Detailed summary.
What is Poverty by Jo Goodwin Parker
This personal essay, ‘What is Poverty?’ has been written by an anonymous person named Jo Goodwin Parker from West Virginia, in the Southern United States. This essay was mailed to George Henderson, a professor at the University of Oklahoma, with the signature of Jo Goodwin Parker. Later on, this essay was published with no further information about its actual author or source. The essay was published with the facts of the hardships faced by a woman due to poverty.
Here in this essay, we find the writer's painful experiences in her life due to her poverty. She has explained her miserable experiences from childhood to adulthood, where she has experienced various hardships in her life.
In her essay, she has talked about various aspects of poverty. She has given a real and graphic account of what being poor actually means on a daily basis. According to her, poverty is more ugly, cruel, and devastating than it is shown in newspapers.
She has defined poverty as a lack—that is, living without hope, better foodstuffs, medicinal care, proper sanitation, and proper education. It is like an acid that destroys pride, honour, health, and the future. Parker’s main purpose is to show how shameful, humiliating, and disgusting it is to be poor. She wants to draw the readers’ attention to the pathetic state of the poor. She wants her readers to know about poverty without showing pity for her.
Poor people have to live a restless life, looking at the dark future of their children. Poverty breaks relationships. Parker had three children. Her husband left her due to poverty. He didn't have a regular job. He left all of them due to the burden of the family. He left home without saying goodbye. Their condition was quite worse during that time. They even didn't have money to buy contraceptives to prevent unwanted births. She had a job. She only earned 22 dollars a week then. Due to her poor diet, she suffered from anaemia. The doctor advised her to have an operation, but she didn't have money. She struggled alone to care for her children. She faced various hardships to care for her children during the cold and summer seasons' days and nights.
Once, she left her children under her mother's care. But when she returned home, she found her kids in a very pitiable condition. Her youngest son was covered with fly specks, and his diaper hadn’t been changed since morning. Her next kid was playing with broken glasses, and the oldest son was playing alone at the edge of the lake. She didn’t have enough income to admit them to a nursery school. She had to pay up to 20 dollars a week for three children to admit them. But, her income was 22 dollars only. For the sake of the children's care, she decided to quit her job.
This essay is related to the problems of poverty. Poverty makes us weaker in various aspects. Money plays a vital role in poverty. If we want to solve problems, we need money. To get rid of the garbage, we need a shovel. But to buy a shovel, we need money. To get any job, we must be neat and clean, but we need money to buy soap and clothes. The writer has described various events that happened to her because of poverty. She left the school because rich people’s children used to tease her all the time in the school because she was poor. She became pregnant many times because birth control was expensive for her. Her husband left her because of poverty. Her economic status was too poor, so she couldn’t do her operation in time. She used to provide cornbread without oil as a breakfast to her kids. She used to wash dishes with cold water without using soap. She didn't buy soap in order to buy her baby's diaper. She even didn't buy vaseline for her hands or the baby's diaper rash. She visited various government and private agencies to ask for help but did not find the right person to help her. She felt much shame and humiliation. For the sake of three children, she had to spread her hands in different places.
This essay, "What is Poverty?" has been written by American writer Jo Goodwin Parker. In her essay “What is Poverty?" Jo Goodwin Parker has described her life living in poverty and her daily struggles for the sake of her family. Here, we find her very descriptive in the text about her daily life. She has put forward her personal painful experiences of living a life in poverty. According to her, poverty is a lack—that is, living without hope, better foodstuffs, medicinal care, proper sanitation, and proper education. It is like an acid that destroys pride, honour, health, and the future. Parker describes herself as “dirty, smelly, and living life with no proper underwear on and with rotten teeth that stink much." She describes that due to the high cost of essential things such as hot water, soap, medicine, and clothing, she doesn't have luxuries in her life. She informs all her readers through her writing that it is difficult to get help from government agencies' programmes. Help-related programmes for poor people by government agencies never existed in her area. She wants to get help through various agencies, but she has no means to travel to reach them. Parker explains that her job even doesn't support her getting out of her situation because the job does not pay enough to cover the expense of child care. Parker writes that “poverty is looking into a black future” and states that her children have no future. She suffers a lot due to her poverty. It's difficult for her to run her family on a daily basis. For her, running her life on a daily basis is a great challenge. In this situation, no one can expect a good future. Parker does not want sympathy, but rather she wants an understanding of poverty for her readers.
