of Review Articles and Brief Illustrations
  • Concluding Remarks

Related information

  • PMC PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

  • Chapter 9 Methods for Literature Reviews - Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Ev... Chapter 9 Methods for Literature Reviews - Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

statistics

  • UConn Library
  • Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
  • Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

  • Getting Started
  • How to Pick a Topic
  • Strategies to Find Sources
  • Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
  • Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
  • Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
  • Citation Resources
  • Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

  • To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
  • To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
  • Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

  • A research paper assigned in a course
  • A thesis or dissertation
  • A grant proposal
  • An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

  • Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

  • Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

  • Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

  • Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

  • UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
  • << Previous: Getting Started
  • Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
  • Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
  • URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

Creative Commons

  • University of Wisconsin–Madison
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Research Guides
  • Evidence Synthesis, Systematic Review Services
  • Literature Review Types, Taxonomies

Evidence Synthesis, Systematic Review Services : Literature Review Types, Taxonomies

  • Develop a Protocol
  • Develop Your Research Question
  • Select Databases
  • Select Gray Literature Sources
  • Write a Search Strategy
  • Manage Your Search Process
  • Register Your Protocol
  • Citation Management
  • Article Screening
  • Risk of Bias Assessment
  • Synthesize, Map, or Describe the Results
  • Find Guidance by Discipline
  • Manage Your Research Data
  • Browse Evidence Portals by Discipline
  • Automate the Process, Tools & Technologies
  • Adapting Systematic Review Methods
  • Additional Resources

Choosing a Literature Review Methodology

Growing interest in evidence-based practice has driven an increase in review methodologies. Your choice of review methodology (or literature review type) will be informed by the intent (purpose, function) of your research project and the time and resources of your team. 

  • Decision Tree (What Type of Review is Right for You?) Developed by Cornell University Library staff, this "decision-tree" guides the user to a handful of review guides given time and intent.

Types of Evidence Synthesis*

Critical Review - Aims to demonstrate writer has extensively researched literature and critically evaluated its quality. Goes beyond mere description to include degree of analysis and conceptual innovation. Typically results in hypothesis or model.

Mapping Review (Systematic Map) - Map out and categorize existing literature from which to commission further reviews and/or primary research by identifying gaps in research literature.

Meta-Analysis - Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results.

Mixed Studies Review (Mixed Methods Review) - Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies.

Narrative (Literature) Review - Generic term: published materials that provide examination of recent or current literature. Can cover wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness.

Overview - Generic term: summary of the [medical] literature that attempts to survey the literature and describe its characteristics.

Qualitative Systematic Review or Qualitative Evidence Synthesis - Method for integrating or comparing the findings from qualitative studies. It looks for ‘themes’ or ‘constructs’ that lie in or across individual qualitative studies.

Rapid Review - Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research.

Scoping Review or Evidence Map - Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research.

State-of-the-art Review - Tend to address more current matters in contrast to other combined retrospective and current approaches. May offer new perspectives on issue or point out area for further research.

Systematic Review - Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review. (An emerging subset includes Living Reviews or Living Systematic Reviews - A [review or] systematic review which is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available.)

Systematic Search and Review - Combines strengths of critical review with a comprehensive search process. Typically addresses broad questions to produce ‘best evidence synthesis.’

Umbrella Review - Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. Focuses on broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results.

*These definitions are in Grant & Booth's "A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies."

Literature Review Types/Typologies, Taxonomies

Grant, M. J., and A. Booth. "A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies."  Health Information and Libraries Journal  26.2 (2009): 91-108.  DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x  Link

Munn, Zachary, et al. “Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors When Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology , vol. 18, no. 1, Nov. 2018, p. 143. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. Link

Sutton, A., et al. "Meeting the Review Family: Exploring Review Types and Associated Information Retrieval Requirements."  Health Information and Libraries Journal  36.3 (2019): 202-22.  DOI: 10.1111/hir.12276  Link

  • << Previous: Home
  • Next: The Systematic Review Process >>
  • Last Updated: Aug 2, 2024 4:56 PM
  • URL: https://researchguides.library.wisc.edu/literature_review

Duke University Libraries

Literature Reviews

  • Types of reviews
  • Getting started

Types of reviews and examples

Choosing a review type.

  • 1. Define your research question
  • 2. Plan your search
  • 3. Search the literature
  • 4. Organize your results
  • 5. Synthesize your findings
  • 6. Write the review
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) tools
  • Thompson Writing Studio This link opens in a new window
  • Need to write a systematic review? This link opens in a new window

types of research literature review

Contact a Librarian

Ask a Librarian

  • Meta-analysis
  • Systematized

Definition:

"A term used to describe a conventional overview of the literature, particularly when contrasted with a systematic review (Booth et al., 2012, p. 265).

Characteristics:

  • Provides examination of recent or current literature on a wide range of subjects
  • Varying levels of completeness / comprehensiveness, non-standardized methodology
  • May or may not include comprehensive searching, quality assessment or critical appraisal

Mitchell, L. E., & Zajchowski, C. A. (2022). The history of air quality in Utah: A narrative review.  Sustainability ,  14 (15), 9653.  doi.org/10.3390/su14159653

Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

"An assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue...using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research" (Grant & Booth, 2009, p. 100).

  • Assessment of what is already known about an issue
  • Similar to a systematic review but within a time-constrained setting
  • Typically employs methodological shortcuts, increasing risk of introducing bias, includes basic level of quality assessment
  • Best suited for issues needing quick decisions and solutions (i.e., policy recommendations)

Learn more about the method:

Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J., & Moher, D. (2012). Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach.  Systematic reviews, 1 (1), 1-9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10

Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries. (2021). Rapid Review Protocol .

Quarmby, S., Santos, G., & Mathias, M. (2019). Air quality strategies and technologies: A rapid review of the international evidence.  Sustainability, 11 (10), 2757.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102757

Grant, M.J. & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of the 14 review types and associated methodologies.  Health Information & Libraries Journal , 26(2), 91-108. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Developed and refined by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), this review "map[s] out and categorize[s] existing literature on a particular topic, identifying gaps in research literature from which to commission further reviews and/or primary research" (Grant & Booth, 2009, p. 97).

Although mapping reviews are sometimes called scoping reviews, the key difference is that mapping reviews focus on a review question, rather than a topic

Mapping reviews are "best used where a clear target for a more focused evidence product has not yet been identified" (Booth, 2016, p. 14)

Mapping review searches are often quick and are intended to provide a broad overview

Mapping reviews can take different approaches in what types of literature is focused on in the search

Cooper I. D. (2016). What is a "mapping study?".  Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA ,  104 (1), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.013

Miake-Lye, I. M., Hempel, S., Shanman, R., & Shekelle, P. G. (2016). What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products.  Systematic reviews, 5 (1), 1-21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x

Tainio, M., Andersen, Z. J., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Hu, L., De Nazelle, A., An, R., ... & de Sá, T. H. (2021). Air pollution, physical activity and health: A mapping review of the evidence.  Environment international ,  147 , 105954.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105954

Booth, A. (2016). EVIDENT Guidance for Reviewing the Evidence: a compendium of methodological literature and websites . ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1562.9842 . 

Grant, M.J. & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of the 14 review types and associated methodologies.  Health Information & Libraries Journal , 26(2), 91-108.  https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

"A type of review that has as its primary objective the identification of the size and quality of research in a topic area in order to inform subsequent review" (Booth et al., 2012, p. 269).

  • Main purpose is to map out and categorize existing literature, identify gaps in literature—great for informing policy-making
  • Search comprehensiveness determined by time/scope constraints, could take longer than a systematic review
  • No formal quality assessment or critical appraisal

Learn more about the methods :

Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.  International Journal of Social Research Methodology ,  8 (1), 19-32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science: IS, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Example : 

Rahman, A., Sarkar, A., Yadav, O. P., Achari, G., & Slobodnik, J. (2021). Potential human health risks due to environmental exposure to nano-and microplastics and knowledge gaps: A scoping review.  Science of the Total Environment, 757 , 143872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143872

A review that "[compiles] evidence from multiple...reviews into one accessible and usable document" (Grant & Booth, 2009, p. 103). While originally intended to be a compilation of Cochrane reviews, it now generally refers to any kind of evidence synthesis.

  • Compiles evidence from multiple reviews into one document
  • Often defines a broader question than is typical of a traditional systematic review

Choi, G. J., & Kang, H. (2022). The umbrella review: a useful strategy in the rain of evidence.  The Korean Journal of Pain ,  35 (2), 127–128.  https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.2.127

Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C. M., Holly, C., Khalil, H., & Tungpunkom, P. (2015). Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare , 13(3), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055

Rojas-Rueda, D., Morales-Zamora, E., Alsufyani, W. A., Herbst, C. H., Al Balawi, S. M., Alsukait, R., & Alomran, M. (2021). Environmental risk factors and health: An umbrella review of meta-analyses.  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Dealth ,  18 (2), 704.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020704

A meta-analysis is a "technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the result" (Grant & Booth, 2009, p. 98).

  • Statistical technique for combining results of quantitative studies to provide more precise effect of results
  • Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching
  • Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • May be conducted independently or as part of a systematic review

Berman, N. G., & Parker, R. A. (2002). Meta-analysis: Neither quick nor easy. BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-2-10

Hites R. A. (2004). Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the environment and in people: a meta-analysis of concentrations.  Environmental Science & Technology ,  38 (4), 945–956.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es035082g

A systematic review "seeks to systematically search for, appraise, and [synthesize] research evidence, often adhering to the guidelines on the conduct of a review" provided by discipline-specific organizations, such as the Cochrane Collaboration (Grant & Booth, 2009, p. 102).

  • Aims to compile and synthesize all known knowledge on a given topic
  • Adheres to strict guidelines, protocols, and frameworks
  • Time-intensive and often takes months to a year or more to complete
  • The most commonly referred to type of evidence synthesis. Sometimes confused as a blanket term for other types of reviews

Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2015). Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: a systematic review.  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ,  12 (4), 4354–4379.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120404354

"Systematized reviews attempt to include one or more elements of the systematic review process while stopping short of claiming that the resultant output is a systematic review" (Grant & Booth, 2009, p. 102). When a systematic review approach is adapted to produce a more manageable scope, while still retaining the rigor of a systematic review such as risk of bias assessment and the use of a protocol, this is often referred to as a  structured review  (Huelin et al., 2015).

  • Typically conducted by postgraduate or graduate students
  • Often assigned by instructors to students who don't have the resources to conduct a full systematic review

Salvo, G., Lashewicz, B. M., Doyle-Baker, P. K., & McCormack, G. R. (2018). Neighbourhood built environment influences on physical activity among adults: A systematized review of qualitative evidence.  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ,  15 (5), 897.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050897

Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. https://www.evidera.com/resource/whats-in-a-name-systematic-and-non-systematic-literature-reviews-and-why-the-distinction-matters/

Flowchart of review types

  • Review Decision Tree - Cornell University For more information, check out Cornell's review methodology decision tree.
  • LitR-Ex.com - Eight literature review methodologies Learn more about 8 different review types (incl. Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews) with practical tips about strengths and weaknesses of different methods.
  • << Previous: Getting started
  • Next: 1. Define your research question >>
  • Last Updated: Aug 9, 2024 9:35 AM
  • URL: https://guides.library.duke.edu/litreviews

Duke University Libraries

Services for...

  • Faculty & Instructors
  • Graduate Students
  • Undergraduate Students
  • International Students
  • Patrons with Disabilities

Twitter

  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
  • Support the Libraries

Creative Commons License

Research Methods

  • Getting Started
  • Literature Review Research
  • Research Design
  • Research Design By Discipline
  • SAGE Research Methods
  • Teaching with SAGE Research Methods

Literature Review

  • What is a Literature Review?
  • What is NOT a Literature Review?
  • Purposes of a Literature Review
  • Types of Literature Reviews
  • Literature Reviews vs. Systematic Reviews
  • Systematic vs. Meta-Analysis

Literature Review  is a comprehensive survey of the works published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to the most significant works.

Also, we can define a literature review as the collected body of scholarly works related to a topic:

  • Summarizes and analyzes previous research relevant to a topic
  • Includes scholarly books and articles published in academic journals
  • Can be an specific scholarly paper or a section in a research paper

The objective of a Literature Review is to find previous published scholarly works relevant to an specific topic

  • Help gather ideas or information
  • Keep up to date in current trends and findings
  • Help develop new questions

A literature review is important because it:

  • Explains the background of research on a topic.
  • Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
  • Helps focus your own research questions or problems
  • Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
  • Suggests unexplored ideas or populations
  • Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
  • Tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.
  • Identifies critical gaps, points of disagreement, or potentially flawed methodology or theoretical approaches.
  • Indicates potential directions for future research.

All content in this section is from Literature Review Research from Old Dominion University 

Keep in mind the following, a literature review is NOT:

Not an essay 

Not an annotated bibliography  in which you summarize each article that you have reviewed.  A literature review goes beyond basic summarizing to focus on the critical analysis of the reviewed works and their relationship to your research question.

Not a research paper   where you select resources to support one side of an issue versus another.  A lit review should explain and consider all sides of an argument in order to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted.

A literature review serves several purposes. For example, it

  • provides thorough knowledge of previous studies; introduces seminal works.
  • helps focus one’s own research topic.
  • identifies a conceptual framework for one’s own research questions or problems; indicates potential directions for future research.
  • suggests previously unused or underused methodologies, designs, quantitative and qualitative strategies.
  • identifies gaps in previous studies; identifies flawed methodologies and/or theoretical approaches; avoids replication of mistakes.
  • helps the researcher avoid repetition of earlier research.
  • suggests unexplored populations.
  • determines whether past studies agree or disagree; identifies controversy in the literature.
  • tests assumptions; may help counter preconceived ideas and remove unconscious bias.

As Kennedy (2007) notes*, it is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the original studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field. In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews.

Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are several approaches to how they can be done, depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Listed below are definitions of types of literature reviews:

Argumentative Review      This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews.

Integrative Review      Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication.

Historical Review      Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical reviews are focused on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review      A review does not always focus on what someone said [content], but how they said it [method of analysis]. This approach provides a framework of understanding at different levels (i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches and data collection and analysis techniques), enables researchers to draw on a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection and data analysis, and helps highlight many ethical issues which we should be aware of and consider as we go through our study.

Systematic Review      This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?"

Theoretical Review      The purpose of this form is to concretely examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review help establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

* Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature."  Educational Researcher  36 (April 2007): 139-147.

All content in this section is from The Literature Review created by Dr. Robert Larabee USC

Robinson, P. and Lowe, J. (2015),  Literature reviews vs systematic reviews.  Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39: 103-103. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12393

types of research literature review

What's in the name? The difference between a Systematic Review and a Literature Review, and why it matters . By Lynn Kysh from University of Southern California

Diagram for "What's in the name? The difference between a Systematic Review and a Literature Review, and why it matters"

Systematic review or meta-analysis?

A  systematic review  answers a defined research question by collecting and summarizing all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria.

A  meta-analysis  is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of these studies.

Systematic reviews, just like other research articles, can be of varying quality. They are a significant piece of work (the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination at York estimates that a team will take 9-24 months), and to be useful to other researchers and practitioners they should have:

  • clearly stated objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies
  • explicit, reproducible methodology
  • a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies
  • assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies (e.g. risk of bias)
  • systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies

Not all systematic reviews contain meta-analysis. 

Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects of health care than those derived from the individual studies included within a review.  More information on meta-analyses can be found in  Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 9 .

A meta-analysis goes beyond critique and integration and conducts secondary statistical analysis on the outcomes of similar studies.  It is a systematic review that uses quantitative methods to synthesize and summarize the results.

An advantage of a meta-analysis is the ability to be completely objective in evaluating research findings.  Not all topics, however, have sufficient research evidence to allow a meta-analysis to be conducted.  In that case, an integrative review is an appropriate strategy. 

Some of the content in this section is from Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: step by step guide created by Kate McAllister.

  • << Previous: Getting Started
  • Next: Research Design >>
  • Last Updated: Jul 15, 2024 10:34 AM
  • URL: https://guides.lib.udel.edu/researchmethods

Libraries | Research Guides

Literature reviews, what is a literature review, learning more about how to do a literature review.

  • Planning the Review
  • The Research Question
  • Choosing Where to Search
  • Organizing the Review
  • Writing the Review

A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it relates to your research question. A literature review goes beyond a description or summary of the literature you have read. 

  • Sage Research Methods Core This link opens in a new window SAGE Research Methods supports research at all levels by providing material to guide users through every step of the research process. SAGE Research Methods is the ultimate methods library with more than 1000 books, reference works, journal articles, and instructional videos by world-leading academics from across the social sciences, including the largest collection of qualitative methods books available online from any scholarly publisher. – Publisher

Cover Art

  • Next: Planning the Review >>
  • Last Updated: Jul 8, 2024 11:22 AM
  • URL: https://libguides.northwestern.edu/literaturereviews
  • University of Michigan Library
  • Research Guides

Evidence Syntheses (Scoping, systematic, & other types of reviews)

  • Types of Reviews

Choosing a Review Type

Types of literature reviews.

  • Should You Do a Systematic Review?
  • Work with a Search Expert
  • Covidence Review Software
  • Evidence in a Systematic Review
  • Information Sources
  • Search Strategy
  • Managing Records
  • Selection Process
  • Data Collection Process
  • Study Risk of Bias Assessment
  • Reporting Results
  • For Search Professionals

This guide focuses on the methodology for systematic reviews (SRs), but an SR may not be the best methodology to use to meet your project's goals. Use the articles listed here or in the Types of Literature Reviews box below for information about additional methodologies that could better fit your project. 

  • Haddaway NR, Lotfi T, Mbuagbaw L. Systematic reviews: A glossary for public health . Scand J Public Health. 2022 Feb 9:14034948221074998. doi: 10.1177/14034948221074998. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35139715.
  • Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies . Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. Defines 14 types of reviews and provides a helpful summary table on pp. 94-95.
  • Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements . Health Info Libr J . 2019;36(3):202–222. doi:10.1111/hir.12276
  • If you're not sure what type of review is right for your quantitative review, use this tool to find the best methodology for your project.:What Review is Right for You? https://whatreviewisrightforyou.knowledgetranslation.net

Systematic Reviews

Meta-Analyses

  • Comparative Effectiveness
  • systematically and transparently searches for a broad range of information to synthesize, in order to find the effect of an intervention.
  • uses a protocol 
  • has a clear data extraction and management plan.
  • Time-intensive and often take months to a year or more to complete, even with a multi-person team. 

NOTE: The term "systematic review" is also used incorrectly as a blanket term for other types of reviews.

Methodological Guidance

  • Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. 2011. Institute of Medicine. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13059
  • Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions, v. 6. 2019. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
  • The Joanna Briggs Reviewers Manual. 2024. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
  • The Community Guide/Methods/Systematic Review Methods. 2014. The Community Preventive Services Task Force. http://www.thecommunityguide.org/about/methods.html

For issues in systematic reviews, especially in social science or other qualitative research: 

  • Some Potential "Pitfalls" in the Construction of Educational Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0675-7
  • Lescoat, A., Murphy, S. L., Roofeh, D., et al. (2021). Considerations for a combined index for limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis to support drug development and improve outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397198320961967
  • DeLong, M. R., Tandon, V. J., Bertrand, A. A. (2021). Review of Outcomes in Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction with and without Surgical Mesh Assistance.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33177453/
  • Carey, M. R., Vaughn, V. M., Mann, J. (2020). Is Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Therapy Non-Inferior to Antibiotic Therapy in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections: a Systematic Review.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32270403/
  • Statistical technique for combining the findings from disparate  quantitative studies.
  • Uses statistical methods to objectively evaluate, synthesize, and summarize results.
  • May be conducted independently or as part of a systematic review.
  • Cochrane Handbook, Ch 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-10
  • Bauer, M. E., Toledano, R. D., Houle, T., et al. (2020). Lumbar neuraxial procedures in thrombocytopenic patients across populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31810860/ 6
  • Mailoa J, Lin GH, Khoshkam V, MacEachern M, et al. Long-Term Effect of Four Surgical Periodontal Therapies and One Non-Surgical Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26110453/

Umbrella Reviews

  • Reviews other systematic reviews on a topic. 
  • Often defines a broader question than is typical of a traditional systematic review.
  • Most useful when there are competing interventions to consider.
  • Ioannidis JP. Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses .  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35081993
  • Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C. M., Holly, C., Khalil, H., & Tungpunkom, P.  2015 Methodology for JBI Umbrella Reviews. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?articl.
  • Gastaldon, C., Solmi, M., Correll, C. U., et al. (2022). Risk factors of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms: umbrella review of current evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35081993/
  • Blodgett, T. J., & Blodgett, N. P. (2021). Melatonin and melatonin-receptor agonists to prevent delirium in hospitalized older adults: An umbrella review.   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34749057/

Comparative effectiveness 

  • Systematic reviews of existing research on the effectiveness, comparative effectiveness, and comparative harms of different health care interventions.
  •  Intended to provide relevant evidence to inform real-world health care decisions for patients, providers, and policymakers.
  • “Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.” Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/collections/cer-methods-guide
  • Main document of above guide :  https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cer-methods-guide_overview.pdf .
  • Tanni KA, Truong CB, Johnson BS, Qian J. Comparative effectiveness and safety of eribulin in advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jul;163:103375. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103375. Epub 2021 Jun 2. PMID: 34087344.
  • Rice D, Corace K, Wolfe D, Esmaeilisaraji L, Michaud A, Grima A, Austin B, Douma R, Barbeau P, Butler C, Willows M, Poulin PA, Sproule BA, Porath A, Garber G, Taha S, Garner G, Skidmore B, Moher D, Thavorn K, Hutton B. Evaluating comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions adjunctive to opioid agonist therapy for opioid use disorder: A systematic review with network meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244401. PMID: 33370393; PMCID: PMC7769275.

​ Scoping Review or Evidence Map

Systematically and transparently collect and  categorize  existing evidence on a broad question of  policy or management importance.

Seeks to identify research gaps and opportunities for evidence synthesis rather than searching for the effect of an intervention. 

May critically evaluate existing evidence, but does not attempt to synthesize the results in the way a systematic review would. (see  EE Journal  and  CIFOR )

May take longer than a systematic review.

  • For useful guidance on whether to conduct a scoping review or not, see Figure 1 in this article. Pollock, D , Davies, EL , Peters, MDJ , et al. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics . J Adv Nurs . 2021 ; 77 : 2102 – 2113 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743For a helpful

Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework http://10.1080/1364557032000119616

Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds. (2020) . JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.  JBI. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews

Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tet al. (2018)  Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30453902/

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al.. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4. PMID: 30178033.  https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/epdf/10.7326/M18-0850

Bouldin E, Patel SR, Tey CS, et al. Bullying and Children who are Deaf or Hard-of-hearing: A Scoping Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33438758

Finn M, Gilmore B, Sheaf G, Vallières F. What do we mean by individual capacity strengthening for primary health care in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic scoping review to improve conceptual clarity. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33407554/

Hirt J, Nordhausen T, Meichlinger J, Braun V, Zeller A, Meyer G. Educational interventions to improve literature searching skills in the health sciences: a scoping review.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33013210/

​ Rapid Review

Useful for addressing issues needing timely decisions, such as developing policy recommendations. 

Applies systematic review methodology within a time-constrained setting.

Employs intentional, methodological "shortcuts" (limiting search terms for example) at the risk of introducing bias.

Defining characteristic is the transparency of team methodological choices.

Garritty, Chantelle, Gerald Gartlehner, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Valerie J. King, Candyce Hamel, Chris Kamel, Lisa Affengruber, and Adrienne Stevens. “Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group Offers Evidence-Informed Guidance to Conduct Rapid Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 130 (February 2021): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007 .

Klerings I , Robalino S , Booth A , et al. Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 19 April 2023. https:// 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079

WHO. “WHO | Rapid Reviews to Strengthen Health Policy and Systems: A Practical Guide.” World Health Organization. Accessed February 11, 2022. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/258698 .

Dobbins, Maureen. “Steps for Conducting a Rapid Review,” 2017, 25.  https://www.nccmt.ca/uploads/media/media/0001/01/a816af720e4d587e13da6bb307df8c907a5dff9a.pdf

Norris HC, Richardson HM, Benoit MC, et al. (2021) Utilization Impact of Cost-Sharing Elimination for Preventive Care Services: A Rapid Review.   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34157906/

Marcus N, Stergiopoulos V. Re-examining mental health crisis intervention: A rapid review comparing outcomes across police, co-responder and non-police models. Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb 1. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13731. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35103364.

Narrative ( Literature ) Review

A broad term referring to reviews with a wide scope and non-standardized methodology.

See Baethge 2019 below for a method to provide quality assessment,

Search strategies, comprehensiveness, and time range covered will vary and do not follow an established protocol.

It provides insight into a particular topic by critically examining sources, generally over a particular period of time.

Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29578574/

  • Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S. & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s41073-019-0064-8   https:// researchintegrityjournal. biomedcentral.com/articles/10. 1186/s41073-019-0064-8
  • Czypionka, T., Greenhalgh, T., Bassler, D., & Bryant, M. B. (2021). Masks and Face Coverings for the Lay Public : A Narrative Update. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33370173/
  • Gardiner, F. W., Nwose, E. U., Bwititi, P. T., et al.. (2017). Services aimed at achieving desirable clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus: A narrative review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29201367/
  •  Dickerson, S. S., Connors, L. M., Fayad, A., & Dean, G. E. (2014). Sleep-wake disturbances in cancer patients: narrative review of literature focusing on improving quality of life outcomes.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25050080/

University of Texas

  • University of Texas Libraries
  • UT Libraries

Systematic Reviews & Evidence Synthesis Methods

Types of reviews.

  • Formulate Question
  • Find Existing Reviews & Protocols
  • Register a Protocol
  • Searching Systematically
  • Supplementary Searching
  • Managing Results
  • Deduplication
  • Critical Appraisal
  • Glossary of terms
  • Librarian Support
  • Video tutorials This link opens in a new window
  • Systematic Review & Evidence Synthesis Boot Camp

Not sure what type of review you want to conduct?

There are many types of reviews ---  narrative reviews ,  scoping reviews , systematic reviews, integrative reviews, umbrella reviews, rapid reviews and others --- and it's not always straightforward to choose which type of review to conduct. These Review Navigator tools (see below) ask a series of questions to guide you through the various kinds of reviews and to help you determine the best choice for your research needs.

