diplomatic speech

Advertisement

Supported by

Transcript of Blinken’s Speech on ‘New Chapter’ in Afghanistan

Shortly after the last U.S. troops left Afghanistan, the secretary of state outlined a plan to use diplomacy to try to extract remaining Americans and Afghan allies.

• Share full article

The following is a transcript of Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken’s remarks on Monday about the U.S. plan for engagement with Afghanistan after evacuations ended and the last American troops departed .

Good evening, everyone.

Eighteen days ago, the United States and our allies began our evacuation and relocation operation in Kabul. As you just heard from the Pentagon a few hours ago, that operation was completed. More than 123,000 people have been safely flown out of Afghanistan. That includes about 6,000 American citizens.

This has been a massive military, diplomatic and humanitarian undertaking. One of the most difficult in the nation’s history and an extraordinary feat of logistics and coordination under some of the most challenging circumstances imaginable. Many, many people made this possible.

I want to commend our outstanding diplomats who worked around the clock, and around the world, to coordinate the operation. They volunteered for duty at the Kabul airport. They flew to transit countries to help process thousands of Afghans bound for the United States. They deployed to ports of entry and American military bases to welcome Afghans to their new homes.

They staffed a 24/7 task force here in Washington, overseen by Deputy Secretary Brian McKeon. And they built a list of Americans possibly seeking to leave Afghanistan, then worked to contact every single one of them, repeatedly, making 55,000 phone calls, sending 33,000 emails since Aug. 14.

They solved problem after problem to keep the mission moving forward. They did this because for the thousands of State Department and U.S.A.I.D. employees who served in Afghanistan in the past 20 years, this evacuation operation was very personal. Many worked hand in hand for years with Afghan partners, many of whom became trusted friends. We also lost cherished members of our foreign service community in Afghanistan. We’ll never forget them.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

Be Diplomatic Blog

Inspiring Understanding, Advocating Diplomacy

How to Be Diplomatic When Speaking

Effective communication is a crucial skill in both personal and professional settings . The ability to express oneself diplomatically can greatly impact the success of conversations and relationships. Diplomatic speech involves choosing words wisely, maintaining a tactful tone, and fostering positive connections in various communication contexts. In this article, we will explore effective strategies on how to be diplomatic when speaking, as well as gain insights into the key principles of diplomatic speech.

1. Choose Your Words Wisely

One of the fundamental aspects of diplomatic speech is the careful selection of words . It is important to consider the impact your words may have on the listener and to choose language that is respectful and inclusive. Avoid using inflammatory or offensive language that may escalate tensions or create misunderstandings.

Additionally, using neutral and objective language can help to maintain a diplomatic tone . Instead of making sweeping generalizations or using absolutes, focus on presenting facts and expressing your ideas in a balanced manner. This allows for open dialogue and encourages others to engage in a constructive conversation.

2. Maintain a Tactful Tone

Another key element of diplomatic speech is maintaining a tactful tone. This involves speaking in a calm and composed manner, even in challenging or confrontational situations. Avoid raising your voice or using aggressive body language, as this can create a hostile environment and hinder effective communication.

Active listening is also crucial in maintaining a tactful tone. Show genuine interest in what others have to say, and respond thoughtfully. Avoid interrupting or dismissing their opinions, as this can come across as disrespectful. By actively listening and responding with empathy, you can foster a positive and respectful conversation.

3. Foster Positive Connections

Diplomatic speech is not just about the words you choose or the tone you use, but also about fostering positive connections with others. Building rapport and trust is essential for effective communication. Find common ground and areas of agreement, and emphasize shared goals or interests.

When faced with differing opinions, focus on finding areas of compromise or common understanding. Acknowledge the validity of different perspectives and seek to find a middle ground that satisfies both parties. By fostering a sense of collaboration and cooperation, you can create an environment that encourages open dialogue and respectful communication.

4. Understand Cultural Sensitivities

In today’s globalized world, it is important to be aware of and respect cultural sensitivities when communicating diplomatically. Different cultures may have different norms and expectations when it comes to communication styles and etiquette.

Take the time to educate yourself about the cultural practices and customs of the individuals or groups you are communicating with. This will help you avoid inadvertently causing offense or misunderstanding. By demonstrating cultural awareness and sensitivity, you can build stronger relationships and promote effective cross-cultural communication.

5. Practice Self-Reflection

Lastly, developing diplomatic speech requires ongoing self-reflection and self-awareness. Take the time to reflect on your own communication style and the impact it may have on others. Consider seeking feedback from trusted individuals who can provide honest insights into your strengths and areas for improvement.

Continuously strive to enhance your communication skills by seeking out opportunities for growth and learning. This may include reading books or articles on effective communication, attending workshops or seminars, or even working with a communication coach. By investing in your own development, you can become a more diplomatic and effective communicator.

In conclusion, being diplomatic when speaking is an essential skill for successful conversations and relationships. By choosing your words wisely, maintaining a tactful tone, fostering positive connections, understanding cultural sensitivities, and practicing self-reflection, you can enhance your diplomatic speech and create more meaningful and productive interactions. Remember, effective communication is not just about what you say, but also how you say it.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Official websites use .gov

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

Secretary Blinken to Deliver a Foreign Policy Speech

Notice to the Press

Office of the Spokesperson

March 2, 2021

Secretary of State Antony Blinken will deliver a speech on U.S. foreign policy at 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 3, 2021, at the Department of State.

Out of an abundance of caution and in order to practice safe social distancing, Secretary Blinken’s speech will be pooled press coverage only.

The Secretary’s speech will be live streamed on  www.state.gov .

For more information, please contact the Office of Press Relations at  [email protected] .

U.S. Department of State

The lessons of 1989: freedom and our future.

Biden to rally US diplomats with 1st major foreign policy speech

The president will outline his vision amid concerns over political appointments.

President Joe Biden will deliver his first major foreign policy speech in office Thursday during a visit to the State Department, where he is expected to talk about "reclaiming America's role in the world" and restoring values to the center of U.S. foreign policy, according to White House press secretary Jen Psaki.

Biden's speech, alongside Secretary of State Antony Blinken, will outline his foreign policy vision and how he will put diplomacy at the center of it, a senior administration official told ABC News -- a point driven home by the fact that the State Department will be the first federal agency he visits as president. He is also expected to take a series of executive actions while there, the official said.

MORE: Joe Biden's top foreign policy challenges in 2021

The president plans to "thank the men and women of the national security workforce for their service to our country," Psaki added, telling reporters the following day that Biden would "talk broadly about foreign policy" but would not lay down "his vision for every issue and every foreign policy issue."

The visit, she said Wednesday, would be "largely focused on his desire to thank the men and women who are us -- who are Foreign Service officers, civil servants, who are the heart and soul of that institution and, frankly, our government."

But after four years of former President Donald Trump's proposed budget cuts, taunts against the "deep state" department and political retaliation against career diplomats, the agency remains beset by low morale.

While many of Biden and Blinken's initial steps and messages have been welcomed, some career officials have expressed concern that career diplomats will be sidelined again under this administration.

To that end, Biden is expected to talk about how the administration will support State Department employees' work, according to the senior official, and name career diplomats to senior positions, according to current and former State Department officials.

Turning Trump's 'America First' into multilateralism

Rolling back Trump's nationalist approach to the world -- which he termed "America First" -- has already become a hallmark of Biden's short time at the White House.

He has returned the United States to international agreements and organizations his predecessor left -- including the Paris climate accord and the World Health Organization -- and has endorsed a multilateral approach to issues ranging from the COVID-19 pandemic to China and Iran.

"We can make America, once again, the leading force for good in the world," he declared in his inaugural address .

MORE: Biden admin designates Myanmar military's takeover a coup d'état, triggering aid freeze

The president will also announce several executive actions at the State Department that are aimed at emphasizing American values in the country's foreign policy, according to the administration official. The official would not provide more details, although one may mirror an order Biden signed his first day in office that emphasized the importance of science to the federal government's decision-making.

At the same time, the Biden administration has made clear it believes addressing a series of domestic crises -- the coronavirus pandemic, the economic crisis and calls for racial justice -- should take precedence.

"Foreign policy is domestic policy, and domestic policy is foreign policy," Biden's national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, said last week . "And at the end of the day, right now, the most profound national security challenge facing the United States is getting our own house in order, is domestic renewal."

Multiple U.S. policies are under review by the State Department, especially those implemented by Trump and his top diplomat, Mike Pompeo , after the 2020 election. Blinken has said the most "urgent" is their designation of the Houthi rebels in Yemen as a terrorist group , which imperils food aid and other assistance to the war-torn country on the brink of famine.

MORE: As Biden reviews US-Saudi relations, pressure rises to remake ties over Khashoggi killing, Yemen war

The administration is also reviewing Trump's tariffs on China and sanctions on Iran, U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan, relations with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, and the designation of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism.

Biden to elevate career diplomats amid concerns over appointees

The president had originally planned to visit the State Department Monday, but his remarks were pushed back to later in the week because of a snowstorm that hit Washington, according to the White House.

But when he does address career diplomats, Biden will have done so far earlier in his term than his two immediate predecessors. Trump visited the agency after one year in office and only after firing his first secretary Rex Tillerson, while President Barack Obama's first speech there was in 2011, three years into his first term in office.

That's a welcome sign to many, as were Blinken's welcome remarks on his first full day in office , telling the department's 70,000 employees worldwide, "I will have your back."

"It starts with rebuilding morale and trust. This is a priority for me because we need a strong department for the United States to be strong in the world," Blinken said on Jan. 27 -- adding the administration will be investing "significantly in building a diverse and inclusive State Department."

So far, the administration has given senior roles to two men and five women, three of them women of color like Linda Thomas-Greenfield, Biden's nominee to be ambassador to the United Nations.

MORE: Biden's UN envoy pick to vow tough stance on China, greater US engagement

But in those positions and down through lower levels, they have so far only named political appointees rather than career officials, and unlike his Democratic campaign opponent Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Biden did not pledge to end the practice, unique to the U.S., of giving wealthy donors ambassadorships.

"I'd be hard pressed going back to the Carter years to point to an incoming team that is as well-versed on the department and has such a strong history at the department, including some of the political deputy assistant secretaries they're bringing in," said Michael McKinley, who served as U.S. ambassador to Brazil, Afghanistan, Colombia, and Peru and resigned as Pompeo's senior adviser .

"Yes, they're political, but they have a long trajectory in the State Department, and they, of all people, will understand the importance of supporting the career Foreign Service. There will be a significant return to an important role for Foreign Service professionals," he told ABC News.

Some of those senior officials are Foreign Service officers who either resigned or were pushed out by the Trump administration, with many colleagues welcoming them back -- but others concerned the message is if they want to obtain senior positions, they're better off leaving the nonpartisan Foreign Service to come back with a political appointment.

"That's definitely not gone unnoticed," said one U.S. diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the press. "It tells us you should've been working for Albright-Stonebridge rather than toiling away somewhere in Foggy Bottom" -- a reference to the consulting firm chaired by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright where several former U.S. diplomats have worked, including Thomas-Greenfield and Biden's pick for deputy secretary of state, Wendy Sherman.

A senior State Department official pushed back on those concerns, saying that the department's "greatest resource" is "our people" and that Blinken will elevate career officials to senior positions soon.

MORE: State Department's 1st openly gay spokesperson sends signal to the world, advocates say

Ambassador Eric Rubin, the president of the American Foreign Service Association, diplomats' union, applauded Blinken and other Biden officials for reaching out already.

"They are being very proactive in reaching out and very accessible," Rubin told ABC News. "We look forward to seeing upcoming announcements about career senior Foreign Service officer being selected for senior positions at the department."

State Department spokesperson Ned Price hinted at the same, telling reporters in his first briefing Tuesday, "You will see a number of respected career officials assume some of the most senior positions in this building. There's no doubt about that."

Related Topics

• President Biden

Trending Reader Picks

Trump immunity judgment is returned to lower court

• Aug 2, 2:59 PM

Gershkovich and Whelan return home

• Aug 2, 12:53 AM

Harris and Trump tied in 538's new polling average

• Aug 2, 10:28 AM

Trump lashes out at Biden over prisoner exchange

• Aug 2, 12:31 PM

What the polls say about a Harris-Trump matchup

• Jul 22, 12:51 PM

ABC News Live

24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events

Presidential Remarks on Diplomacy and Global Challenges

President Biden made remarks at the State Department on U.S. diplomacy and global challenges. He began his remarks by declaring, “America is… read more

President Biden made remarks at the State Department on U.S. diplomacy and global challenges. He began his remarks by declaring, “America is back, America is back. Diplomacy is back, at the center of our foreign policy,” and later speaking about rebuilding alliances that have “atrophied over the past few years of neglect, and I would argue abuse.” The president said he had spoken to President Putin of Russia, saying they haf reached an agreement to preserve the START Treaty, and that the days of America “rolling over” to Russia are done, and that the United States “will not hesitate to raise the cost on Russia.” President Biden also spoke about halting troop withdrawals from Germany, working to end the war in Yemen, and restoring the refugee admission program. close

Javascript must be enabled in order to access C-SPAN videos.

Points of Interest

For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events. Click the play button and tap the screen to see the at the bottom of the player. Tap the to see a complete list of all Points of Interest - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.