The writer has described various events that happened to her because of poverty. She left the school because rich people’s children used to tease her all the time in the school because she was poor. She became pregnant many times because birth control was expensive for her. Her husband left her because of poverty. Her economic status was too poor, so she couldn’t do her operation in time. She used to provide cornbread without oil as a breakfast to her kids. She used to wash dishes with cold water without using soap. She didn't buy soap in order to buy her baby's diaper. She even didn't buy vaseline for her hands or the baby's diaper rash. She visited various government and private agencies to ask for help but did not find the right person to help her. She felt much shame and humiliation. For the sake of her three children, she had to spread her hands in different places.
BEFORE YOU READ
a. What do you consider poverty to be? Do you have a definitive explanation of it or do you consider it an abstract circumstance?
I consider poverty to be a curse. Yes, I have a definitive explanation for it. I have watched the lifestyle of poor people in my lifetime. Just like the writer, I also think the same about poverty. Poverty is living life in disparity, where we feel a lack of various things. Poverty is living life without hope, better foodstuffs, medicinal care, proper sanitation, and proper education. It is like an acid that destroys pride, honour, health, and the future.
b. Look at this picture. What do you see? Where do you see such people? Who are the poor? Why are they poor? Where do the poor usually live?
I see a poor woman with her baby on her lap. The poor are those who lack basic requirements in their lives. They are poor because they don't have good economic status and support. They usually live in different places, such as footpaths, fields, deserts, old houses, etc.
UNDERSTANDING THE TEXT
Answer the following questions:
a. What is poverty according to Parker ?
According to Parker, poverty is a lack - that is, living without hope, better foodstuffs, medicinal care, proper sanitation, and proper education. It is like an acid that destroys pride, honour, health, and the future.
b. How is poverty difficult for Parker’s children? List some specific examples.
Parker's three children suffer a lot due to poverty. They live miserable lives due to a lack of proper foodstuffs, education, clothing, and care. Parker has presented the very bad condition of her children along with her. She has provided us with information related to her children's bad state. According to her, they used to eat oilless cornbread as breakfast. They used to wear dirty clothes. They weren't sent to a proper school. Parker has informed us about a day's event when she left her children under the care of her mother during her job. After her job, that day she found her youngest covered in fly specks, whose diaper hadn't been changed since morning. Her next son was playing with the broken glasses. Her eldest son was playing on the edge of the lake.
c. How does Parker try to obtain help, and what problems does she encounter?
Paker tries to obtain help by spreading her hands in front of different people and institutions for the sake of her children. Due to the lack of money, she tries her best to find supportive hands most of the time. To get help, she encounters problems finding the right organisation and person most of the time. She has to move to different organisations. She has to wait and tell her miserable story again and again.
d. Why are people’s opinions and prejudices her greatest obstacles?
People's opinions and prejudices are her greatest obstacles because these aspects prevent her from getting supportive hands for the sake of her family. Most people don't realise the bitter experience of poverty. For them, the pain of poor people is nothing. They keep on giving their opinions and prejudices against poor people. In the case of Parker, these opinions and prejudices of people make her fail to get help to run her family.
e. How does Parker defend her inability to get help? How does she discount the usual solutions society has for poverty (e.g., welfare, education, and health clinics)?
Parker defends her inability to get help through her opinions related to her experiences of poverty. She discounts the usual solutions society has for poverty by sharing her experiences related to welfare, education, and health clinics. According to her, in the name of welfare, she has to move and spread her hands in many agencies in many places. In these agencies, she has faced shame all the time. She has to prove her poverty time and again. She has to tell her story many times. Sometimes, welfare programmes promise to help, but reaching them takes a lot of time. In the name of education, school launch programmes are there, but they are of no use. She has experienced her two children's conditions since sending them to school. If we talk about the vital aspects of health clinics, Parker's life is quite far from health clinics' facilities. To get medical help, she has to walk miles. If she asks for someone's help, the helper expects negative things from her. Thus, Parker is quite away from all three important aspects.