  • Which review is right for you? (Univ. of Manitoba)
  • What type of review is right for you? (Cornell)
  • Review Ready Reckoner - Assessment Tool (RRRsAT)
  • A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. by Grant & Booth
  • Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements | Health Info Libr J, 2019
Label Description Search Appraisal Synthesis Analysis
Critical Review Aims to demonstrate writer has extensively researched literature and critically evaluated its quality. Goes beyond mere description to include degree of analysis and conceptual innovation. Typically results in hypothesis or model Seeks to identify most significant items in the field No formal quality assessment. Attempts to evaluate according to contribution Typically narrative, perhaps conceptual or chronological Significant component: seeks to identify conceptual contribution to embody existing or derive new theory
Literature Review Generic term: published materials that provide examination of recent or current literature. Can cover wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness. May include research findings May or may not include comprehensive searching May or may not include quality assessment Typically narrative Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc.
Mapping review/ systematic map Map out and categorize existing literature from which to commission further reviews and/or primary research by identifying gaps in research literature Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints No formal quality assessment May be graphical and tabular Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. May identify need for primary or secondary research
Meta-analysis Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching. May use funnel plot to assess completeness Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion and/or sensitivity analyses Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary Numerical analysis of measures of effect assuming absence of heterogeneity
Mixed studies review/mixed methods review Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies Requires either very sensitive search to retrieve all studies or separately conceived quantitative and qualitative strategies Requires either a generic appraisal instrument or separate appraisal processes with corresponding checklists Typically both components will be presented as narrative and in tables. May also employ graphical means of integrating quantitative and qualitative studies Analysis may characterise both literatures and look for correlations between characteristics or use gap analysis to identify aspects absent in one literature but missing in the other
Overview Generic term: summary of the [medical] literature that attempts to survey the literature and describe its characteristics May or may not include comprehensive searching (depends whether systematic overview or not) May or may not include quality assessment (depends whether systematic overview or not) Synthesis depends on whether systematic or not. Typically narrative but may include tabular features Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc.
Qualitative systematic review/qualitative evidence synthesis Method for integrating or comparing the findings from qualitative studies. It looks for ‘themes’ or ‘constructs’ that lie in or across individual qualitative studies May employ selective or purposive sampling Quality assessment typically used to mediate messages not for inclusion/exclusion Qualitative, narrative synthesis Thematic analysis, may include conceptual models
Rapid review Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research Completeness of searching determined by time constraints Time-limited formal quality assessment Typically narrative and tabular Quantities of literature and overall quality/direction of effect of literature
Scoping review Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research) Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. May include research in progress No formal quality assessment Typically tabular with some narrative commentary Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. Attempts to specify a viable review
State-of-the-art review Tend to address more current matters in contrast to other combined retrospective and current approaches. May offer new perspectives on issue or point out area for further research Aims for comprehensive searching of current literature No formal quality assessment Typically narrative, may have tabular accompaniment Current state of knowledge and priorities for future investigation and research
Systematic review Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion Typically narrative with tabular accompaniment What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; uncertainty around findings, recommendations for future research
Systematic search and review Combines strengths of critical review with a comprehensive search process. Typically addresses broad questions to produce ‘best evidence synthesis’ Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching May or may not include quality assessment Minimal narrative, tabular summary of studies What is known; recommendations for practice. Limitations
Systematized review Attempt to include elements of systematic review process while stopping short of systematic review. Typically conducted as postgraduate student assignment May or may not include comprehensive searching May or may not include quality assessment
Typically narrative with tabular accompaniment  

Reproduced from Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies . Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

  • Last Updated: Aug 6, 2024 2:29 PM
  • URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/systematicreviews

Creative Commons License

ON YOUR 1ST ORDER

Different Types of Literature Review: Which One Fits Your Research?

By Laura Brown on 13th October 2023

You might not have heard that there are multiple kinds of literature review. However, with the progress in your academic career you will learn these classifications and may need to use different types of them. However, there is nothing to worry if you aren’t aware of them now, as here we are going to discuss this topic in detail.

There are approximately 14 types of literature review on the basis of their specific objectives, methodologies, and the way they approach and analyse existing literature in academic research. Of those 14, there are 4 major types. But before we delve into the details of each one of them and how they are useful in academics, let’s first understand the basics of literature review.

Demystifying 14 Different Types of Literature Reviews

What is Literature Review?

A literature review is a critical and systematic summary and evaluation of existing research. It is an essential component of academic and research work, providing an overview of the current state of knowledge in a particular field.

In easy words, a literature review is like making a big, organised summary of all the important research and smart books or articles about a particular topic or question. It’s something scholars and researchers do, and it helps everyone see what we already know about that topic. It’s kind of like taking a snapshot of what we understand right now in a certain field.

It serves with some specific purpose in the research.

  • Provides a comprehensive understanding of existing research on a topic.
  • Identifies gaps, trends, and inconsistencies in the literature.
  • Contextualise your own research within the broader academic discourse.
  • Supports the development of theoretical frameworks or research hypotheses.

4 Major Types Of Literature Review

The four major types include, Narrative Review, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Scoping Review. These are known as the major ones because they’re like the “go-to” methods for researchers in academic and research circles. Think of them as the classic tools in the researcher’s toolbox. They’ve earned their reputation because they have a unique style for literature review introduction , clear steps and specific qualities that make them super handy for different research needs.

1. Narrative Review

Narrative reviews present a well-structured narrative that reads like a cohesive story, providing a comprehensive overview of a specific topic. These reviews often incorporate historical context and offer a broad understanding of the subject matter, making them valuable for researchers looking to establish a foundational understanding of their area of interest. They are particularly useful when a historical perspective or a broad context is necessary to comprehend the current state of knowledge in a field.

2. Systematic Review

Systematic reviews are renowned for their methodological rigour. They involve a meticulously structured process that includes the systematic selection of relevant studies, comprehensive data extraction, and a critical synthesis of their findings. This systematic approach is designed to minimise bias and subjectivity, making systematic reviews highly reliable and objective. They are considered the gold standard for evidence-based research as they provide a clear and rigorous assessment of the available evidence on a specific research question.

3. Meta Analysis

Meta analysis is a powerful method for researchers who prefer a quantitative and statistical perspective. It involves the statistical synthesis of data from various studies, allowing researchers to draw more precise and generalisable conclusions by combining data from multiple sources. Meta analyses are especially valuable when the aim is to quantitatively measure the effect size or impact of a particular intervention, treatment, or phenomenon.

4. Scoping Review

Scoping reviews are invaluable tools, especially for researchers in the early stages of exploring a topic. These reviews aim to map the existing literature, identifying gaps and helping clarify research questions. Scoping reviews provide a panoramic view of the available research, which is particularly useful when researchers are embarking on exploratory studies or trying to understand the breadth and depth of a subject before conducting more focused research.

Different Types Of Literature review In Research

There are some more approaches to conduct literature review. Let’s explore these classifications quickly.

5. Critical Review

Critical reviews provide an in-depth evaluation of existing literature, scrutinising sources for their strengths, weaknesses, and relevance. They offer a critical perspective, often highlighting gaps in the research and areas for further investigation.

6. Theoretical Review

Theoretical reviews are centred around exploring and analysing the theoretical frameworks, concepts, and models present in the literature. They aim to contribute to the development and refinement of theoretical perspectives within a specific field.

7. Integrative Review

Integrative reviews synthesise a diverse range of studies, drawing connections between various research findings to create a comprehensive understanding of a topic. These reviews often bridge gaps between different perspectives and provide a holistic overview.

8. Historical Review

Historical reviews focus on the evolution of a topic over time, tracing its development through past research, events, and scholarly contributions. They offer valuable context for understanding the current state of research.

9. Methodological Review

Among the different kinds of literature reviews, methodological reviews delve into the research methods and methodologies employed in existing studies. Researchers assess these approaches for their effectiveness, validity, and relevance to the research question at hand.

10. Cross-Disciplinary Review

Cross-disciplinary reviews explore a topic from multiple academic disciplines, emphasising the diversity of perspectives and insights that each discipline brings. They are particularly useful for interdisciplinary research projects and uncovering connections between seemingly unrelated fields.

11. Descriptive Review

Descriptive reviews provide an organised summary of existing literature without extensive analysis. They offer a straightforward overview of key findings, research methods, and themes present in the reviewed studies.

12. Rapid Review

Rapid reviews expedite the literature review process, focusing on summarising relevant studies quickly. They are often used for time-sensitive projects where efficiency is a priority, without sacrificing quality.

13. Conceptual Review

Conceptual reviews concentrate on clarifying and developing theoretical concepts within a specific field. They address ambiguities or inconsistencies in existing theories, aiming to refine and expand conceptual frameworks.

14. Library Research

Library research reviews rely primarily on library and archival resources to gather and synthesise information. They are often employed in historical or archive-based research projects, utilising library collections and historical documents for in-depth analysis.

Each type of literature review serves distinct purposes and comes with its own set of strengths and weaknesses, allowing researchers to choose the one that best suits their research objectives and questions.

Choosing the Ideal Literature Review Approach in Academics

In order to conduct your research in the right manner, it is important that you choose the correct type of review for your literature. Here are 8 amazing tips we have sorted for you in regard to literature review help so that you can select the best-suited type for your research.

  • Clarify Your Research Goals: Begin by defining your research objectives and what you aim to achieve with the literature review. Are you looking to summarise existing knowledge, identify gaps, or analyse specific data?
  • Understand Different Review Types: Familiarise yourself with different kinds of literature reviews, including systematic reviews, narrative reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, and integrative reviews. Each serves a different purpose.
  • Consider Available Resources: Assess the resources at your disposal, including time, access to databases, and the volume of literature on your topic. Some review types may be more resource-intensive than others.
  • Alignment with Research Question: Ensure that the chosen review type aligns with your research question or hypothesis. Some types are better suited for answering specific research questions than others.
  • Scope and Depth: Determine the scope and depth of your review. For a broad overview, a narrative review might be suitable, while a systematic review is ideal for an in-depth analysis.
  • Consult with Advisors: Seek guidance from your academic advisors or mentors. They can provide valuable insights into which review type best fits your research goals and resources.
  • Consider Research Field Standards: Different academic fields have established standards and preferences for different forms of literature review. Familiarise yourself with what is common and accepted in your field.
  • Pilot Review: Consider conducting a small-scale pilot review of the literature to test the feasibility and suitability of your chosen review type before committing to a larger project.

Bonus Tip: Crafting an Effective Literature Review

Now, since you have learned all the literature review types and have understood which one to prefer, here are some bonus tips for you to structure a literature review of a dissertation .

  • Clearly Define Your Research Question: Start with a well-defined and focused research question to guide your literature review.
  • Thorough Search Strategy: Develop a comprehensive search strategy to ensure you capture all relevant literature.
  • Critical Evaluation: Assess the quality and credibility of the sources you include in your review.
  • Synthesise and Organise: Summarise the key findings and organise the literature into themes or categories.
  • Maintain a Systematic Approach: If conducting a systematic review, adhere to a predefined methodology and reporting guidelines.
  • Engage in Continuous Review: Regularly update your literature review to incorporate new research and maintain relevance.

Some Useful Tools And Resources For You

Effective literature reviews demand a range of tools and resources to streamline the process.

  • Reference management software like EndNote, Zotero, and Mendeley helps organise, store, and cite sources, saving time and ensuring accuracy.
  • Academic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science provide access to a vast array of scholarly articles, with advanced search and citation tracking features.
  • Research guides from universities and libraries offer tips and templates for structuring reviews.
  • Research networks like ResearchGate and Academia.edu facilitate collaboration and access to publications. Literature review templates and research workshops provide additional support.

Some Common Mistakes To Avoid

Avoid these common mistakes when crafting literature reviews.

  • Unclear research objectives result in unfocused reviews, so start with well-defined questions.
  • Biased source selection can compromise objectivity, so include diverse perspectives.
  • Never miss on referencing; proper citation and referencing are essential for academic integrity.
  • Don’t overlook older literature, which provides foundational insights.
  • Be mindful of scope creep, where the review drifts from the research question; stay disciplined to maintain focus and relevance.

While Summing Up On Various Types Of Literature Review

As we conclude this classification of fourteen distinct approaches to conduct literature reviews, it’s clear that the world of research offers a multitude of avenues for understanding, analysing, and contributing to existing knowledge.

Whether you’re a seasoned scholar or a student beginning your academic journey, the choice of review type should align with your research objectives and the nature of your topic. The versatility of these approaches empowers you to tailor your review to the demands of your project.

Remember, your research endeavours have the potential to shape the future of knowledge, so choose wisely and dive into the world of literature reviews with confidence and purpose. Happy reviewing!

Laura Brown

Laura Brown, a senior content writer who writes actionable blogs at Crowd Writer.

  • Research Guides
  • University Libraries
  • Advanced Research Topics

Common Paper Types

  • Literature Review
  • Scoping Review
  • Systematic Review
  • Author Profile

Understanding Literature Reviews 

I.  Getting Started with a Workshop Video  (Highly recommended!)

  • Searching for Literature Reviews: Before You Write, You Have to Find   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9la5ytz9MmM

          A lecture by the Writing Center, TAMU.

II.  What is a Literature Review?

  • Generally, the purpose of a review is to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge through summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles. <http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html>  
  •  A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.  < http://writingcenter.unc.edu/resources/handouts-demos/specific-writing-assignments/literature-reviews >  
  •  A literature review is a body of text that aims to review the critical points of current knowledge including substantive findings as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic...Its ultimate goal is to bring the reader up to date with current literature on a topic and forms the basis for another goal, such as future research that may be needed in the area. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature_review>

III.  What Major Steps Literature Reviews Require?

  • 1. Develop a review protocol. Protocols define the scope of studies that will be reviewed, the process through which studies will be identified, and the outcomes that will be examined. Protocols also specify the time period during which relevant studies will have been conducted, the outcomes to be examined in the review, and keyword strategies for the literature search. 2. Identify relevant studies, often through a systematic search of the literature. 3. Screen studies for relevance and the adequacy of study design, implementation, and reporting. 4. Retrieve and summarize information on the intervention studied, the study characteristics, and the study findings. 5. Combine findings within studies and across studies when relevant. < http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v2_1_standards_handbook.pdf>  
  • The basic stages in a typical research project are: i) identify your topic of interest, ii) perform a literature review, iii) generate related questions, iv) state your unsolved problem or hypothesis, v) find or develop a solution, and vi) document your results.  
  • The four stages required: Problem formulation—which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? Literature search—finding materials relevant to the subject being explored Data evaluation—determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic Analysis and interpretation—discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature < http://library.ucsc.edu/help/howto/write-a-literature-review#components >

IV.    What Basic Elements Comprise a Literature Review?   

  • An overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review
  • Division of works under review into categories (e.g. those in support of a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative theses entirely)
  • Explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others
  • Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research    

          < http://library.ucsc.edu/help/howto/write-a-literature-review#components > V.    Which Citation Tool Are You Going to Use to Manage the Search Results?

  •   Choose your citation tool before conducing your literature reviews. If you decide to use  RefWorks , the information can be found at  http://tamu.libguides.com/refworks .          

VII. Other Useful Guides

  • Literature Reviews (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
  • The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It
  • How to Write a Literature Review  (UCSC)
  • Learn how to write a review of literature  (WISC)
  • Reviewing the Literature
  • Next: Scoping Review >>
  • Last Updated: Aug 5, 2024 7:43 AM
  • URL: https://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=1415100

Banner

Literature Reviews: Types of Literature

  • Library Basics
  • 1. Choose Your Topic
  • How to Find Books
  • Types of Clinical Study Designs

Types of Literature

  • 3. Search the Literature
  • 4. Read & Analyze the Literature
  • 5. Write the Review
  • Keeping Track of Information
  • Style Guides
  • Books, Tutorials & Examples

Different types of publications have different characteristics.

Primary Literature Primary sources means original studies, based on direct observation, use of statistical records, interviews, or experimental methods, of actual practices or the actual impact of practices or policies. They are authored by researchers, contains original research data, and are usually published in a peer-reviewed journal. Primary literature may also include conference papers, pre-prints, or preliminary reports. Also called empirical research .

Secondary Literature Secondary literature consists of interpretations and evaluations that are derived from or refer to the primary source literature. Examples include review articles (such as meta-analysis and systematic reviews) and reference works. Professionals within each discipline take the primary literature and synthesize, generalize, and integrate new research.

Tertiary Literature Tertiary literature consists of a distillation and collection of primary and secondary sources such as textbooks, encyclopedia articles, and guidebooks or handbooks. The purpose of tertiary literature is to provide an overview of key research findings and an introduction to principles and practices within the discipline.

Adapted from the Information Services Department of the Library of the Health Sciences-Chicago , University of Illinois at Chicago.

Original research results in journals,
dissertations, conference proceedings, correspondence

Review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, practice guidelines, monographs on a specific subject

Textbooks, encyclopedias, handbooks, newspapers

Sources: NEJM, JAMA Sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Williams Obstetrics, Hurst's The Heart Sources:  Gale Encyclopedia of Genetic Disorders, Oxford Handbook of Internal Medicine

Types of Scientific Publications

These examples and descriptions of publication types will give you an idea of how to use various works and why you would want to write a particular kind of paper.

  • Scholarly article aka empirical article
  • Review article
  • Conference paper

Scholarly (aka empirical) article -- example

Empirical studies use data derived from observation or experiment. Original research papers (also called primary research articles) that describe empirical studies and their results are published in academic journals.  Articles that report empirical research contain different sections which relate to the steps of the scientific method.

      Abstract - The abstract provides a very brief summary of the research.

     Introduction - The introduction sets the research in a context, which provides a review of related research and develops the hypotheses for the research.

     Method - The method section describes how the research was conducted.

     Results - The results section describes the outcomes of the study.

     Discussion - The discussion section contains the interpretations and implications of the study.

     References - A references section lists the articles, books, and other material cited in the report.

Review article -- example

A review article summarizes a particular field of study and places the recent research in context. It provides an overview and is an excellent introduction to a subject area. The references used in a review article are helpful as they lead to more in-depth research.

Many databases have limits or filters to search for review articles. You can also search by keywords like review article, survey, overview, summary, etc.

Conference proceedings, abstracts and reports -- example

Conference proceedings, abstracts and reports are not usually peer-reviewed.  A conference article is similar to a scholarly article insofar as it is academic. Conference articles are published much more quickly than scholarly articles. You can find conference papers in many of the same places as scholarly articles.

How Do You Identify Empirical Articles?

To identify an article based on empirical research, look for the following characteristics:

     The article is published in a peer-reviewed journal .

     The article includes charts, graphs, or statistical analysis .

     The article is substantial in size , likely to be more than 5 pages long.

     The article contains the following parts (the exact terms may vary): abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, references .

  • << Previous: Types of Clinical Study Designs
  • Next: 3. Search the Literature >>
  • Last Updated: Dec 29, 2023 11:41 AM
  • URL: https://research.library.gsu.edu/litrev

Share

Home

  • Duke NetID Login
  • 919.660.1100
  • Duke Health Badge: 24-hour access
  • Accounts & Access
  • Databases, Journals & Books
  • Request & Reserve
  • Training & Consulting
  • Request Articles & Books
  • Renew Online
  • Reserve Spaces
  • Reserve a Locker
  • Study & Meeting Rooms
  • Course Reserves
  • Pay Fines/Fees
  • Recommend a Purchase
  • Access From Off Campus
  • Building Access
  • Computers & Equipment
  • Wifi Access
  • My Accounts
  • Mobile Apps
  • Known Access Issues
  • Report an Access Issue
  • All Databases
  • Article Databases
  • Basic Sciences
  • Clinical Sciences
  • Dissertations & Theses
  • Drugs, Chemicals & Toxicology
  • Grants & Funding
  • Interprofessional Education
  • Non-Medical Databases
  • Search for E-Journals
  • Search for Print & E-Journals
  • Search for E-Books
  • Search for Print & E-Books
  • E-Book Collections
  • Biostatistics
  • Global Health
  • MBS Program
  • Medical Students
  • MMCi Program
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Path Asst Program
  • Physical Therapy
  • Researchers
  • Community Partners

Conducting Research

  • Archival & Historical Research
  • Black History at Duke Health
  • Data Analytics & Viz Software
  • Data: Find and Share
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • NIH Public Access Policy Compliance
  • Publication Metrics
  • Qualitative Research
  • Searching Animal Alternatives

Systematic Reviews

  • Test Instruments

Using Databases

  • JCR Impact Factors
  • Web of Science

Finding & Accessing

  • COVID-19: Core Clinical Resources
  • Health Literacy
  • Health Statistics & Data
  • Library Orientation

Writing & Citing

  • Creating Links
  • Getting Published
  • Reference Mgmt
  • Scientific Writing

Meet a Librarian

  • Request a Consultation
  • Find Your Liaisons
  • Register for a Class
  • Request a Class
  • Self-Paced Learning

Search Services

  • Literature Search
  • Systematic Review
  • Animal Alternatives (IACUC)
  • Research Impact

Citation Mgmt

  • Other Software

Scholarly Communications

  • About Scholarly Communications
  • Publish Your Work
  • Measure Your Research Impact
  • Engage in Open Science
  • Libraries and Publishers
  • Directions & Maps
  • Floor Plans

Library Updates

  • Annual Snapshot
  • Conference Presentations
  • Contact Information
  • Gifts & Donations
  • What is a Systematic Review?

Types of Reviews

  • Manuals and Reporting Guidelines
  • Our Service
  • 1. Assemble Your Team
  • 2. Develop a Research Question
  • 3. Write and Register a Protocol
  • 4. Search the Evidence
  • 5. Screen Results
  • 6. Assess for Quality and Bias
  • 7. Extract the Data
  • 8. Write the Review
  • Additional Resources
  • Finding Full-Text Articles

Review Typologies

There are many types of evidence synthesis projects, including systematic reviews as well as others. The selection of review type is wholly dependent on the research question. Not all research questions are well-suited for systematic reviews.

  • Review Typologies (from LITR-EX) This site explores different review methodologies such as, systematic, scoping, realist, narrative, state of the art, meta-ethnography, critical, and integrative reviews. The LITR-EX site has a health professions education focus, but the advice and information is widely applicable.

Review the table to peruse review types and associated methodologies. Librarians can also help your team determine which review type might be appropriate for your project. 

Reproduced from Grant, M. J. and Booth, A. (2009), A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26: 91-108.  doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Aims to demonstrate writer has extensively researched literature and critically evaluated its quality. Goes beyond mere description to include degree of analysis and conceptual innovation. Typically results in hypothesis or mode

Seeks to identify most significant items in the field

No formal quality assessment. Attempts to evaluate according to contribution

Typically narrative, perhaps conceptual or chronological

Significant component: seeks to identify conceptual contribution to embody existing or derive new theory

Generic term: published materials that provide examination of recent or current literature. Can cover wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness. May include research findings

May or may not include comprehensive searching

May or may not include quality assessment

Typically narrative

Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc.

Map out and categorize existing literature from which to commission further reviews and/or primary research by identifying gaps in research literature

Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints

No formal quality assessment

May be graphical and tabular

Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. May identify need for primary or secondary research

Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results

Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching. May use funnel plot to assess completeness

Quality assessment may determine inclusion/ exclusion and/or sensitivity analyses

Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary

Numerical analysis of measures of effect assuming absence of heterogeneity

Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies

Requires either very sensitive search to retrieve all studies or separately conceived quantitative and qualitative strategies

Requires either a generic appraisal instrument or separate appraisal processes with corresponding checklists

Typically both components will be presented as narrative and in tables. May also employ graphical means of integrating quantitative and qualitative studies

Analysis may characterise both literatures and look for correlations between characteristics or use gap analysis to identify aspects absent in one literature but missing in the other

Generic term: summary of the [medical] literature that attempts to survey the literature and describe its characteristics

May or may not include comprehensive searching (depends whether systematic overview or not)

May or may not include quality assessment (depends whether systematic overview or not)

Synthesis depends on whether systematic or not. Typically narrative but may include tabular features

Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc.