• Text type Full Transcript Text People Graphical Timeline
• Filter by Speaker All Speakers Joe Biden Antony J. Blinken
• Search this text

*This text was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events. Click the play button and move your cursor over the video to see the . Click on the marker to see the description and watch. You can also click the in the lower left of the video player to see a complete list of all Points of Interest from this program - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.

People in this video

Hosting Organization

• White House White House

Airing Details

• Feb 04, 2021 | 2:42pm EST | C-SPAN 3
• Feb 05, 2021 | 5:12am EST | C-SPAN RADIO
• Feb 07, 2021 | 10:18am EST | C-SPAN RADIO
• Feb 07, 2021 | 3:50pm EST | C-SPAN 1

Featured Clips from This Video

President Biden Announces START Treaty Extension, Calls for Immediate Release of Alexey Navalny

President Biden says he has spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin and that the two have agreed to extend the STAR…

President Biden Calls on Military in Burma to Relinquish Power and Release Political Leaders and Activists

In his first foreign policy speech at the State Department, President Biden calls on the military in Burma to relinquish…

• 1,355 views

Related Video

President Biden Remarks to State Department Employees

President Biden and Vice President Harris delivered brief remarks on U.S. diplomacy to State Department employees. Vice …

Secretary of State Blinken Remarks at State Department

Secretary of State Antony Blinken delivered welcome remarks to staff and colleagues on his first day at the State Depart…

Swearing-In Ceremony for Secretary of State Blinken

Vice President Kamala Harris particiipated in a swearing-in ceremony for Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Secretary of State Blinken Remarks on Foreign Policy

Secretary of State Antony Blinken gave his first major speech on U.S. foreign policy priorities. In his remarks, he talk…