REFERENCE TO THE CONTEXT
a. Explain the following:
Poverty is looking into a black future.
This line, "Poverty is looking into a black future," has been stated by the writer Jo Goodwin Parker in her essay. She has put forward this line for her readers to present her experience related to poverty. Here in this line, the writer is advising all the readers about an ugly and cruel aspect of poverty. According to her, poverty leads people towards a black future. Poor people have to live a miserable life every day. It is quite difficult to manage proper daily foodstuffs for them. For them, there is no hope for the upcoming future. They keep on spending their lives in disparity, looking into a black future. Poverty breaks expectations and dreams of future days.
b. What does Parker mean by “The poor are always silent”?
By "the poor are always silent", Parker means the helpless state of poor people. In poverty, money plays a very vital role. Money itself is the right solution for all the problems. But, due to a lack of money, poor people feel weaker. They always remain silent in front of others. They have to listen to others words while being silent due to their pathetic state.
c. What writing strategy does the author use at the beginning of most of the paragraphs? Do you notice a recurring pattern? What is it?
In this essay, the author uses her repetition strategy at the beginning of most of the paragraphs. Yes, I notice a recurring pattern. It is the structure of "poverty." The essay is well organised, and the structure “Poverty is” is repeated at the beginning of each paragraph.
Here, with the help of her repetition strategy, she tries to establish a relationship between the woman and the readers. The author's informal style makes the writing appear as part of a casual conversation between the narrator and the readers. Goodwin Parker’s writing is extremely effective and reaches its purpose.
d. How does Parker develop each paragraph? What details make each paragraph memorable?
Parker develops each paragraph, starting with her repetition strategy. She starts most of her paragraphs with a repetition statement, "Poverty is." Later, she provides her personal experiences about her topic sentences.
The author first clearly explains to her readers that her purpose is to help people understand what poverty is. Her second purpose is to convince all her readers to help people in need. The details related to her personal painful experiences and the bitter reality of poverty make each paragraph memorable.
e. In the final paragraph, how does the author use questions to involve the readers in the issue of poverty?
In the final paragraph, the author uses questions in her informal style of direct conversation to involve the readers in the issue of poverty.
Parker has done a successful job of involving her readers through her persuasive manner. She asks them to look at the poor with an angry heart but not with a pitiable heart. This manner of question has attracted readers' emotions as well as attention. Here, in the final paragraph, she has become successful in attracting her readers' attention towards her plight and the struggles of others' in her situation.
REFERENCE BEYOND THE TEXT
a. Define a social problem (homelessness, unemployment, racism) imitating Parker’s style.
Homelessness is sleeping on footpaths. Homelessness compels you to sleep on footpaths. Living life on footpaths makes you weaker in various aspects. It ends up boosting your pride and prestige.
Unemployment is living a life with shame. Unemployment degrades your value in society. Due to the lack of a job, you feel shame and humiliation all the time. People ridicule you in the name of unemployment.
Racism is living a life of humiliation. The racists make you feel weaker in society. They keep humiliating you in the matter of skin colour. Due to your skin colour, you will have to face humiliation in your society. Living life under the concept of racism is a curse.
b. Using adjectives to highlight the futility of the situation, write a short definition essay on Growing up in Poverty.
Poverty is defined as a pitiable situation where people feel a lack of various essential things in their lives. Apart from others' opinions, I think growing up in poverty is annoying. Poverty never allows you to be happy. Living in poverty annoys you most of the time. Growing up in poverty makes your life boring. You never try to do anything interesting while living within the criteria of poverty. You feel both confusing and disappointing about growing up in poverty. You feel confused about your life all the time. Disparity and inequality never let you be free and do something good in your life. Growing up in poverty is a frightening experience where you have to face various hardships and struggles. It provides you with a tiring and worrying experience where pain is always ready to welcome you.