Method for integrating or comparing the findings from qualitative studies. It looks for ‘themes’ or ‘constructs’ that lie in or across individual qualitative studies

May employ selective or purposive sampling

Quality assessment typically used to mediate messages not for inclusion/exclusion

Qualitative, narrative synthesis

Thematic analysis, may include conceptual models

Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research

Completeness of searching determined by time constraints

Time-limited formal quality assessment

Typically narrative and tabular

Quantities of literature and overall quality/direction of effect of literature

Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research)

Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. May include research in progress

No formal quality assessment

Typically tabular with some narrative commentary

Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. Attempts to specify a viable review

Tend to address more current matters in contrast to other combined retrospective and current approaches. May offer new perspectives

Aims for comprehensive searching of current literature

No formal quality assessment

Typically narrative, may have tabular accompaniment

Current state of knowledge and priorities for future investigation and research

Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review

Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching

Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion

Typically narrative with tabular accompaniment

What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; uncertainty around findings, recommendations for future research

Combines strengths of critical review with a comprehensive search process. Typically addresses broad questions to produce ‘best evidence synthesis’

Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching

May or may not include quality assessment

Minimal narrative, tabular summary of studies

What is known; recommendations for practice. Limitations

Attempt to include elements of systematic review process while stopping short of systematic review. Typically conducted as postgraduate student assignment

May or may not include comprehensive searching

May or may not include quality assessment

Typically narrative with tabular accompaniment

What is known; uncertainty around findings; limitations of methodology

Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. Focuses on broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results

Identification of component reviews, but no search for primary studies

Quality assessment of studies within component reviews and/or of reviews themselves

Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary

What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; recommendations for future research

  • << Previous: What is a Systematic Review?
  • Next: Manuals and Reporting Guidelines >>
  • Last Updated: Jun 18, 2024 9:41 AM
  • URL: https://guides.mclibrary.duke.edu/sysreview
  • Duke Health
  • Duke University
  • Duke Libraries
  • Medical Center Archives
  • Duke Directory
  • Seeley G. Mudd Building
  • 10 Searle Drive
  • [email protected]

Systematic Reviews: Methods & Resources

  • Methods & Resources
  • Protocol & Registration
  • Search Strategy
  • Where to Search
  • Study selection and appraisal
  • Data Extraction, Study Characteristics, Results
  • Reporting the quality/risk of bias
  • PRISMA Reporting Items
  • Manage citations using RefWorks This link opens in a new window
  • Covidence Guide This link opens in a new window

Many organizations have created guidelines to standardize reporting of analytical research. See some of the main ones below. The NIH offers a useful chart of Research Reporting Guidelines , and you can find over 500 on the EQUATOR network

  • PRISMA Guidelines Gold-standard guideline on how to perform and write-up a systematic review and/or meta-analysis of the outcomes reported in multiple clinical trials of therapeutic interventions
  • AHRQ's Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews
  • Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews Campbell, M. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ, 368. Guideline on how to analyze evidence for a narrative review, to provide a recommendation based on heterogenous study types
  • Methods Manual for Community Guide Systematic Reviews Community Preventive Services Task Force (2021). The Methods Manual for Community Guide Systematic Reviews. (Public Health Prevention systematic review guidelines)
  • Planning Worksheet for Structured Literature Reviews Cornell University Library (2019). A basic framework for a literature review.
  • STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement
  • MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies Brooke BS, Schwartz TA, Pawlik TM. MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(8):787–788. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0522

Tools and Guidance

  • Right Review Flowchart to help you choose the proper review methodology for your project
  • Systematic Review Accelerator Catalog of tools that support various tasks within the systematic review and wider evidence synthesis process. Tools include the 'Polyglot Search Translator'.
  • Institute of Medicine. (2011). Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies
  • Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2022)
  • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
  • Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis Provides guidance on how to analyze both quantitative and qualitative research
  • Cochrane Qualitative & Implementation Methods Group. (2019). Training resources.
  • Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019). Health information and libraries journal, 36(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276
  • Studying a Study and Testing a Test: Reading Evidence-based Health Research Riegelman, R. K., & Nelson, B. A. (2021). 7th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health. Textbook that describes quantitative statistical methods used in health sciences research

Software tools for systematic reviews

  • Covidence Available for free to GW affiliates, this is a popular tool for facilitating screening decisions, used by the Cochrane Collaboration. Register for an account.
  • Statistical software available at Himmelfarb SPSS, SAS, Stata, NVivo, Atlas.ti, and MATLAB
  • RedCAP Software to create survey forms for research or data collection or data extraction.
  • SRDR tool from AHRQ Free, web-based and has a training environment, tutorials, and example templates of systematic review data extraction forms
  • RevMan 5 ReviewManager (RevMan) is Cochrane's bespoke software for writing Cochrane Reviews.
  • Rayyan Free, web-based tool for collecting and screening citations. It has options to screen with multiple people, masking each other.
  • GradePro Free, web application to create, manage and share summaries of research evidence (called Evidence Profiles and Summary of Findings Tables) for reviews or guidelines, uses the GRADE criteria to evaluate each paper under review.
  • DistillerSR Needs subscription. Create coded data extraction forms from templates.
  • EPPI Reviewer Needs subscription. Like DistillerSR, tool for text mining, data clustering, classification and term extraction
  • SUMARI Needs subscription. Qualitative data analysis.
  • Dedoose Needs subscription. Qualitative data analysis, similar to NVIVO in that it can be used to code interview transcripts, identify word co-occurence, cloud based.

Forest Plot Generators

  • Meta-Essentials a free set of workbooks designed for Microsoft Excel that, based on your input, automatically produce meta-analyses including Forest Plots. Produced for Erasmus University Rotterdam joint research institute.
  • Neyeloff, Fuchs & Moreira Another set of Excel worksheets and instructions to generate a Forest Plot. Published as Neyeloff, J.L., Fuchs, S.C. & Moreira, L.B. Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes 5, 52 (2012). https://doi-org.proxygw.wrlc.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-52
  • For R programmers instructions are at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/forestplot/vignettes/forestplot.html and you can download the R code package from https://github.com/gforge/forestplot
  • << Previous: Home
  • Next: Protocol & Registration >>

Creative Commons License

  • Last Updated: Aug 8, 2024 1:07 PM
  • URL: https://guides.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/systematic_review

GW logo

  • Himmelfarb Intranet
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • GW is committed to digital accessibility. If you experience a barrier that affects your ability to access content on this page, let us know via the Accessibility Feedback Form .
  • Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library
  • 2300 Eye St., NW, Washington, DC 20037
  • Phone: (202) 994-2962
  • [email protected]
  • https://himmelfarb.gwu.edu

Introduction to Systematic Reviews

In this guide.

  • Introduction
  • Types of Reviews
  • Systematic Review Process
  • Protocols & Guidelines
  • Data Extraction and Screening
  • Resources & Tools

Before You Start Checklist

Are you ready to carry out a knowledge synthesis project such as a systematic review, meta-analysis, or scoping review? Remember that systematic reviews require:

  • a team to carry out screening, extraction, and critical appraisal methods
  • a significant amount of time to complete
  • enough high quality studies to make a systematic review feasible
  • a rigorous protocol (that should be registered)
  • adherence to transparent and rigorous methods
  • a strong project management component with defined goals, responsibilities, deliverables, and timelines 
  • financial resources to complete the project 

What Review Is Right For You?

If you're unsure what type of knowledge synthesis best suits your research purposes, follow along this flowchart or complete this short quiz to find your personalized review methodologies: https://whatreviewisrightforyou.knowledgetranslation.net/

types of research literature review

Reproduced from  "What type of review could you write?" Yale Medical Library. 

Types of Knowledge Syntheses

Conducting effective reviews is essential to advance the knowledge and understand the breadth of research on a topic; synthesize existing evidence; develop theories or provide a conceptual background for subsequent research; and identify research gaps. However, there are over 100 different kinds of reviews to choose from. The following provides a comparison of common review types.

Generic term: published materials that provide an examination of recent or current literature. Can cover a wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness. May include research findings

May or may not include comprehensive

searching

May or may not include quality

assessment

Typically narrative

Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc.

Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesize research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review

Aims for exhaustive,

Comprehensive searching

Quality assessment

may determine

inclusion/exclusion

Typically narrative

with tabular

accompaniment

What is known; recommendations

for practice. What remains unknown; uncertainty around findings, recommendations for

future research

Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results

Aims for exhaustive searching. May use funnel plot to assess completeness

Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion and/or sensitivity analyses

Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary

Numerical analysis of measures of effect assuming absence of heterogeneity

Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify the nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research)

Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. May include research in progress

No formal quality assessment

Typically tabular with some narrative commentary

Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. Attempts to specify a viable review

Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context, it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies

Requires either very sensitive search to retrieve all studies or separately conceived quantitative and qualitative strategies

Requires either a generic appraisal instrument or separate appraisal processes with corresponding checklists

Typically both components will be presented as narrative and in tables. May also employ graphical means of integrating quantitative and qualitative studies

Analysis may characterize both works of literature and look for correlations between characteristics or use gap analysis to identify aspects absent in one literature but missing in the other

Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. Focuses on a broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results

Identification of component reviews, but no search for primary studies

Quality assessment of studies within component reviews and/or of reviews themselves

Graphical and tabular with narrative commentary

What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; recommendations for future research

Reproduced from Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26 (2), 91-108. DOI: 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2009.00848.X

Fifty Shades of Review - Dr Andrew Booth from ScHARR Library on Youtube .

Books on Knowledge Synthesis

Cover Art

  • Finding What Works in Health Care by Jill Eden (Editor); Laura Levit (Editor); Alfred Berg (Editor); Sally Morton (Editor); Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research; Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services Staff ISBN: 0309164257 Publication Date: 2011

Cover Art

  • << Previous: Introduction
  • Next: Systematic Review Process >>
  • Last Updated: Jul 31, 2024 1:44 PM
  • URL: https://laneguides.stanford.edu/systematicreviews
  • UNC Libraries
  • Course Guides
  • ENGL105 - Scholarly Articles 101

Types of Scholarly Articles

Engl105 - scholarly articles 101: types of scholarly articles.

  • Peer-review
  • Other Types of Sources

Research Articles

Review articles, tips & practice.

  • How to Read a Scholarly Article
  • Extend Your Knowledge

Sometimes a professor might ask you to find original research or may ask you to not use literature reviews/systematic reviews as sources, but what do those terms mean? How can we tell if our potential source meets our professor's criteria?

In a research article, an original study is conducted by the authors. They collect and analyze data, sharing their methods and results, and then draw conclusions from their analysis. The kind of study performed can vary (surveys, interviews, experiments, etc.), but in all cases, data is analyzed and a new argument is put forth. Research articles are considered primary sources.

  • Note: research articles will often contain a section titled "literature review" - this is a section that looks at other existing research as a foundation for their new idea. Simply seeing the words "literature review" does not automatically mean an article is a review article- it is important to look closer

Below is a screenshot of the abstract of the article Effectiveness of Health Coaching in Diabetes Control and Lifestyle Improvement: A Randomized-Controlled Trial , with some words underlined that let us know that a study was conducted and that this is a research article.

A screenshot of an abstract. The words "study," "controlled trial," "114 diabetic patients," "6-month period," "intervention group" are underlined

A review article gathers multiple research articles on a certain topic, summarizing and analyzing the arguments made in those articles. A review article might highlight patterns or gaps in the research, might show support for existing theories, or suggest new directions for research, but does not conduct original research on a subject. Review articles can be a great place to get an overview of the existing research on a subject. A review article is a secondary source.

  • Looking in the reference section of a literature or systematic review can be a good place to find original research studies.

Below is a screenshot of the abstract of the article The Effect of Dietary Glycaemic Index on Glycaemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , with words underlined that clue us in that this is a review article.

A screenshot of an abstract. The words "systematic review," "meta-analysis," "selected from a number of databases" are underlined

Tips for identifying article type

Start by looking at the abstract to determine if a source might be a research article or a review article. If you're not sure after looking at the abstract, find the methods section for the source - what methods did the authors use? If they mention searching databases, it's most likely a review and if they mention conducting an experiment, survey, interview, etc., it's most likely a research article. If you're still unsure, feel free to reach out to a librarian and ask ! 

Let's Practice

Below are two different scholarly articles. Look at the abstract and the methods section- Which one is an original research study? Which one is a literature review?

  • Article 1- Research or Review?
  • Article 2- Research or Review?

Research & Instruction Associate

Profile Photo

  • << Previous: Anatomy of a Scholarly Article
  • Next: How to Read a Scholarly Article >>
  • Last Updated: Aug 7, 2024 2:00 PM
  • URL: https://guides.lib.unc.edu/scholarly-articles-101
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 August 2024

Literature review of complementary and alternative therapies: using text mining and analysis of trends in nursing research

  • Jihye Nam   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-2660 1 ,
  • Hyejin Lee   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-0560 1 ,
  • Seunghyeon Lee   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-6411-364X 1 &
  • Hyojung Park   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-0593 1  

BMC Nursing volume  23 , Article number:  526 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

264 Accesses

Metrics details

This study aimed to review the literature on complementary and alternative therapies, utilizing text mining and trend analysis in nursing research. As CAM becomes increasingly prevalent in healthcare settings, a comprehensive understanding of the current research landscape is essential to guide evidence-based practice, inform clinical decision-making, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

This study aimed to identify CAM-related literature published from 2018 to 2023. Using the search terms 'complementary therap*', 'complementary medicine', 'alternative therap*', and 'alternative medicine', we performed a comprehensive search in eight databases, including EMBASE, Cochrane Central, PubMed Central, Korea Education and Research Information Service (RISS), Web of Science, KMbase, KISS, and CINAHL. From the text network and topic modeling analysis of 66,490 documents, 15 topics were identified. These topics were classified into two nursing-related topics through an academic classification process involving three doctors with doctoral degrees, three nurses, and three pharmacists. Based on the classified topics, research trends were comparatively analyzed by re-searching the database for 12 nursing and 22 non-nursing literature.

This study found that in nursing literature, yoga is used to improve mental symptoms such as stress and anxiety. In non-nursing literature, most of the experimental studies on complementary and alternative therapies were conducted in a randomized manner, confirming that a variety of physiological and objective indicators were used. Additionally, it was discovered that there were differences in the diversity of research subjects and research design methods for the same intervention method. Therefore, future research should focus on broadening the scope of subjects and measurement tools in nursing studies. Additionally, such studies should be conducted with randomization and generalizability in the experimental design in mind.

This study employed text network analysis and text mining to identify domestic and international CAM research trends. Our novel approach combined big data-derived keywords with a systematic classification method, proposing a new methodological strategy for trend analysis. Future nursing research should focus on broadening the scope of subjects, diversifying measurement tools, and emphasizing randomization and generalizability in experimental designs.

Peer Review reports

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as healthcare practices outside a country's traditional or conventional medicine [ 1 ]. According to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), CAM encompasses nutritional approaches (e.g., herbs), psychological methods (e.g., mindfulness), physical therapies (e.g., massage), integrated mind–body practices (e.g., yoga or auricular acupressure), and modalities that combine psychology and nutrition [ 2 ]. This definition suggests CAM may facilitate holistic nursing by addressing both psychological and physical aspects [ 3 ]. Consequently, substantial CAM research is conducted in nursing internationally [ 4 , 5 ], spanning areas like pain, depression, anxiety, chronic disease symptoms, sleep disturbances, and vomiting [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Classification systems exist, with the Korean Nursing Association (2023) delineating 12 CAM subcategories [ 6 ] and NCCIH outlining 76 therapies across major categories like nutrition, body, and psychotherapies [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. The multitude of CAM types has prompted trend identification research, including reviews on Chinese medicine for allergic rhinitis, aromatherapy, auricular acupressure, and CAM for COVID-19 [ 6 , 8 ]. However, many previous studies have significant limitations in comprehensively identifying overall research trends in CAM. First, they tend to focus narrowly on specific diseases or treatments, lacking a broader perspective on the field as a whole [ 6 , 8 ]. Second, the use of search queries containing keywords from a specific discipline or arbitrarily selected by researchers introduces bias and hinders the identification of overarching trends [ 9 , 10 ]. These limitations highlight the need for a more systematic and data-driven approach to analyzing CAM research trends [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. A previous study [ 14 , 15 ] suggested the use of text mining technique as an approach for literature review [ 16 ]. To date, the analysis on research trend in nursing has been conducted more than five years after publication or has only been conducted with partial analyses through literature reviews and text mining [ 17 , 18 , 19 ].

The overarching goal was to extract keywords identifying domestic and international CAM research trends using text network analysis and analyze these trends within the nursing field. Specific objectives were: 1) Identify frequency, degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality for keywords appearing in domestic and international CAM studies; 2) Identify key themes within these studies; 3) Discern nursing keywords among sub-topic groups; 4) Analyze and compare nursing and other disciplinary literature based on findings; and 5) Analyze the trend of CAM in nursing based on extracted nursing keywords.

Study design and methodological framework

This study employs a novel methodological framework that combines text mining techniques with expert validation to identify and analyze CAM research trends in a comprehensive and data-driven manner. The framework consists of the following key steps.

Data collection: A comprehensive search of multiple databases is conducted to collect a broad range of CAM-related literature across various disciplines.

Text preprocessing involves several techniques to prepare the data for analysis. These include natural language processing, stopword removal, and synonym standardization.

Keyword extraction and network analysis: Text mining techniques, including term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and centrality analysis, are applied to extract key topics and analyze their relationships within the literature.

Topic modeling: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is used to identify latent topics within the literature and visualize their proportions and relationships.

Expert validation: An expert panel of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists is consulted to validate the relevance and credibility of the identified topics and classify them into respective academic fields.

Focused literature analysis: Based on the expert-validated nursing-related topics, a focused re-search and analysis of the literature are conducted to identify trends specific to nursing research on CAM.

This multi-step framework allows for a more comprehensive and less biased exploration of CAM research trends by leveraging text mining techniques to process large volumes of literature, identify key topics, and uncover patterns that may not be apparent through traditional review methods [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The integration of expert validation ensures the relevance and credibility of the findings, while the focused analysis of nursing literature provides insights specific to the nursing discipline within the broader context of CAM research. The process of selecting studies for our analysis is illustrated in Fig.  1 , which provides a clear visual representation of the key steps involved, from the initial database search to the final classification of studies into nursing and other disciplines. This multi-step approach, combined with the visual aid, enhances the clarity and transparency of our methodology, allowing readers to better understand and contextualize the subsequent data analysis steps.

figure 1

Flow diagram for literature selection process

Literature selection

This study focused on complementary and alternative medicine studies conducted in the fields of medicine, public health, and nursing in Korea and abroad. After specifying the research title and abstract as the search scope to extract the literature and build a database, the literature related to nursing was classified based on the topics derived through text network analysis and then, the literature that met the selection criteria was secondarily extracted and analyzed through the abstract screening. The three researchers checked the consistency of the study selection process and if there was any discrepancy, the final decision was made through consensus among the researchers.

The selection criteria for the literature were: (1) domestic and foreign studies published within the last five years (January 2018 to September 2023) that conducted studies on complementary and alternative medicine; and

The exclusion criteria for the literature were grey literatures, dissertations, and studies for which original texts are not available.

Data collection strategies

In this study, the database was selected by referring to the COSI (Core, Standard, Ideal) [ 20 ] model presented by the National Library of Medicine for literature search. EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and PubMed Central were selected as the core databases.

On the other hand, the standard databases selected were the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); and Korean database services such as the Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), KMbase, and Korean studies Information Service System (KISS). These Korean databases were included to ensure a comprehensive coverage of potentially relevant studies published in South Korea, as they index a wide range of domestic and international journals, conference proceedings, and dissertations across various disciplines, including those related to CAM. However, it is important to note that the inclusion of these Korean databases does not limit the scope of our study to Korean literature only, as the majority of our analysis focuses on studies published in English and indexed in the core and standard international databases.

In addition, the Web of Science was selected to include a wider range of literature for the ideal database, and the period of literature search focused on the last five years, from 1 January 2018 to 15 September 2023. to capture the most recent trends in CAM research following the last comprehensive analysis of CAM research trends conducted in 2018 by Sung et al. [ 19 ]. This time frame was chosen to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis of CAM research trends, building upon the findings of previous studies and identifying new patterns and areas of focus that have emerged in recent years, given the rapid evolution of CAM research and the increasing integration of CAM into mainstream healthcare.

The data collection procedure was limited for both domestic and foreign studies. In case of foreign studies, ‘English’ was limited as the search language, ‘abstract and title’ were identified as the field, ‘article’ was set as the document form, and the keywords were ‘complementary therap*,’ ‘complementary medicine,’ ‘alternative therap*,’ and ‘alternative medicine.’ For the Korean studies, ‘Korean’ was limited as the search language, ‘abstract and title’ were identified as the field, ‘article’ was set as the document form, and the search keywords used were ‘보완대체,’ ‘대체요법,’ and ‘대체의학.’ In searching for the secondary literature, studies in the field of nursing were presented to a group of nine experts including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists with a master's degree or higher, and then the relevant areas were classified to extract the keywords. These keywords were then used in the text mining search. Topic words, the majority of which were classified as nursing, were re-searched in the collected database. The literature selection and classification process were carried out independently by three researchers and promoted through discussions between the researchers.

Data analysis process

Data extraction.

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across eight databases: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, KISS, Kmbase, PubMed, RISS, and Web of Science. This extensive search yielded a total of 77,062 studies. To ensure the integrity and non-redundancy of our dataset, we employed a rigorous two-step deduplication process. First, we utilized the 'Find Duplicates' function in EndNote software for initial automatic deduplication. This function systematically identifies and groups potential duplicate records based on shared metadata such as title, authors, year, and DOI. Through this automated process, 12,107 duplicate records were identified and removed.

Following the automated process, we conducted a manual review to identify and remove any remaining duplicates that the software might have missed. This careful manual screening allowed us to catch subtle duplicates that automated systems might overlook, such as those with slight variations in titles or author names. Through this manual review, an additional 465 duplicate records were identified and removed. In total, our rigorous two-step deduplication process resulted in the removal of 12,572 duplicate records. Of these, 12,107 were removed through automated deduplication and 465 through manual review. After deduplication, 64,490 unique studies were retained for further analysis. These studies were systematically organized by title and subjected to a thorough text preprocessing phase. During this phase, unstructured words were sorted and cleaned using the social networking program Netminer 4.3.3 and text editor Notepad + + (version 8.5.8).

Also, stopwords such as pronouns, adverbs, and numbers were deleted through natural language processing, while exception list, defined words, and thesaurus were registered. The exception list and thesaurus were selected by the three researchers, and if they failed to reach a unanimous agreement, the keywords were refined through consultation and the abstracts and preambles were reviewed again to examine the context in which the words were used. In case of the exception list, literature search keywords or stopwords such as pronouns, adverbs, numbers, and special symbols were considered, while ‘complementary,’ ‘medicine,’ ‘alternative,’ ‘therapeutic,’ ‘therapy,’ ‘therap,’ ‘therapies,’ ‘the,’ ‘a,’ ‘and,’ ‘of,’ ‘for,’ ‘in,’ ‘to,’ and ‘among’ were excluded. Special symbols like ‘’,:'"()&-?# <  >  + "",‘ were excluded as well. As for defined words, ‘cells → cell,’ ‘effects → effect,’ ‘staphylococcus aureus → staphylococcus,’ ‘aureus → staphylococcus,’ ‘characteristics → characterization,’ ‘efficacy → effect,’ ‘rat → mice,’ ‘radio → radiation,’ ‘systems → system,’ ‘agents → agent,’ ‘activity → activation,’ ‘carcinoma → cancer,’ ‘cases → case,’ ‘mouse → mice,’ ‘practices → practice,’ ‘radio sensitization → radiation,’ ‘years → year,’ ‘α → alpha,’ and ‘β → beta’ were selected, and data sorting for synonyms was performed. As a result of the analysis, a database consisting of 464,625 words was constructed.

Data analysis

In this study, text mining and topic modeling analysis were employed using textom and RStudio (4.3) to identify keywords related to CAM. Word analysis, TF-IDF, and degree centrality analysis were performed through text mining, with results presented via visualization. TF-IDF determines if a keyword holds actual significance within a document, as words with high TF and TF-IDF values appear frequently and are more likely keywords or important terms [ 21 , 22 ]. Following previous studies [ 22 , 23 ], the minimum word length was set to two, with the top 20 words extracted per topic. Text network analysis created word networks expressing co-occurrence frequency as links [ 24 ]. To gauge word occurrence frequency, words were converted to word-word one-mode, and degree centrality analysis identified highly influential network words. The results of these analyses, including frequency, TF-IDF, degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality of core keywords, can be found in Table 1 .

This study utilized Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic modeling, a statistical method that estimates the probability distribution of topics within documents based on the Document Term Matrix (DTM). Following established practices in the literature, we set the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameters to alpha = 1.44, beta = 0.001, and iterations = 1,000 [ 25 ]. To determine the optimal number of topics, we iteratively tested configurations ranging from 1 to 20 topics. Through a combination of silhouette clustering analysis and researcher consensus, we identified that a 15-topic model best represented the research trends in our corpus.

LDA visualization indicated that larger topic sizes represented greater proportions within the analyzed studies [ 25 ]. We confirmed that the ideal number of topics, where topics do not overlap and have distinct boundaries, is 15, as shown in Fig.  2 . To validate the relevance and credibility of the topic modeling results, we consulted an expert panel consisting of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists with master's or doctoral degrees. The panel members were asked to classify the 15 derived topics into their respective academic fields. Based on the survey results, two topics (Topics 4 and 7) were identified as nursing-related, with the majority of the expert panel categorizing them as such.

figure 2

LDA topic modeling visualization

Using the words from these two nursing-related topics, a keyword search was conducted within the database to identify the final set of literature containing these terms. The selected literature was then classified as either nursing-related or non-nursing-related based on the following criteria: (1) the study was published by a nursing school or department, (2) the authors were nurses or nursing researchers, (3) the authors were hospital-affiliated nurses, or (4) the study was published in a nursing journal. The classification process was carried out independently by three authors, and the final categorization was determined through a verification process among them.

Literature review

After the three researchers re-searched the database built based on the sub-words of the extracted topics, a total of 35 articles were selected, including 13 nursing-related literatures and 22 other discipline-related literatures. The sub-words used for the re-search were derived from Topic 4 and Topic 7 in Table 2  and were classified using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework. The population-related sub-words included 'patient,' 'students,' and 'nursing.' The intervention-related sub-words were 'yoga,' 'treatment,' 'radiation,' 'acupuncture,' 'education,' and 'cam.' The comparison-related sub-word was 'placebo,' and the outcome-related sub-words included 'anxiety,' 'depression,' 'symptoms,' 'knowledge,' 'attitudes,' and 'perceptions.' These PICO-classified sub-words were used to conduct the database re-search.

In order to examine the research trends in nursing and other related fields, general characteristics (author, country of publication, year of publication) and research characteristics (research design model, statistical method, research subject, intervention method, outcome variable, measurement instruments) were identified, presented, and compared. Meanwhile, the three researchers independently prepared a characteristic table to ensure the accuracy of the extracted contents and if there was any discrepancy, one data was selected through the discussion process until a consensus was reached and a characteristic table was constructed.

To assess the quality of the selected studies, we employed the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), a concise tool designed to evaluate various study designs, including qualitative, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies, quantitative descriptive studies, and mixed methods studies [ 26 ]. This comprehensive tool allowed us to systematically evaluate the methodological rigor of our diverse selection of studies. Each study was evaluated against five MMAT criteria specific to its design, focusing on aspects such as research question appropriateness, data collection methods, and result interpretation. Our assessment revealed varying levels of methodological quality. Among nursing studies (A1-A12), 25% were high quality (5/5 criteria met), 58.3% moderate quality (4/5 criteria), and 16.7% low quality (3/5 criteria). Importantly, all included studies met at least 3 out of the 5 MMAT criteria, indicating an overall moderate to high quality across the selected literature. This suggests that the studies included in our analysis provide a reliable foundation for drawing conclusions. Studies that did not meet all criteria were carefully reviewed, and their potential limitations were considered when interpreting their findings. The MMAT provided a useful overview of study quality and was deemed suitable for assessing methodological rigor while maintaining the feasibility of our analysis. This approach ensured a balanced and nuanced interpretation of the evidence in the field of complementary and alternative medicine. The detailed results of this quality assessment can be found in Tables 3  and 4 .

Data collection and ethical considerations

Since the data used in this study did not contain information that can identify individuals, the study was conducted after obtaining an IRB approval (IRB No: ewha-202311–0008-01) from the Institutional Review Board of Ewha Womans University.