User Created Clips from This Video

User Clip: Joe Biden, Speech at State Department, 4 Feb. 2021

User Clip: President Biden calls for end to war in Yemen

Mobile Menu Overlay

The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, July 30,   2024

1:54 P.M. EDT   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Good afternoon, everybody.    Q    Good afternoon.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So many jokes.  But —   Q    No, it’s just you and Jacqui are matching.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Oh!  Okay, Jacqui.    Q    -ish.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  All right.  Got the memo.   Q    Yeah.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, I want to say — start by saying that today is the Biden-Harris administration’s 500th briefing.  Yay.  I know you guys are excited.  (Laughter.)   And then, from now until the end of our term, we will do 500 more.  I’m just kidding.  Can you imagine?  (Laughter.)  Anyway.   Guys, all kidding aside, so, we’ve shared a lot of moments together and important exchanges.  We are proud to be a White House that understands the important [importance] of the role all of you play.   As President Biden has said, a free press is a pillar of our democracy.  And so, really happy to do this exercise with you almost every day from — from here, from this podium — behind this lectern.    And, really, the freedom of the press is so incredibly important.  And I think what we do almost every day shines a light to the world of how democracy works.  And so, thank you — thank you all for — for participating in that.  And we appreciate the journalistic work that you all do.   Today, the Senate took a major bipartisan step forward in making our kids safer online as our nation grapples with an unprecedented youth mental health crisis.  There is undeniable evidence that social media and other online platforms have contributed to it.   As the president said today in his statement: Our children are subjected to a Wild West online with virtually no limits or regulation, and it’s past time to address that.   It’s exactly why he has made tackling the mental health crisis a key priority of this Unity Agenda for the nation.  It’s an issue that cuts across politics and affects red states and blue states.  And it’s why the administration has invested historic resources, launched new tools to ensure people can just — can get the help they need, and has consistently called on Congress to work together in a bipartisan way on solutions.   This bill does what the president called for in the — in his first State of the Union Address.  It strengthens privacy protections, bans targeted advertising to children, and demands tech companies stop collecting personal data on our children.   As the president said, our kids have been waiting too long for the safety and privacy protections they deserve and with — and which this bill provides.   And he is pleased with the overwhelming bipartisan vote in the Senate and encourages the House to send this bill to his desk for his signature without delay.   We continue to pray for the thousands of Americans under mandatory evacuation orders as wildlife continues — wildfires continue to devastate communities across the western United States.   The president has been briefed on the fires, including the Park Fire in California and the fires in Oregon.   As of July 30th, over 7,000 federal personnel from the U.S.  Forest Service and the Department of the Interior are on the ground across California and the Pacific Northwest hel- — helping fight the bl- — the blaze and keep people safe, including more than 620 personnel assigned to both the Park and Borel fires in California.   Numerous firefighting air tankers are flying — are flying fire suppression missions as conditions allow, and the Department of Defense has mobilized four of its C-130 Modular Airborne Fire Fighting Systems to support fire suppression efforts.   DOD has — has also begun training National Guard troops should they be requested by governors to assist with fire suppression, and they are supporting California state National Guard operators’ early and rapid detect- — detection of new fire starts.   Additional — additionally, FEMA has issued several Fire Management Assistance Grants to help reimburse states for firefighting costs.   As always, we stand ready to provide further support as needed.   Today, the 59th anniversary of Medicare and Medicaid, two programs that have given tens of millions of Americans the security and dignity of affordable health care coverage.   Nearly 140 million Americans benefit from these programs.  Yet still, Republicans in Congress have proposed budgets and — and slashes to these critical programs and endorsed extreme policies of Project 2025 that would slash Medicaid funding and cut Medicare benefits like the president’s Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.   The contrast is clear.  The Biden-Harris administration is committed to protecting and strengthening these programs, like making sure children and pregnant women covered by Medicaid have coverage for a full year.   And we are committed to making health care more affordable and accessible for all, including the 1 million people newly covered under the ACA’s Medicaid expansion since the president and vice president took over.   Now think about the Inflation Reduction Act and what that does.  It allows Medicare to negotiate lower prices on prescription drugs; caps out-of-pocket drug costs at $2,000 per year, saving Medicare ben- — beneficiaries thousands of dollars annually; and provides Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries with free vaccines.   And under President Biden and Vice President Harris, more people have health insurance than ever before.   So, today, we recognize the anniversary of Medicare and Medicaid, we affirm our commitment to build on this program, protect access to these programs from Republican elected officials’ extreme attacks.   With that, I appreciate your patience.  Colleen, how did you — what time did you get home last night?   Q    (Laughs.)  A little late.  At 1:45.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  1:45.  Okay.  All right.    Q    It’s been a — it’s been a rough morning.     MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Let’s do this.   Q    Let’s do it.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Matt, too.  I see Matt back there.   Q    Ken, too.   So, can you give us an update on where Vene- — on where the U.S. stands on the Venezuela elections?  In particular, I know the president is speaking with President Lula of Brazil later, but I’m just wondering if there’s any progress on how the U.S. is trying to decide, you know, what to do.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, a couple of things.  I believe right before I walked out, a statement from the National Security Council spox went out, so I’ll certainly refer you to that.    But just to give you a little bit of what that — what was in that statement.  Obviously, the U.S. has been closely monitoring Venezuela’s presidential election that took place on Sunday and the subsequent announcements by Venezuela’s National Electoral Council.    First, let me say that the U.S. applauds the Venezuelan people for their courage and commitment to democracy by participating in this election in the face of repression and adversity.    So, we continue to call on Venezuela’s electoral authorities to release full, transparent, and detailed voting results, including by polling stations as well.    This especially critical — this is especially critical given that there are clear signs that the election results announced by the Venezuela’s National Electoral Council do not reflect the will of the Ve- — the Venezuelan people as it was expressed at the ballot box on July 28th.    We are also reviewing other electoral data shared by civil society organizations and the reports of international election monitors.    The United States stands on the side of the democratic aspirations of the Venezuela people, including supporting their right to express their views freely and without reprisal.    So, that is where we stand.  And again, we’re just going to not get ahead of that.  But we’ve been very clear — very clear about the election results.    Q    And can you help us understand a little bit about what the president was talking about last night?  He was asked when he’d go campaign for Vice President Harris, and he said, “Well, I did today.”  I was wondering if there was — was yesterday — was there a campaign element to yesterday?  Was he sort of talking broadly?  I just wonder if you could help us understand that.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, as — as you know, the president gave a little — is this when he — when we came back at 1:15 a.m. and —   Q    Yeah.  Yeah.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Okay, 1:15 a.m. on the South Lawn, the president took a couple of your colleagues’ questions.  I think he was — I did not ask him about that particular answer.  My guess is he was speaking more broadly.    Look, at the end of the day, I’m not going to speak for the campaign.  I’m not going to speak to the president’s campaigning schedule.  That is something for the campaign to speak to.  But they are partners in this administration.    The president, the vice president — as you know, we announced SCOTUS reform in — at LBJ — LBJ Library just yesterday in Austin, and that was an important moment.  That was an important moment to talk about where we are today.  And the president met the moment talking about how no one is above the law here and how important the rule of law —   I just started this top — the top of the briefing talking about how it’s so important to have the freedom of the press — right? — and how we’ve had our — this is the 500th briefing.  It is also important for our democracy.    And so, obviously, the president was — and the vice president were partners in making that announcement in the sense of how they were going to move forward of the three things that he laid out on what reform looks like for this administration.   As it relates to the campaign, don’t have anything specific to share.  But this is certainly the Biden-Harris administration.  And everything that we have done the past three and a half years, we want to continue to do moving forward and continue to work on behalf of the American people.    Yeah.   Q    Thanks, Karine.  Last night, the president said he’s been talking to the vice president about her potential running mate.  Could you just explain how often they’ve been talking to each other and when is the last time they spoke?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, I’m going to be super careful.  Not going to speak to the running mate or anything like that.  I’m not going to go beyond what the president shared.    What I can say is the — and I have said this before — the president and the vice president talk regularly.  They actually spoke about a day or two ago.  They stay in touch.    And — and that’s going to continue as they — as they — not just because, obviously, the — the vice president is running.  But that’s going to continue because, as I said, she’s a critical partner in what they do.  But they do speak regularly.    Q    Is there —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  And that I can assure you.   Q    Is there any color you could add about the kind of conversations, if there’s, you know, counseling — the president — advice he’s been sharing with his vice president?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, I’ll say this.  The president has been in the public service, as you know, for more than 54 years — as a senator, as vice president.  He had the role, as you will know, for eight years as vice president.  And now he is president for three and a half years and six more — six more — six more months of his term.    And I think as — you know, as a leader of the Democratic Party as well, I think he always offers up advice, any type of — a little bit of wisdom that he has with experience on these multiple fronts that he’s been able to lead this country.    And so, you know, I think he’s — that is certainly a role that he plays as well with the vice president.  I’m not going to speak to the campaign.    But certainly, when the vice president became vice president herself, he offered his advice, his opinion, and also, I — I would say he was a mentor to her.  But certainly not going to go beyond — beyond that.    Q    And where is the president when it comes to picking a new Secret Service director?  Is this a very short list?  Is he really broadening this search?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah, I think it was asked this question yesterday or very recently.  Look, the president understands how important it is to fulfill this role, to — to have someone who is experienced.  And so, he’s taking this very seriously, like he does any other appointment that he makes within — within the administration.    Don’t have anything for you on timing, on timeline.  I don’t have a personal announcement for you today.  But certainly, the president is taking this very seriously.  And when we have locked in someone, ready to make that announcement, we will — certainly you all will know about it.    Go ahead.    Q    Karine —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  You — you, like, ruined the first row, (inaudible).  (Laughter.)   Q    What did I — oh, I’m sorry.  I apologize to you —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  It’s — and it’s always Reuters.   Q    — and to everyone for that.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  It’s always —   Q    Yes.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  It’s always Reuters.  Last time, it was Steve.   Q    (Laughs.)  I take — take full blame for that.  (Laughter.)   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  But we love you anyway.   Q    The Israeli strikes in Lebanon today, do you view them as escalatory?  Do you think they’re an appropriate response to what we saw previously?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, obviously, we are aware of the reports out there that the IDF just conducted a strike against Hezbollah in Lebanon, and I leave it to Israel to speak for their own military operations.    I do not have an immediate comment, as this just happened — literally just happened a few minutes before I walked out.  So, I’m going to leave Israel to — to certainly — IDF, as they have been doing, to respond to this.  And just don’t have an immediate comment at this time.    Q    And then just a follow up on — on Colleen’s question earlier — the Lula call today.  Is there —    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.  Oh, I didn’t — I’m sorry, Colleen, I didn’t touch on that.    Q    Is there any expectation that that there’s going to be some prep as far as sanctions are concerned or is — I mean, is there — what is the Venezuela content of that call?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Okay.  So, let me just say — and I think we shared this all — with all of you that the president was going to be speaking with the president of Brazil.    And so, they’re going to discuss a number of issues.  And like we normally do, we will certainly have a readout for all of you.    So, look, we are — as it relates to Venezuela, we are obviously in the process of evaluating the [what] Maduro and his representatives do next, and we will respond accordingly.    And so, while I have nothing to announce today as it relates to sanctions or moving forward, we will continue to assess our — our calibrated sanctions policy towards Venezuela in light of overall U.S. interests, the actions and nonactions that are taken by Maduro and his representatives, and the overall direction of our broader U- — U.S. bilateral engagement with Venezuela.    And so, again, don’t want to get ahead of where we are at this — at this time.    Go ahead, Danny.   Q    Thanks, Karine.  Just going back to Israel, if I may.  Kirby said yesterday that fears of an all-out war between Israel and Hezbollah were exaggerated.  Is that still the White House’s assessment after today’s strike?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, we do not believe that an all-out war is inevitable.  That is not something that we believe.  And we believe that it can still be avoided.    You know, this is a president you — you’ve watched him the last three and a half years; he believes in diplomacy, diplomatic solutions — especially, as we’re talking in this moment, along the Blue Line.  That — that is true as well.    And so — and that will end these attacks, if we have some diplomatic kind of solution from Hezbollah, once and for all and allow Israel and Lebanese citizens on both sides of the border to return to their homes and live — and live — and live in — in safety.  And that’s what we want to see.    So, we — that’s what we believe.  There’s a diplomatic solution here.  And that’s what we’re trying to get to.   Q    And will the White House be reaching out again to Israel in the wake of this strike too?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, look, I don’t have any, again, immediate reactions to this or immediate comments from us on this.  We regularly talk to — our counterparts here regularly talk to our Israeli counterparts or government — our counterparts there — our counterparts there.  And so, that will continue.  That is a regular, daily conversation.    I just want to be really mindful.  I just don’t have any immediate comment to today.    Go ahead, Weijia.   Q    Thanks, Karine.  So, what reason do you and the president have to believe that there is a diplomatic solution here?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Because we have to, you know, continue to be optimistic here.  I think it’s important to have a diplomatic solution.  We do not want to see an escalation.  We do not want to see an all-out war.    Those conversations happening — happened — the diplomatic conversations.  Obviously, I’m not going to get into private discussions from here.  But it is important — it is important for the people of Israel, it is important for the Lebanese people to live in safety, to get back to their homes.  And that’s what we want to see.    Q    And then, I’m following up on something else the president said yesterday when he was asked about Supreme Court reform.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yes.    Q    What did he mean when he said that Speaker Johnson is “dead on arrival”?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, look, he actually addressed this right — in his speech, in his remarks.  Yesterday, he — he went right to it and talked about how — his idea basically was dead on arrival — the speaker’s idea.  He actually talked about it, and he said, what the speaker — he reiterated what the speaker said about the SCOTUS reforms announcement, and then he said that his idea was dead on arrival.    So, I would just refer you to the president himself and how he addressed this directly during his remarks when he was at LBJ Library.    Q    So, he misspoke?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I don’t think he misspoke.  I think he — he clear — he cleared what he meant specifically so people understood.  I would not say he misspoke.  I think he —   Q    I meant initially when he said, “I think that’s what he is.”   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Well, I — I — look, let’s be very clear.  He spoke while he landed, while he was — well, after we landed getting off the Air Force One.  And he gets shouted questions, and he responded.  He just wanted to be really clear what he meant by “dead on arrival.”   Those — you — you’ve been there.  You know how it happens.  He goes back and forth.  People can’t really hear him.  Sometimes he can’t hear you all.  And that is something he wanted to make sure he was clear on his statement.  But that was always his in- — intent when he answered that question.    Q    Thank you, Karine.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.    Go ahead, Jacqui.   Q    Thank you, Karine.  Is this Supreme Court proposal just an election year gambit?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I will say this.  I think if you read the Washington Post op-ed that the president put out yesterday, if you listen to his speech, he was reacting to what SCOTUS has been doing over the past — not just past couple of weeks but certainly in the last two years, starting from Dobbs and so many other important decisions that come — have come out of — come out of the Supreme Court.   The Dobbs decision certainly was something that we talked about just two years ago.  And he had a commission to take a look at the Supreme Court.  He certainly appreciated the commission and what they did and the work that they’ve done.    But when you have, you know, a Supreme Court — and the president actually gave — gave examples — right? — of what — the decision of immunity that they made recently, what that means for the president of the United States, you know.    And what we’re seeing right now is not normal.  And a majority of Americans agree with us.  Right?  What we’re seeing at the Supreme Court is not normal.    And the president spoke to that at length.  He’s — he went to the LBJ Library because of the historic nature of that — of that library, the 60th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act.  And there’s — there’s so much here that’s at stake.    And so, that’s why he wanted to do this.  This is about the right thing to do.  This is about meeting the moment that we’re in.  This is not about reacting to what the — the SCOTUS did.  He said in his op-ed: American democracy is founded on the rule of law.  No one — not the president, not the Supreme Court — are above the law.    And in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling, for example, it grants presidents immunity for crimes committed in office and gut fundamental freedoms recognized for more than 50 years.  And so, he wanted to take action on that.  And, you know —   Q    But why would he not, then, read in top Democrats, including the Senate judiciary chair —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I mean, here —   Q    — about this effort?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Here’s the thing.  Majority of Americans want to see this.  They want to see some form of reform.  And the president is certainly — want to make sure that he is where the majority of Americans —   I will say, and I talked about this a little bit yesterday when we were in a gaggle, a range of conservative legal experts and Republican elected officials have voiced support.  For example, term limits, which is part of what the president laid out yesterday.   For — for example, last year, a bipartisan group of legal experts, including retired judges and Charles Fried, Ronald Reagan’s solicitor general, endorsed term limits for the Supreme Court.    Steven Calabresi, the chairman of the Federalist Society, who served in the administrations of Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush — he also endorsed term limits.    You had Marco Rubio, a senator, right now — right? — a current senator — endorse this as well, along with other congressional — congressional Republicans.    So, there is bipartisan support for this.   Q    But I’m trying to understand how we got to this in the last week, because you brought up the president’s commission.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    His commission also found, on term limits, that a statutory change for term limits, for instance, would be inherently unstable, underscore constitutional doubts; said that the composition would crea- — generate greater uncertainty and distrust.    The president himself, again, on the campaign trail in 2020, said about term limits, “Presidents come and go.  Supreme Court justices stay for generations. I’m not trying to change that at all.”  That was two different days he spoke to this.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I mean —   Q    So, how — how do we get there —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Here — here’s — first of all, you — he appreciates the commission, appreciates the work that they’ve done.  Their — their job was to give the president some thoughts and ideas.  And, obviously, the president makes the final decision on how he wants to move forward.    We have to look at what the Supreme Courts have done.   Q    Two years later, though?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Wait, wait — wait, wait.   Q    I mean, that was 2021.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  You’ve got — you’ve got to let me answer the question.  I’m not done.  Let me finish the question.   In the past several weeks, the actions that the Supreme Court has taken in undermining democracy and the rule of law, that’s important.  The pr- — the president felt he needed to address this.    Remember, we were supposed to go to LBJ Library two weeks ago, and we went — two weeks ago this past Monday, yesterday.  And so, the president still wanted to move forward, still wanted to make sure he addressed this important issue.    I mean, just look at what the Supreme Court has done these past few weeks, this past —   Q    Is he still endorsing eliminating the filibuster, then?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I mean, look, we are — he laid out the three ways that he wants to move forward.  We’re going to have, hopefully, a healthy debate with Congress on what this going to look — what this is going to look like.  This is going to be legislation that we want to move forward with.    And, loo- — and I will say this.  You know, one of the reasons the president ran in 2020 was because of what he saw in Charlottesville, was because of the fear of, you know, wanting to make sure that we protect the soul of our nation.  That was part of it.  And just look at what’s happened, you know, the last — you know, the last several years and the actions that the Supreme Court has taken.    I mean, this is a president that was on the Judiciary Committee for almost the 36 years that he was president, right?  If you think —   Q    So, “yes” on the filibuster?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I actually answered this.  I said we’re going to have a healthy debate with Congress on what this is going to look like.  The president laid out the three ways that he sees moving forward.  There’s — I’m not going to go beyond those three measures that he’s laid out.  But we’re going to have a healthy debate.  And that’s what’s important here.   Q    So, the filibuster is an open question?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I — I just said we are going to —   Q    He welcomes the question on filibuster?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  We — we welcome — we welcome a healthy debate on how to move forward.  He put forth three — three ways to move forward on this on really dealing with SCOTUS reform, and I just laid out some conservative legal experts who agree with us — who agree with us, at least on the term limits.  They’ve been very clear as well.   Go ahead.   Q    Former President Trump did an interview where he said that maybe being called a “threat to democracy” was a cause of his being shot.  How would the president respond to that?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  What I will say is the president has always been very clear when it comes to violent political rhetoric.  There’s no place — no place here in this country, in our nation for it.  He’s always spoken about that.  He’s spoken about that for the past — you know, the past several years throughout his career.    And, you know, right after the attempt — assassination attempt, the president said — he even made an address in the — in the Oval Office and talked about lowering the temperature.  He talked about getting to the bottom — the bottom of this, having a — an — a independent investigation and how important it was to do just that.   And, you know, I talked about Charlottesville.  We saw how the president spoke against January 6th.  The day that — and I remember this — the day that January 6th happened in 2021, the president was then president-elect.  He was supposed to talk about the economy.  He took that opportunity to denounce what happened.    Two thousand — two thousand people went to the Capitol.  A mob went to the Capitol.  Officers — law enforcement officers were harmed; some of them lost their lives afterwards.  And he condemned that.  He condemned the political violence.  And they were doing that because they were trying to overturn free and fair elections.   When Paul Pelosi was attacked by a hammer, the president also spoke out about, you know, violent political rhetoric and where we — where we will — you know, where — what happened, how horrific that was, and violence has no place — no place in this country.    So, if anything, this is a president — has been constantly and proactively called out on all Americans to come together and oppose political violence, regardless of our views — regardless of our views.    Q    He’s had a little more than a week now to contemplate his change in status: not being a candidate but being the sitting president.  Has he described to you ways he wants to use the time perhaps differently, since he doesn’t have the campaign obligation?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah, I think, look, we have six — six more months left, and the president is certainly very much thinking through what that’s going to look like as far as delivering for the American people.  His job doesn’t stop; it continues.    We’ve had an unprecedented record for three and a half years on things that we were able to accomplish, whether it’s the economy being the strongest — having the strongest economy in the world, leading the world; whether it is foreign policy, making sure that we are, again, rebuilding those relationships with our partners and allies — that’s something that he’s been able to do; you know, health care — I just talked about Medicaid and Medicare at the top.  There are many ways that the president wants to continue.    The Supreme Court reform announcement that he made was also really important.  A majority of the Americans care about that.    You will hear more from this president.  He will articulate what the next 180 days or so — or less — looks like.  He is going to take this very seriously.    Q    Do you see less travel?  Often, it’s an official event and campaign coinciding, so would he be based here more do you anticipate?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, look, I think, Matt — Matt was asking me this question in a gaggle yesterday: recalibrating.  And, yes, there’s a little bit of recalibrating here, right?  And that is — that is the honest truth.    So, we’re trying to figure out what that’s going to look like.  The president is thinking about this in a — in a — in a way that he does — right? — on behalf of the American people, putting them first.    And so, we’ll have certainly more to share.  Obviously, the president enjoys being out there, talking directly to the American people.  I think that’s one of the ways that we are more effective — right? — when the president gets out there.   