All notes of compulsory english 11 .
So helpful 🌻
Thanks..study well
Contact form.
Home — Essay Samples — Literature — The Singer Solution to World Poverty — Analysis of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”
About this sample
Words: 561 |
Published: Aug 1, 2024
Words: 561 | Page: 1 | 3 min read
Summary of "the singer solution to world poverty", analysis of singer's argument.
Let us write you an essay from scratch
Get high-quality help
Dr Jacklynne
Verified writer
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
4 pages / 1725 words
1.5 pages / 780 words
3 pages / 1393 words
5.5 pages / 2475 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
In nature people always found ways to separate themselves and others based on physical, geographical, mental, economic, social, or religious features. From the early days, there has been survival of the fittest. People are [...]
When you bring up world poverty it always seems to depress people, yet they go eat out once a week and they buy things that they do not even need. Do people really care about world poverty, if they are willing to spend [...]
Much of Charles Dickens' representation of morality in his most famous of Christmas stories, A Christmas Carol, is derived from "the wisdom of our ancestors." (1) From the beginning of his narrative Dickens explains his usage of [...]
Dickens’s “A Christmas Carol” is set in Victorian London and tells the story of the transformation of a wicked, miserly Scrooge into a benevolent humanitarian via supernatural intervention. The invited reading persuades readers [...]
"When Thomas More wrote Utopia in 1515, he started a literary genre with lasting appeal for writers who wanted not only to satirize existing evils but to postulate the state, a kind of Golden Age in the face of reality" (Hewitt [...]
Like Christmas morning itself - when each present represents a discrete mystery, separate from the last - the Christmas Carol is divided into a set of episodes. The book's chapters are episodic, with the duration of each spirit [...]
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
Advertisement
She wants to protect the right to abortion nationally. Here’s what else to know about her positions.
By Maggie Astor
Follow the latest news about the 2024 election, and the Trump and Harris campaigns.
With Vice President Kamala Harris poised to replace President Biden on the Democratic ticket, her stances on key issues will be scrutinized by both parties and the nation’s voters.
She has a long record in politics: as district attorney of San Francisco, as attorney general of California, as a senator, as a presidential candidate and as vice president.
Here is an overview of where she stands.
Ms. Harris supports legislation that would protect the right to abortion nationally, as Roe v. Wade did before it was overturned in 2022, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
After the Dobbs ruling, she became central to the Biden campaign’s efforts to keep the spotlight on abortion, given that Mr. Biden — with his personal discomfort with abortion and his support for restrictions earlier in his career — was a flawed messenger. In March, she made what was believed to be the first official visit to an abortion clinic by a president or vice president.
She consistently supported abortion rights during her time in the Senate, including cosponsoring legislation that would have banned common state-level restrictions, like requiring doctors to perform specific tests or have hospital admitting privileges in order to provide abortions.
As a presidential candidate in 2019, she argued that states with a history of restricting abortion rights in violation of Roe should be subject to what is known as pre-clearance for new abortion laws — those laws would have to be federally approved before they could take effect. That proposal is not viable now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
They include richard hanania, whose pseudonymous writings for white supremacist sites were uncovered last year..
Former President Donald Trump has spent weeks distancing himself from Project 2025, a sprawling 900-plus page manifesto that seeks to create a blueprint for the next Trump presidency.
Billed as a vision built by conservatives for conservatives, the effort “dismantles the unaccountable Deep State, taking power away from Leftist elites and giving it back to the American people and duly-elected President,” according to its website.
But for months commentators and academics have been sounding the alarm on Project 2025. The effort, they say, is a deeply racist endeavor that actually is aimed at dismantling many protections and aid programs for Americans of color.
“Really, it's kind of a white supremacist manifesto,” said Michael Harriot, a writer and historian who wrote an article earlier this month titled: “I read the entire Project 2025. Here are the top 10 ways it would harm Black America.”
And a closer look at the named contributors to Project 2025 adds to the concern: A USA TODAY analysis found at least five of them have a history of racist writing or statements, or white supremacist activity.