Analysis of word frequency and centrality

The frequency and percentage of the top 20 words related to complementary and alternative medicine are shown in Table 1 . The frequency and percentage of the top 20 words related to complementary and alternative medicine are shown in Table 1 . The table presents the top 20 keywords ranked by frequency, TF-IDF, degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality. The frequency column indicates the number of times each keyword appears in the analyzed documents, while the TF-IDF column represents the importance of each keyword within the entire document set. Degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality are network analysis measures that indicate the importance and influence of each keyword within the text network. The words with the highest frequency included ‘cell’ (7,653 times), ‘patient’ (6,910 times), ‘treatment’ (6,851 times), ‘cancer’ (6,722 times), ‘study’ (6,295 times), and ‘effect’ (6,203 times). The words with the highest values of TF-IDF, in order, were ‘cell,’ ‘effect,’ ‘cancer,’ ‘patient,’ ‘treatment,’ and ‘study.’ As a result of centrality analysis, the top six common words, in order, were ‘effect,’ ‘treatment,’ ‘study,’ ‘analysis,’ ‘disease,’ and ‘approach.’ Except for common words, the words with the highest values in the centrality analysis, in order, were ‘model,’ ‘patient,’ ‘activation,’ and ‘use.’ The words with the highest values for closeness centrality were ‘factor,’ ‘model,’ ‘patient,’ and ‘activation,’ while the words with the highest values for betweenness centrality were ‘factor,’ ‘model,’ ‘type,’ and ‘activation.’

Results of the topic modeling

The LDA visualization provides insights into the relative importance and distinctiveness of identified topics. In this visualization, the size of each topic circle is proportional to its prevalence within the analyzed corpus, with larger circles indicating topics that are more frequently discussed across the literature. Interestingly, we observed that some topics, despite being represented by smaller circles, were positioned at considerable distances from other topics. This spatial separation suggests that these topics, while perhaps less prevalent, possess high discriminant validity and represent distinct thematic areas within the field of complementary and alternative medicine research. This interpretation is consistent with established principles in topic modeling, where spatial relationships in visualizations can indicate semantic distinctiveness. An expert panel of 9 individuals (3 doctors, 3 nurses, and 3 pharmacists), each holding a master's or doctoral degree, conducted a survey to classify the topics based on the keywords. The topic that received the most votes from the panel was designated as the representative field for that topic. Based on the resulting values of the topic modeling, 20 sub-words for each topic were presented and provided in Table 2 , Topics 1–3, 5–6, and 9–15 were classified as Medicine, Topics 4 and 7 as Nursing, and Topics 8 and 10 as Pharmacology.

The process of selecting studies for our analysis is illustrated in Fig.  2 . To determine the optimal number of topics for our analysis, we conducted Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) visualization. As Greene et al. [ 25 ] suggest, larger topic sizes in LDA visualization indicate a greater proportion of that topic within the analyzed studies. We tested topic numbers ranging from 1 to 20, seeking a configuration where topics were visually distinct and non-overlapping. This approach aligns with Liu et al. [ 24 ], who note that topics with high discriminant validity appear as small but clearly separated clusters. After careful visual analysis, we determined that 15 topics provided the most coherent and distinct groupings, as shown in Fig.  2 . This visualization demonstrates the independence and non-overlapping nature of our identified topics, supporting the robustness of our topic modeling approach. Based on the resulting values of the topic modeling, 20 sub-words for each topic were presented and provided in Table 2 . The expert panel's classification suggested that Topics 4 and 7 had relevance to nursing research. However, upon closer examination of the keywords included in these topics, it became apparent that they also encompassed literature from other medical disciplines. While the expert panel's classification indicated these topics were nursing-related, the presence of medical terminology suggested a broader interdisciplinary scope. This highlighted the limitations in identifying nursing-specific research using the current topic modeling approach. To address this issue and clarify the nursing-specific research within these topics, a further refinement of the literature search was conducted using the PICO framework. The keywords from Topics 4 and 7 were used to formulate a focused research question and search strategy. This targeted approach yielded a final selection of 12 nursing-specific articles and 22 articles from other disciplines. By employing the PICO framework and leveraging the keywords from the identified nursing-related topics, it was possible to isolate the nursing research within the broader interdisciplinary landscape.

The words included in topic 4 were the following: ‘trial,’ ‘effect,’ ‘yoga,’ ‘treatment,’ ‘radiation,’ ‘phage,’ ‘protocol,’ ‘anxiety,’ ‘dose,’ ‘zinc,’ ‘symptoms,’ ‘depression,’ ‘placebo,’ ‘acupuncture,’ ‘feasibility,’ ‘training,’ ‘insights,’ ‘toxicity,’ ‘mri,’ and ‘emergency.’ The words included in the topic 7 were: ‘role,’ ‘survey,’ ‘practice,’ ‘evidence,’ ‘failure,’ ‘utilization,’ ‘heart,’ ‘students,’ ‘cam,’ education,’ ‘healthcare,’ ‘valve,’ ‘knowledge,’ ‘communication,’ ‘narrative,’ ‘practitioners,’ ‘attitudes,’ ‘nursing,’ ‘perceptions,’ and ‘pseudomonas.’

The characteristics of the 12 studies included in the literature review analysis are shown in Table 3 .

Of the 12 final literature selections in nursing, there were four randomized controlled trials [A2] [A4] [A7] [A8], three non-randomized comparative trials [A3] [A5] [A6], four descriptive survey studies [A1] [A9] [A10] [A11], and one qualitative study [A12]. Regarding the country of the study’s publication, there were five studies from the United States, three from the United Kingdom, two from Germany and Turkey, and one from Australia. As for the statistical techniques that appeared with high frequency, 10 studies, which were [A1] [A2] [A3] [A4] [A5] [A7] [A8] [A9] [A10] [A11,] used independent t-test, and it was used in most studies. On the other hand, χ2 test was used in seven studies [A3] [A4] [A7] [A8] [A9] [A10] [A11] and one-way analysis of variance was used in four studies [A1] [A9] [A10] [A11]. Regarding the studies that were conducted targeting patients, there was one study conducted on cancer patients [A5], one study on women with post-traumatic stress disorder caused by a car accident [A8], one study on hypertension patients [A7], and one study on breast cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy [A4]. There were seven studies conducted on medical staffs [A1] [A3] [A6] [A9] [A10] [A11] [A12] and one study conducted on nursing students [A2]. Among the interventional therapies used in clinical trials, the most common one was yoga, which was identified in three studies. Specifically, there was one study that used yoga therapy for chemotherapy patients [A5], laughter yoga for nursing students [A2], and yoga therapy for women with post-traumatic disorder [A8]. There were also studies conducted on virtual cancer education program [A6], education on complementary and alternative medicine [A3], auricular acupressure for hypertensive patients [A7], and music therapy for those with breast cancer [A4]. In the studies conducted among medical professionals and nursing students, knowledge [A1] [A3] [A6] [A9] [A10] [A11], attitudes [A1] [A3] [A10] [A11], and usage surveys [A1] [A11] were identified as measurement variables, whereas depression [A8], pain [A7], quality of life [A7], and anxiety [A8] [A4] were identified as the measurement variables in the studies conducted on patients.

Other disciplines

The detailed characteristics of these studies, including the study design, sample, intervention, statistical methods, and outcome measures, are presented in Table 4 .

Of the 22 final literature selections in other disciplines, there were 20 randomized controlled trials [B1] [B2] [B3] [B5] [B6] [B7] [B8] [B9] [B10] [B11] [B12] [B13] [B14] [B15] [B16] [B17] [B18] [B20] [B21] [B22], one pre- and post-hoc comparative study [B4], and one scoping review [B19]. The detailed characteristics of these studies, including the study design, sample, intervention, statistical methods, and outcome measures, are presented in Table 4 . Regarding the country of the study's publication, there were seven studies from the United States of America and the United Kingdom, three studies from China, two studies from the Netherlands, and one study each from Germany, India, and Hong Kong. As for the statistical techniques that appeared with high frequency, there were 10 studies that used independent t-test [B2] [B3] [B5] [B6] [B8] [B11] [B13] [B15] [B18] and one-way ANOVA [B3] [B6] [B7] [B9] [B11] [B14] [B18] [B21] [B20] [B22], while seven studies used repeated measures ANOVA [B2] [B4] [B10] [B11] [B15] [B20] [B22]. All studies for the literature review were conducted on patients. The most common intervention used was auricular acupressure, which was applied on patients with Parkinson’s disease [B11], poststroke depression [B6] [B14], insomnia and depression [B20] [B21], carpal tunnel syndrome [B7], soldiers with PTSD [B19], migraine [B15], pelvic organ prolapse [B8], and gallbladder stones [B22]. The second most common intervention used was yoga therapy, and the subjects were those with active arthritis [B18], generalized anxiety disorder [B17], hemodialysis [B4], and hypertension [B2]. Other subjects and interventions shown in the studies were the following: irritable bladder syndrome patients treated with cinnamon patch [B13]; depression patients treated with bouldering psychotherapy [B12]; dementia patients treated with aromatherapy [B10]; insomnia patients treated with Tai-chi and meridian pressure [B9]; Crohn’s disease patients treated with moxibustion [B3]; HIV patients treated with green tea [B5]; and peripheral arterial disease patients treated with laser acupuncture [B1]. On the other hand, the following were identified as the measurement variables for yoga intervention: level of depression, arthritis stage, anxiety level, quality of life, treatment response rate, sleep, and autonomic function [B2] [B4] [B16] [B17] [B18]. Measurement variables for auricular acupressure included level of depression, sleep quality, level of pain, physical and psychological symptoms, severity of depressive symptoms pelvic organ prolapse, and gastrointestinal symptoms [B3] [B6] [B7] [B8] [B11] [B14] [B15] [B19] [B20] [B21] [B22].

In the study conducted using cinnamon patches, the overactive bladder symptom scores and residual urine volume after urination were identified [B13]. In the study which used green tea, the level of depression was assessed while measuring the severity of depressive symptoms through bouldering [B12]. In the study that used aromatherapy, the behavior, psychology, daily living ability, and cognitive function of the patients with dementia were also assessed [B10].

The present study employed text mining techniques to analyze the literature on CAM published over the past five years and identify trends in nursing research. The text network analysis revealed keywords with high TF-IDF and degree centrality, such as 'cell', 'patient', 'treatment', 'cancer', 'study', and 'effect', suggesting a strong focus on cellular mechanisms, patient-centered approaches, and treatment effects, particularly in the context of cancer [ 22 , 23 ]. The high centrality of these keywords indicates their importance and influence within the broader network of CAM research [ 24 , 25 ]. The topic modeling approach identified 15 major topics, providing a comprehensive overview of the key areas of focus in recent CAM research. This data-driven method offers a more nuanced understanding of research trends compared to previous studies that relied on arbitrary searches or focused on narrow populations or interventions [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. By employing this systematic approach, the present study captures the breadth and diversity of CAM research, overcoming the limitations of previous nursing studies.

An expert panel of 9 individuals (3 doctors, 3 nurses, and 3 pharmacists), each holding a master's or doctoral degree, conducted a survey to classify topics based on keywords. According to the expert classification results shown in Table 2 , Topics 1–3, 5–6, and 9–15 were classified as Medicine, Topics 4 and 7 as Nursing, and Topics 8 and 10 as Pharmacology. While Topics 4 and 7 were found to be nursing-related, closer examination revealed the presence of literature from other medical disciplines within these topics. To address this issue and clarify the nursing-specific research, a further refinement of the literature search was conducted using the PICO framework. The keywords from Topics 4 and 7 were used to formulate a focused research question and search strategy, yielding a final selection of 34 articles, with 12 nursing-specific articles and 22 articles from other disciplines. Analyzing trends in nursing and interdisciplinary studies within the context of the existing literature provides a more comprehensive understanding of CAM research trends. From a nursing perspective, the identification of topics related to patient care, such as symptom management, quality of life, and patient education, highlights the potential for CAM interventions to improve patient outcomes and experiences. The prominence of keywords such as 'patient', 'treatment', and 'effect' highlights the need for evidence-based practice and the need for rigorous studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAM interventions in nursing care. Furthermore, the expert panel's validation of Topics 4 and 7 as relevant to nursing research emphasizes the relevance of these areas within the nursing discipline. Topic 4, which includes keywords such as 'trial', 'effect', 'yoga', 'anxiety', and 'depression', suggests a focus on the psychological benefits of CAM interventions, particularly in the context of clinical trials. This aligns with the growing recognition of the importance of holistic, patient-centered care in nursing practice [ 3 , 4 ]. Topic 7, which includes keywords such as 'practice', 'evidence', 'education', 'knowledge', and 'attitudes', highlights the importance of evidence-based practice and the need for nurse education and training in CAM. As CAM interventions become increasingly popular among patients, it is crucial for nurses to have the knowledge and skills needed to provide safe and effective care [ 5 , 6 ]. The insights gained from this study highlight the potential of text mining and topic modeling techniques for investigating research trends in various fields [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. By leveraging these methods, researchers can systematically analyze large volumes of literature, identify key areas of focus, and uncover patterns and trends that may not be apparent through traditional review methods [ 14 , 15 ]. This approach can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the current state of research and inform future directions for investigation.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the value of text mining and topic modeling techniques in analyzing research trends, particularly in the field of CAM [ 9 , 10 ]. The systematic approach employed in this study allowed for a more comprehensive and data-driven exploration of the research landscape, overcoming the limitations of previous studies and providing valuable insights into the trends in nursing research on CAM. The findings of this study have significant implications for nursing practice, highlighting the need for evidence-based approaches, patient-centered care, and the integration of CAM interventions into nursing education and training. Future studies should consider adopting similar methodological approaches to investigate research trends in other fields, as this can lead to a more complete understanding of the current state of research and inform future directions for investigation.

The trends analysis of nursing and interdisciplinary studies on CAM revealed notable differences in research design, subject characteristics, intervention types, and assessment methods. Nursing studies exhibited a more balanced distribution of research designs, including randomized controlled trials [A2, A4, A7, A8], non-randomized comparative trials [A3, A5, A6], descriptive survey studies [A1, A9-A11], and a qualitative study [A12]. In contrast, other disciplines predominantly utilized experimental designs, with 95.2% of the studies being randomized controlled trials [B1-B3, B5-B18, B20-B22]. This disparity suggests that nursing research on CAM should expand its focus on experimental studies to enhance the evidence base and align with the methodological approaches of other disciplines.

The subject characteristics of nursing studies differed significantly from those of other disciplines, with nursing research primarily focusing on healthcare professionals and students [A1, A3, A6, A9-A12], while other disciplines exclusively studied patient populations [B1-B22]. This highlights the need for nursing research to diversify its study subjects and investigate the effects of CAM interventions on patients and healthcare providers [ 28 , 29 ], as well as broader community and general health populations [ 3 , 6 ]. By expanding its scope, nursing research can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and applicability of CAM interventions in promoting health and well-being across diverse settings and populations [ 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 ]. Nurses, as frontline healthcare providers, are uniquely positioned to bridge the gap between healthcare settings and the community, engaging with patients and community members to assess their health needs and provide evidence-based recommendations for CAM interventions [ 1 , 2 ]. This expanded focus, coupled with interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge exchange [ 9 , 10 ], can lead to the development of innovative, culturally sensitive, and evidence-based CAM interventions that address the complex health needs of individuals and communities alike.

A closer examination of the intervention types in nursing studies reveals that although they focused on a relatively limited range of CAM modalities, such as yoga [A2, A5, A8] and auricular acupressure [A7], these interventions demonstrated promising potential for managing various symptoms and conditions. For instance, yoga was found to be effective in reducing psychological symptoms and cortisol levels in college students [A2], alleviating chemotherapy-related symptoms in cancer patients [A5], and improving post-traumatic stress disorder among traffic accident survivors [A8]. Similarly, auricular acupressure was shown to help decrease angina symptoms in hypertensive patients [A7]. These research findings suggest that even though the scope of CAM interventions in nursing research may be limited, they can provide significant benefits to diverse patient populations [ 2 , 4 , 22 ]. In contrast, the wide array of CAM interventions investigated in other disciplines, such as aromatherapy for dementia [B10], green tea for depression in HIV patients [B5], laser acupuncture for peripheral arterial disease [B1], cinnamon patch for irritable bladder syndrome [B13], bouldering psychotherapy for depression [B12], Tai-chi and meridian pressure for insomnia [B9], and moxibustion for Crohn's disease [B3], demonstrates the potential for nursing research to explore and apply new therapies. The safety, efficacy, and potential of these diverse CAM modalities, as evidenced in other disciplines [ 23 , 24 ], should encourage nursing researchers to investigate their applicability in patient care. By conducting rigorous studies on the safety and efficacy of various CAM interventions, nursing research can provide valuable evidence to support the integration of complementary therapies into nursing practice [ 2 , 4 , 22 ]. Moreover, this trends analysis emphasizes the importance of studying CAM interventions for chronic disease management. With the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions [ 1 , 9 , 10 ], nursing research can play a pivotal role in evaluating the effectiveness of CAM for managing these diseases. Studies on yoga for hypertension [B2] and arthritis [B18], auricular acupressure for insomnia and depression [B20, B21], and moxibustion for Crohn's disease [B3] demonstrate the potential of CAM in improving patient outcomes and quality of life. As nurses have more direct and prolonged contact with patients compared to other healthcare professionals, they are well-positioned to assess the effectiveness of CAM interventions in both clinical and community settings [ 3 , 5 ]. By conducting well-designed studies on the safety and efficacy of various CAM modalities, nursing research can provide the necessary evidence to support the integration of complementary therapies into chronic disease management plans, ultimately enhancing patient care and outcomes across diverse settings. Leveraging their unique role in patient care and conducting rigorous studies on the safety and efficacy of various CAM interventions, particularly for chronic disease management, can enable nursing research to make significant contributions to the integration of complementary therapies into nursing practice. This approach has the potential to not only improve patient outcomes and experiences but also strengthen the evidence base for CAM in healthcare, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration in CAM research and advancing the field of nursing.

The analysis of assessment methods revealed that nursing studies heavily relied on self-developed measurement instruments (58.3%) [A3, A5, A6, A9-A12], while other disciplines predominantly used previously validated tools [B1-B22]. Furthermore, nursing studies rarely incorporated physiological indicators (8.3%) [A2], in contrast to the more frequent use of such measures in other disciplines (36.3%) [B1-B22]. These findings underscore the importance of utilizing validated assessment tools and physiological indicators in nursing research to enhance the reliability and validity of study results [ 31 ]. By incorporating these objective measures, nursing research can more clearly identify significant factors and strengthen the level of evidence, ultimately improving the credibility and applicability of the results.

The trends analysis of statistical techniques revealed a higher prevalence of independent t-tests in nursing research (83.3%) [A1-A5, A7-A11], while other disciplines showed a more balanced use of various techniques, including one-way ANOVA (45.5%) [B3, B6, B7, B9, B11, B14, B18, B20-B22] and repeated measures ANOVA (31.8%) [B2, B4, B10, B11, B15, B20, B22]. This difference can be attributed to the nature of the dependent variables assessed in each field, with nursing studies primarily focusing on single assessments of knowledge, attitudes, education, beliefs, and symptoms [A1, A3-A11], whereas other disciplines frequently employed repeated measures of pain, depression, response rate, serum levels, and neurological outcomes [B2-B4, B6-B8, B10, B11, B14-B22]. These findings underscore the importance of aligning the choice of statistical techniques with the nature of the outcome measures to ensure the validity and reliability of the research findings.

In conclusion, the trends analysis of nursing and interdisciplinary studies on CAM highlights the need for nursing research to expand its focus on experimental designs, diversify study subjects, explore various CAM interventions, utilize validated assessment tools and physiological indicators, and employ robust statistical techniques. By addressing these methodological considerations, nursing research can strengthen the evidence base for CAM interventions, facilitate their integration into nursing practice, and contribute to interdisciplinary dialogue in the field of CAM research [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. As CAM use becomes increasingly prevalent among patients, particularly those with chronic conditions [ 1 , 9 , 10 ], nursing research has a crucial role to play in investigating the safety and efficacy of various CAM modalities [ 2 , 4 , 22 ]. This approach not only has the potential to improve patient outcomes and experiences but also enables nursing research to make valuable contributions to interdisciplinary collaboration in the field of CAM [ 3 , 5 ]. By embracing the diversity of CAM interventions and fostering interdisciplinary interactions, nursing research can broaden its scope, enhance the efficiency of patient-focused care, and move closer to providing truly holistic care that addresses the multifaceted needs of patients. Also, the integration of CAM into nursing practice, supported by robust research evidence, has the power to transform healthcare delivery and improve the lives of patients, particularly those with chronic conditions who stand to benefit greatly from a more comprehensive and individualized approach to care.

The trends analysis of nursing and interdisciplinary studies on CAM highlights the potential for nursing research to draw inspiration from the diverse CAM interventions studied in other disciplines and adapt them for nursing practice. For example, the use of aromatherapy for dementia [B10], green tea for depression in HIV patients [B5], and cinnamon patch for irritable bladder syndrome [B13] could be explored in nursing research to assess their feasibility and effectiveness in nursing care settings. By learning from the experiences of other disciplines and adapting promising CAM interventions for nursing practice, researchers can expand the scope of nursing research on CAM and contribute to the development of innovative, evidence-based complementary therapies for various patient populations. Given the current trends in nursing research on CAM, it is essential for future studies to consider the research directions and methodologies employed in other disciplines to guide the advancement of nursing science in this field. In summary, this trends analysis emphasizes the need for nursing research to embrace a more diverse and rigorous approach to CAM research, drawing inspiration from the methodologies and interventions studied in other disciplines. By expanding the focus on experimental designs, diversifying study subjects, exploring novel CAM interventions, utilizing validated assessment tools and physiological indicators, nursing research can strengthen the evidence base for CAM interventions, facilitate their integration into nursing practice.

Limitations

This study aimed to identify research trends in CAM through text network analysis and to analyze nursing research trends based on the findings. The use of text mining and big data analysis allowed for a more comprehensive and less biased approach to data collection and processing compared to arbitrary search strategies. However, there were still limitations in defining each field intuitively due to the diverse and wide-ranging areas of CAM used in different disciplines. Future studies should focus on analyzing overall topics across various fields as well as keyword extraction through text mining to gain a more holistic understanding of CAM research trends. Another limitation of this study is that the search languages were restricted to Korean and English. This may have excluded relevant studies published in other languages and might limit the generalizability of the findings. As CAM is rooted in diverse cultures and traditions worldwide, it is important to include studies conducted in various languages for a comprehensive understanding. Future research should incorporate more languages to provide a global perspective on CAM research trends.

Despite these limitations, this study offers a novel methodological strategy for trend analysis by combining keywords extracted using big data rather than relying on researchers' arbitrary settings. The keyword-based classification and literature analysis provide a new approach to identifying research trends and directions. The trends analysis between nursing literature and other disciplines revealed differences in subject selection, study design, statistical techniques, and measurement of dependent variables, highlighting the need for nursing research to broaden the range of subjects and measurement tools while considering randomization and generalization in experimental designs. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the importance of using design techniques that facilitate the sharing of research results beyond the nursing community.

Conclusions

This study significantly advances CAM research in nursing by providing a comprehensive, data-driven overview of research trends. We have identified key areas for improvement, such as the need for more randomized controlled trials and broader subject diversity, and have proposed innovative methodological strategies. Our findings underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the adoption of diverse, rigorous research approaches. By addressing these gaps, nursing research in CAM can be strengthened, ultimately enhancing the integration of evidence-based CAM practices in nursing care and improving patient outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Complementary and Alternative Medicine

World Health Organization

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health

Research Information Sharing Service

Korean studies Information Service System

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature

Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency

Latent Dirichlet Allocation

Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Document Term Matrix

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool

Institutional Review Board

World Health Organization. Traditional complementary and integrative medicine. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from:  https://www.who.int/health-topics/traditional-complementary-and-integrative-medicine#tab=tab_1 . Cited 7 Oct 2023.

Google Scholar  

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: what's in a name? Bethesda (MD): NCCIH; 2023. Available from: https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementary-alternative-or-integrative-health-whats-in-a-name . Cited 7 Oct 2023.

Shin GR. Development of Korean nursing intervention: alternative (complementary) therapy. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1999;29(6):1403–18.

Article   Google Scholar  

Kang MA, Kim BH, Kim HJ. Complementary and alternative therapy use and health promotion activities among adult women in urban areas. J Korean Wellness Soc. 2017;12(1):677–87. https://doi.org/10.21097/ksw.2017.02.12.677 .

Balouchi A, Mahmoudirad G, Hastings-Tolsma M, Shorofi SA, Shahdadi H, Abdollahimohammad A. Knowledge, attitude and use of complementary and alternative medicine among nurses: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;31:146–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.02.008 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Korean Nurses Association of Complementary and Alternative Therapies. Introduction to the divisions of the Korean Nurses Association of complementary and alternative therapies. Seoul: KNACAT; 2023. Available from:  http://catnurse.co.kr/html/frontend/ .

Oh K, Kim KS, Kwon SH, Park JW. Research trend of complementary and alternative medicine. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2006;36(5):721–31. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.5.721 .

Pratt M, Wieland S, Ahmadzai N, Butler C, Wolfe D, Pussagoda K, et al. A scoping review of network meta-analyses assessing the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative medicine interventions. Syst Rev. 2020;9:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01328-3 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Baek EM, Lee HJ. Analysis of research trends and articles related to work-related overwork using text mining. Occup Health Res. 2023;5(2):79–90. https://doi.org/10.35861/KJOH.2023.5.2.79 .

Kim EJ, Kim JY. Exploring the online news trends of the metaverse in South Korea: A data-mining-driven semantic network analysis. Sustainability. 2023;15(23): 16279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316279 .

Karami A, Spinel MY, White CN, Ford K, Swan S. A systematic literature review of sexual harassment studies with text mining. Sustainability. 2021;13(12): 6589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126589 .

Lee, HJ, Youn KH. The Analysis of Research Trends in Social Service Quality Using Text Mining and Topic Modeling. J Int Things Converg. 2022;8(3):29–40. https://doi.org/10.20465/KIOTS.2022.8.3.029 .

Kim HY, Seo DH. A Topic Modeling Approach to the Analysis of Domestic Performance. Official J Korean Soc Dance Sci. 2019;36(3):67–78. https://doi.org/10.21539/Ksds.2019.36.3.99 .

O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1–22.  http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/4/1/5 .

Kim HJ, Jang HJ, Shin MS. Analysis of research trends on stuttering in adolescence using text mining and literature review. Lang Ther Res. 2020;29(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2020.29.4.001 .