Can’t speak to the campaign.  That’s something that the campaign can speak to.  But the president wants to get out there.  He wants to speak directly to the American people.  He wants to continue to deliver.  And you will hear him articulate that more, I would — you know, I will predict in the short — in short order.   Go ahead.   Q    We saw the president meet briefly with Congressman Doggett of Texas on the tarmac yesterday.  I wondered if you just had a readout of that conversation, given Doggett’s —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — status as the first — first Democrat to call for him to withdraw.  And just broadly speaking —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — I mean, just — does this — is the president’s relationships with some of these members affected by them if — if they — they were among, you know, the 30 or so to call for the president to withdraw before (inaudible)?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I mean, you kind of answered that question yourself.  President [Congressman] Doggett was there at — on the tarmac greeting the president.   I’m not going to go into private conversations.  Not something that I do and will do from here — we’ve done for the past three and a half years.  So, going to continue with that.    But, I mean, I think you saw — you saw them greet each other.  Look, I mean, this is a president — and I’ve said this many times: He believes in, you know, reaching across the aisle, for example, and working with Republicans who say he can’t get things done, right?  This is a president who understands that the Democratic Party is big and there are many, many thoughts.  And that’s what makes our party, I think, so unique and important: because we have different ideas, because we have different thoughts.    And the president understands, you know, they had their opinion.  There were Democrats who had their opinion.  He obviously had his.  And — and he appreciated we were able to have an unprecedented historic record because of the relationships that he’s had with these Democratic members.    I don’t think that will change.  I don’t think that will change.   Yeah.   Q    Going back to the Venezuelan —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Are you new to the —   Q    Yes.  I’m Stephanie from Bloomberg.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Hi, Stephanie from Bloomberg.    Q    Yes.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Nice to see you.   Q    Thanks for —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Is this your first time in the briefing room?   Q    Not my first time —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Oh, okay.   Q    — but my first time asking a question.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Oh, okay.   Q    So, thank you for that.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  All right.  Here we go.   Q    Going back to the Venezuelan elections.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Sure.    Q    Is the president using the call with Lula as an intermediary to deal with the election results?  And what kind of assurances is he looking for from his Brazilian counterpart about Maduro’s promises to (inaudible) —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, they’re going to be, I believe, speaking shortly, if they — if it hasn’t started — with the president of Brazil.  They’re going to talk about a wide range of issues.    Obviously, we’ll have a readout.  Don’t want to get ahead of that conversation, ahead of that call.    I — think I have said before, and we have said here that the world is watching.  We’re not going to get ahead of the process.  I think you saw the statement from — from NSC spox.  You heard what I said at the top.    And so, you know — and I — I’ll add, you know, other — other leaders across the country has also called on a full and detailed tabulation votes to be released.  And so, we’ve expressed our concerns.  And not going to get ahead of the readout that’s going to come out from the president after his conversation with the president of Brazil.  But the world is watching certainly.   Q    Does the administration have a reaction to the arrest of Venezuelan opposition figures?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Look, I’ll say this: Any political repression or violence against protesters or — or the opposition is obviously unacceptable.  The United States supports the democratic aspirations of the Venezuelan people and their right to express their views freely and without reprisal.  And so, that’s where I’ll leave it there.    Go ahead — go ahead — sorry — (laughs) — go ahead, April.    Q    Oh, you forgot me.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I know, I know, I know.  The mask threw me off.  Okay.   Q    All right.  Moving on.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yes.   Q    Karine, why is President Biden not going to the NABJ convention after originally thought?  And is the vice president going this week to the NABJ convention?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, the NABJ convention decision was done by the campaign.  So, I would have to refer you to the campaign on — on both of your questions about the president and the vice president as, obviously, the president is no longer a candidate.  So, I’m assuming that played a role into it.    As far as the vice president, you would have to ask the campaign about her.   Q    But this is something typically during an election year that presidential candidates do take part of.  Is this something that is overshadowed because of recent controversies?  I mean, is the White House paying attention to the recent controversy about Donald Trump —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — going there tomorrow?  And what you can tell us?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, look, I’m certainly not going to comment on the former president’s campaign stops.  That’s a campaign stop for him.    And the NABJ, they make the — their own decisions on guests.  So, certainly that’s for them to speak to.   What I can say more broadly about us and how we as an administration — taking away the campaign, just as an administration — what we’ve done for the last three and a half years: We appreciate the importance of speaking to all Americans, including African Americans, Black Americans, as well.    That’s why we have — we have always been very — you know, very direct and very focused on speaking to both local and — and national Black-owned outlets.  That is something that not just the president and the vice president has done.  Many of his senior se- — their senior folks have done as well — senior White House officials.    And so, we understand the important [importance] of — of Black Americans to hear directly from this administration, and we have done that — and not just Black Americans but all Americans.    And so, that is certainly something that we will continue to do.  And — and we take that very, very seriously.   As far as the NABJ, that is something for them to speak to and — and the campaigns to speak — speak to directly.    Go ahead, Michael.    Q    Karine, thank you.  I want to talk about Israel and Gaza.  The regional director for the World Food Program said, “Right now the biggest challenge is we don’t have enough crossing points to bring the food in.  We need road access.  We need the Rafah [crossing] to reopen again.  We need Kerem Shalom to work better.  We need law and order.”  Did the president bring that up with Netanyahu in his meeting last week?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, look, I don’t have anything more to read out — to read out to you from what we put out from our readout of — of their conversation.    I will say this: This is why it is so important to get that hostage deal.  This is one of the — obviously, one of the main point of conversations that the president had with the prime minister.    The president understands how important it is to get a ceasefire.  He understands how important it is to get that — continue to get humanitarian aid into Gaza.  That is something that the United States has led in that effort.    And so, we want to see that.  We want to — we want to see an influx of humanitarian aid.  That’s why we’ve been trying to do this by air, by sea, by land.  And so, conversations about the crossings, conversations on making sure trucks go through is certainly daily, regular conversations that our counterparts here have with the Israeli government and will continue to do that.    But it is incredibly important to get this ceasefire deal.  And we’ve been working on this 24/7.  And, you know, I will say this, and — and we’ve said this before: The gaps have certainly narrowed.  And that’s important.  But there’s still some work to do, and we’re going to get to that work and try to make sure we do everything that we can to get this done.    Q    Is the U.S. worried that an increased Israeli focused on fighting in the north could lead to a worsening humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I mean, look, we believe that there is no need for this to escalate.  Right?  We have said that.  I said that at the top to — answering to one of your colleagues, answering a question.    And, look, we understand that the humanitarian situation is dire in Gaza.  That’s why the presi- — the president, this administration has led in getting humanitarian aid in.  That’s why we’re continuing to work on this hostage deal, get a ceasefire.  And we’re going to continue to do so.   And it was — obviously, it was an important conversation that the president had with the prime minister.    Go ahead.   Q    Thank you, Karine.  Two questions.  The first is on those IDF strikes.  I know that you said that the strikes just happened so you can’t comment specifically on those.  But broader on the trajectory of this conflict.  It’s been the goal of the U.S. not to have the war widen since October 7th.  And President Biden and Prime Minister Netanyahu just sat down together last week.  Was the president — was his team surprised by what’s happened in recent days?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, again, I’m not going to get into immediate comment on the IDF strike.  So, that’s not something I’m going to do at this time.    And, again, as we speak to escalation — poten- — potential escalation or the questions I’ve been — I’ve gotten of an all-out war, we do not believe — we do not believe that an all-out war is inevitable, and we believe that it can be avoided.  And that’s why it’s important to get to a diplomatic solution here.  And so —   Q    But did the president get any sense during that meeting last week that a diplomatic solution was within reach?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  We want to work and focus on getting that diplomatic solution along the Blue Line.  And that is important.  We want to see these attacks from Hezbollah end.  And — for all and — for all and allow Israelis and also Lebanese citizens on both sides of the border to be able to return home to their lives and to, you know, live in safety.    And so, that’s what we want to be — that’s where we want to be.  And so, diplomatic solution is the way that we want to see the direction of this.  And we do not believe that an all-out war is inevitable here.    But as it relates to the — obviously, the — the strikes that just occurred, I just don’t have any immediate comment on — on this at this time.    Q    And then, on the personnel front, President Biden obviously himself served as the vice president for eight years.  He handpicked Kamala Harris for that role nearly four years ago.  What level of input, if any, has he provided as she undergoes that same decision?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Look, he was asked this question directly — the president at 1:15 a.m. on the South Lawn.  He responded to it.  So, I’m going to let the president’s words speak for itself.  I don’t have anything beyond that.    Go ahead, Karen.    Q    Well, I’m going to try this, knowing that you can’t answer, but I’m going to ask you if you can answer it from the president’s perspective how he feels about the vice president’s first week-plus out on the campaign trail.  Like, what does he think about the fundraising she’s done, the events she’s done, and what he has seen so far?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I’ll say — I’ll — I’ll say this.  Obviously, the president — and also being mindful about talking about an election.  Obviously, the president endorsed Kamala Harris, the vice president for a reason.  He thought she would be ready on day one.    This is someone who was a senator, who was an attorney general for the largest state in — in the country.  She has been, obviously, a vice president for almost four years.  She is immensely qualified.    And, you know, the president, having been a senator and a vice president himself, understands what it takes — what it takes, and he sees that in her.  So, I would say he’s not surprised.  He’s not surprised.  And I’m going to leave it at that to not get myself in —   Q    Can I ask one —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  — in too much trouble.    Q    Can I just ask just (inaudible)? MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    Is he watching any of the Olympics?  (Laughter.)  Like, is he taking in anything?  Because, like, my phone is blowing up.  (Laughter.)  So, like, what is his —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  It’s been great so far.   Q    — consumption of sports?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  The Olympics has been so great.    Q    Yes.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Look, the president and the first lady are certainly proudly cheering on Team USA.  As you saw, the first lady to traveled to — (a reporter sneezes) — bless you — traveled to Paris to lead the delegation — the U.S. delegation for the opening ceremonies and cheered on Team — Team — Team USA.  And you saw her out there being very supportive.    And so, the pre- — the president certainly is proud of — of all the athletes competing on behalf of the U.S., on behalf of our nation.  And he’s going to continue to — to cheer — cheer them on.   Q    Karine, following up on that.  Did the president see —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Oh, wait, wait —   Q    — the Last Supper controversy at the Olympics?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Go ahead — I — I —    Q    Do you know, did he see that —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I don’t have anything —   Q    — the Last Supper controversy?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I appreciate the question.  I just don’t have anything to share.    Q    Millions of Christians across the globe —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I — I understand.   Q    — were offended by it.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I understand.   Q    The president is Christian.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I — I just answered —   Q    Was he offended by it?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I just answered your question.  I just answered —   Q    But was the president offended by it?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I just — I just answered your question.   Q    Did — can I just ask it: Did he see it?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I just — I don’t have anything else to add.    Q    Did he see it?  Did he — did — okay.   Q    Thank you, Karine.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Go — (laughs) — thank you.  Thank you so much.  Go ahead.   Q    I have a couple of foreign policy questions.  But just to follow up —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah, sure.    Q    — on Jacqui’s question.  If Supreme Court reform does not pass — and it seems unlikely under this Congress that it will — what does the president hope his effort will accomplish?  Is it to get the American people used to the idea of the need of reform?  Is it a message to Justice Roberts?  What does he think this could have — this would lead to?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I will say majority of the Ameri- — American people support and want to see reform.  Right?  They want to see this.  This is where majority of Americans are.    And I will say this.  The president and the vice president believe that the rule of law is the foundation of our democracy.  It is the foundation of our democracy, which is why the president took action yesterday.  And he’s calling on Congress to do the same.    Now, what we welcome is a debate.  As we’ve seen, man- — as many times as the president introduced legislation or some ideas on how — the direction of a legislation that’s important to the American people, we see a healthy debate.    I listed out moments ago, when I was having a back-and-forth with Jacqui here, conservative legal experts who support, for example, term limits.  And so, I think that was important to note.  Senator Marco Rubio, who I also mentioned, who’s obviously a current senator in the U.S. Senate supports term limits.  So, there are ways that we can work together.    I’m not going to get into what that legislation is going to look like.    We’re going to have a healthy debate.  We think that’s important.  But we’re talking about the rule of law here.  We’re talking about the rule of law, which is the foundation of our democracy.  The president is going to say something.  The president is going to make sure that is protected, as he has done.  That is one of the reasons he decided to run.  That is one of the reasons of — of the — the work that we were able to do.  2022 — the rule of law, democracy was one of the top issues that Americans cared about.   Q    Could it also be a message to Justice Roberts?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I’m not going to get into messages to — to the chief justice.  That’s — that’s not what we’re talking about here.    We’re talking about the right thing to do.  We’re talking about the right thing to do here.    Q    And on the foreign policy side, there’s reporting that North Korea could conduct another nuclear test to coincide with the U.S. election — the presidential election.  How concerned is the administration about this?  Is this a real threat?  Do you have a message to Pyongyang?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I’m just not going to get into hypotheticals from here.   What’s your next question?   Q    Okay.  On today’s sanctions on Iran that Treasury announced —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — individuals and entities related to its ballistic missiles and drones program.  Can you speak about the timing?  Today, the Iranian new president is being sworn in by the parliament.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  So, look, what I can say: This is something that the Department of Treasury did; they announced new sanctions, as you just said, targeting five individuals and seven entities based in Iran, the PRC, Hong Kong, that have facilitated procurements beh- — on behalf of Ira- — Iran’s military forces.  The designated entities have been involved in procuring key components of Iran’s ballistic missiles and U- –UAV program.  These sanctions are part of — you’ve heard us talk about sanctions before, especially in the last three and a half years — they’re part of our ongoing efforts to counter Iran’s destabilizing activities, including its arming of proxies in the Middle East and its enabling of Russia’s war in Ukraine.    You’ve heard tal- — talk about this.  Again, this is part of announcements that we — ongoing efforts that we’ve had here in this administration.  And that’s how I would view it.   Q    Nothing specific on the timing?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  It’s ongoing.  This has been ongoing sanctions that we’ve had throughout this administration.   AIDE:  Karine, you have time for a couple more.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Okay.   Q    In the back?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Oh, go ahead.    Q    Has the president met with Leaders Schumer and Jeffries about legislative priorities for the remainder of this — this six months, as you discussed?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah, don’t have any meetings or conversation at this time to — to read out or lay out on — on conversations specifically on the next six months.    But, again, this is something that the president has taken very seriously.  He wants to continue to deliver on behalf of the American people.  That’s what you’re going to see him do in the next six months.    He will articulate this — on what this is going to look like specifically, what he’s going to focus on.  And I think what you saw yesterday was a clear indica- — indicator of that.   Q    And you mentioned he’ll be giving remarks at some point sort of articulating —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — the vision for the next six months.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Well —   Q    Any timeline on when that might be?   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I don’t have any timeline.  I said he will articulate that.  We’ll see what that looks like.    But, look, he wants to certainly — and I think this is a little bit of — of Kelly O’s question to me — he certainly wants to get out there.  He wants to continue to — to talk directly to the American people.    And, again, just bringing in my friend Matt Viser here: There is a recollaboration [recalibration] here.  We’re trying to see what that looks like, what that’s going to look like, what he wants to focus on.  And so, just, you know, give it a sec- — give us a second.  We have a lot to focus on.    But I would also say, you know, there’s these historic pieces of legislation, whether it is — whether it’s the bipartisan infrastructure legislation — as we know, there are thousands of projects out there that we want to make sure that gets implemented; there’s the Inflation Reduction Act; there’s Medicare, who continues to negotiate with Big Pharma.  We want to make sure that on — on medication — on drugs that are important, making sure that the prices go down.  We’re going to continue to do that.  There’s the — the CHIPS and Science Act for — that’s going to bring investments into this country.  Want to see that — those big pieces of legislation that obviously are now laws, acts that we want to see implemented.    And so, that’s always been a priority of this president.  And so, that’s certainly going to be — continue to be so.    Q    Karine —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Go ahead.  I know I keep ca- —   Q    Since my name was invoked.    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I know.  I — I — this is, like, the second time.  (Laughter.)  I know, I — I conjured you up to ask a question.  I’ve — I’ve called your name out many times today.   Q    I mean, since we’re watching that recalibration in real time, do you —    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  (Laughter.)  That’s the word of the week.   Q    Do you have a sense on what the president is doing today?  Like, what —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — his schedule is like today —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — or for the remainder of the week?  And if —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  No, and I appreciate that question.  I have — I have something to share with all of you.  And I said he’s going to continue — the president is going to continue to work for the American people day in and day out.  That does not change.  It is extremely important to him to continue building on his accomplishments and finish the job.    You saw him on the road yesterday for over 12 hours in Texas, and he spoke with reporters — I’ve been mentioning many times — many times during this — this briefing — at 1 o’clock — 1:15 in the morning, taking some questions.    Look, he has a call with the president of Brazil today, which we’ll have a readout, as I mentioned — a completed readout once we are done.    Once he’s done having that conversation, the president will receive his regular presidential daily briefing.  He’s going to do that this afternoon and then meet with his national security team.    And tomorrow, the president will be briefed on the implementation of important provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act.  And we will actually have more to come on that, so stay tuned.  We’ll have more on that later today.    He will also receive a briefing from senior officials on the administration’s new actions on ongoing work to crack down on drug trafficking — traffickers smuggling deadly drugs, including fentanyl into the United States, and efforts to beat the global opioid epidemic.    And I should have mentioned this before, as — when I was — asking about the vice president.  He will indeed see the vice president tomorrow.  He will have lunch with her tomorrow, as they regularly do.  As I said, they stay in regular contact, as — as she is a critical partner for him in how he moves forward in this administration.   All right.  Okay.  Go ahead.    Q    Yeah, thanks.  Thanks, Karine.  So, the national debt crossed $35 trillion for the first time ever.  The amount being added to the debt seems to be increasing at a — at a growing rate.  Today, we talked with Fitch, and they told us that — they are a credit rating agency — and they told us that large fiscal deficits and increasing debt burden were key factors to the downgrade that the U.S. had last year.  Is the president worried about another downgrade because our spending is — is more than the money we’re taking in?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.  So, let me just tick off a couple of things, if I may.  And — and want to be super clear about this.  The president signed a $1 trillion of deficit reduction into law, and his budget would lower the deficit by another $3 trillion by making billionaires and the biggest corporations pay their fair share and cutting spending on special interests.  That was an action that the president did.   The prior administration increased the debt — let’s not forget what the prior administration did — by a record $8 trillion and didn’t sign a single law to reduce the de- — deficit.  And that’s what we’re dealing with right now.    And on top of that, you have congressional Republicans that — to continue to want to blow up the debt, again, with $5 trillion more in Trump tax cuts, while making hardworking families, you know, pay the price by cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Affordable Care Act.    And we want to do the opposite.  Right?  The president’s economic agenda: We want to make sure that we put middle-class family first, hardworking families first.  And congressional Americans [Republicans] want to give more tax cut to the rich, to the billionaires, to the corporations.    So, the president has taken action to try and lower the deficit.  And Republicans want to balloon that.  And $8 trillion — $8 trillion from the last administration, and they did nothing — nothing to try to make sure that we lower the deficit.    Q    But — so, you’re saying that — that we crossed $35 trillion because former President Trump’s administration?  I mean, that was four years ago.  You know, the debt keeps increasing.  You know, at what point —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  The fact is —   Q    — is —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  The fact is $8 trillion dollars was what the — increase in debt was what the last administration did — the Trump administration.  They didn’t put forth — they didn’t put forth any type of legislation to counter that.  They didn’t.  They just let the debt balloon by $8 trillion.  That’s what they —    Q    That’s still going on.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  But that’s what they did.  The president — but what I —   Q    Under — for the last three years —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Wh- — and what I’m saying —   Q    — it’s still going on.   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  — to you is, like, we can’t — we can’t discount what happened in the last administration.  And we can’t discount what the — this president is trying to do to make sure that we address this.  One trillion dollars in deficit reduction into law, that’s what the president signed.    And — and that would lower the deficit by three — another $3 trillion by making billionaires and the biggest — the biggest corporations pay their fair share.  Republicans are offering the opposite of that.    So, I think policy matters.  What we’ve been able to get done matters.  I’m not discounting what you’re saying.  I’m just saying the president is actually working to make — to lower the deficit, and Republicans want to do the opposite.    That is where we are when we think about the policy.  That is where we are.  And I think that matters as well.    I know I have to get going.    Go ahead, sir.    Q    Thanks, Karine.  You — in the beginning, you mentioned the importance of press freedom —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  Yeah.   Q    — like the — like the case of Evan Gershkovich, Austin Tice, Yuyu Dong.  We — we see that the press freedom itself is extremely important issue worldwide.  In the case of Mongolia, considering the fact that the foreign minister of Mongolia visited just seven days ago, it seems like the — the — there is an increased fear of the degradation of press freedom within the country.   In the case of Unurtsetseg Naran, (inaudible) —   MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  You’re talking about Mon- — okay, Mongolia.    Q    It is — it is a big concern.  Is the — in — with the increase of U.S.-Mongolia relations in the upcoming future, is press freedom — is the issue of press freedom going to be mentioned a lot more into the conversation?    And then also at the same time, given the fact that it seems the Kremlin or Beijing influence has reached into the country, would this be a point of concern for the Biden administration?    MS. JEAN-PIERRE:  I think we — the last point, certainly, we’ve spoken to that at length about — certainly our concerns.    Look, when it comes to the freedom of the press, this is something that the president is never afraid to talk about with any — with any world leaders or leaders more broadly.  That is something that he has done.  He has had those conversations.    He certainly has said it publicly.  And what he says publicly, he certainly says privately.   Not going to get into specifics of conversations of that particular relationship, but he understands — he understands the importance — the importance of the freedom of the press.  It is important to have that.  It is part of our democracy.    We’ve been talk- — kind of — kind of a theme of this briefing has been democracy — right? — and being able to be able to lead on that as a country.  And that’s what we’ve been doing here, and we’re going to continue to do that.    And, again, he’s going to have those conversations.  He’s going to say what we’re saying publicly, certainly privately as well.    All right, guys.  I’ll see you tomorrow.  Thank you, everyone.    2:47 P.M. EDT  