They include Richard Hanania, who for years wrote racist essays for white supremacist publications under a pseudonym until he was unmasked by a Huffington Post investigation last year.
Failed Virginia GOP Senate candidate Corey Stewart, another named contributor, has long associated with white supremacists and calls himself a protector of America’s Confederate history tasked with “taking back our heritage.”
One Project 2025 contributor wrote in his PhD dissertation that immigrants have lower IQs than white native citizens, leading to “underclass behavior.” Another dropped out of contention for a prestigious role at the Federal Reserve amid controversy over a racist joke about the Obamas.
The presence of contributors to Project 2025 who have published racist or offensive tropes comes as no surprise to academics and commentators who have been sounding the alarm on the endeavor for months.
The plan calls for the abolition of diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the federal government. It would severely limit the mailing of abortion pills and disband the Department of Education. It would replace the Department of Homeland Security with a new, more powerful border and immigration enforcement agency to choke immigration . It would also curtail or disband programs that experts say greatly benefit communities of color, including the Food Stamp and Head Start programs.
“Project 2025 is a plan about how to regulate and control people of color, including how they organize, work, play and live,” said Arjun Sethi, a civil rights lawyer and adjunct professor of law at Georgetown Law. “It seeks to regulate what they do with their bodies, how they advocate for their rights, and how they build family and community — all while disregarding the historical injustices and contemporary persecution they have experienced.”
What is Project 2025? Inside the conservative plan Trump claims to have 'no idea' about.
It’s not clear how much influence the contributors USA TODAY identified had on the creation of the Project 2025 manifesto. They are listed among scores of contributors to the document, and none would agree to an interview for this story.
But even among the broader collection of think tanks, nonprofits and pundits on the author list, others have past controversies on the issue of race. Seven of the organizations on Project 2025’s Advisory Board have been designated as extremist or hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center, according to a May report from Accountable.us, a nonpartisan organization that tracks interest groups in Washington, D.C.
This proliferation of organizations and individuals with racist modus operandi is by design, not accident, Harriot said.
“One of the things that you see when you read Project 2025 is not just the racist dog whistles, but some ideas that were exactly lifted from some of the most extreme white supremacists ever,” Harriot said.
After multiple requests from USA TODAY, the Heritage Foundation declined to address questions about the Project 2025 contributors and their past statements.
Hanania is a right-wing author and pundit who has built a reputation among Republicans as an “anti-woke crusader.”
Before he became a favorite of prominent conservatives – including Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, who is now Trump’s pick for vice president – Hanania was pushing a far more extreme version of his right-wing views.
An investigation last year by the Huffington Post unmasked Hanania as having written under a pseudonym for websites connected to the “alt-right,” the white supremacist movement that flared up before and during the first Trump presidency.
In the early 2010s, writing under the pen name “Richard Hoste,” Hanania “identified himself as a ‘race realist.’” Huffington Post reported last August. “He expressed support for eugenics and the forced sterilization of ‘low IQ’ people, who he argued were most often Black. He opposed ‘miscegenation’ and ‘race-mixing.’ And once, while arguing that Black people cannot govern themselves, he cited the neo-Nazi author of ‘The Turner Diaries,’ the infamous novel that celebrates a future race war.”
Hanania acknowledged writing the posts under a pseudonym and, since then, has only partly renounced his past. Two days after the Huffington Post exposé, in a post on his website titled “Why I Used to Suck, and (Hopefully) No Longer Do,” Hanania wrote “When I was writing anonymously, there was no connection between the flesh and blood human being who would smile at a cashier or honk at someone in traffic, and the internet ‘personality’ who could just grow more rabid over time.”
Vance’s connection to Hanania was documented in a 2021 interview with conservative talk show host David Rubin — two years before Hanania began denouncing his racist past — when Vance described Hanania as a “friend” and a “really interesting thinker.”
Vance and Hanania have also interacted several times on X, formerly known as Twitter, liking and commenting on each other’s posts.
Richard Spencer, a white supremacist credited with creating the alt-right moniker, published several of Hanania’s articles on the website AlternativeRight.com, including one in which Hanania wrote “If the races are equal, why do whites always end up near the top and blacks at the bottom, everywhere and always?”