Gurcan F, Cagiltay NE. Research trends on distance learning: A text mining-based literature review from 2008 to 2018. Interact Learn Environ. 2023;31(2):1007–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815795 .

Yang NY, Shin KL. Analysis of research trends in nursing papers on complementary and alternative therapies in Korea. J Adult Nurs. 2003;15(2):226–35. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2021.28.2.174 .

Han KS, Lee PS, Choi WH, Ahn KH. The analysis of trends in complementary and alternative therapy (CAT) in nursing research in Korea. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2003;10(3):392–8.

Sung HR, Kim YS, Kim HY, Ha NY, Chae SM. Research trend about complementary and alternative therapy in Korea using text network analysis. Korean J Rehabil Nurs. 2018;21(2):61–70. https://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2018.61 .

Bidwell S, Jensen MF. Using a search protocol to identify sources of information: The COSI model. In: Topfer LA, Auston I, editors. Etext on Health Technology Assessment Information Resources [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine; 2006. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20060905/nichsr/ehta/chapter3.html#COSI . Cited 2023 Mar 20.

Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res. 2003;3:993–1022.

Lee SJ, Kim HJ. Keyword extraction from news corpus using modified TF-IDF. J Soc e-Bus Stud. 2009;14(4):59–73.

Lee JH. Semantic network analysis of 2019 Gangwon-do wild fire news reporting: focusing on media agenda analysis. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2019;19(11):153–67. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.11.153 .

Liu S, Zhou MX, Pan S, Song Y, Qian W, Cai W, et al. Tiara: Interactive, topic-based visual text summarization and analysis. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2012;3(2):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2089094.2089101 .

Greene D, O'Callaghan D, Cunningham P. How many topics? stability analysis for topic models. In: Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2014; 2014 Sep 15–19; Nancy, France: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. p. 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44848-9_32

Leung L. Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(3):324–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306 .

Park S, Lee JL. Research trend analysis of Korean new graduate nurses using topic modeling. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2021;27(3):240–50. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2021.27.3.240 .

Kim HJ, Lee HN, Oh HS, Yang YJ, Shin SH. Trend Analysis of Articles Published in the Journal of East-West Nursing Research. J East-West Nurs Res. 2014;20(2):167–76. https://doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2014.20.2.167 .

v SH. Analysis of research trends in complementary and alternative therapy studies published in the Journal of Adult Nursing (2009-2018). In: Adult Nursing Academic Conference. 2019. p. 179–80.

Shin KR, Ha JY. The analysis of research trends about reflexology in Korea. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2006;18(4):603–11.

Lee HY, Kim SY. The trends of nursing research on aromatherapy in Korea. J East-West Nurs Res. 2010;16(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.14370/JEWNR.2010.16.2.085 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants who accepted to be part of this work.

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022R1F1A1071533)

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-Gil, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03760, South Korea

Jihye Nam, Hyejin Lee, Seunghyeon Lee & Hyojung Park

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design: JN, HP, and HL; Data collection and Data analysis : JN and HL ;Study supervision: HP; Manuscript writing: JN, HL, and SL Critical revisions for important intellectual content: HP. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyojung Park .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This study was granted an exemption from requiring ethics approval, as it utilized secondary data. The exemption was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ewha Womans University (IRB No: ewha-202304–0016-01). Informed consent was not required due to the nature of the study, which involved the analysis of existing data that did not include any personally identifiable information. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary material 1., supplementary material 2., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Nam, J., Lee, H., Lee, S. et al. Literature review of complementary and alternative therapies: using text mining and analysis of trends in nursing research. BMC Nurs 23 , 526 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02172-9

Download citation

Received : 01 April 2024

Accepted : 11 July 2024

Published : 01 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02172-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Alternative
  • Complementary
  • Text network

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

types of research literature review

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

buildings-logo

Article Menu

types of research literature review

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Author Biographies
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

A compendium of research, tools, structural analysis, and design for bamboo structures.

types of research literature review

1. Introduction

2. methodology.

Click here to enlarge figure

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. bamboo species.

Species IDScientific Name of Bamboo (Local Name)Reference
S-1Bambusa Bluemeana (Thorny/Spiny/Ori bamboo)[ ]
S-2Bambusa tuldoides[ ]
S-3Dendrocalamus asper[ ]
S-4Dendrocalamus sericeus[ , ]
S-5Gigantochloa atroviolacea[ ]
S-6Gigantochloa apus[ ]
S-7Gigantochloa pseudoarundinacea[ ]
S-8Guadua angustifolia Kunth[ , , ]
S-9Phyllostachys aurea[ , ]
S-10Phyllostachys bambusoides[ , ]
S-11Phyllostachys edulis/Phyllostachys pubescens (Moso bamboo)[ , , , , , , , , , ]
S-12Phyllostachys viridiglaucescens[ ]
S-13Bambusa pervariabilis[ ]
S-14Gigantochloa atter[ ]
S-15Bambusa Stenostachya[ , ]
S-16Bambusa Vulgaris[ ]
S-17Dendrocalamus strictus[ ]
CountriesSpecies ID
S-1S-2S-3S-4S-5S-6S-7S-8S-9S-10S-11S-12S-13S-14S-15S-16S-17
Brazil
China
Colombia
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Malaysia
Philippines
Thailand
Indonesia
USA
India

3.2. Bamboo Structures

3.3. codes and standards for structural analysis and design of bamboo structures.

Codes and StandardsProvisionRelated
Material
SubjectInternationalLocalCountryReference
AC 162Evaluation of bambooBambooTest Methods Canada[ ]
ASTM D143 [ ]Standard Test methodsTimberTest Methods [ , , ]
ASTM C469 [ ]Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in CompressionConcreteTest Methods [ , ]
ASTM D2915 [ ]Standard Practice for Sampling and Data-AnalysisTimber/WoodData Analysis [ , ]
BS EN 26891 Test procedures for ConnectionsTimberTest Methods [ , ]
NBR8681 [ ]Load
Parameters
Steel, ConcreteDesign Brazil[ , , ]
NBR16828 [ , ]Loading Conditions, Material GeometrySteel, ConcreteMaterial Grading, Loading Parameters Brazil[ , , ]
NSR-10 [ ]Design Procedure, Loading ParametersBambooDesign Colombia[ , , ]
ISO 19624:2018 [ ]Grading ProceduresBambooMaterial Grading [ ]
ISO 22156:2021 [ ]Design GuidelinesBambooDesign [ , , ]
ISO 22157:2019 [ ]Test ProceduresBambooTest Methods [ , , , , , , , , ]
SNI-5Load ParametersTimberDesign Indonesia[ ]
GB/T 2690Design GuidelinesBamboo timberDesign China[ ]
JG/T 199Testing procedureBambooTest Methods China[ ]
JGJ 254Design guidelinesBambooDesign China[ ]
Not mentioned [ , , , , , , , , ]

3.4. Software Packages for Structural Analysis of Bamboo Structures

SoftwareApplicationReference
Structural AnalysisDesignInvestigation
AbaqusXX[ , , , , , , , ]
AbaqusX[ ]
AbaqusXX[ ]
AnsysXX[ , , ]
CADX[ ]
GalileoXX[ ]
GrasshopperXX[ ]
Karamba3DXX[ , , ]
LS-DYNAXX[ , ]
OasysXX[ ]
OpenSeesPyXX[ ]
SAP2000X[ ]
SAP2000XX[ ]
SAP2000X[ , , ]
Not mentionedXX[ , ]

3.5. Adopted Methodologies

3.5.1. material parameters, 3.5.2. load parameters, 3.6. research gaps and challenges, 3.6.1. material properties, 3.6.2. structural analysis and design, 4. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

  • Raftery, A.E.; Alkema, L.; Gerland, P. Bayesian Population Projections for the United Nations. Stat. Sci. 2014 , 29 , 419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • United Nations Population Fund. State of World Population 2023: 8 Billion Lives, Infinite Possibilities: The Case for Rights and Choices ; State of World Population; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2023; ISBN 978-92-1-002713-7. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Watari, T.; Cao, Z.; Serrenho, A.C.; Cullen, J. Growing Role of Concrete in Sand and Climate Crises. iScience 2023 , 26 , 106782. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wu, W.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Shen, Y. Managing Bamboo for Carbon Sequestration, Bamboo Stem and Bamboo Shoots. Small-Scale For. 2015 , 14 , 233–243. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cho, E.; Um, Y.; Yoo, S.K.; Lee, H.; Kim, H.B.; Koh, S.; Shin, H.C.; Lee, Y. An Expressed Sequence Tag Analysis for the Fast-Growing Shoots of Bambusa Edulis Murno. J. Plant Biol. 2011 , 54 , 402–408. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bredenoord, J. Bamboo as a Sustainable Building Material for Innovative, Low-Cost Housing Construction. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 2347. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ahmad, Z.; Upadhyay, A.; Ding, Y.; Emamverdian, A.; Shahzad, A. Bamboo: Origin, Habitat, Distributions and Global Prospective. In Biotechnological Advances in Bamboo ; Ahmad, Z., Ding, Y., Shahzad, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–31. ISBN 9789811613098. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Madhushan, S.; Buddika, H.A.D.; Bandara, S.; Navaratnam, S.; Abeysuriya, N. Uses of Bamboo for Sustainable Construction-A Structural and Durability Perspective—A Review. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 11137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hailemariam, L.M.; Amede, E.A.; Hailemariam, E.K.; Nuramo, D.A. Philosophies of Bamboo Structural Design and Key Parameters for Developing the Philosophies. Cogent Eng. 2022 , 9 , 2122155. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Iqbal, Q. Scopus: Indexing and Abstracting Database. 2018. Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus (accessed on 12 June 2024).
  • Aniñon, M.J.C.; Garciano, L.E.O. Advances in Connection Techniques for Raw Bamboo Structures—A Review. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 41126. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • MATLAB , R2024a. The MathWorks Inc.: Natick, MA, USA, 2024.
  • Roque, C.; Lourenço Cardoso, J.; Connell, T.; Schermers, G.; Weber, R. Topic Analysis of Road Safety Inspections Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation: A Case Study of Roadside Safety in Irish Main Roads. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2019 , 131 , 336–349. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Osmani, A.; Mohasefi, J.B.; Gharehchopogh, F.S. Enriched Latent Dirichlet Allocation for Sentiment Analysis. Expert Syst. 2020 , 37 , e12527. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dela Cruz, O.; Ongpeng, J. Building Information Modeling on Construction Safety: A Literature Review. In Advances in Architecture, Engineering and Technology: Smart Techniques in Urban Planning & Technology ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 89–102. ISBN 978-3-031-11231-7. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu, W.; Hui, C.; Wang, F.; Wang, M.; Liu, G.; Liu, W.; Hui, C.; Wang, F.; Wang, M.; Liu, G. Review of the Resources and Utilization of Bamboo in China. In Bamboo—Current and Future Prospects ; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78923-231-8. [ Google Scholar ]
  • VOSViewer: Visualizing Scientific Landscapes 2010. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/ (accessed on 6 June 2024).
  • Akinlabi, E.T.; Anane-Fenin, K.; Akwada, D.R. Bamboo the Multipurpose Plant ; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; ISBN 978-3-319-56807-2. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bahtiar, E.T.; Imanullah, A.P.; Hermawan, D.; Nugroho, N. Abdurachman Structural Grading of Three Sympodial Bamboo Culms (Hitam, Andong, and Tali) Subjected to Axial Compressive Load. Eng. Struct. 2019 , 181 , 233–245. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Candelaria, M.D.E.; Hernandez, J.Y. Determination of the Properties of Bambusa Blumeana Using Full-Culm Compression Tests and Layered Tensile Tests for Finite Element Model Simulation Using Orthotropic Material Modeling. ASEAN Eng. J. 2019 , 9 , 54–71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ávila de Oliveira, L.; Luiz Passaia Tonatto, M.; Luiza Cota Coura, G.; Teixeira Santos Freire, R.; Hallak Panzera, T.; Scarpa, F. Experimental and Numerical Assessment of Sustainable Bamboo Core Sandwich Panels under Low-Velocity Impact. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021 , 292 , 123437. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chahrour, M.K.; Hosen, M.A.; Goh, Y.; Tong, T.Y.; Yap, S.P.; Khadimallah, M.A. Failure Mechanisms of Structural Bamboo Using Microstructural Analyses. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021 , 2021 , 1571905. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Buachart, C.; Hansapinyo, C.; Sukontasukkul, P.; Zhang, H.; Sae-Long, W.; Chetchotisak, P.; O’Brien, T.E. Characteristic and Allowable Compressive Strengths of Dendrocalamus Sericeus Bamboo Culms with/without Node Using Artificial Neural Networks. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024 , 20 , 2794. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tangphadungrat, P.; Hansapinyo, C.; Buachart, C.; Suwan, T.; Limkatanyu, S. Analysis of Non-Destructive Indicating Properties for Predicting Compressive Strengths of Dendrocalamus Sericeus Munro Bamboo Culms. Materials 2023 , 16 , 41352. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Bahtiar, E.T.; Malkowska, D.; Trujillo, D.; Nugroho, N. Experimental Study on Buckling Resistance of Guadua Angustifolia Bamboo Column. Eng. Struct. 2021 , 228 , 111548. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Quintero, M.A.M.; Tam, C.P.T.; Li, H. Structural Analysis of a Guadua Bamboo Bridge in Colombia. Sustain. Struct. 2022 , 2 , 20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Villegas, L.; Moran, R.; García, J. Combined Culm-Slat Guadua Bamboo Trusses. Eng. Struct. 2019 , 184 , 495–504. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Seixas, M.; Eustáquio Moreira, L.; Bina, J.; Ripper, J. Design and Analysis of a Self-Supporting Bamboo Roof Structure with Flexible Connections. J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct. 2019 , 60 , 221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Seixas, M.; Moreira, L.E.; Stoffel, P.; Bina, J. Form Finding and Analysis of an Active Bending-Pantographic Bamboo Space Structure. J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct. 2021 , 62 , 206–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ramful, R. Failure Analysis of Bamboo Bolt Connection in Uniaxial Tension by FEM by Considering Fiber Direction. For. Prod. J. 2021 , 71 , 58–64. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ramful, R.; Sakuma, A. Investigation of the Effect of Inhomogeneous Material on the Fracture Mechanisms of Bamboo by Finite Element Method. Materials 2020 , 13 , 5039. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Han, S.; Xu, H.; Chen, F.; Wang, G. Construction Relationship between a Functionally Graded Structure of Bamboo and Its Strength and Toughness: Underlying Mechanisms. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023 , 379 , 131241. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Jin, B.-B.; Hao, J.-P.; Luo, Y.-N.; Tian, L.-M. Mechanical Behavior of Round Bamboo under Transverse Local Compression. Eng. Struct. 2023 , 294 , 116790. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lefevre, B.; West, R.; O’Reilly, P.; Taylor, D. A New Method for Joining Bamboo Culms. Eng. Struct. 2019 , 190 , 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Long, L.; Wang, Z.; Chen, K. Analysis of the Hollow Structure with Functionally Gradient Materials of Moso Bamboo. J. Wood Sci. 2015 , 61 , 569–577. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Meng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Xu, F.; Feng, P. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effects of Bamboo Nodes on the Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Culms. Eng. Struct. 2023 , 297 , 116975. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nie, S.; Yu, P.; Huang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, M.; Elchalakani, M. Experimental Study on Compressive Performance of the Multiple-Culm Bamboo Columns Connected by Bolts. Eng. Struct. 2024 , 303 , 117525. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, F.; Yang, J. Experimental and Numerical Investigations on Load-Carrying Capacity of Dowel-Type Bolted Bamboo Joints. Eng. Struct. 2020 , 209 , 109952. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, J.; Shi, D.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Z.; Marmo, F.; Demartino, C. An Active-Bending Sheltered Pathway Based on Bamboo Strips for Indoor Temporary Applications: Design and Construction. Eng. Struct. 2024 , 307 , 117863. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, G.; Zhuo, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J. Study on the Mechanical Properties and Design Method of Frame-Unit Bamboo Culm Members Based on Semi-Rigid Joints. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 991. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chiacchiera, P.; Bocco, A.; Ceretto, W.; Ghirardotti, D. An Investigation of Bamboo-Strip Constructions Built According to Yona Friedman’s Manuals. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Constr. Mater. 2022 , 175 , 82–91. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Pradhan, N.; Paraskeva, T.; Dimitrakopoulos, E. Simulation and Experimental Verification of an Original Full-Scale Bamboo Truss. Eng. Struct. 2022 , 256 , 113965. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nurdiah, E.; Wang, T.-H.; Chang, W.-S. Form Finding and Optimisation of Bamboo Gridshell Structures. In Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe ; Dokonal, W., Hirschberg, U., Wurzer, G., Wurzer, G., Eds.; 2023; Volume 1, pp. 579–588. Available online: https://ecaade.org/conference/past/ (accessed on 6 June 2024).
  • Harries, K.A.; Bumstead, J.; Richard, M.; Trujillo, D. Geometric and Material Effects on Bamboo Buckling Behaviour. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 2017 , 170 , 236–249. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Moran, R.; Webb, K.; Harries, K.; García, J.J. Edge Bearing Tests to Assess the Influence of Radial Gradation on the Transverse Behavior of Bamboo. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017 , 131 , 574–584. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sá Ribeiro, R.; Sá Ribeiro, M.; Miranda, I. Bending Strength and Nondestructive Evaluation of Structural Bamboo. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017 , 146 , 38–42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chand, N.; Shukla, M.; Sharma, M.K. Analysis of Mechanical Behaviour of Bamboo (Dendrocalamus Strictus) by Using FEM. J. Nat. Fibers 2008 , 5 , 127–137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhou, Q.; Li, J.; Liu, P.; Fu, F.; Zhu, H.; Chen, H. Study of the Tensile Properties of the Original Bamboo Sleeve Grouting Joints. J. Build. Eng. 2023 , 78 , 107708. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Puri, V.; Chakrabortty, P.; Anand, S.; Majumdar, S. Bamboo Reinforced Prefabricated Wall Panels for Low Cost Housing. J. Build. Eng. 2017 , 9 , 52–59. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Taufani, A.R.; Nugroho, A.S.B. Proposed Bamboo School Buildings for Elementary Schools in Indonesia. Procedia Eng. 2014 , 95 , 5–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • ISO 22157:2019 ; Bamboo Structures—Determination of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Culms—Test Methods 2019. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  • Lorenzo, R.; Mimendi, L. Digitisation of Bamboo Culms for Structural Applications. J. Build. Eng. 2020 , 29 , 101193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Janssen, J.J. Bamboo in Building Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Hogeschool Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1981. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lorenzo, R.; Godina, M.; Mimendi, L.; Li, H. Determination of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Moso, Guadua and Oldhamii Bamboo Assisted by Robotic Fabrication. J. Wood Sci. 2020 , 66 , 20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Mimendi, L.; Lorenzo, R.; Li, H. An Innovative Digital Workflow to Design, Build and Manage Bamboo Structures. Sustain. Struct. 2022 , 2 , 11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • NBR-16828-2 ; Métodos de Prueba Para Determinar Las Propiedades Físico-Mecánicas de Los Bambúes. Brazilian Association of Technical Standards: Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil, 2020.
  • NBR-16828-1 ; Diseño y Dimensionamiento de Estructuras de Bambú. Brazilian Association of Technical Standards: Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil, 2020.
  • NSR-10 ; Colombian Building Code. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica: Bogotá, Colombia, 2010.
  • ASTM ASTM D143 ; Test Methods for Small Clear Specimens of Timber. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PN, USA, 2013.
  • C09 Committee ASTM C469 ; Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poissons Ratio of Concrete in Compression. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PN, USA, 2022.
  • BS EN 26891 ; Timber Structures-Joints Made with Mechanical Fasteners–General Principles for the Determination of Strength and Deformation Characteristics. British Standards Institution (BSI): London, UK, 1991.
  • AC 162 ; Acceptance Criteria for Structural Bamboo. ICC Evaluating Service, LCC: Brea, CA, USA, 2000. Available online: https://icc-es.org/acceptance-criteria/ac162/ (accessed on 6 June 2024).
  • ASTM D2915 ; Practice for Sampling and Data-Analysis for Structural Wood and Wood-Based Products. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PN, USA, 2022.
  • ISO 19624:2018 ; Bamboo Structures—Grading of Bamboo Culms—Basic Principles and Procedures. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
  • ISO 22156:2021 ; Bamboo Structures—Bamboo Culms—Structural Design. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  • JG/T 199-2007 ; Standardization Administration of China Testing Methods for Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Used in Building. Standardization Administration of China (SAC): Beijing, China, 2007.
  • GB/T 2690 ; Bamboo Timber. 2000. Available online: https://max.book118.com/html/2019/0810/8022043116002041.shtm (accessed on 6 June 2024).
  • ABNT NBR 8681 ; Ações e Segurança Nas Estruturas. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT): Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003.
  • NSR-10 ; Título G—Estructuras de Madera y Estructuras de Guadua. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica: Bogotá, Colombia, 2010.
  • Michiels, T.; Lu, L.; Archer, R.; Adriaenssens, S.; Tresserra, G. Design of Three Hypar Roofs Made of Guadua Bamboo. J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct. 2017 , 58 , 844. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • JGJ 254 ; Technical Code for Safety of Bamboo Scaffold in Construction. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD): Beijing, China, 2011.
  • Hailemariam, E.; Hailemariam, L.; Amede, E.; Nuramo, D. Identification of Barriers, Benefits and Opportunities of Using Bamboo Materials for Structural Purposes. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2022 , 30 , 996. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Khatry, R.; Mishra, D.P. Finite Element Analysis of Bamboo Column along with Steel Socket Joint under Loading Condition. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2012 , 7 , 1247–1251. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Smith, M. ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual, Version 6.9 ; Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp: Providence, RI, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
  • DeSalvo, G.J.; Swanson, J.A. ANSYS Engineering Analysis System User’s Manual ; Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc.: Elisabeth, PA, USA, 1979. [ Google Scholar ]
  • SAP2000 ; Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design. Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI): Berkeley, CA, USA, 2013.
  • Tahmasebinia, F.; Ma, Y.; Joshua, K.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E.; Yu, Y.; Li, J.; Sepasgozar, S.; Marroquin, F.A. Sustainable Architecture Creating Arches Using a Bamboo Grid Shell Structure: Numerical Analysis and Design. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 2598. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Strand7 Release 3.1.4 (R3.1.4). Available online: https://www.strand7.com/r3/Strand7%20R3%20Setup%20Guide.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2024).
  • Estrada Meza, M.G.; González Meza, E.; Chi Pool, D.A.; McNamara Trujillo, J.S. Design Exploration of Bamboo Shells Structures by Using Parametric Tools. Appl. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 7522. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • de Albuquerque, N.B.; Gaspar, C.M.R.; Seixas, M.; Santana, M.V.B.; Cardoso, D.C.T. Design, Fabrication and Analysis of a Bio-Based Tensegrity Structure Using Non-Destructive Testing. Eng. Struct. 2022 , 265 , 114457. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Oasys Software. Available online: https://www.oasys-software.com/ (accessed on 6 June 2024).
  • Torres, L.A.; Ghavami, K.; García, J.J. A Transversely Isotropic Law for the Determination of the Circumferential Young’s Modulus of Bamboo with Diametric Compression Tests. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 2007 , 37 , 255–260. [ Google Scholar ]
  • García, J.J.; Rangel, C.; Ghavami, K. Experiments with Rings to Determine the Anisotropic Elastic Constants of Bamboo. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012 , 31 , 52–57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hu, C.; Cheng, R.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, J. Study on Behavior of Steel Hoop Connections for Raw Bamboo Members. Materials 2021 , 14 , 7253. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Khatry, R.; Mishra, D.P. Finite Element Analysis of Bamboo and Joints Using Steel Members under Various Loading Conditions for Design Study. Ind. Inst. Technol. Kanpur 2013 . [ Google Scholar ]
  • Masdar, A.; Suhendro, B.; Siswosukarto, S.; Sulistyo, D. Determinant of Critical Distance of Bolt on Bamboo Connection. J. Teknol. 2014 , 69 , 3319. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Taylor, D.; Kinane, B.; Sweeney, C.; Sweetnam, D.; O’Reilly, P.; Duan, K. The Biomechanics of Bamboo: Investigating the Role of the Nodes. Wood Sci. Technol. 2015 , 49 , 345–357. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
ReferenceStructuresDescription
[ ]Active bending structureActive bending structural systems include curved rods or shells that have been elastically bent from an initial straight or plane configuration. The literature includes experiments, analysis, and modeling
[ , , , , , , , , , ]Bamboo culmBamboo culm is the raw round bamboo.
[ ]Bamboo trussTruss members carry axial loads, tension, or compression. The literature includes experiments, analysis and modeling
[ ]Frame-unit bamboo culm structureA framed bamboo grid structure
[ ]FootbridgePedestrian bridge with bamboo members
[ , , ]Joint connectionThe joint connection is the junction where bamboo culms are joined to create a structure. The literature includes experiments, analysis and modeling of bamboo connection
[ , ]Space frameThe frame is a structure that can carry shear, moment, and axial forces. The literature includes experiments, analysis and modeling
[ ]Sandwich panelA sandwich panel can be defined as a three-layer construction, comprised of two thin face sheets and a core.
[ ]Bamboo-reinforced wallA bamboo-reinforced wall is a structural element composed of bamboo grids, bamboo columns, steel wire mesh, and concrete, designed to enhance strength and durability.
[ ]Bamboo school buildingA bamboo frame structure
ReferenceAgeSpeciesSampleUniform for all DirectionsNo. of Layers
[ ]*S-11Bamboo Culm0.351 layer
[ ]*S-1Bamboo Strips0.283 layers (inner, middle, outer)
[ ]*S-8Bamboo culm0.41 layer
[ , ]3–4*Bamboo Culm0.33 layers (inner, middle, outer)
[ ]3–4*Bamboo Culm0.31 layer
[ ]4S-11Bamboo Culm0.008–0.33 layers (inner, middle, outer)
ReferenceAgeSpeciesSampleShear ModulusNo. of Layers
[ ]4*Bamboo Culm800 MPa *
[ , ]3–4*Bamboo Culm0.17–8.5 GPa3 layers
[ ]4S-11Bamboo Culm175–581 MPa3 layers
ReferenceAgeSpeciesSampleLongitudinal DirectionTransverse DirectionUniform for All Directions
[ ]*S-11Bamboo Culm40 GPa1.7 GPa*
[ ]3–5S-8Bamboo Slat8.787 GPa747.8 MPa*
[ ]3–5S-8Bamboo Culm***
[ ]*S-11, S-9Bamboo Culm11.9–15.8 GPa*15.5 GPa
[ ]3S-8Bamboo Culm**910 MPa
[ ]3S-2Sandwich Panel***
[ ]*S-8Bamboo Culm Column***
[ ]*S-8Bamboo Culm ***
[ ]*S-3bamboo Culm**3.96–7.98 GPa
[ ]4–5S-11Bamboo Culm **10 GPa
[ ]3–5S-8Bamboo Culm **9.5 GPa
[ ]4S-11Bamboo Culm***
[ ]* Bamboo Culm***
[ ]3–4S-11Bamboo Fiber**22.8 GPa
[ ]3–4S-11Bamboo Matrix**3.7 GPa
[ ]4S-11Bamboo Culm***
[ ]4S-11Bamboo Culm, Bamboo Strip**8.2 GPa
[ ]4–6S-11Bamboo Culm**8.2 GPa
[ ]*S-8Bamboo Culm**7.5 GPa
[ ]*S-9Bamboo Culm**19.4 GPa
[ ]*S-13Bamboo Culm**14.375 GPa
[ ]4*Bamboo Culm12 GPa686–1611 MPa*
[ ]3–5S-6Bamboo Culm***
[ ]3–5S-14Bamboo Culm***
[ ]3–5S-3Bamboo Culm***
[ ]3–4*Bamboo Culm***
[ ]4S-11Bamboo Culm***
[ ]3–4*Bamboo Culm15 GPa675 MPa*
[ ]3–4*Bamboo Culm**3 GPa
[ ]*S-11Bamboo Culm**6645 MPa
[ ]*S-15Bamboo Culm**13,450 MPa
[ ]*S-8Bamboo Culm***
[ ]*S-11Bamboo Culm*1359*
[ ]*S-15Bamboo Culm*662*
[ ]*S-8Bamboo Culm*862*
[ ]4S-8Bamboo Culm**9.5 GPa
[ ]4S-16Bamboo Culm**7.217–14.255 GPa
[ ]*S-5Bamboo Culm**12 GPa
[ ]*S-5Bamboo Culm, Connection***
[ ]3 and 5S-8Bamboo Culm***
[ ]*S-17Bamboo Culm**360 MPa
ReferenceDead LoadLive LoadWind LoadSeismic LoadNot Mentioned
[ ]
[ ]
[ , ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Muhammad, N.A.G.; Orejudos, J.N.; Aniñon, M.J.C. A Compendium of Research, Tools, Structural Analysis, and Design for Bamboo Structures. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082419