Stay Connected

We'll be in touch with the latest information on how President Biden and his administration are working for the American people, as well as ways you can get involved and help our country build back better.

Opt in to send and receive text messages from President Biden.

Don't bomb Beirut: U.S. leads push to rein in Israel's response

• Medium Text

Sign up here.

Additional reporting by John Irish in Paris, Simon Lewis in Washington, Mayaan Lubell in Jerusalem, Parisa Hafezi in Dubai, and Trevor Hunnicutt and Daphne Psaledakis in Washington; Editing by Samia Nakhoul and Pravin Char

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab

Renewed rioting sweeps British cities in wake of child murders

Violent disorder swept across several British cities on Saturday, injuring police and damaging property in the most widespread rioting in the country for 13 years, following the murder of three young girls in northwest England.

• Political Science
• International Relations

Diplomatic Language: An Analysis of Salutations from Speeches used in International Diplomacy

• Journal of International Affairs 3(1)

• Daito Bunka University

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Olena Kaminska
• Kateryna Tulyulyuk
• Joanna Wojciechowska
• Maria Śmigielska
• Mateusz Sypniewski

• Nornadia Liz Zakaria
• Vincent Pouliot
• Jérémie Cornut
• HAFRIZA BURHANUDEEN
• Ragnar Rommetveit
• Dirk Heerwegh