In an interview this month, Spencer told USA TODAY that while Hanania may have moderated some of his views, “I think it’s very clear that Richard is a race realist and eugenicist.” The term eugenicist refers to proponents of eugenics, the belief that the genetic quality of the human race can be improved through certain practices — practices viewed by many as scientific racism.
Hanania did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
In a 2017 speech at the “Old South Ball” in Danville, Va., Stewart, an attorney who would become the 2018 Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate, told the assembled crowd he was proud to stand next to a Confederate flag:
“That flag is not about racism, folks, it’s not about hatred, it’s not about slavery, it is about our heritage,” Stewart said. At the same event, he called Virginia “the state of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.”
According to a 2018 New York Times profile of Stewart, white supremacists volunteered on the then-Senate candidate’s campaign. “Several of his aides and advisers have used racist or anti-Muslim language, or maintained links to outspoken racists like Jason Kessler ” – who helped organize the white supremacist Unite The Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia – the Times reported.
Stewart did not respond to an email seeking comment. Kessler did not respond to a phone call.
At least three contributors to Project 2025 have supported the racist “Great Replacement” theory, which contends that powerful Democrats and leftists are conspiring to change the demographics of the United States by turning a blind eye to, or even encouraging, illegal immigration.
Michael Anton, a former senior national security official in the Trump administration, wrote in a pseudonymous essay published in 2016 that “The ceaseless importation of Third World foreigners with no tradition of, taste for, or experience in liberty means that the electorate grows more left, more Democratic, less Republican, less republican, and less traditionally American with every cycle. As does, of course, the U.S. population.”
Anton has also written several essays, including one for USA TODAY, arguing to end birthright citizenship. His arguments have been widely criticized as factually incorrect and misleading. In an opinion piece for the Washington Post, Tufts University politics professor Daniel Drezner called them “ very racist .”
Anton did not respond to a request for comment.
Another contributor is Stephen Moore, who in 2019 withdrew his name for consideration for the Federal Reserve Board amid scrutiny for his misogynistic and racist jokes and commentary.
Moore, who had made a joke about Trump removing the Obamas from public housing when he took office, was widely mocked when he later tried to clear up the joke in a television interview. The fallout, combined with concerns about Moore’s history of writing articles viewed as disparaging toward women, led him to withdraw his name for consideration.
Moore did not respond to a request for comment.
The 2009 PhD thesis of Project 2025 contributor Jason Richwine was titled, “ IQ and Immigration Policy .” The thesis includes statements such as: “No one knows whether Hispanics will ever reach IQ parity with whites, but the prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-IQ children and grandchildren is difficult to argue against.”
Richwine resigned from his position at the Heritage Foundation in 2013 amid controversy over his research. He now works at the Center For Immigration Studies. The paper, and Richwine’s defense of it, were widely decried as racist , bigoted and scientifically incorrect .
It didn’t help Richwine that his thesis was uncovered in the midst of controversy over an immigration study he co-authored that was roundly criticized by liberals and conservatives alike.
“Had he not just argued, in an extremely tendentious fashion, that Hispanic immigrants are, on the whole, parasites, he might have endured public criticism of his dissertation,” read an analysis in The Economist . “Had he not in his dissertation argued that Hispanic immigration ought to be limited on grounds of inferior Hispanic intelligence, he would have endured the firestorm over the risible Heritage immigration study.”
Richwine did not respond to a request for comment.
“The fact that they consulted individuals with such abhorrent views to develop this plan is further evidence of just how un-American these proposals are,” Tony Carrk, executive director of Accountable.us told USA TODAY. “The idea that the next conservative administration might replace 50,000 government experts with extremists like this should concern every American.”
At a campaign rally in Michigan earlier this month, Trump told the crowd that Project 2025 is “seriously extreme.”
“Some on the severe right, came up with this Project 25,” Trump said. “ I don’t even know, some of them I know who they are, but they’re very, very conservative. They’re sort of the opposite of the radical left.”
In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump had previously distanced himself from the effort.