Muhammad NAG, Orejudos JN, Aniñon MJC. A Compendium of Research, Tools, Structural Analysis, and Design for Bamboo Structures. Buildings . 2024; 14(8):2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082419

Muhammad, Nurwin Adam G., Jerson N. Orejudos, and Mary Joanne C. Aniñon. 2024. "A Compendium of Research, Tools, Structural Analysis, and Design for Bamboo Structures" Buildings 14, no. 8: 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082419

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

  • Case Report
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 August 2024

Chrysosporium articulatum mimicking Trichophyton spp. infection in a cat: a case presentation and literature review

  • Magdalena Kizerwetter-Świda 1 ,
  • Iwona Bąk 1 ,
  • Małgorzata Justyna Biegańska 1 ,
  • Kourou Dembele 2 &
  • Dorota Chrobak-Chmiel 1  

BMC Veterinary Research volume  20 , Article number:  359 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Dermatophytosis is a common skin infection of cats and many other animals. A reliable diagnosis is crucial because of the zoonotic potential of dermatophytes. The routine mycological diagnostic procedures for dermatophytosis are widely known, but in the case of some isolates, identification based on phenotypic characteristics may be incorrect. Infections caused by Chrysosporium spp. are usually described in reptiles, but in other animals they are uncommon.

Case presentation

This study presents a description of a cat with dermatological lesions, that was mistakenly diagnosed with Trichophyton spp. dermatophytosis. Clinical material for mycological examination was collected from alopecic areas on the back of the neck, the ventral abdomen, and the hindlimbs. The initial identification based on phenotypic properties indicated Trichophyton spp. The result of the MALDI-ToF MS allowed the exclusion of the Trichophyton genus. Ultimately, the correct identification as Chrysosporium articulatum was obtained based on the sequencing of ribosomal genes.

Conclusions

Interpretation of the results of the mycological examination of samples collected from animals’ skin or hair shafts is always challenging. Thus, careful consideration of the primary cause of the clinical lesions observed on the skin is mandatory, and the culture results are worth supporting by molecular methods.

Peer Review reports

Dermatophytosis is a common fungal infection in veterinary and human medicine. Dermatophytes are filamentous fungi that may cause superficial infections of keratinized tissues such as skin (stratum corneum of the epidermis), hairs and claws in different animal species, including dogs and cats. The vast majority of dermatophytoses in pets are caused by Micropsorum spp. and Trichophyton spp. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. The pathogenicity of these fungi is related to their ability to degrade keratin found in superficial tissues, typically viable tissues are rather not invaded. However, sporadic invasive infections have been reported in immunocompromised or elderly human patients [ 5 ]. Dermatophytes belong to a group of keratinophilic and keratinolytic fungi. In addition, many keratinophilic environmental fungal species can use pre-digested keratinaceous debris or by-products of keratin degradation. These are: Chrysosporium spp., Psuedogymnoascus spp., Geomyces spp., Pectinotrichum spp., Renispora spp. and others. In general, these non-dermatophytes keratinolytic fungi are saprophytes, engaged in the decomposition of keratinized residues in the soil. However, Chrysposporium spp. strains with kertinolytic properties have been described, with positive results in hair perforation test [ 6 , 7 ].

Chrysosporium genus is classified in the family Onygenaceae , Onygenales order, Eurotiomycetes class and Ascomycota phylum. This genus includes about 100 species [ 8 ], commonly found in the environment, soil, and water sediments, but also on the skin and hairs of animals and humans. The taxonomical classification is often based on the fungal morphology. However, when sexual states and macroconidia are not present, the microconidia-producing fungi are clustered in polyphyletic genera, such as the genus Chrysosporium . Recent research results based on genetic properties have allowed the updating of the Chryspsporium spp. taxonomy [ 9 ]. Moreover, Kendemir et al. (2022) have shown 100% ITS sequence identity in C. articulatum UAMH 4320 with Aphanoascus reticulisporus [ 10 ]. Colonies formed by Chrysosporium are white or pale with septate hyphae producing pyriform or obovate to ellipsoidal microconidia [ 6 ]. The appearance of these powdery colonies as well as micromorphology resembles some dermatophytes, e.g. Trichophyton mentagrophytes [ 11 ]. Fungi classified in the genus Chrysosporium are regarded as non-pathogenic. However, there has been an increasing number of infections caused by these fungi in recent years. Most of the documented cases involve immunocompromised humans [ 12 , 13 ]. Infections of this etiology also occur in animals, mainly in reptiles, most often as cases of dermatitis, but also as life-treating infections [ 14 , 15 ]. Chrysosporium tropicum was described as a causative agent for dermatomycosis in chickens [ 16 ]. Additionally, Chrysosporium spp. is often isolated from feathers [ 17 ].

The clinical manifestations of dermatophytosis in cats are variable and related to the dermatophyte species involved [ 18 ]. Typically, single or several alopecic areas with scaling, crusting and erythema are observed. However, other clinical presentations are also possible, like a matted coat, seborrhea, miliary dermatitis, the presence of pustules, papules, macules, nodules, hyperpigmentation, kerions, and onychomycosis. Infected animals may show symptoms of pruritus. The variable clinical appearance of dermatophytosis can be explained by differences in the composition and structure of keratin, the specificity of enzymes produced by particular fungi, and the defence mechanisms of host organisms [ 18 , 19 ]. Moreover, any other dermatoses may cause similar clinical manifestations. Thus, differential diagnosis including, among others food allergy, hormonal disorders, atopic dermatitis, autoimmune dermatoses, bacterial dermatitis, or infestation with skin parasites should always be performed. Hence, the diagnostic procedures must be accurate and carried out step-by-step. Apart from mycological examination, the results of additional tests such as parasitic, bacteriological, histopathology of biopsy material and allergy tests should also be performed [ 19 ]. Of note, the reliable diagnosis of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats is also essential because of the zoonotic potential of most of the species isolated from pets [ 20 ]. Moreover, cats may be asymptomatic carriers of M. canis or they may have a subclinical infection, which further complicates the diagnosis [ 3 ].

In this study we present a case of a cat with dermatological lesions, initially diagnosed with Trichophyton spp. infection. Ultimately, the cultured fungi were identified by sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry method (MALDI-ToF MS) as C. articulatum , which is usually regarded as a non-pathogenic fungus. Moreover, we present a review of diagnostic procedures used in dermatophyte identification and the literature data on infections caused by Chrysosporium spp.

A 7-year-old an outdoor, neutralized male European shorthair cat weighing 6 kg showing dermatological lesions was admitted to the Small Animal Clinic at the Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences. Clinical findings included: intense pruritus and alopecia on the back of the neck, on the ventral abdomen, and the hindlimbs (Fig.  1 ). At the visit, flea dermatitis was excluded. Wood’s lamp examination was performed, and no fluorescence was observed. The cat was diagnosed with dermatitis miliaris. To reduce intense itching, the cat was treated with dexafort (0,9 mg i.m.). Plucked hairs and scraped scales were collected for mycological examination.

figure 1

Pruritic self-inflicted alopecic areas on the back of the neck (left) and the hindlimb (right)

Direct microscopic examination of collected hairs and scales was performed with KOH, but wet-mounts failed to detect any spores or other fungal elements in both examined samples. Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA), Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with 0.05% cycloheximide and 0.005% chloramphenicol, and dermatophyte test medium (DTM) were used for fungal culture. All plates were incubated aerobically, at 25 °C for four weeks. The colonies appeared on SDA and DTM medium after five days of incubation. Colonies were flat, white in colour, with a powdery surface (Fig.  2 ). DTM medium turned red, as is observed when dermatophytes grow. Colony morphology resembled colonies of Trichophyton spp. (Fig.  3 ). The isolate was examined for microscopic morphology using lactophenol cotton blue staining. Conidia were smooth and thin-walled, pyriform, one-celled, and sessile, usually on side branches or at the ends of long narrow stalks (Fig.  4 ). Additionally, a hair perforation test was performed following standard mycological procedures, and no keratinolysis was noted. The isolate was identified based on the colony morphology on SDA, DTM medium and micromorphology as Trichophyton spp. Thus, topical and systematic antifungal therapy was prescribed.

The fungal isolate was further identified using MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction at the Jagiellonian Centre of Innovation (Kraków, Poland). The identification of our isolate with the MALDI-ToF MS method revealed Chrysosporium keratinophilum with a score value of 2.11. The identification score ranging 2.00–3.00 was considered as a high-confidence identification to the species level.

Ultimately, molecular biology methods were used for identification. Genomic DNA was extracted from five-day-old colonies using the method described by Brillowska-Dabrowska et al. [ 21 ]. Briefly, a fragment of a colony was mixed with 100 µl of extraction buffer (60 mM sodium bicarbonate, 250 mM potassium chloride and 50 mM Tris, pH 9.5, Sigma Aldrich) and incubated at 95 °C for 10 min. Then, 100 µl of 2% bovine serum albumin was added and after vigorous vortexing for 5 s, the obtained solution was used for PCR. Amplification of the internal transcribed sequence (ITS) region of ribosomal RNA was used with conserved primers ITS4 and ITS5 described by White et at. [ 22 ], with the following thermal-cycling conditions: initial denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 50 °C, 45 s of at 72 °C, and final elongation for 6 min. The obtained product was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and subjected to sequencing with the same primers. Finally, the sequence was analyzed with BLAST software using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. GenBank BLAST analysis of the obtained sequence of the internal transcribed sequence region of ribosomal RNA indicated 99.27% identity to a sequence of Chrysosporium articulatum deposited in the NCBI database.

Finally, the isolate obtained from a cat was recognized as C. articulatum , which was considered an environmental isolate contaminating the fur. Based on the verified identification dermatophytosis was ultimately excluded, allowing to avoid unnecessary implementation of antifungal therapy to the patient. The final diagnosis was a food allergy, with the recommendation of an elimination diet. After four weeks, a follow-up visit took place, during which the veterinarian confirmed that the cat’s condition improved, in alopecic areas, fur started to regrow and the itching had stopped. During the follow-up visit, hair samples were collected for mycological culture, which gave a negative result.

figure 2

Colony morphology on SDA medium supplemented with chloramphenicol and cycloheximide (front and back of the plate) - flat, white colonies, with a powdery surface on the front and pale brown on the reverse

figure 3

Colony morphology on DTM medium - colour change from yellow to red (five days of incubation on the left and four weeks of incubation on the right)

figure 4

Morphology of septate hyphae and microconidia – light microscope examination under 400x magnification with lactophenol cotton blue staining

Veterinary mycological diagnostics encounter certain difficulties in identifying unusual, less frequently isolated species. The positive fungal culture results in invasive infections or disseminated cutaneous infections and does not pose any problems in interpretation because the clinical samples are collected from tissues and should not contain any fungal elements, including saprophytes. The cultivation of fungi commonly considered environmental saprophytes from superficial skin lesions is more challenging in interpretation. It may be difficult to assess whether these fungi caused the infection (in some immunocompromised patients) or whether they were cultivated accidentally. Moreover, in some cases, the differentiation of dermatophytes and other non-dermatophytic fungi may be more demanding than it seems. Incorrect identification of pathogenic fungi as saprophytes may result in the omitting of necessary antifungal therapy despite the medical indications. Alternatively, therapy may be introduced for patients that do not require such treatment, because only environmental saprophytic fungi were cultured from samples collected superficially. The treatment of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats may be topical or quite often requires systemic administration of antifungals [ 23 ]. Topical therapy is used to minimize disease transmission and environmental contamination, while systemic antifungal therapy eradicates the infection within the hair follicle [ 24 ]. Treatment of dermatophytosis may be associated with side effects, such as liver toxicity or vasculitis, and it may lead to an increase in fungal resistance. Unnecessary antifungal treatment, which is usually long-term, causes an imbalance in natural microbiota.

Fungi classified in the genus Chrysosporium are regarded as non-pathogenic, non-dermatophyte keratinolytic fungi. Recently, the number of cases of human infections caused by Chrysosporium spp. described in the literature is increasing, especially in immunocompromised human patients. Chrysosporium zonatum and Chrysosporium tropicanum are most commonly reported [ 25 ]. The clinical presentation includes respiratory allergic reactions, pulmonary invasive infections and skin infections. There is only one documented case of Chrysosporium articulatum invasive pulmonary infection in human, 16-year-old man diagnosed with lymphoblastic leukemia [ 12 ].

In veterinary medicine infections caused by Chrysosporium spp. are rarely described, and mostly are reported in reptiles. In recent years, Chrysosporium anamorph of Nannizziopsis vriesii (CANV) has become the leading fungal agent of dermatitis in reptiles. The lesions initially involve the skin, and the presence of hyperkeratosis, necrosis, vesicles, crusts, and ulceration may be observed. Progress to fatal systemic disease often occurs [ 14 , 15 ].

We have gathered here five literature reports concerning Chrysosporium spp. infections in dogs and cats. Of note, publications describing the isolation of these fungi from before 1990 have been omitted due to the unreliable identification methods used at that time. The first is a review study concerning 157 cases of disseminated canine mould infections demonstrated that the majority (59,3%) was caused by Aspergillus spp. Chrysosporium spp. was identified as the etiological agent only in two cases, which corresponds to only 1,3% of incidence [ 26 ]. One of the publications included in the review mentioned above was a case report concerning disseminated infection in German shepherd dog in Australia. Fungal hyphae were observed in needle aspirates of the iliac lymph nodes and spleen. The fungal culture from these materials was positive and was diagnosed as Chrysosporium spp. [ 27 ]. An earlier publication also from Australia described disseminated opportunistic fungal infections among 10 dogs, of which, in one case, Chrysosporium spp. was found to be the etiological agent [ 28 ]. In another review study describing fungal keratitis in 11 dogs, the presence of Chrysosporium spp. was confirmed in one patient [ 29 ]. Moreover, the literature provides one description of superficial skin lesions in two Persian cats and their owner caused by Chrysosporium spp. These two cats lived in the same household. Moreover, Chrysosporium spp. was also isolated from its owner, who was undergoing chemotherapy for mammary cancer. Fungal culture from hairs and skin scrapings revealed the presence of Chrysosporium spp. in both cats. Unfortunately, the authors did not verify the identification with molecular biology methods, however, effective antifungal treatment proved, that the isolated fungi were the etiological agent involved in the observed clinical changes [ 30 ]. Additionally, in 2011 Pin et al. described well-documented onychomycosis caused by C. keratinophilum in seven captive Bennett’s wallabies [ 31 ].

Diverse fungal species may occur on the skin and hairs of cats, which may be either pathogens or contaminating saprophytes. Thus, veterinary mycological diagnostics encounter dilemmas, such as contamination of superficial clinical samples by saprophytic fungi, which is most probable when the samples of hair, skin scrapings or claws are collected. Chrysosporium spp. is one of many saprophytic fungi that can contaminate the animal’s haircoat or skin and thus contribute to the contamination of clinical samples. Chrysosporium spp. has been most commonly isolated (25%) from healthy dogs and cats in Mexico [ 32 ]. This creates a challenge for veterinary laboratory diagnostics because Chrysosporium spp. shows similar characteristics to dermatophytes [ 7 ]. These fungi may have macromorphology and micromorphology similar to some Trichophyton spp., thus may be easily misidentified. Additionally, Chrysposporium spp. can grow on the DTM agar, causing pH change and redness of the medium while showing morphological characteristics corresponding to dermatophytes [ 30 ]. Furthermore, a positive hair perforation test was observed for Chrysosporium species. isolated from the environment, confirming their keratinolytic properties. Mitola et al. have described positive results of a hair perforation test for Chryspsporium georgii , Chrysosporium keratinophilum , and Chrysosporium lucknowense isolates obtained from environmental samples [ 7 ]. Likewise, Gurung et al. observed keratinolytic activity in soil isolates identified as Chrysosprium indicum and Chrysosporium fluviale [ 6 ].

A common opinion is that dermatophytes may be easily discriminated with DTM agar plate. However, literature data indicate that other fungi can also produce a positive reaction in this medium. These include Chrysosporium spp., as confirmed by Dokuzeylul et al. [ 30 ] and Jang et al. [ 33 ]. Jang et al. (2007) found that 63% of moulds isolated from dogs produced colour changes to red on DTM medium, including Chrysosporium , as well as some isolates of Aspergillus , Penicillium and others. Thus, as mentioned before, the color change of DTM agar is not sufficient to confirm the presence of dermatophytes.

The identification of our isolate with MALDI-ToF MS showed Chrysosporium keratinophilum with a high score value of 2.11. However, the sequencing of ribosomal genes indicated Chrysosporium articulatum . While performing MALDI-ToF MS analyses, the manufacturer’s Brucker database included protein spectra from only two species of this genus ( C. keratinophilum and Chrysosporium shanxiense ). Therefore, we were unable to obtain correct species identification with this method. Nevertheless, the high score value of C. keratinophilum allows us to exclude Trichophyton spp. Similar difficulties in the identification of filamentous fungi were described by Normand et al. [ 34 ] and Wilkendorf et al. [ 35 ]. The explanation for this situation is that proteomic profiles of unusual, saprophytic, filamentous fungi are currently not included in available databases, also indicating the need to expand and update these databases.

Our report describes a case of a cat with dermatological lesions initially misdiagnosed as dermatophytosis caused by Trichophyton spp. The initial identification of DTM-positive isolate as Trichophyton spp. was confirmed by colony morphology on Sabouraud agar as well as its micromorphology. Nevertheless, correct identification to the species level was obtained after sequencing of ribosomal genes. The identification using the MALDI-ToF MS technique was not possible because the available database does not include this species. Although this method allowed for the recognition of the genus Chrysosporium . Results presented in this study indicate that interpretation of the results of the mycological examination in all cases of culturing saprophytic fungi, growing from superficial samples is always challenging. Thus, careful consideration of the primary causative agent of the clinical lesions observed on the skin is mandatory. Moreover, DTM medium should be used only as a screening method, and the identification of DTM-positive isolates as dermatophytes must be confirmed by other tests.

Data availability

The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study is available in the NCBI GenBank repository, under the accession number: PP758650.

Abbreviations

Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry

Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA); DTM - Dermatophyte test medium

Cafarchia C, Romito D, Sasanelli M, Lia R, Capelli G, Otranto D. The epidemiology of canine and feline dermatophytoses in southern Italy. Mycoses. 2004;47(11–12):508–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.01055.x .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dworecka-Kaszak B, Biegańska MJ, Dąbrowska I. Occurrence of various pathogenic and opportunistic fungi in skin diseases of domestic animals: a retrospective study. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16(1):248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02460-x .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Chupia V, Ninsuwon J, Piyarungsri K, et al. Prevalence of Microsporum canis from Pet cats in Small Animal hospitals, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Vet Sci. 2022;9(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9010021 .

Jarjees KI, Issa NA. First study on molecular epidemiology of dermatophytosis in cats, dogs, and their companions in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Vet World. 2022;15(12):2971–8. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.2971-2978 .

Kidd SE, Weldhagen GF. Diagnosis of dermatophytes: from microscopy to direct PCR. Microbiol 2022;Aust 43, 9–13; https://doi.org/10.1071/MA22005 .

Gurung SK, Adhikari M, Kim SW, et al. Discovery of two Chrysosporium species with keratinolytic activity from Field Soil in Korea. Mycobiology. 2018;46(3):260–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2018.1514732 .

Mitola G, Escalona F, Salas R, García E, Ledesma A. Morphological characterization of in-vitro human hair keratinolysis, produced by identified wild strains of Chrysosporium species. Mycopathologia. 2002;156(3):163–9. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023340826584 .

Database MYCOBANK. https://www.mycobank.org . Accessed 02 June 2024.

Labuda R, Bernreiter A, Hochenauer D, Kubátová A, Kandemir H, Schüller C. Molecular systematics of Keratinophyton : the inclusion of species formerly referred to Chrysosporium and description of four new species. IMA Fungus. 2021;12(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-021-00070-2 . PMID: 34233753; PMCID: PMC8265132.

Kandemir H, Dukik K, de Melo Teixeira M, et al. Phylogenetic and ecological reevaluation of the order Onygenales . Fungal Divers. 2022;115:1–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-022-00506-z .

Article   Google Scholar  

Kidd S, Halliday C, Alexiou H, Ellis D. Description of medical fungi, 3rd edition. 2016, https://www.adelaide.edu.au/mycology/ua/media/1596/fungus3-book.pdf . Accessed 02 June 2024.

Suankratay C, Dhissayakamol O, Uaprasert N, Chindamporn A. Invasive pulmonary infection caused by Chrysosporium articulatum : the first case report. Mycoses. 2015;58(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12270 .

Sigler L, Hambleton S, Paré JA. Molecular characterization of reptile pathogens currently known as members of the Chrysosporium anamorph of Nannizziopsis Vriesii complex and relationship with some human-associated isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(10):3338–57. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01465-13 .

Lott MJ, Moore RL, Milic NL, Power M, Shilton CM, Isberg SR. Dermatological conditions of farmed crocodilians: a review of pathogenic agents and their proposed impact on skin quality. Vet Microbiol. 2018;225:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.09.022 .

Saidi SA, Bhatt S, Richard JL, Sikdar A, Ghosh GR. Chrysosporium Tropicum as a probable cause of mycosis of poultry in India. Mycopathologia. 1994;125(3):143–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01146518 .

Yamaguchi S, Sano A, Hiruma M, et al. Isolation of dermatophytes and related species from domestic fowl (Gallus gallus Domesticus). Mycopathologia. 2014;178(1–2):135–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-014-9758-0 .

Boehm TMSA, Mueller RS. Dermatophytosis in dogs and cats - an update. Dermatophytose Bei Hund Und Katze – Ein Update. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2019;47(4):257–68. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0969-1446 .

Pin D. Non-dermatophyte dermatoses mimicking dermatophytoses in animals. Mycopathologia. 2017;182(1–2):113–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-016-0090-8 .

Frymus T, Gruffydd-Jones T, Pennisi MG, et al. Dermatophytosis in cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. J Feline Med Surg. 2013;15(7):598–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X13489222 .

Hernandez-Bures A, Pieper JB, Bidot WA, O’Dell M, Sander WE, Maddox CW. Survey of dermatophytes in stray dogs and cats with and without skin lesions in Puerto Rico and confirmed with MALDI-TOF MS. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9):e0257514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257514 .

Brillowska-Dabrowska A, Saunte DM, Arendrup MC. Five-hour diagnosis of dermatophyte nail infections with specific detection of Trichophyton Rubrum . J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(4):1200–4. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02072-06 .

White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press Inc.; 1990. pp. 315–22.

Google Scholar  

Rochette F, Engelen M, Vanden Bossche H. Antifungal agents of use in animal health–practical applications. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2003;26(1):31–53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2885.2003.00457.x .

Moriello K. 2019. Dermatophytosis in cats and dogs: a practical guide to diagnosis and treatment. In Practice. 2019;41:138–147; https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.l1539 .

Anstead GM, Sutton DA, Graybill JR. Adiaspiromycosis causing respiratory failure and a review of human infections due to Emmonsia and Chrysosporium spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1346–54. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00226-11 .

Elad D. Disseminated canine mold infections. Vet J. 2019;243:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.11.016 .

Cook E, Meler E, Garrett K, et al. Disseminated Chrysosporium infection in a German shepherd dog. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2016;10:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mmcr.2016.01.002 .

Watt PR, Robins GM, Galloway AM, O’Boyle DA. Disseminated opportunistic fungal disease in dogs: 10 cases (1982–1990). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995;207(1):67–70.

Scott EM, Carter RT. Canine keratomycosis in 11 dogs: a case series (2000–2011). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2014;50(2):112–8. https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6012 .