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

• Search Menu

Sign in through your institution

• Browse content in Arts and Humanities
• Browse content in Archaeology
• Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology
• Archaeological Methodology and Techniques
• Archaeology by Region
• Archaeology of Religion
• Archaeology of Trade and Exchange
• Biblical Archaeology
• Contemporary and Public Archaeology
• Environmental Archaeology
• Historical Archaeology
• History and Theory of Archaeology
• Industrial Archaeology
• Landscape Archaeology
• Mortuary Archaeology
• Prehistoric Archaeology
• Underwater Archaeology
• Zooarchaeology
• Browse content in Architecture
• Architectural Structure and Design
• History of Architecture
• Residential and Domestic Buildings
• Theory of Architecture
• Browse content in Art
• Art Subjects and Themes
• History of Art
• Industrial and Commercial Art
• Theory of Art
• Biographical Studies
• Byzantine Studies
• Browse content in Classical Studies
• Classical Numismatics
• Classical Literature
• Classical Reception
• Classical History
• Classical Philosophy
• Classical Mythology
• Classical Art and Architecture
• Classical Oratory and Rhetoric
• Greek and Roman Papyrology
• Greek and Roman Archaeology
• Greek and Roman Epigraphy
• Greek and Roman Law
• Late Antiquity
• Religion in the Ancient World
• Social History
• Digital Humanities
• Browse content in History
• Colonialism and Imperialism
• Diplomatic History
• Environmental History
• Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours
• Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing
• Historical Geography
• History by Period
• History of Emotions
• History of Agriculture
• History of Education
• History of Gender and Sexuality
• Industrial History
• Intellectual History
• International History
• Labour History
• Legal and Constitutional History
• Local and Family History
• Maritime History
• Military History
• National Liberation and Post-Colonialism
• Oral History
• Political History
• Public History
• Regional and National History
• Revolutions and Rebellions
• Slavery and Abolition of Slavery
• Social and Cultural History
• Theory, Methods, and Historiography
• Urban History
• World History
• Browse content in Language Teaching and Learning
• Language Learning (Specific Skills)
• Language Teaching Theory and Methods
• Browse content in Linguistics
• Applied Linguistics
• Cognitive Linguistics
• Computational Linguistics
• Forensic Linguistics
• Grammar, Syntax and Morphology
• Historical and Diachronic Linguistics
• History of English
• Language Evolution
• Language Reference
• Language Variation
• Language Families
• Language Acquisition
• Lexicography
• Linguistic Anthropology
• Linguistic Theories
• Linguistic Typology
• Phonetics and Phonology
• Psycholinguistics
• Sociolinguistics
• Translation and Interpretation
• Writing Systems
• Browse content in Literature
• Bibliography
• Children's Literature Studies
• Literary Studies (Romanticism)
• Literary Studies (American)
• Literary Studies (Modernism)
• Literary Studies (Asian)
• Literary Studies (European)
• Literary Studies (Eco-criticism)
• Literary Studies - World
• Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
• Literary Studies (19th Century)
• Literary Studies (20th Century onwards)
• Literary Studies (African American Literature)
• Literary Studies (British and Irish)
• Literary Studies (Early and Medieval)
• Literary Studies (Fiction, Novelists, and Prose Writers)
• Literary Studies (Gender Studies)
• Literary Studies (Graphic Novels)
• Literary Studies (History of the Book)
• Literary Studies (Plays and Playwrights)
• Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)
• Literary Studies (Postcolonial Literature)
• Literary Studies (Queer Studies)
• Literary Studies (Science Fiction)
• Literary Studies (Travel Literature)
• Literary Studies (War Literature)
• Literary Studies (Women's Writing)
• Literary Theory and Cultural Studies
• Mythology and Folklore
• Shakespeare Studies and Criticism
• Browse content in Media Studies
• Browse content in Music
• Applied Music
• Dance and Music
• Ethics in Music
• Ethnomusicology
• Gender and Sexuality in Music
• Medicine and Music
• Music Cultures
• Music and Media
• Music and Culture
• Music and Religion
• Music Education and Pedagogy
• Music Theory and Analysis
• Musical Scores, Lyrics, and Libretti
• Musical Structures, Styles, and Techniques
• Musicology and Music History
• Performance Practice and Studies
• Race and Ethnicity in Music
• Sound Studies
• Browse content in Performing Arts
• Browse content in Philosophy
• Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art
• Epistemology
• Feminist Philosophy
• History of Western Philosophy
• Metaphysics
• Moral Philosophy
• Non-Western Philosophy
• Philosophy of Language
• Philosophy of Mind
• Philosophy of Perception
• Philosophy of Action
• Philosophy of Law
• Philosophy of Religion
• Philosophy of Science
• Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
• Practical Ethics
• Social and Political Philosophy
• Browse content in Religion
• Biblical Studies
• Christianity
• East Asian Religions
• History of Religion
• Judaism and Jewish Studies
• Qumran Studies
• Religion and Education
• Religion and Health
• Religion and Politics
• Religion and Science
• Religion and Law
• Religion and Art, Literature, and Music
• Religious Studies
• Browse content in Society and Culture
• Cookery, Food, and Drink
• Cultural Studies
• Customs and Traditions
• Ethical Issues and Debates
• Hobbies, Games, Arts and Crafts
• Natural world, Country Life, and Pets
• Popular Beliefs and Controversial Knowledge
• Sports and Outdoor Recreation
• Technology and Society
• Travel and Holiday
• Visual Culture
• Browse content in Law
• Arbitration
• Browse content in Company and Commercial Law
• Commercial Law
• Company Law
• Browse content in Comparative Law
• Systems of Law
• Competition Law
• Browse content in Constitutional and Administrative Law
• Government Powers
• Judicial Review
• Local Government Law
• Military and Defence Law
• Parliamentary and Legislative Practice
• Construction Law
• Contract Law
• Browse content in Criminal Law
• Criminal Procedure
• Criminal Evidence Law
• Sentencing and Punishment
• Employment and Labour Law
• Environment and Energy Law
• Browse content in Financial Law
• Banking Law
• Insolvency Law
• History of Law
• Human Rights and Immigration
• Intellectual Property Law
• Browse content in International Law
• Private International Law and Conflict of Laws
• Public International Law
• IT and Communications Law
• Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
• Law and Society
• Law and Politics
• Browse content in Legal System and Practice
• Courts and Procedure
• Legal Skills and Practice
• Legal System - Costs and Funding
• Primary Sources of Law
• Regulation of Legal Profession
• Medical and Healthcare Law
• Browse content in Policing
• Criminal Investigation and Detection
• Police and Security Services
• Police Procedure and Law
• Police Regional Planning
• Browse content in Property Law
• Personal Property Law
• Restitution
• Study and Revision
• Terrorism and National Security Law
• Browse content in Trusts Law
• Wills and Probate or Succession
• Browse content in Medicine and Health
• Browse content in Allied Health Professions
• Arts Therapies
• Clinical Science
• Dietetics and Nutrition
• Occupational Therapy
• Operating Department Practice
• Physiotherapy
• Radiography
• Speech and Language Therapy
• Browse content in Anaesthetics
• General Anaesthesia
• Clinical Neuroscience
• Browse content in Clinical Medicine
• Acute Medicine
• Cardiovascular Medicine
• Clinical Genetics
• Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
• Dermatology
• Endocrinology and Diabetes
• Gastroenterology
• Genito-urinary Medicine
• Geriatric Medicine
• Infectious Diseases
• Medical Toxicology
• Medical Oncology
• Pain Medicine
• Palliative Medicine
• Rehabilitation Medicine
• Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonology
• Rheumatology
• Sleep Medicine
• Sports and Exercise Medicine
• Community Medical Services
• Critical Care
• Emergency Medicine
• Forensic Medicine
• Haematology
• History of Medicine
• Browse content in Medical Skills
• Clinical Skills
• Communication Skills
• Nursing Skills
• Surgical Skills
• Medical Ethics
• Browse content in Medical Dentistry
• Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
• Paediatric Dentistry
• Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics
• Surgical Dentistry
• Medical Statistics and Methodology
• Browse content in Neurology
• Clinical Neurophysiology
• Neuropathology
• Nursing Studies
• Browse content in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
• Gynaecology
• Occupational Medicine
• Ophthalmology
• Otolaryngology (ENT)
• Browse content in Paediatrics
• Neonatology
• Browse content in Pathology
• Chemical Pathology
• Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
• Histopathology
• Medical Microbiology and Virology
• Patient Education and Information
• Browse content in Pharmacology
• Psychopharmacology
• Browse content in Popular Health
• Caring for Others
• Complementary and Alternative Medicine
• Self-help and Personal Development
• Browse content in Preclinical Medicine
• Cell Biology
• Molecular Biology and Genetics
• Reproduction, Growth and Development
• Primary Care
• Professional Development in Medicine
• Browse content in Psychiatry
• Addiction Medicine
• Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• Forensic Psychiatry
• Learning Disabilities
• Old Age Psychiatry
• Psychotherapy
• Browse content in Public Health and Epidemiology
• Epidemiology
• Public Health
• Browse content in Radiology
• Clinical Radiology
• Interventional Radiology
• Nuclear Medicine
• Radiation Oncology
• Reproductive Medicine
• Browse content in Surgery
• Cardiothoracic Surgery
• Gastro-intestinal and Colorectal Surgery
• General Surgery
• Neurosurgery
• Paediatric Surgery
• Peri-operative Care
• Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• Surgical Oncology
• Transplant Surgery
• Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
• Vascular Surgery
• Browse content in Science and Mathematics
• Browse content in Biological Sciences
• Aquatic Biology
• Biochemistry
• Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology and Conservation
• Evolutionary Biology
• Genetics and Genomics
• Microbiology
• Molecular and Cell Biology
• Natural History
• Plant Sciences and Forestry
• Research Methods in Life Sciences
• Structural Biology
• Systems Biology
• Zoology and Animal Sciences
• Browse content in Chemistry
• Analytical Chemistry
• Computational Chemistry
• Crystallography
• Environmental Chemistry
• Industrial Chemistry
• Inorganic Chemistry
• Materials Chemistry
• Medicinal Chemistry
• Mineralogy and Gems
• Organic Chemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Polymer Chemistry
• Study and Communication Skills in Chemistry
• Theoretical Chemistry
• Browse content in Computer Science
• Artificial Intelligence
• Computer Architecture and Logic Design
• Game Studies
• Human-Computer Interaction
• Mathematical Theory of Computation
• Programming Languages
• Software Engineering
• Systems Analysis and Design
• Virtual Reality
• Browse content in Computing
• Business Applications
• Computer Games
• Computer Security
• Computer Networking and Communications
• Digital Lifestyle
• Graphical and Digital Media Applications
• Operating Systems
• Browse content in Earth Sciences and Geography
• Atmospheric Sciences
• Environmental Geography
• Geology and the Lithosphere
• Maps and Map-making
• Meteorology and Climatology
• Oceanography and Hydrology
• Palaeontology
• Physical Geography and Topography
• Regional Geography
• Soil Science
• Urban Geography
• Browse content in Engineering and Technology
• Agriculture and Farming
• Biological Engineering
• Civil Engineering, Surveying, and Building
• Electronics and Communications Engineering
• Energy Technology
• Engineering (General)
• Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology
• History of Engineering and Technology
• Mechanical Engineering and Materials
• Technology of Industrial Chemistry
• Transport Technology and Trades
• Browse content in Environmental Science
• Applied Ecology (Environmental Science)
• Conservation of the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Environmental Sustainability
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Environmental Science)
• Management of Land and Natural Resources (Environmental Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environmental Science)
• Nuclear Issues (Environmental Science)
• Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Environmental Science)
• History of Science and Technology
• Browse content in Materials Science
• Ceramics and Glasses
• Composite Materials
• Metals, Alloying, and Corrosion
• Nanotechnology
• Browse content in Mathematics
• Applied Mathematics
• Biomathematics and Statistics
• History of Mathematics
• Mathematical Education
• Mathematical Finance
• Mathematical Analysis
• Numerical and Computational Mathematics
• Probability and Statistics
• Pure Mathematics
• Browse content in Neuroscience
• Cognition and Behavioural Neuroscience
• Development of the Nervous System
• Disorders of the Nervous System
• History of Neuroscience
• Invertebrate Neurobiology
• Molecular and Cellular Systems
• Neuroendocrinology and Autonomic Nervous System
• Neuroscientific Techniques
• Sensory and Motor Systems
• Browse content in Physics
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
• Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
• Biological and Medical Physics
• Classical Mechanics
• Computational Physics
• Condensed Matter Physics
• Electromagnetism, Optics, and Acoustics
• History of Physics
• Mathematical and Statistical Physics
• Measurement Science
• Nuclear Physics
• Particles and Fields
• Plasma Physics
• Quantum Physics
• Relativity and Gravitation
• Semiconductor and Mesoscopic Physics
• Browse content in Psychology
• Affective Sciences
• Clinical Psychology
• Cognitive Psychology
• Cognitive Neuroscience
• Criminal and Forensic Psychology
• Developmental Psychology
• Educational Psychology
• Evolutionary Psychology
• Health Psychology
• History and Systems in Psychology
• Music Psychology
• Neuropsychology
• Organizational Psychology
• Psychological Assessment and Testing
• Psychology of Human-Technology Interaction
• Psychology Professional Development and Training
• Research Methods in Psychology
• Social Psychology
• Browse content in Social Sciences
• Browse content in Anthropology
• Anthropology of Religion
• Human Evolution
• Medical Anthropology
• Physical Anthropology
• Regional Anthropology
• Social and Cultural Anthropology
• Theory and Practice of Anthropology
• Browse content in Business and Management
• Business Ethics
• Business History
• Business Strategy
• Business and Technology
• Business and Government
• Business and the Environment
• Comparative Management
• Corporate Governance
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Entrepreneurship
• Health Management
• Human Resource Management
• Industrial and Employment Relations
• Industry Studies
• Information and Communication Technologies
• International Business
• Knowledge Management
• Management and Management Techniques
• Operations Management
• Organizational Theory and Behaviour
• Pensions and Pension Management
• Public and Nonprofit Management
• Social Issues in Business and Management
• Strategic Management
• Supply Chain Management
• Browse content in Criminology and Criminal Justice
• Criminal Justice
• Criminology
• Forms of Crime
• International and Comparative Criminology
• Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
• Development Studies
• Browse content in Economics
• Agricultural, Environmental, and Natural Resource Economics
• Asian Economics
• Behavioural Finance
• Behavioural Economics and Neuroeconomics
• Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
• Economic History
• Economic Methodology
• Economic Systems
• Economic Development and Growth
• Financial Markets
• Financial Institutions and Services
• General Economics and Teaching
• Health, Education, and Welfare
• History of Economic Thought
• International Economics
• Labour and Demographic Economics
• Law and Economics
• Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
• Microeconomics
• Public Economics
• Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
• Welfare Economics
• Browse content in Education
• Adult Education and Continuous Learning
• Care and Counselling of Students
• Early Childhood and Elementary Education
• Educational Equipment and Technology
• Educational Strategies and Policy
• Higher and Further Education
• Organization and Management of Education
• Philosophy and Theory of Education
• Schools Studies
• Secondary Education
• Teaching of a Specific Subject
• Teaching of Specific Groups and Special Educational Needs
• Teaching Skills and Techniques
• Browse content in Environment
• Applied Ecology (Social Science)
• Climate Change
• Conservation of the Environment (Social Science)
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Social Science)
• Management of Land and Natural Resources (Social Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environment)
• Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Social Science)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Social Science)
• Sustainability
• Browse content in Human Geography
• Cultural Geography
• Economic Geography
• Political Geography
• Browse content in Interdisciplinary Studies
• Communication Studies
• Museums, Libraries, and Information Sciences
• Browse content in Politics
• African Politics
• Asian Politics
• Chinese Politics
• Comparative Politics
• Conflict Politics
• Elections and Electoral Studies
• Environmental Politics
• Ethnic Politics
• European Union
• Foreign Policy
• Gender and Politics
• Human Rights and Politics
• Indian Politics
• International Relations
• International Organization (Politics)
• Irish Politics
• Latin American Politics
• Middle Eastern Politics
• Political Behaviour
• Political Economy
• Political Institutions
• Political Theory
• Political Methodology
• Political Communication
• Political Philosophy
• Political Sociology
• Politics and Law
• Politics of Development
• Public Policy
• Public Administration
• Qualitative Political Methodology
• Quantitative Political Methodology
• Regional Political Studies
• Russian Politics
• Security Studies
• State and Local Government
• UK Politics
• US Politics
• Browse content in Regional and Area Studies
• African Studies
• Asian Studies
• East Asian Studies
• Japanese Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Middle Eastern Studies
• Native American Studies
• Scottish Studies
• Browse content in Research and Information
• Research Methods
• Browse content in Social Work
• Addictions and Substance Misuse
• Adoption and Fostering
• Care of the Elderly
• Child and Adolescent Social Work
• Couple and Family Social Work
• Direct Practice and Clinical Social Work
• Emergency Services
• Human Behaviour and the Social Environment
• International and Global Issues in Social Work
• Mental and Behavioural Health
• Social Justice and Human Rights
• Social Policy and Advocacy
• Social Work and Crime and Justice
• Social Work Macro Practice
• Social Work Practice Settings
• Social Work Research and Evidence-based Practice
• Welfare and Benefit Systems
• Browse content in Sociology
• Childhood Studies
• Community Development
• Comparative and Historical Sociology
• Disability Studies
• Economic Sociology
• Gender and Sexuality
• Gerontology and Ageing
• Health, Illness, and Medicine
• Marriage and the Family
• Migration Studies
• Occupations, Professions, and Work
• Organizations
• Population and Demography
• Race and Ethnicity
• Social Theory
• Social Movements and Social Change
• Social Research and Statistics
• Social Stratification, Inequality, and Mobility
• Sociology of Religion
• Sociology of Education
• Sport and Leisure
• Urban and Rural Studies
• Browse content in Warfare and Defence
• Defence Strategy, Planning, and Research
• Land Forces and Warfare
• Military Administration
• Military Life and Institutions
• Naval Forces and Warfare
• Other Warfare and Defence Issues
• Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
• Weapons and Equipment

• < Previous chapter
• Next chapter >

10 The Forms of Diplomatic Communication

• Published: September 2015
• Cite Icon Cite
• Permissions Icon Permissions

Diplomacy is the reign of words: words can be spoken, declaimed, read, or written but also omitted in a significant silence; moreover, diplomats also moved, acted, and reacted while negotiating, and their bodies had many resources to convey or conceal meaning and messages. This chapter focuses on the discursive techniques through which communication networks and concepts were activated. Orality, reading, enacting, and recording composed an unstable grammar of interactions: the choice and use of different communicative forms shaped the interaction and tightened the relationship between the event itself and its recording. Each form of communication had its own associated conventions and patterns, which we might call codes; and these codes changed over time. Their changes were part of a broader transformation of political languages, and literary and artistic culture, but the changes in languages and discursive resources emerge in diplomatic dispatches with a detail unparalleled in any other contemporary documentary source.