“I have no idea who is behind it,” he wrote on July 5. “I disagree with some of the things they’re saying, and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.”
But reports show at least 31 of the 38 official authors and editors of Project 2025 have a connection to the former president and GOP presidential candidate.
Vance, who Trump announced as his running mate earlier this month, also has connections to Project 2025. He wrote the foreword for a book being released later this year by Kevin Roberts, one of the manifesto's key architects.
“Never before has a figure with Roberts’s depth and stature within the American Right tried to articulate a genuinely new future for conservatism,” Vance wrote in a review of the book, published on Amazon, which has since been removed.
Trump has pointed to his own policy manifesto – “ Agenda 47 ,” so named because the next U.S. president will be its 47th – as evidence that he doesn’t plan to use Project 2025 if he wins in November. Agenda 47 focuses on the same broad issues as Project 2025: Education, immigration and crime, and also tackles the LGBTQ+ community and welfare programs.
The plans differ in some ways. Agenda 47 doesn’t mention abortion once, for example, while abortion is a focus of Project 2025, which calls on the FDA to reverse its approval of abortion drugs and severely limit the mailing of abortion pills.
Harriot, the author who has closely studied the document, described Project 2025 as the “employee manual” for a future Trump administration. Agenda 47 is the public-facing statement of the former president’s political intentions, Harriot said, but Project 2025 is where the details are.
“There’s some cognitive dissonance,” Harriot said. “Trump doesn’t get elected by people who are just outwardly racist, and being associated with Project 2025 would dismantle his plausible deniability, because it's so blatantly racist.”
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
In this essay, the author uses her repetition strategy at the beginning of most of the paragraphs. She repeats the phrase "Poverty is". The essay is well organized where she repeats the word - poverty many times. That means her main concern is poverty and she is showing her bitter feelings and frustrations about her miserable conditions.
The essay " What is Poverty? " is written by Jo Goodwin Parker, an American writer. She mailed her essay to George Henderson, preferring that the editor present no Egline. George Henderson received it when he was writing his 1971, Lost America`s other Children, the public school`s outside suburbia. She explained her experienced of rural ...
The essay is a personal account, addressed directly to the—reader, about living in poverty. Journal Discuss an image or experience that you witnessed that presented the humiliat- ... Poverty means insects in your food, in your nose, in your eyes, and crawling over you when you sleep. Poverty is hoping it never
500+ Words Essay on Poverty Essay. "Poverty is the worst form of violence". - Mahatma Gandhi. We can define poverty as the condition where the basic needs of a family, like food, shelter, clothing, and education are not fulfilled. It can lead to other problems like poor literacy, unemployment, malnutrition, etc.
poverty, the state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions.Poverty is said to exist when people lack the means to satisfy their basic needs. In this context, the identification of poor people first requires a determination of what constitutes basic needs. These may be defined as narrowly as "those necessary for survival" or as broadly as ...
Jo Goodwin Parker's essay, "What is Poverty?" is about Parker who has personally experienced rural poverty. She explains her story from childhood to adulthood. Parker's struggles are overwhelming; look at any sentence, the evidence of her daily struggle is there. From her underwear to living arrangements, and everything in between ...
Major English Grade XII. What Is Poverty ? o Goodwin Parker in her realistic essay "What is Poverty" gives a real and graphic account of what being poor actually means on a daily basis. Parker stresses that poverty is more ugly, cruel and devastating than it is shown in newspapers. She defines poverty as a lack - that is living without ...
The essay is a personal account, addressed directly to the reader, about living in poverty. In the essay, Parker offers detailed accounts, experiences and scenarios in Poverty Stories and factual experiences provide insight to readers that explicate the reality of any situation.
The essay is a personal account. addressed directly to the reader, about living in poverty. In her essay. "What is Poverty? ", American essayist Jo Goodwin Parker forwards a comprehensive definition of poverty. According to her, poverty is a bad smell, dirt, tiredness, ugliness, cruelty, sleeplessness, begging, a black future, and a nightmare.