Dokuzeylul B, Basaran Kahraman B, Sigirci BD, Gulluoglu E, Metiner K, Or ME. Dermatophytosis caused by a Chrysosporium species in two cats in Turkey: a case report. Vet Med-Czech. 2013;5:633–46. https://doi.org/10.17221/7187-VETMED .

Pin D, Vidémont E, Derian-Autier D, Guillot J, Plouzeau E. First description of onychomycosis caused by Chrysosporium Keratinophilum in captive Bennett’s wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus). J Zoo Wildl Med. 2011;42(1):156–9. https://doi.org/10.1638/2010-0129.1 .

Guzman-Chavez RE, Segundo-Zaragoza C, Cervantes-Olivares RA, Tapia-Perez G. Presence of keratinophilic fungi with special reference to dermatophytes on the haircoat of dogs and cats in México and Nezahualcoyotl cities. Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 2000;42(1):41–4.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Jang KS, Yun YH, Yoo HD, Kim SH. Molds isolated from pet dogs. Mycobiology. 2007;35(2):100–2. https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2007.35.2.100 .

Normand AC, Cassagne C, Gautier M, et al. Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0937-2 .

Wilkendorf LS, Bowles E, Buil JB, et al. Update on Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Identification of Filamentous Fungi. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(12):e01263–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01263-20 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Beata Kowalkowska for her excellent technical assistance.

Studies were partially financed by the Science Development Foundation – Warsaw University of Life Sciences.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Ciszewskiego Str. 8, Warsaw, 02-786, Poland

Magdalena Kizerwetter-Świda, Iwona Bąk, Małgorzata Justyna Biegańska & Dorota Chrobak-Chmiel

Department of Small Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, Warsaw, 02-776, Poland

Kourou Dembele

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

DCC obtained all clinical samples, prepared all photographs, and provided contact with the cat’s owner and a veterinarian. DCC and MKŚ performed phenotypic identification, DNA isolation, PCR and sequencing analysis. MJB and IB were involved in mycological consultation. IB provided valuable comments regarding PCR and sequencing. KD conducted the clinical examination and differential diagnosis. All authors have read, critically discussed the results, and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Kizerwetter-Świda .

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval.

This study did not require the approval of an ethical committee since it is a case report.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Kizerwetter-Świda, M., Bąk, I., Biegańska, M.J. et al. Chrysosporium articulatum mimicking Trichophyton spp. infection in a cat: a case presentation and literature review. BMC Vet Res 20 , 359 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04185-7

Download citation

Received : 17 April 2024

Accepted : 08 July 2024

Published : 10 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04185-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Dermatophytosis
  • Chrysosporium articulatum
  • Trichophyton spp.
  • Misidentification

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

types of research literature review

MINI REVIEW article

Assessment of the economic viability, environmental, and social impacts of green hydrogen production: an algerian case study.

Alexander Anim-Mensah,

  • 1 African Membrane Society (AMSIC), a Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs du Mali Abderhamane Baba Touré, Bamako, Mali
  • 2 i2i Innovation MegaHub (“i2iMegaHub”), Accra, Ghana
  • 3 Agence Nationale de la Valorisation des Résultats de la Recherche et du Développement Technologique (ANVREDET), El Djazair, Algeria

The impacts of climate change are real and in many parts of the world testify to its harsh reality, including rampant extreme weather events, droughts, heat, wildfires, and flooding which have recorded in places which have not experienced them in recent memory. In the quest to avert such events, there is a growing awareness and demand for sustainable processes and operations. Today, sustainability encompasses a balance between ecological footprint and human development index, taking into consideration economics, the green environment, safety, quality, ethics, diversity and inclusion (D&I), and communities. This article presents some steps that have been taken by Algeria to balance energetic autonomy and sustainable development, and a case study on green hydrogen production employing membrane processes. Algeria’s objective to join the global fight against climate change is to develop its green hydrogen base. Given its resources, including available solar and wind power, seawater desalination plants, building capacity, and its favorable location, it is developing its green hydrogen economy to supply hydrogen, especially to Europe. This presents an opportunity for other developing nations, especially in Africa, to gain from this experience.

1 Introduction

Hydrogen by nature is a green fuel and produces little to no toxic emissions if used effectively ( Wang et al., 2023 ; Anwar et al., 2021 ). Hydrogen is projected to be the clean energy of the future and it is expected that green hydrogen will be a decarbonization substitute for much of the fossil fuel energy used today, hence reducing the impacts posed by non-green fuels ( Al-Zareer et al., 2018 ; Lee et al., 2018 ; Anwar et al., 2021 ; Nasser and Hassan, 2023 ).

Hydrogen as a fuel is fundamentally green; however, it is the means of its production that classifies it as green, grey, blue, red/pink, cyan/turquoise, brown and black, green, yellow, and white ( Lubbe et al., 2023 ; Chaudhary et al., 2024 ). A fully green production process is preferable given the increasing requirements to reduce environmental impacts and decarbonization ( Chi and Yu, 2018 ; Lubbe et al., 2023 ).

This study will share some of the different non-green and green hydrogen production technologies and color codes. Algeria currently produces grey hydrogen and is investigating ways to change to green hydrogen to tap into the European market. Algeria now is considering strategies to move into this space to reduce environmental impacts.

Here we will discuss the global demand trends for hydrogen, the types of hydrogen, and their production sources. The focus will be on green hydrogen, various technologies used to produce it, its drawbacks, the various cost contributors, and future research focuses.

Most hydrogen currently produced comes from the natural gas or coal industry, as well as steam reforming of natural gas; in general, these are not fully green ( Wang et al., 2023 ). There is, however, a drive to boost green hydrogen production despite its challenges.

The different color coding categorization of produced hydrogen is generally based on the energy source, carbon emission associated with the production process, the overall environmental impacts, and the specific production process ( Arcos and Santos, 2023 ).

Membrane science and technology have and will have a significant role to play in renewable and non-renewable hydrogen production as far as electrolyzers, water treatment, and separation and purification are involved.

2 Literature

2.1 current uses of hydrogen.

Industrial processes that use hydrogen include: hydrodesulfurization, where sulfur is removed from fuels in the petroleum refining industry ( Lee et al., 2018 ); the metal industry for treatment such as sintering, brazing, annealing, powder coating, and metal injection modeling; in the fertilizer industry for ammonia-based fertilizer production ( Chaudhary et al., 2024 ); in the food industry for oil hydrogenation for margarine production ( Puprasit et al, 2022 ). Hydrogen has the potential to replace or supplement natural gas for cooking and heating; hydrogen-powered fuel cells provide the energy to power vehicles, maritime vessels, and aviation, as well as devices such as cell phones, laptops, and back-up and emergency power in buildings and military applications ( Chaudhary et al., 2024 ). More areas of interest are emerging for hydrogen application ( Agyekum et al., 2022 ; Osman et al., 2022 ; Chaudhary et al., 2024 ).

2.2 Global demands for hydrogen

Hydrogen Insight projects that the global demand for hydrogen in 2050 is expected to more than triple. This will mainly be driven by aviation, power generation/energy storage, heavy industry ( E1A, 2019 ; Otto et al., 2022 ; Dally, 2024 ), water and road transport, and residential/commercial heating. S&P Global Commodity Insights projects that by mid-century, the total global hydrogen produced (249.5 MT) will comprise 67% green hydrogen, 16% blue hydrogen fossil fuel with carbon capture and storage (CCS), and the remaining 17% produced from unabated gas or coal without carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology ( Collins, 2023 ).

Moreover, it is expected that 17% of total global hydrogen produced will be traded across borders from areas with abundant wind and solar power, including Australia, Chile, North Africa, and the Middle East, to carbon conscious regions such as the Europeans Union and East Asia ( Collins, 2023 ).

2.3 Global projection for green hydrogen production

Rystad Energy through Hydrogen Insight projects the top ten green hydrogen producing nations for 2023–2030 to be Australia, the United States, Spain, Canada, Chile, Egypt, Germany, India, Brazil, and Morocco, with Australia, the US, and Spain in the lead ( Klevstrand, 2003 ). Table 1 shows some of the companies in the individual top ten (10) hydrogen producing countries projected for 2023–2030.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 . Some companies in the projected top ten hydrogen producing countries 2023–2030.

2.4 Hydrogen type color coding and production technologies

Several technologies are involved in the production of renewable and non-renewable hydrogen ( Anwar et al., 2021 ; Hydrogen Technologies, 2023 ). Table 2 shows hydrogen color codes assocaited with the different hydrogen production processes. Ambiguities exist in the literature on hydrogen color coding, highlighting the need for a global uniform color coding.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 . Hydrogen color codes associated with different hydrogen production processes.

Figure 1 shows the various non-renewable and renewable hydrogen production technology relative positions on technology maturation versus readiness ( Hydrogen Technologies, 2023 ).

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 . Hydrogen production technology maturation versus technology readiness level ( Hydrogen Technologies, 2023 ).

The demand for green hydrogen is focused the on the four promising electrolyzer types: alkaline (ALK), polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM), anion exchange membrane (AEM), and solid oxide electrolyte (SOE) ( Chi and Yu, 2018 ; Lu et al., 2023 ). They have advantages and disadvantages, challenges they face and expected future research and development directions ( Kumar and Lim, 2022 ).

2.5 Green hydrogen production technologies involving electrolyzers

Green hydrogen production involves electrolyzers, which use electrodes, membranes, electrolytes, water, and renewable energy, comprising ALK, PEM, AEM, and SOE mentioned above ( Chi and Yu, 2018 ; Kumar and Lim, 2022 ; Lu et al., 2023 ). Both ALK and PEM are commercialized while SOE and AEM are still in the pre-commercialization stage, with SOE ahead of AEM in development ( Patonia and Poudineh, 2022 ; Franco and Giovannini, 2023 ; Hydrogen Technologies, 2023 ).

Figure 2 shows the operation mechanisms of these four. Each has advantages and disadvantages that need to be understood and explored for their proper selection, application, and operation ( Franco and Giovannini, 2023 ).

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 . Promising electrolyzer types ( IRENA, 2020 ; El-Shafie, 2023 ).

2.6 A basic water electrolyzer–green hydrogen production system

A basic water electrolyzer–green hydrogen production system consists of feed water into a gas separator to remove all gases including oxygen (O 2 ) produced from the electrolyzer stack(s) on the input end, and an electrolyzer stack(s) where renewable electricity is supplied to split the feed water. The output end has another gas separator to enhance hydrogen purification, a deoxo unit to further purify the hydrogen produced, and a unit to dry the hydrogen for compression to storage ( IRENA, 2020 ; El-Shafie, 2023 ).

2.7 Global demand for green hydrogen production electrolyzers and the companies involved

The increasing demand for hydrogen, specifically green hydrogen, has led to an increasing demand for electrolyzers. For the United States and Europe, ALK is dominant and will remain so into the near future, then PEM followed by SOE and then AEM. For manufacturers outside the United States and Europe, a twelve-fold growth (i.e. 1000E to 12,000E) is expected by 2030, driven by ALK, PEM, and SOE. The total global demand for electrolyzers is expected to see a six-fold growth by 2025 and a ten-fold growth by 2035, also mainly driven by ALK, PEM, and SOE ( Ernst and Young LLP, 2023 ).

2.8 Various electrolyzers: advantages, disadvantages, and challenges

These electrolyzers have different electrodes and electrolyte materials, construction, installation, feedwater requirements, and associated operational costs. The electrolyte carries the created chemical charges from one electrode to the other.

From a general and simplistic standpoint, an electrolyzer system is composed of water and electrical supply systems, electrodes comprised of an anode (positive) and cathode (negative), membrane(s), and a separation system for the gases produced.

A general electrolyzer operational flow process is depicted in Figure 3 . With the electrical system turned on, (1) the water supplied to the electrolyzer at the anode side undergoes oxidation where both O 2 and positively charged hydrogen ions (H + ) are produced alongside the release of electrons, and (2) the membrane(s) selectively transport H + to the cathode to be reduced to hydrogen gas ( US Department of Energy, 2024 ).

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 . Electrolyzers operational flow process ( US Department of Energy, 2024 ).

Figure 2 shows the various reactions at the anodes and cathodes for the individual PEM, ALK, AEM and SOE electrolyzers.

Both ALK and AEM electrolyzers are considered alkaline systems while PEM as acidic and SOE is a solid oxide or ceramic ( IRENA, 2020 ; Patonia and Poudineh, 2022 ).

The alkaline systems use liquid electrolytes such as potassium hydroxide (KOH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), while PEM uses acids such as perflurosulfonated acids (PFSA) ( El-Shafie, 2023 ). Both AEM and PEM use solid polymers, and SOE uses solid oxide or ceramic. The alkaline systems(i.e., ALK and AEM) are involved in the transport of anions—hydroxide or hydroxyl ions (OH − )—through the electrolyte from the cathode to the anode, while the acidic system (i.e., PEM) selectively transports cations—protons or H + —through the solid polymer electrolyte from the anode to the cathode. SOE selectively transports anions—charged oxygen ions (O 2- )—through the solid oxide or ceramic electrolyte from the cathode to the anode. For all four electrolyzers, hydrogen is generated on the cathode side. ALK is the most mature, durable, and cheapest ( Simoes et al., 2021 ; Nasser and Hassan, 2023 ; Yang, et al., 2023 ).

However, the drawbacks of ALK include only pressurized versions being compatible with renewable electricity and having lower purity hydrogen than PEM ( Nasser and Hassan, 2023 ) While AEM could compete with ALK from a cost perspective and better compatibility with renewable electricity, it has lower degradation rates ( Miller, 2022 ; Yang, et al., 2023 ).

Commercialized PEM, while compatible with renewable electricity, has high material costs ( Wang et al., 2023 ). SOE, the most efficient and compatible with renewable electricity, is associated with very high operating temperature and lower durability ( Nasser and Hassan, 2023 ) and is still in development.

PEM requires the use of pure water while ALK uses a variety of water sources, including seawater and wastewater. PEM’s pure water requirement could make it expensive and, in some cases, limit its use. Similarly, the pressurized ALK version for renewable energy compatibility makes it less efficient than PEM and could limit its use. ALK electrode material includes nickel and iron, making it more durable and less sensitive to feedwater impurities ( Hydrogen Newsletter, 2022 ).

Generally, AEM requiring drinking quality water ( Du et al., 2022 ) produces better results with similar PEM iridium anode ( Miller, 2022 ) while SOE is exploring the use of a wide range of water qualities, especially impure water sources ( Maddaloni et al., 2023 ).

ALK, PEM, and AEM, which operate at lower temperatures compared than SOE, have improved performance, longer device lives, and produce higher quality hydrogen with quality feedwater water. However, quality feedwater adds to the costs, process complexities, and design limitations ( Becker et al., 2023 ).

2.9 Environmental and social impacts of green hydrogen production

Green hydrogen is considered a potential fuel to reduce the overall global carbon footprint; however, the green hydrogen industry is associated with some environmental and social impacts and risks ( Vernick, 2024 ). The hydrogen industry production, storage, and utilization is associated with environmental and social risks and impacts ( Vernick, 2024 ).

However, the resultant impact is expected to be lower. Green hydrogen production involves the use of energy, water, and land. The land acquisition and clearing for green hydrogen production plants is associated with both environmental and social risk and impacts. Environmental risk and impacts include deforestation and habitat loss ( Tolba and El-Kholy, 1992 ), soil erosion and degradation ( Lal, 2001 ), water pollution and decreased water quality ( Camara et al., 2019 ), loss of biodiversity and ecosystem disruption ( Mullu, 2016 ), and increased greenhouse emissions ( Romijn, 2011 ).

Social risks and impacts include displacement of indigenous communities and loss of traditional lands ( Moreda, 2017 ), conflict and human violation ( Grant and Das, 2015 ), economic impacts on local communities, particularly loss of livelihood ( Hufe and Heuermann, 2017 ), cultural heritage destruction ( Pankaj et al., 2023 ), and health impacts, including increased respiratory problems ( Myers et al., 2013 ).

Moreover, energy is required to split water to produce green hydrogen, and the energy source needs to be green ( Osman et al., 2022 ). The equipment used in green hydrogen production itself could be associated with a significant carbon footprint ( Hurwitz et al., 2023 ). Additionally, the production process requires a significant quantity of water which could lead to water scarcity ( Vernick, 2024 ). The different electrolyzers require different water quality, which in turn demands different treatment methods with different environmental or social impacts. Hydrogen stored in high pressure containers and pipelines can leak and cause explosions ( Vernick, 2024 ). Ensuring both environmental and safety integration will lower overall environmental and safety impacts and risks. Moreover, the proper integration of land, energy, and water alongside the selection of a production process and storage systems reduces overall impacts and risks.

3 Green hydrogen production cost and economic viability

There is a general drive to increase green hydrogen adoption, partly due to lower environmental impacts and costs, while driving favorable policies over its non-green hydrogen counterparts ( Ishaq et al., 2022 ).

The electrolyzers and renewable electricity costs ( Badgett et al., 2022 ) are among the factors which may be hindering green hydrogen growth and adoption. Hence, as costs reduce, green hydrogen will be able to compete with the dominant fossil fuel hydrogen.

The total cost of ownership (TCO) of green hydrogen mostly includes the costs of electrolyzers, ancillary equipment, installation, and operational costs. Ancillary equipment to electrolyzers includes cooling equipment, compression, electricity sources, water treatment, purification, dryers, and power electronics ( IRENA, 2020 ).

There are costs associated with installing a complete system, while operating costs involve consumable and unit costs involved in the production process, including the electricity consumption rate and cost, water quality and consumption rate, and stack degradation and replacement rates. Other factors affecting overall production costs include operational efficiency, economy of scale, increasing automation, and design complexities. A large capacity system operating close to maximum capacity for longer hours is preferred for reducing costs and improving return on investment from an operational efficiency standpoint. Improving electrolyzers and their electrical efficiency are expected to reduce electrical consumption and costs. Generally, increasing module and manufacturing plant sizes can all significantly reduce costs in addition to automation ( Corbeau and Merz, 2023 ). Each of the above factors could impact the overall cost differently, given that all the electrolyzers have some distinct differences.

From 2019 to 2022, electrical efficiencies generally improved for each type of electrolyzer. Electrolyzers improved in the following order: SOE > PEM > ALK > AEM. In 2050, system electrical efficiencies expressed in kilowatt-hours per kilogram of green hydrogen produced are expected to be lowest for SOE (<40) and similarly for ALK, PEM and AEM (<45) ( IRENA, 2020 ; Patonia and Poudineh, 2022 ).

Generally, ALK requiring the use of low-cost steel or nickel alloy-plated material has the lowest cost ( Miller et al., 2020 ). However, costs are associated with controlling the hydroxide electrolyte solution concentration, temperature, corrosion ( Lohmann-Richters et al., 2021 ), and hydrogen produced needing further purification to meet some requirements.

PEM requires the use of expensive platinum-group metals, mostly iridium, to withstand the corrosive acid operating environment. The high voltage applied for high hydrogen production rates results in higher initial costs ( Corbeau and Merz, 2023 ). This restricts opportunities for cost reduction.

SOE, still in development, has the flexibility of being constructed from a variety of materials including steel, nickel, and zirconia ( Hauch et al., 2020 ). This offers some advantages in reducing costs. However, in the current developmental stages, manufacturing process complexities mean that it is more expensive than ALK and PEM. The expectation is that SOE still will implement cost reduction opportunities ( Minary-Jolandan, 2022 ).

AEM is a better alternative to ALK for easy renewable energy compatibility, costs the same as ALK, and performs like PEM. Moreover, AEM is being explored as an alternative to PEM but with lower overall costs. AEM performance with PEM iridium anodes has returned the best AEM results ( Miller, 2022 ; Yang, et al., 2023 ).

In conclusion, selection of any of these electrolyzers depends on the specific application, availability of resources and infrastructure, and expected project viability ( Hydrogen Newsletter, 2022 ).

While green hydrogen production using an electrolyzer is driven by many factors, available electricity and costs are among the most critical. Industry guides suggest that economic viability could favor higher efficiency and higher capex electrolyzers such as SOE, which may be applicable to areas with a scarcity of renewable electricity, while lower efficiency and lower capex electrolyzers such as ALK may be suitable for areas with sufficient renewable electricity. Driving green hydrogen production costs down depends on the upfront investment, electricity availability and cost, efficiency, stack degradation, and replacement rates. Other considerations include the effects of module size, manufacturing economy of scale, hydrogen produced for specific applications, feed water quality, and the integration of an electrolyzer of interest with intermittent renewable energy operation ( Corbeau and Merz, 2023 ).

Remarkably, some of these parameters may be coupled such that an improvement in any of the parameters could adversely impact the others. This requires making a conscious decision on selection. The ALK, AEM, PEM, and SOE electrolyzers operate differently, hence entailing different cost implications, effectiveness, and production system designs ( Kumar and Lim, 2022 ).

Furthermore, the fast-paced industrial innovation occurs behind closed doors, so up-to-date information is lacking in the public domain. This lack of access to new information means that outdated information is available to academia and the public ( Corbeau and Merz, 2023 ).

The role of membrane science and technology in green hydrogen production using electrolytic splitting of water cannot be overstated, from transporting ionic species from one electrode to the other in electrolyzers, treating the different water sources to meet electrolyzers’ feed water quality to ensure improved productivity and system lives, and producing hydrogen purification.

Increasing use of green hydrogen over established fuels will not only lead to decarbonization of the energy system but a revolution in the water industry, leading to improved water treatment technologies and water use strategies in the face of dwindling clean water resources. The water industry is and will play a vital role in electrolytic green hydrogen production given that water is one of the key raw materials. Hence, countries seeking to adopt net zero strategies should consider a more integrated approach to renewable electricity, water, and green hydrogen ( Newborough and Cooley, 2021 ).

Future green hydrogen development includes increasing adoption of renewable hydrogen by lowering costs and instituting favorable policies to promote it over non-green hydrogen ( Kumar and Lim, 2022 ).

SOE, still in development, is expected to emerge as the best electrolytic solution with lower costs and high efficiency ( Miller, 2022 ). Other green hydrogen developments include exploring (1) photolytic means, where sunlight is directly used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, (2) thermochemically converting biomass into liquid or gas and separating hydrogen, and (3) biological production of hydrogen by microbes ( EIA, 2023 ).

Growing infrastructure demands include hydrogen refueling stations, storage, and transportation which are crucial for the industry’s success and growth. Economic opportunities associated with green hydrogen include the growth of new industries, job creation, and economic expansion ( Hassan et al., 2024 ; Jones, 2024 ). The future of hydrogen as part of the global energy mix will depend on continued investment, improvement, lowering of costs, increasing adoption, and policy direction.

4 The Algerian case study: existing capabilities and preparation for its green hydrogen economy

Algeria is a motivated player in the hydrogen industry given that is has many assets for becoming a regional and international player. Currently, Algeria is involved in the blue hydrogen industry. However, it wants to join the fight against climate change and plans to become a leading green hydrogen production country. The road map towards this includes (1) regulatory and institutional adaptation, (2) human capital development, (3) industrial integration and growth, (4) financing mechanisms and incentives, (5) international cooperation and technology transfer, and (6) deployment of the hydrogen sector. The road map involves the following actionable phases with objectives and timelines. (1) Start-up phase (2023–2030) focusing on start-up activities and training, laying the groundwork for building projects and expertise, and initiating pilot projects to explore hydrogen production and utilization. (2) Market expansion and creation phase (2030–2040) that emphasizes the shift to market expansion and creation, scale-up, and the establishment of markets for the applications. (3) Industrialization and export phase (2040–2050) that prioritizes the export of hydrogen derivatives and contributing to global energy markets. ( National Hydrogen Development Strategy in Algeria, 2023 ).

Algeria’s energy transition quest will promote energy transition, innovation, and efficiency ( ITA, 2023 ). Moreover, Algeria seeks to establish a supportive hydrogen sector framework by 2050 dubbed the “The Algerian Strategy on Green Hydrogen 2050”. Algeria’s ambitious target includes reducing its greenhouse gases (GHG) and petroleum products consumption. Algeria projects to export 30–40 TWh of gaseous, liquefied, and derived green hydrogen by 2040 ( Stambouli et al., 2024 ).

Algeria is taking the necessary steps in developing strategies and policies. It is forming internal and external alliances and dealing with some of the existing challenges to make it align with the needs of a green hydrogen economy. Algeria’s plans to appeal to the European market across the Mediterranean. It has acquired land and solved its water scarcity issues by building desalination plants as well as boosting green energy resources with solar and wind energy systems. Moreover, Algeria is considering ways to reduce the impacts of its blue hydrogen industry amid its pursuit of green hydrogen production. Furthermore, it is collaborating with local energy clusters to build and sustain the overall energy ecosystem ( National Hydrogen Development Strategy in Algeria, 2023 ).

Algeria’s Sonatrach state-owned oil company signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Hecate Energy Global Renewables (HGR Energy) to explore both renewable energy and green hydrogen projects in Algeria ( Djunisic, 2024 ).

One of Algeria’s local energy clusters is the Green Energy Cluster Algeria (GEC) which is a collaborative organization including industries, universities, research centers and institutes, and representatives from key government ministries. Its main goal is to foster synergies among its members, promote competitiveness, contribute to sector-specific training to add to its human resource capacity to develop and transfer the knowledge base to support Algeria’s hydrogen economy ( Green Energy Cluster Algeria, 2024 ).

5 Conclusion and directions

Algeria is on track with the start-up phase of its roadmap, building more capability as it positions itself, including lowering costs and moving in the right direction to grow its green hydrogen base. Currently, it is addressing challenges to its water supply by installing desalination plants, designating land, building more solar energy plants, collaborating with local energy clusters, signing MoUs with major global companies for hydrogen projects, and pilot projects to build expertise and training ( National Hydrogen Development Strategy in Algeria, 2023 ).

The above review presents some information on renewable hydrogen production strategies and Algeria’s plans so that other developing nations can decide whether to replace existing non-renewable hydrogen production with renewable hydrogen.

Author contributions

AA-M: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology. ND: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing–review and editing. WB: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Agyekum, E. B., Nutakor, C., Agwa, A. M., and Kamel, S. (2022). A critical review of renewable hydrogen production methods: factors affecting their scale-up and its role in future energy generation. Membr 12 (2), 173. doi:10.3390/membranes12020173

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Zareer, M., Dincer, I., and Rosen, M. A. (2018). Analysis and assessment of a hydrogen production plant consisting of coal gasification, thermochemical water decomposition and hydrogen compression systems. Energ. Conver. Manage. 157, 600–618. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.047

Anez-Lingerfelt, M. (2022). Hydrogen power: why filtration is a key to a green energy future, filtration + separations. Available at: https://www.filtsep.com/content/features/hydrogen-power-why-filtration-is-the-key-to-a-green-energy-future/ (Accessed November 5, 2023).