Personal account

• Sign in with email/username & password
• Get email alerts
• Save searches
• Purchase content
• Activate your purchase/trial code
• Add your ORCID iD

Institutional access

Sign in with a library card.

• Sign in with username/password
• Recommend to your librarian
• Institutional account management
• Get help with access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

• Click Sign in through your institution.
• Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
• When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
• Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

• Click Sign in through society site.
• When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

• View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
• View the institutional accounts that are providing access.

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.

• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Rights and permissions
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Author: Irina Tsvetkova-Hegedus

Diplomatic language and translation. Case study: President Donald Trump’s rhetoric

You may also be interested in

Texts in diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Professor Dietrich Kappeler provides an overview of the various types of formal written documents used in diplomacy, pointing out where the practices surrounding these documents have changed in recent years. He also discusses multi-language treaties, including the difficulties of translation and interpretation.

International domain names from a multilingualism and security perspective

From an Internet governance perspective, multilingualism and security have been two of the cornerstone themes since its inception. The security theme addresses topics regarding the Domain Names System (DNS), Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Internet attacks, security awareness, and policies and legal measures to ensure a safe and secure Internet experience. Security is a very diverse area where multiple topics should be tackled, and ignoring one or more topics while securing other areas would still jeopardise the safety of Internet users.

Language and Diplomacy

Language and Diplomacy is a collection of papers presented at the February 2000 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Diplomacy and the January 2001 Conference on Language and Diplomacy. The book examines traditional aspects of language in diplomacy: diplomatic signaling, rhetorical patterns and ambiguities; as well as new issues raised by information technology. The publication is available online.

Documenting diplomacy, Evaluating documents: The case of the CSCE

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Rather than individual documents, Dr Keith Hamilton looks at the process and purpose of compiling collections of documents. He focuses on his own experience as the editor of Documents on British Policy Overseas, and particularly on his work publishing a collection of documents concerning the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe from 1972 until 1975.

Do the Experts Mean What Their Metaphors Say? An Exploration of Metaphor in Mediation Literature

The message explores the use of metaphor in mediation literature to determine if experts truly align with what their metaphors suggest.

Historical rhetoric and diplomacy – An uneasy cohabitation

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Drazen Pehar writes about historical rhetoric; specifically the historical analogies used by diplomats and politicians to strengthen their arguments and convince others of their views. Using numerous historical and current examples, especially from the Balkans region, Pehar explains why historical analogies are used. He examines the role historical analogies often play in worsening relations between nations and bringing about conflict.

Pragmatics in diplomatic exchanges

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Edmond Pascual interprets diplomatic communication with the linguistic tools of pragmatics. He begins by reminding us that while the diplomat is a "man of action," the particular nature of the diplomat's action is that it consists of speech. Pascual applies three concepts of pragmatics to diplomatic discourse: speech as an intentional act; the effects of the act of speech; and the role of the unsaid in the act of speech.

Multiculturalism for the masses: Social advertising and public diplomacy post-9/11

The terrorist attacks of 9/11 have brought an old problem into new focus: how to unite a population potentially divided along racial, ethnic and denominational fault lines. In the light of unprovoked and indiscriminate racist attacks on Muslim-looking minorities, multi-media advertising campaigns were mounted in several countries in order to quell racism and sell multiculturalism. This paper examines the use of advertising campaigns as a medium for public diplomacy, and focuses on the promotion of national unity out of cultural diversity.

Challenges facing women in overseas diplomatic positions

This paper identifies challenges that women face when working overseas in diplomatic positions, a professional environment that historically has been male dominated and that can be characterised in some ways as an 'old boys' network. It identifies some of the significant issues from the perspective of women who are serving or have served their countries’ foreign missions.

Setting priorities for a ‘world language’ initiative

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Dr Donald Sola asks whether software innovation can make a contribution to the needs of those learning the world "languages of wider communication". He presents his work in developing computer-assisted language learning software, a multi-disciplinary activity not based simply on technology but also on the theory and practice of education and linguistics.

Communication barriers to negotiation: Encountering Chinese in cross-cultural business meetings

When two negotiating parties from different cultural backgrounds attempt to communicate, the potential for disagreement and misunderstanding is great. People from other cultural backgrounds, especially from the West, often find the behaviour of Chinese negotiators strange and unintelligible. This paper examines communication barriers between Chinese, Australian and American negotiators.

To Begin the World Anew: The Genius and Ambiguities of the American Founders

When I feel dispirited about the current crop of political leaders in Switzerland or around the world, I like to take refuge in one of the most uplifting political stories of mankind – the American Revolution.

Language and Power

The text discusses the relationship between language and power, highlighting how language can be used to manipulate and control individuals and societies. It explores how those in power often dictate the norms and values through language, influencing perceptions and behaviors. The text also emphasizes the importance of recognizing and challenging power dynamics embedded in language to promote equality and social change. Language is portrayed as a tool that can both reinforce and challenge power structures within a society.

Intercultural competence and its relevance for international diplomacy

The changing nature of international diplomacy requires new knowledge and awareness of intercultural and other skills needed to perform effectively in the role of diplomat. The research presented in this paper serves to inform current and future planning for the selection, training, and evaluation of international diplomats.

Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy

Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy is a collection of papers presented at two conferences: the 2003 Conference on Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy, and the 2004 Conference on Organisational and Professional Cultures and Diplomacy.

Talking to Americans: Problems of language and diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Professor Paul Sharp discusses negotiation with American mediators. He notes that most literature on negotiation is written to advise Americans and other Westerners about negotiating with foreigners.

The origins – where is the connection between persuasion and rhetoric?

As ancient rhetoricians believed that language was a potent force for persuasion, they insisted that their students develop copia in all spheres of their art. Copia denotes an abundant and ready supply of language in any situation that arises. Why did ancient teachers of rhetoric insist on this practice? Well, they knew that training their students in different rhetorical arts prepared them for the multitude of communicative and persuasive possibilities that exist in language.

Leaders’ rhetoric and preventive diplomacy – issues we are ignorant about

In this paper, Drazen Pehar analyses the argumentation made by George Lakoff of the University of California at Berkeley in his seminal paper on ‘Metaphor and War’, in which he tried to deconstruct the rhetoric U.S. president George Bush used to justify the war in the Gulf. He also analyses a reading by psycho-historian Lloyd deMause, whose theory differs from Lakoff’s. Throughout his analysis, Pehar describes the role of rhetoric in diplomatic prevention of armed conflicts, and its several functions, and concludes that the methods of preventive diplomacy depend heavily on the theory of...

Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf

The text discusses how metaphors are used to justify war in the Gulf.

Knowledge management and international development – the role of diplomacy

In this chapter, Walter Fust talks about the role of knowledge management, and knowledge for development, in diplomacy. He describes various methods to assess what knowledge should be stocked, and explains the need for managers who are assigned the task of deciding what should be stocked. These decisions need to be guided by principles, or guidelines - referred to as value management.

Lessons from two fields

A conversation between a diplomat and an interculturalist, combining real-life examples from the diplomatic field with intercultural theory.

On intercultural training of diplomats

Today the world is becoming smaller and smaller - distances shrink and become irrelevant, information flows are immense and very fast. People tend to speak foreign languages and, to their surprise, find out that this is not enough. There is more to it, and it is culture. It is of paramount importance to educate a generation of people capable of communicating effectively and working together with representatives of other cultures.

Hypertext in diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): The final paper in this volume, by Jovan Kurbalija, is based on the experience of ten years of research and development work in the field of information technology and diplomacy. Kurbalija explains the relevance and potential of hypertext software tools for the field of diplomacy.

Framing an argument

Dr Biljana Scott’s article on framing an argument introduces the linguistic and rhetoric aspects of persuasion. The way in which we frame an issue largely determines how that issue will be understood and acted upon. By dissecting Obama’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech of December 2010, Dr Scott illustrates the main techniques for framing an argument.

Deconstruction and the undoing of diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Ivan Callus and Ruben Borg apply a very different set of tools to the analysis of diplomatic discourse. Their paper applies the discourse of deconstruction, a form of literary criticism, to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

An intercultural model for diplomacy training in New Zealand

This paper develops a model of diplomacy training based on intercultural competence and situated learning and applies the model to intercultural encounters.

Language, culture and the globalisation of discourse

To explore the idea that word use is culture-bound, this paper examines the English words culture and globalisation, to discover how they are used, and how they have come to have certain meanings or represent certain ideas.

Jargon, protocols and uniforms as barriers to effective communication

This paper presents a number of case studies illustrating the role of jargon, protocols and uniforms in creating communication problems. The authors provide some pointers for improving communication and are conscious of the fact that in the five thousand years of recorded history, extensive research in philosophy, biology, sociology, psychology and other disciplines has offered few answers to the problems of effective communication across cultures and professions. However, some measures do work, when there is a will from all parties for them to work.

Diplomats as cultural bridge builders

Diplomats are people who are on the fringe somewhere, because they are either permanently living in or at least dealing with alien cultures, cultures with different values. The success of a diplomat depends on this brinkmanship because, on the one hand, they must remain credible with their superiors back home and, on the other hand, they must have access to the leaders in the country where they are posted. This paper discusses the role of diplomats as cultural bridge-builders.

Summitry as intercultural communication

In one of his last essays before his premature death in 1972, Martin Wight described international conferences as ‘the set pieces punctuating the history of the European states-system, moments of maximum communication’.

Theories of persuasion and psychology: the power of situations

Throughout its history, humankind has been motivated to war, terrorism, ethnic cleansing, genocide, racist hysteria, religious intolerance and extremism, mass suicide and many other forms of irrational and pathological behaviour. The problem arises as Milan Kundera defines it, when we ask that terrible anthropological question – ‘What are people capable of’?

Misunderstood: The IT manager’s lament

Communication between information technologists and their clients – including diplomats - does not work as well as it should. We know that information technology has become ubiquitous. We also know that diplomats rely extensively on web services, electronic mail and documents in electronic form. Yet when communication does not work well, technologists poorly understand the needs of the diplomatic community. As a result, technical solutions may not address the real needs of end-users. This paper is a study on inter-professional miscommunication.

Use of language in diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Ambassador Stanko Nick takes a practical approach, examining issues such as the choice of language in bilateral and multilateral meetings, the messages conveyed by language choice, difficulties posed by interpretation, and aspects of diplomatic language including nuance, extra-linguistic signalling, and understatement. Language, according to Nick, is not a simple tool but "often the very essence of the diplomatic vocation."

Through the Diplomatic Looking Glass

This study presents and analyses books published by Italian diplomats. The more than seven-hundred and fifty titles listed give a broad and varied picture of diplomats and the diplomatic world. This volume evokes not only the talent for describing situations and characters, but also the broad, diverse interests that distinguish the members of this profession. As well, this study takes a broader view of relations between diplomacy and literature, examining the primary moments and protagonists of this relationship.

Negotiating across cultures

The text is about the importance of understanding cultural differences in negotiations. It highlights the need for awareness of varying communication styles, etiquette, and values when engaging in cross-cultural negotiations. By acknowledging and respecting cultural nuances, negotiators can build trust, establish rapport, and achieve successful outcomes in diverse settings.

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Dr Abu Jaber brings a cross-cultural element to the discussion of language and diplomacy, surveying the historical development of diplomatic language particularly in the Arab world. However, he points out that the very idea of a language of diplomacy "is that it should not be culture-bound but an attempt at transcending such boundaries to create a quasi neutral vehicle of exchange." Abu Jaber notes that the language of diplomacy has to this date not been successful in resolving violence between nations and peoples. Yet he believes that solutions to violen...

Who are diplomats?

Many remember Ivo Andric for his Nobel Prize for Literature. He is also remembered as a diplomat with over 20 years of experience. In his note on diplomacy, published here for the first time in English with the kind permission of the Andric Foundation, Andric describes who the diplomat is, and the qualities that those devoting themselves to diplomacy ought to have.

Persuasion: bad practices and … others

Persuasion is a very relative concept. Like beauty, persuasion is the eye of the beholder. Admittedly, persuasion does not exist in the absence of results. One can say that persuasion can be defined as such, if and only if it is effective and reaches its goals. If we accept this prerequisite, we may find persuasion where we least expect it.

Theatre of Power: The Art of Signaling

Theatre of Power: The Art of Signaling discusses how strategic signaling plays a vital role in navigating power dynamics. Leaders can use various techniques to convey strength and influence, such as body language, attire, and other symbols. Mastering the art of signaling can help individuals assert dominance and command respect in various settings.

Interpretation and diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Conference interpreters Vicky Cremona and Helena Mallia outline the different types of conference interpretation, difficulties in interpretation, preparation and techniques, and team work. On the topic of diplomatic conferences they point out that "confidence in the interpreters is essential.