Main Summary. In this essay, Jo Goodwin Parker has described her life living in poverty and her daily struggles for the sake of her family. According to her poverty has many faces. For her poverty is living with dirt, living without hope, better foodstuff, medical care, proper sanitation, and proper education.
In 'What is Poverty', Jo Goodwin Parker shares her own experience living in poverty to provide a real definition of what poverty actually means. This essay is in Class 11 English essays Unit 4. Textbook exercise question answers solution and summary of this text is discussed in this article.
Download. Essay, Pages 4 (994 words) Views. 6500. Jo Goodwin Parker's essay, "What is Poverty? " is about Parker who has personally experienced rural poverty. She explains her story from childhood to adulthood. Parker's struggles are overwhelming; look at any sentence, the evidence of her daily struggle is there.
In the essay, Parker states "Poverty is an acid that drips on pride until pride is worn away. Poverty is a chisel that chips on honor until honor is worn away.". (3) these metaphors are very thought provoking and powerful, making you think about the impoverished in a new light. Read More.
The U.S. Census Bureau defines "deep poverty" as living in a household with a total cash income below 50 percent of its poverty threshold. According to the Census Bureau, 20.03 million people lived in deep poverty in 2021. Those in deep poverty represented 6.2 percent of the total population and 48.4 percent of those in poverty.
Main Argument. Dalrymple argues that what is often called poverty in England is more similar to 'squalor.'. The instance of the rude patient, a man who had overdosed on heroin and then verbally abused doctors, is a part of his reasoning. Dalrymple states that the comfort and certainty of having the government provide the necessities to live ...
1. Introduction. Poverty "is one of the defining challenges of the 21st Century facing the world" (Gweshengwe et al., Citation 2020, p. 1).In 2019, about 1.3 billion people in 101 countries were living in poverty (United Nations Development Programme and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, Citation 2019).For this reason, the 2030 Global Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals ...
Summary of What is Poverty. In the essay "What is Poverty?" by Jo Goodwin Parker, the author provides a detailed and poignant description of what poverty is and how it impacts the daily lives of those who experience it. Through vivid and descriptive language, the author conveys the physical and emotional challenges of living in poverty ...
Poverty is one of the driving forces of inequality in the world. Between 1990-2015, much progress was made. The number of people living on less than $1.90 went from 36% to 10%. However, according to the World Bank, the COVID-19 pandemic represents a serious problem that disproportionately impacts the poor. Research released in February of 2020 ...
For most of us, living on less than $2 a day seems far removed from reality. But it is the reality for roughly 800 million people around the globe. Approximately 10% of the global population lives in extreme poverty, meaning that they're living below the poverty line of $1.90 per day.
Answer: By "the poor are always silent", Parker means the helpless state of poor people. In poverty, money plays a very vital role. Money itself is the right solution for all the problems. But, due to a lack of money, poor people feel weaker. They always remain silent in front of others.
"What Is Poverty?" Jo Goodwin Parker The following selection was published in America's Other Children: Public Schools Outside Suburbs, by George Henderson in 1971 by the University of Oklahoma Press. The author has requested that no biographical information about her be distributed. The essay is a personal account, addressed directly to
In the thought-provoking essay "The Singer Solution to World Poverty," Peter Singer addresses the ethical dilemma of whether it is our moral obligation to help those in extreme poverty. Singer argues that affluent individuals have a duty to donate a significant portion of their income to charitable organizations, as it can save countless lives.
Summary Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty; Summary Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty. 1532 Words 7 Pages. In Singer's article "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" Singer's main conclusion is that people should give up their luxury spending or over spending of money on things that are not really needed. Instead of spending ...
One of Ms. Harris's mandates as vice president has been to address the root causes of migration from Latin America, like poverty and violence in migrants' home countries.
Poverty is living in a smell that never leaves. This is a smell of urine, sour milk, and spoiling food sometimes joined with the strong smell of long-cooked onions. Onions are cheap. If you have smelled this smell, you did not know how it came. It is the smell of the outdoor privy.
Seven of the organizations on Project 2025's Advisory Board have been designated as extremist or hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center, according to a May report from Accountable.us, a ...