Google Scholar

Anwar, S., Khan, F., Zhang, Y., and Djire, A. (2021). Recent development in electrocatalysts for hydrogen production through water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46 (63), 32284–32317. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.191

Arcos, J. M. M., and Santos, D. M. F. (2023). The hydrogen color spectrum: techno-economic analysis of the available technologies for hydrogen production. Gases 3 (1), 25–46. doi:10.3390/gases3010002

Badgett, A., Ruth, M., and Pivovar, B. (2022). “Economic considerations for hydrogen production with a focus on polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis,” in Electrochemical power sources: fundamentals, systems, and applications . Editors T. Smolinka, and J. Garche ( Elsevier ), 327–364. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-819424-9.00005-7

Becker, H., Murawski, J., Shinde, D. V., Stephens, I. E. L., Hinds, G., and Smith, G. (2023). Impact of impurities on water electrolysis: a review. Sustain. Energy Fuels 7, 1565–1603. doi:10.1039/D2SE01517J

Blackridge Research and Consulting (2024a). Top 10 green hydrogen companies in the world. Available at: https://www.blackridgeresearch.com/blog/list-of-top-green-hydrogen-producing-companies-in-the-world (Accessed May 1, 2024).

Blackridge Research and Consulting (2024b). Top 7 green hydrogen companies in India. Available at: https://www.blackridgeresearch.com/blog/list-of-top-green-hydrogen-producing-manufacturing-companies-in-india (Accessed May 6, 2024).

Brown, J. (2023). Top Canadian hydrogen stocks to watch. Stockhouse . Available at: https://stockhouse.com/news/the-market-herald-news/2023/09/13/top-canadian-hydrogen-stocks-to-watch (Accessed on May 2, 2024).

Camara, M., Jamil, N. R., and Abdullah, A. F. B. (2019). Impact of land uses on water quality in Malaysia: a review. Ecol. Process 8, 10. doi:10.1186/s13717-019-0164-x

Chaudhary, K., Bhardvaj, K., and Chaudhary, A. (2024). A qualitative assessment of hydrogen generation techniques for fuel cell applications. Fuel 358 (A), 130090. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130090

Chi, J., and Yu, H. (2018). Water electrolysis based on renewable energy for hydrogen production. Chin. J. Catal. 39 (3), 390–394. doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62949-8

Collins, L. (2023). Global hydrogen demand to more than triple by 2050, driven by power generation, aviation, and industry. Anal. Hydrog. Available at: https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/author/l_collins (Accessed November 10, 2023).

Corbeau, A.-S., and Merz, A.-K. (2023). Demystifying electrolyzer production costs. Center on global energy policy SIPA . Columbia University . Available at: https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/demystifying-electrolyzer-production-costs/ (Accessed January 11, 2024).

Čučuk, A. (2023a). ACWA Power gearing up to develop $4 billion green hydrogen project in Egypt. Bus. Dev. Proj. Offshore Energy . Available at: https://www.offshore-energy.biz (Accessed May 3, 2024).

Čučuk, A. (2023b). HH2E and LEAG to boost hydrogen economy in Germany, business developments and project, offshore energy. Available at: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/hh2e-and-leag-to-boost-the-hydrogen-economy-in-germany/ (Accessed May 3, 2024).

Cummins, J. (2023). Australia’s going all-in on hydrogen – here are the companies taking development up a notch. Stockhead . Available at: https://stockhead.com.au/energy/australias-going-all-in-on-hydrogen-here-are-the-companies-taking-development-up-a-notch/ (Accessed May 1, 2024).

Dally, B. (2024). The potential role of hydrogen in decarbonizing heavy industry in Saudi Arabia in the Clean Hydrogen Economy and Suadi Arabia . 1st Ed. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group , 584–605. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781003294290-25/potential-role-hydrogen-decarbonizing-heavy-industry-saudi-arabia-bassam-dally .

Daza, M.-L. O., Kamine, J., Vitorla, M., Perze-Marchant, J., Farr, W., and Gallagher, W. L. L. P. (2021). Chile aims to win the green hydrogen race, hydrogen and Chile. Available at: https://www.willkie.com/-/media/files/publications/2021/02/chile-aims-to-win-green-hydrogen-race.pdf (Accessed May 2, 2024).

Djunisic, S. (2024). Sonatrach, hecate energy to explore renewables, green H2 in Algeria, renewable now. Available at: https://renewablesnow.com/news/sonatrach-hecate-energy-to-explore-renewables-green-h2-in-algeria-856287/#:∼:text=Algerian%20state-owned%20oil%20company,hydrogen%20production%20projects%20in%20Algeria (Accessed May 14, 2024).

Du, N., Roy, C., Peach, R., Turnbull, M., Thiele, S., and Bock, C. (2022). Anion-exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Chem. Rev. 122 (13), 11830–11895. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

E1A (2019) “The future of hydrogen report for the G20,” in Japan Seizing today’s opportunities . Available at: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/9e3a3493-b9a6-4b7d-b499-7ca48e357561/The_Future_of_Hydrogen.pdf (Accessed April 28, 2024).

EIA (2023). Hydrogen explained. Prod. Hydrogen . Available at: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/hydrogen/production-of-hydrogen.php (Accessed December 28, 2023).

El-Shafie, M. (2023). Hydrogen production by water electrolysis technologies: a review, Results Eng. , 20, 101426. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101426

E&M Combustion (2023). The protagonists who lead Green Hydrogen projects in Spain. Available at: https://emcombustion.es/en/the-protagonists-who-lead-green-hydrogen-projects-in-spain/ (Accessed May 1, 2024).

Energy Transition (2024). Egypt targets $40 B of green hydrogen investment – plus other top energy stories. World Econ. Forum . Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/03/egypt-green-hydrogen-investment-plus-other-top-energy-stories/ (Accessed May 3, 2024).

Ernst and Young, LLP (2023). Shortage of Electrolyzers for Green Hydrogen. Shortage of electrolyzers for green hydrogen (ey.com) (Accessed on November 25, 2023).

Franco, A., and Giovannini, C. (2023). Recent and future advances in water electrolysis for green hydrogen generation: critical analysis and perspectives. Sustainability 15 (24), 16917. doi:10.3390/su152416917

Garip, P. (2023). Is Chile adrift on green hydrogen? Americas quarterly. Available at: https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/is-chile-adrift-on-green-hydrogen/ (Accessed May 2, 2024).

Grant, E., and Das, O. (2015). Land grabbing, sustainable development and human rights. Trans. Environ. Law 4 (2), 289–317. doi:10.1017/S2047102515000023

Green Energy Cluster Algeria (2024). Available at: www.gec-algeria.com (Accessed May 5, 2024).

Hassan, N. S., Jalil, A. A., Rajendran, S., Khusnun, N. F., Bahari, M. B., Johari, A., et al. (2024). Recent review and evaluation of green hydrogen production via water electrolysis for a sustainable and clean energy society. Int. J. Hydrogen Ener. 52 (Part B), 420–441. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.068

Hauch, A., Küngas, R., Blennow, P., Hansen, A. B., Hansen, J. B., Mathiesen, B. V., et al. (2020). Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis. Science 370 (6513), eaba6118. doi:10.1126/science.aba6118

Hufe, P., and Heuermann, D. F. (2017). The local impacts of large-scale land acquisitions: a review of case study evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. J. Contemp. Afr. Std. 35 (2), 168–189. doi:10.1080/02589001.2017.1307505

Hurwitz, Z., Bujak, N., Tapia, M., Daza, E., and Gischler, C., (2023). Key aspects for managing the environmental and social risks of green hydrogen Available at: https://blogs.iadb.org/sostenibilidad/en/key-aspects-for-managing-the-environmental-and-social-risks-of-green-hydrogen/ [Accessed May 10, 2024].

Hydrogen Newsletter (2022). PEM (proton exchange membrane) electrolyzers vs. AEL/ALK (alkaline electrolysis) electrolyzers: what is the best selection for a green hydrogen project? Available at: https://www.hydrogennewsletter.com/untitled-2/#google_vignette (Accessed November 4, 2023).

Hydrogen Technologies (2023). Technology maturation, winning imperatives: unleashing the power of hydrogen technologies for A sustainable future. Hydrogen Technol. Available at: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/industry-practice/hydrogen/hydrogen-technologies-comparison [Accessed in November 16, 2023].

IRENA (2020) “Green hydrogen cost reduction: scaling up electrolysers to meet the 1.5⁰C climate goal, international renewable energy agency,” in Abu Dhabi Green hydrogen cost reduction: scaling up electrolysers to meet the 1.5C climate goal (irena.org) (Accessed October 5, 2024).

Ishaq, H., Dincer, I., and Crawford, C. (2022). A review on hydrogen production and utilization: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Hyd. Energy 47 (62), 26238–26264. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.149

ITA (2023). Algeria - renewable energy. Available at: https://www.trade.gov/energy-resource-guide-algeria-renewable-energy (Accessed December 30, 2023).

Jones, R. (2024). The economics of green hydrogen: costs, competitiveness, and ROI. Available at: https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=1826 .

Kinch, D. (2003). Brazil 'well-positioned' as green hydrogen exporter to EU steel: energy Transition. Nat. Gas, Metals S P Glob. Commod. Insight . Available at: https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/metals/062223-brazil-well-positioned-as-green-hydrogen-exporter-to-eu-steel-speakers (Accessed May 6, 2003).

Klevstrand, A. (2023). Which ten countries will be the biggest producers of green hydrogen in 2030? Hydrogeninsight . Available at: https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/author/a_klevstrand (Accessed November 14, 2023).

Kumar, S. S., and Lim, H. (2022). An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Rep. 8, 13793–13813. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.127

Lal, R. (2001). Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degrad. Dev. 12 (6), 519–539. doi:10.1002/ldr.472

Lee, B., Heo, J., Kim, S., Sung, C., Moon, C., Moon, S., et al. (2018). Economic feasibility studies of high pressure PEM water electrolysis for distributed H2 refueling stations. Energ. conver. manage. 162, 139–144. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.041

Linde, (2024). Linde to increase green hydrogen production in Brazil. Available at: https://www.linde.com/news-and-media/2024/linde-to-increase-green-hydrogen-production-in-brazil (Accessed May 6, 2024).

Liponi, A., Pasini, G., Baccioli, A., and Ferrari, L. (2023). Hydrogen from renewables: is it always green? The Italian scenario. Ener Conver. Manage. 276, 116525. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116525

Lohmann-Richters, F. P., Renz, S., Lehnert, W., Müller, M., and Carmo, M. (2021). Review -challenges and opportunities for increased current density in alkaline electrolysis by increasing the operating temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168 (11), 114501. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac34cc

Lu, X., Du, B., Zhou, S., Zhu, W., Li, Y., Yang, Y., et al. (2023). Optimization of power allocation for wind-hydrogen system multi-stack PEM water electrolyzer considering degradation conditions. Int. J. Hydro. Energy. 48 (15), 5850–5872. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.092

Lubbe, F., Rongé, J., Bosserez, T., and Martens, J. A. (2023). Golden hydrogen. Chem 39, 100732. doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100732

Maddaloni, M., Marchionni, M., Abbá, A., Mascia, M., Tola, V., Carpanese, M. P., et al. (2023). Exploring the viability of utilizing treated wastewater as a sustainable water resource for green hydrogen generation using solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs). Water 15 (14), 2569. doi:10.3390/w15142569

Matalucci, S. (2023). The Hydrogen Stream: Brazil reveals $3.6 billion hydrogen production plan. Available at: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/11/28/the-hydrogen-stream-brazil-plans-3-6-billion-of-hydrogen-production/ (Accessed May 6, 2024).

Miller, H. A. (2022). Green hydrogen from anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. Cur. Opin. Electrochem 36, 101122. doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2022.101122

Miller, H. A., Bouzek, K., Hnat, J., Loos, S., Bernäcker, C. I., Weißgärber, T., et al. (2020). Green hydrogen from anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: a review of recent developments in critical materials and operating conditions. Sustain. Energy Fuels 4, 2114–2133. doi:10.1039/C9SE01240K

Minary-Jolandan, M. (2022). Formidable challenges in additive manufacturing of solid oxide electrolyzers (SOECs) and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) for electrolytic hydrogen economy toward global decarbonization. Ceramics 5 (4), 761–779. doi:10.3390/ceramics5040055

Moreda, T. (2017). Large-scale land acquisitions, state authority and indigenous local communities: insights from Ethiopia. Third World Q. 38 (3), 698–716. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1191941

Mullu, D. (2016). A review on the effect of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 6 (15). Available at: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JNSR/article/view/32219/33106 .

Myers, S. S., Gaffikin, L., Golden, C. D., Ostfeld, R. S., Redford, K. H., Taylor, H. R., et al. (2013). Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. PNAS 110 (47), 18753–18760. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218656110

Nasser, M., and Hassan, H. (2023). Techno-enviro-economic analysis of hydrogen production via low and high temperature electrolyzers powered by PV/Wind turbines/Waste heat. Energ. Conver. Manage. 278, 116693. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116693

National Hydrogen Development Strategy in Algeria, 2023 (2023). Available at: https://www.energy.gov.dz/Media/galerie/doc_strategie_nationale_hydrogene_v.fr_(sept.2023)_65b65e6f0b8eb.pdf (Accessed May 5, 2024).

Newborough, M., and Cooley, G. (2021). Green hydrogen: water use implications and opportunities. Fuel Cells Bull. 12, 12–15. doi:10.1016/S1464-2859(21)00658-1

Osman, A. I., Mehta, N., Elgarahy, A. M., Hefny, M., Al-Hinai, A., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., et al. (2022). Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review. Chem. Lett. 20, 153–188. doi:10.1007/s10311-021-01322-8

Otto, M., Chagoya, K. L., Blair, R. G., Hick, S. M., and Kapat, J. S. (2022). Optimal hydrogen carrier: holistic evaluation of hydrogen storage and transportation concepts for power generation, aviation, and transportation. J. Ener Storage 55 (Part D), 105714. doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.105714

Pankaj, S., Sravanthi, G., Khan, I., Pahwa, S., Salman, Z. N., and Sethi, G. (2023). Sustainable utilization of natural stone resources: environmental impacts and preservation of cultural heritage. E3S Web Conf. ICMPC 06 , 011. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202343001106

Patonia, A., and Poudineh, R. (2022). Cost-competitive green hydrogen: how to lower the cost of electrolysers? The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies OIES . Available at: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Cost-competitive-green-hydrogen-how-to-lower-the-cost-of-electrolysers-EL47.pdf (Accessed January 5, 2024).

Puprasit, K., Wongsawaeng, D., Ngaosuwan, K., Kiatkittipong, W., and Assabumrungrat, S. (2022). Improved hydrogenation process for margarine production with no trans fatty acid formation by non-thermal plasma with needle-in-tube configuration. J. Food Eng. 334, 111167. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111167

Reuters (2024). Australia's Fortescue partners with OCP Group for green energy development in Morocco Available at: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/australias-fortescue-partners-with-ocp-group-green-energy-development-morocco-2024-04-08/ [Accessed May 7, 2024].

Reuters (2024). Morocco partners with Nareva, GE Vernova in green hydrogen project. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/morocco-partners-with-nareva-ge-renova-green-hydrogen-project-2024-01-30/ (Accessed May 7, 2024).

Romijn, H. A. (2011). Land clearing and greenhouse gas emissions from Jatropha biofuels on African Miombo Woodlands. Energy Policy 39 (10), 5751–5762. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.041

Samir, S. (2022). Infinity power, masdar, hassan allam sign framework agreement for green hydrogen project in SCZONE, green hydrogen, Egypt oil and gas. Available at: https://egyptoil-gas.com/news/infinity-power-masdar-hassan-allam-sign-framework-agreement-for-green-hydrogen-project-in-sczone/ (Accessed May 3, 2024).

Samir, S. (2022). Egypt, CIEG sign two energy MoUs green hydrogen, Egypt oil and gas. Available at: https://egyptoil-gas.com/news/egypt-cieg-sign-two-energy-mous/ (Accessed May 3, 2024).

Samir, S. (2024). India’s Rana group eyes $12 billion investment in Egypt’s green hydrogen production. Green Hydrogen, Egypt Oil Gas . Available at: https://egyptoil-gas.com/tag/green-hydrogen/ (Accessed on May 3, 2024).

Sheikh, S. E., (2022). Fertiglobe, scatec, orascom construction and the sovereign fund of Egypt start commissioning of “Egypt green”, Africa’s first Integr. green hydrogen plant, Dur. U. N. Clim. summit Available at: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/11/08/2550912/0/en/Fertiglobe-Scatec-Orascom-Construction-and-The-Sovereign-Fund-of-Egypt-start-commissioning-of-Egypt-Green-Africa-s-first-integrated-green-hydrogen-plant-during-UN-Climate-summit.html [Accessed May 3, 2024].

Simoes, S. G., Catarino, J., Picado, A., Lopes, T. F., Santino, D. B., Amorim, F., et al. (2021). Water availability and water usage solutions for electrolysis in hydrogen production. J. Clean. Prod. 315, 128124. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128124

Stambouli, B., Kitamura, Y., Benmessaoud, M. T., and Noureddine, Y. (2024). Algeria's journey towards a green hydrogen future: strategies for renewable energy integration and climate commitments. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 58, 753–763. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.119

Tolba, M. K., and El-Kholy, O. A. (1992). “Deforestation and habitat loss,” in The world environment 1972–1992 . Editors M. K. Tolba, and O. A. El-Kholy (Dordrecht: Springer ). doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2280-1_7

US Department of Energy (2024). Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies office. Hydrogen Prod. Electrolysis . Available at: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-electrolysis (Accessed April 30, 2024).

U.S. Geological Survey, USGS (2023). The potential for geologic hydrogen for next-generation energy. Available at: https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/potential-geologic-hydrogen-next-generation-energy (Accessed December 14, 2023).

Vernick, D. (2024). What is green hydrogen, and how can it help tackle the climate crisis? Available at: https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-is-green-hydrogen-and-how-can-it-help-tackle-the-climate-crisis (Accessed May 9, 2024).

Wang, Y., Wen, C., Tu, J., Zhan, Z., Zhang, B., Liu, Q., et al. (2023). The multi-scenario projection of cost reduction in hydrogen production by proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis in the near future (2020–2060) of China. Fuel 354, 129409. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129409

Yang, B., Zhang, R., Shao, Z., and Zhang, C. (2023). The economic analysis for hydrogen production cost towards electrolyzer technologies: current and future competitiveness. J. Hyd. Energy. 48 (37), 13767–13779. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.204

Keywords: hydrogen, electrolyzers, renewables, energy, sustainability, decarbonization, membranes, clean-fuel

Citation: Anim-Mensah A, Drouiche N and Boulaiche W (2024) Assessment of the economic viability, environmental, and social impacts of green hydrogen production: an Algerian case study. Front. Membr. Sci. Technol. 3:1382651. doi: 10.3389/frmst.2024.1382651

Received: 06 February 2024; Accepted: 17 June 2024; Published: 07 August 2024.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2024 Anim-Mensah, Drouiche and Boulaiche. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Alexander Anim-Mensah, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

IMAGES

  1. A Complete Guide on How to Write Good a Literature Review

    types of research literature review

  2. Literature Review: Outline, Strategies, and Examples

    types of research literature review

  3. Types of literature reviews

    types of research literature review

  4. Types of literature review.

    types of research literature review

  5. Types of Literature Reviews

    types of research literature review

  6. 15 Literature Review Examples (2024)

    types of research literature review

COMMENTS

  1. Types of Literature Review

    A Rapid Literature Review (RLR) is the fastest type of literature review which makes use of a streamlined approach for synthesizing literature summaries, offering a quicker and more focused alternative to traditional systematic reviews. Despite employing identical research methods, it often simplifies or omits specific steps to expedite the ...

  2. Types of Literature Review

    The choice of a specific type depends on your research approach and design. The following types of literature review are the most popular in business studies: Narrative literature review, also referred to as traditional literature review, critiques literature and summarizes the body of a literature. Narrative review also draws conclusions about ...

  3. Types of Literature Reviews

    Rapid review. Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research. Completeness of searching determined by time constraints. Time-limited formal quality assessment. Typically narrative and tabular.

  4. Literature Review: Types of literature reviews

    The type of literature review you write will depend on your discipline and whether you are a researcher writing your PhD, publishing a study in a journal or completing an assessment task in your undergraduate study. ... Assesses what is known about an issue by using a systematic review method to search and appraise research and determine best ...

  5. How to Write a Literature Review

    Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.

  6. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines

    This is why the literature review as a research method is more relevant than ever. Traditional literature reviews often lack thoroughness and rigor and are conducted ad hoc, rather than following a specific methodology. Therefore, questions can be raised about the quality and trustworthiness of these types of reviews.

  7. Chapter 9 Methods for Literature Reviews

    9.3. Types of Review Articles and Brief Illustrations. EHealth researchers have at their disposal a number of approaches and methods for making sense out of existing literature, all with the purpose of casting current research findings into historical contexts or explaining contradictions that might exist among a set of primary research studies conducted on a particular topic.

  8. Literature Review

    Types of Literature Review are as follows: Narrative literature review: This type of review involves a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature on a particular topic or research question. It is often used as an introductory section of a research paper. Systematic literature review: This is a rigorous and ...

  9. Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide

    What kinds of literature reviews are written? Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified.

  10. Literature Review Types, Taxonomies

    Rapid Review - Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research. Scoping Review or Evidence Map - Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research. State ...

  11. Types of reviews

    Definition: "A term used to describe a conventional overview of the literature, particularly when contrasted with a systematic review (Booth et al., 2012, p. 265). Characteristics: Provides examination of recent or current literature on a wide range of subjects. Varying levels of completeness / comprehensiveness, non-standardized methodology.

  12. Literature Review Research

    Literature Review is a comprehensive survey of the works published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to the most significant works. Also, we can define a literature review as the ...

  13. Research Guides: Literature Reviews: Choosing a Type of Review

    LITERATURE REVIEW. Often used as a generic term to describe any type of review. More precise definition: Published materials that provide an examination of published literature. Can cover wide range of subjects at various levels of comprehensiveness. Identifies gaps in research, explains importance of topic, hypothesizes future work, etc.

  14. What is a Literature Review?

    A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it ...

  15. Types of Reviews

    A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. Defines 14 types of reviews and provides a helpful summary table on pp. 94-95. Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements.

  16. Systematic Reviews & Evidence Synthesis Methods

    Mixed studies review/mixed methods review: Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies

  17. 14 Types Of Literature Review

    4 Major Types Of Literature Review. The four major types include, Narrative Review, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Scoping Review. These are known as the major ones because they're like the "go-to" methods for researchers in academic and research circles. Think of them as the classic tools in the researcher's toolbox.

  18. Research Guides: Common Paper Types: Literature Review

    A literature review is a body of text that aims to review the critical points of current knowledge including substantive findings as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic...Its ultimate goal is to bring the reader up to date with current literature on a topic and forms the basis for another goal, such as ...

  19. Types of Reviews

    Characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. Attempts to specify a viable review. Systematic Review: Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review. Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching.

  20. Types of Literature

    Literature Reviews: Types of Literature. This interdisciplinary guide describes the basic steps of doing a literature review. 1. Choose Your Topic. 2. Identify Databases & Resources to Search. 3. Search the Literature. 4.

  21. Types of Reviews

    This site explores different review methodologies such as, systematic, scoping, realist, narrative, state of the art, meta-ethnography, critical, and integrative reviews. The LITR-EX site has a health professions education focus, but the advice and information is widely applicable. Types of Reviews. Review the table to peruse review types and ...

  22. Types of Reviews and Their Differences

    A student may do a review for an assignment, while a researcher could include a literature review as support in their grant proposal. Rigor: Some reviews may want to achieve a higher scholarly or objective standard, so they include pre-established or inclusion criteria for what publications can be included. Discipline norms: a literature review ...

  23. Research Guides: Systematic Reviews: Methods & Resources

    Gold-standard guideline on how to perform and write-up a systematic review and/or meta-analysis of the outcomes reported in multiple clinical trials of therapeutic interventions. AHRQ's Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews.

  24. Types of Reviews

    Mixed studies review/mixed methods review. Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context, it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies

  25. ENGL105

    Looking in the reference section of a literature or systematic review can be a good place to find original research studies. Below is a screenshot of the abstract of the article The Effect of Dietary Glycaemic Index on Glycaemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , with words ...

  26. Literature review of complementary and alternative therapies: using

    Purpose This study aimed to review the literature on complementary and alternative therapies, utilizing text mining and trend analysis in nursing research. As CAM becomes increasingly prevalent in healthcare settings, a comprehensive understanding of the current research landscape is essential to guide evidence-based practice, inform clinical decision-making, and ultimately enhance patient ...

  27. Full article: Ethical leadership and public sector performance

    Section 2 provides a hypothesis development and literature review. Section 3 describes the methodology and measures used in this study. Section 4 presents the ... it is advised that future research use a mixed-methods research design and retest the suggested research model in order to deduce causal relationships between study variables and ...

  28. Buildings

    Bamboo is known for its ability to grow at a high speed, with strong sustainability indicators and remarkable strength properties. However, despite these qualities, the practice of designing bamboo structures is still in its early stages in many regions. This paper aims to review the current approaches to structural analysis and design for bamboo structures as found in the existing literature.

  29. Chrysosporium articulatum mimicking Trichophyton spp. infection in a

    Background Dermatophytosis is a common skin infection of cats and many other animals. A reliable diagnosis is crucial because of the zoonotic potential of dermatophytes. The routine mycological diagnostic procedures for dermatophytosis are widely known, but in the case of some isolates, identification based on phenotypic characteristics may be incorrect. Infections caused by Chrysosporium spp ...

  30. Frontiers

    The demand for green hydrogen is focused the on the four promising electrolyzer types: alkaline (ALK), polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM), anion exchange membrane (AEM), and solid oxide electrolyte (SOE) (Chi and Yu, 2018; Lu et al., 2023).They have advantages and disadvantages, challenges they face and expected future research and development directions (Kumar and Lim, 2022).