Language, signaling and diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Ambassador Kishan Rana introduces the dimension of diplomatic signalling. Beginning with a reference to the Bhagwad Gita, one of the sacred texts of the Hindus, Rana outlines the qualities of good diplomatic dialogue: not causing distress to the listener, precision and good use of language, and truthfulness.

A practitioner’s view

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): With examples from a detailed case study of the historical New Zealand Treaty of Waitangi, Aldo Matteucci shows us that the diplomat's job is to decode language. Matteucci writes that all language comes with "hidden baggage": hidden meanings and intentions, historical and political context, legal precedents, etc. In order to find these hidden meanings the diplomat needs a broad understanding of the context of a situation.

Use of ambiguities in peace agreements

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Drazen Pehar looks specifically at the use of ambiguities in peace agreements. Pehar explains why ambiguities are so often used and why diplomats and others involved in international relations may think it best to eliminate ambiguities from peace agreements altogether.

This thesis explores the importance of diplomatic language, persuasive rhetoric and translation in international diplomacy. The hypothesis here is that diplomatic language is changing and that this change affects both our understanding and use of language and linguistic devices. In order to exemplify this trend, a case study analyses President Donald Trump’s controversial rhetoric and its translatability. The thesis provides, first, a close reading of texts that illustrate the pervasive power of a politician’s style, rhetoric and persuasiveness. Second, it considers the translation challen...

Internet governance and service provision in Zimbabwe

Intercultural communication in macedonia: different people, different stories.

This papers examines how the Macedonians and the Albanians live in Macedonia. How do they communicate? Is there friendship everywhere? How do the two nations, live together, how do they communicate. The answer to this question coming from two different people may reveal two opposite viewpoints, the optimistic and the pessimistic. This paper focuses on communication between the Macedonians and the Albanians, considering that these are the two largest ethnic groups in the Macedona and even more, that these two groups were involved in the military conflict in 2001.

Language and Diplomacy: Preface

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): In the preface below, Jovan Kurbalija and Hannah Slavik introduce the chapters in the book, and extract the general themes covered by the various authors.

Applying the pedagogy of positiveness to diplomatic communication

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Dr Francisco Gomes de Matos applies what he calls the "Pedagogy of Positiveness" to diplomatic communication. He proposes a checklist of tips for diplomats to make their communication more positive, emphasising respect and understanding of the other side, and keeping in mind the ultimate goal of avoiding conflict.

Ambiguity versus precision: The changing role of terminology in conference diplomacy

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Of central concern in the field of negotiation is the use of ambiguity to find formulations acceptable to all parties. Professor Norman Scott looks at the contrasting roles of ambiguity and precision in conference diplomacy. He explains that while documents drafters usually try to avoid ambiguity, weaker parties to an agreement may have an interest in inserting ambiguous provisions, while those with a stronger position or more to gain will push for precision.

DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats

On Diplo’s blog, in Diplo’s classrooms, and at Diplo’s events, dialogues stretch over a series of entries, comments, and exchanges and may even linger. DiploDialogue summarises. It’s like in sports events: DiploDialogue aims to bring focus by deleting what, in hindsight, is less relevant. In this first DiploDialogue, Katharina Höne and Aldo Matteucci discuss the usefulness of analogies and metaphors for understanding international relations and diplomacy.

Philosophy of Rhetoric

The author introduces a series of Essays on Rhetoric, explaining their origins and interconnection. This work has been a lifelong pursuit since 1750 and is structured based on a plan laid out in the first two chapters.

Language and negotiation: A Middle East lexicon

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Professor Raymond Cohen writes that "when negotiation takes place across languages and cultures the scope for misunderstanding increases. So much of negotiation involves arguments about words and concepts that it cannot be assumed that language is secondary." With numerous examples of the culturally-grounded references, associations and nuances of certain words and phrases in English and the Middle Eastern languages (Arabic, Turkish, Farsi and Hebrew), Cohen introduces his project of developing a negotiating lexicon of the Middle East as a guide for condu...

Language: Setting the stage

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): Benoit Girardin takes a philosophical approach to rhetoric - along with the issues of interpretation and ethics. He examines each of these three fields and its relation to diplomatic practice and negotiations, showing with examples how diplomatic language exhibiting either a lack or an excess of any of these qualities may lead to problems.

To joke or not to joke: A diplomatic dilemma in the age of internet

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): The first paper, presented by Prof. Peter Serracino-Inglott as the keynote address at the 2001 conference, examines the serious issue of diplomatic communication in a playful manner, through one of the most paradigmatic and creative examples of language use: joking.

The languages of the Knights

Part of Language and Diplomacy (2001): In his examination of the languages used by the Knights of St John in Rhodes and Malta during the 14th to 16th centuries, Professor Joseph Brincat applies the methodology of historical linguistics. As an international and multi-lingual entity, the Order faced difficulties with its administrative methods intimately linked to linguistic issues.

Diplo: Effective and inclusive diplomacy

Diplo is a non-profit foundation established by the governments of Malta and Switzerland. Diplo works to increase the role of small and developing states, and to improve global governance and international policy development.

Diplo on Social

Want to stay up to date.

Subscribe to more Diplo and Geneva Internet Platform newsletters!

• Election 2024
• Entertainment
• Newsletters
• Photography
• AP Buyline Personal Finance
• AP Buyline Shopping
• Press Releases
• Israel-Hamas War
• Russia-Ukraine War
• Global elections
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East
• Delegate Tracker
• AP & Elections
• 2024 Paris Olympic Games
• Auto Racing
• Movie reviews
• Book reviews
• Financial Markets
• Business Highlights
• Financial wellness
• Artificial Intelligence
• Social Media

A diplomatic spat erupts between Hungary and Poland over conflicting views on Russia

FILE - Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, right, speaks with Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk as they pose for a group photo during an Nuclear Energy Summit at the Expo in Brussels, on March 21, 2024. A diplomatic spat has erupted between Poland and Hungary that lays bare the deep tensions within Europe over how to deal with with Russia when it is waging war on Ukraine. (AP Photo/Virginia Mayo, File)

• Copy Link copied

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — A diplomatic spat has erupted between Poland and Hungary that lays bare the deep tensions within Europe over how to deal with Russia when it is waging war on Ukraine .

Poland, like Germany, France and most other European nations, is a staunch ally of Ukraine while Hungary’s populist Prime Minister Viktor Orbán is widely considered to have the warmest relations with the Kremlin among all EU leaders.

The Polish government has been openly critical of Hungary for its stance. The spat erupted when Orbán lashed out at Poland over the weekend.

“The Poles are pursuing the most sanctimonious and the most hypocritical policy in the whole of Europe. They are lecturing us morally, criticizing us for our economic relations with Russia, and at the same time they are doing business with the Russians and buying oil indirectly, and running the Polish economy with it,” Orbán said.

That triggered a denial and angry response from a Polish deputy foreign minister, Władysław Teofil Bartoszewski, who said Sunday: “We do not do business with Russia, unlike Prime Minister Orbán, who is on the margins of international society — both in the European Union and NATO.”

Poland was once dependent on Russian energy sources, but has been working for years to wean itself off Russian oil and gas. After Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Poland decided to end its Russian oil imports.

Magda Jakubowska, vice president of Visegrad Insight, a policy journal focused on Central Europe, said Poland might still have some Russian oil in reserves from past deliveries, but that it no longer imports oil from Russia. The Druzhba pipeline, which brought oil from Russia to Poland, “is no longer working,” she said.

About 50% of Poland’s imports now come from Saudi Arabia and some from Norway, she said. She said it was possible some of the oil imports arriving in Poland could be traced indirectly to Russia, but that the amounts would be insignificant.

A year ago Orbán could have made his claim, but not now, she said. “Maybe he hasn’t been updated,” Jakubowska said.

Bartoszewski added that Orbán should join a union with Putin and even suggested he should leave Western organizations. His comments were reported by the Polish state news agency PAP.

Hungary has found itself isolated in the EU due to its rogue approach to Russia, and friendliness to China as well. Top EU officials have been boycotting informal meetings hosted by Hungary, which now holds the EU’s rotating presidency.

“If you don’t want to be a member of a club, you can always leave,” Bartoszewski said. “I don’t really understand why Hungary wants to remain a member of organizations that it doesn’t like so much and which supposedly treat it so badly.”

The digs didn’t end there.

Hungary’s Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó shot back at Bartoszewski on Facebook by saying: “For a long time we tolerated the provocations and hypocrisy of the current Polish government with the intention of preserving the Polish-Hungarian brotherhood, but we have had enough.”

Poland and Hungary historically have strong ties.

Orbán got along very well with the conservative populists who governed Poland from 2015-2023 due to their shared views on migration and the EU. They both opposed allowing migrants from the Middle East and Africa into Europe. And both governments accused the EU of seeking to take away powers from the nation states.

Those ties only began to sour when Russia invaded Ukraine, aggression that Poles also feel as an existential threat in the region. They have gotten worse since a pro-EU government took over in Warsaw under Prime Minister Donald Tusk in December.

___ Domotor reported from London.

Diplomatic Language in Business English

In the workplace, there is always a need for decorum , or formal politeness. But so often, we face problems at work that make us want to be impolite … computer failures and broken equipment, theft of food from the break room refrigerator, missed deadlines, customers that fail to pay, and so on. The list of upsetting things could go on and on. Work is stressful—that’s why you get paid to do it.

If you’ve been working for at least a few years, you’ve probably learned the art of being diplomatic when you speak. In diplomatic speech, you discuss problems in a polite way that doesn’t cause people to get even more upset than they already are. One tricky thing about diplomatic is that it’s different in different languages. In a sense, you need to re-learn diplomacy when you learn a second language. Let’s look at the key features of diplomatic language in English.

Diplomatic language is more formal

Diplomatic language in the workplace uses words and phrases that are more formal. When practicing workplace diplomacy, avoid slang. Use language that’s closer to written English than normal speech. For example, suppose your office space is very dirty, even though the maintenance crew was supposed to clean it. You could say “This place is a mess,” but that’s pretty informal. “Place” has vague, context-dependent wording that suggests casual conversation.  Similarly, the phrase “is a mess” has a distinctly informal tone. To make your language more formal—and thus more diplomatic—it would be better to say something like “This work area needs some maintenance.”

Diplomatic language uses polite modal verbs

Modal verbs are words that can be used before the main verb in a sentence. Modals give the verb a different connotation or give the whole sentence a different tone. (A list of the most common modals in English can be found here .) Modal verbs that express possibility can make English sound more polite and diplomatic.

For example, if you haven’t received your paycheck on time, you’ll obviously want to talk to a supervisor. But telling your boss “Check with payroll—they didn’t process my pay” could sound rude or demanding. However, if you say “You may want to check with payroll… they might not have processed my pay,” you sound much more diplomatic, just by adding the modals may and might . Similarly, if you get a paycheck that seems way too small, saying “This pay amount may be a mistake. Could you look into it?” sounds much more polite than saying “This pay amount is a mistake. Look into it.”

Diplomatic language uses more words

When you use more words in your speech, it sounds as if you are being more careful in what you say. In a delicate situation, sounding more careful is diplomatic. It suggests to others that you are being cautious about their feelings, and doing your best to find good solutions without blaming anyone.

With more words, the diplomatic example sentences I showed you earlier can be made even more diplomatic. Let’s look at how more words can add diplomatic value:

• Somewhat diplomatic: “This work area needs some maintenance.”
• Even more diplomatic: “It looks like the maintenance crew may have missed this area. Maybe we should ask them to double check it when they return.”
• Somewhat diplomatic: “You may want to check with payroll… they might not have processed my pay.”
• Even more diplomatic: “I double checked my payroll records and my bank account, and it looks like my paycheck may not have arrived yet. It may be a good idea to double check this with payroll, just in case they didn’t process my pay for some reason.”
• Somewhat diplomatic: “This pay amount may be a mistake. Could you look into it?”
• Even more diplomatic: “From what I can tell, the amount of pay on my paycheck here doesn’t quite line up with my recorded hours… I recall working more hours than the paycheck indicates. Is there any possibility you could help me look into this?”

Of course, if you go overboard and get too wordy, the people listening to you might become impatient or annoyed. Add extra words carefully, especially if you are dealing with someone who’s very busy.

For some extra information on good workplace diplomacy and some of the thinking behind the features of diplomatic English, check out Rima’s diplomatic English tutorial on the Let’s Talk YouTube Channel.

David is a Test Prep Expert for Magoosh TOEFL and IELTS. Additionally, he’s helped students with TOEIC, PET, FCE, BULATS, Eiken, SAT, ACT, GRE, and GMAT. David has a BS from the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire and an MA from the University of Wisconsin-River Falls. His work at Magoosh has been cited in many scholarly articles , his Master’s Thesis is featured on the Reading with Pictures website, and he’s presented at the WITESOL (link to PDF) and NAFSA conferences. David has taught K-12 ESL in South Korea as well as undergraduate English and MBA-level business English at American universities. He has also trained English teachers in America, Italy, and Peru. Come join David and the Magoosh team on Youtube , Facebook , and Instagram , or connect with him via LinkedIn !

View all posts

More from Magoosh

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Deputy Ministers
• Speeches of the Deputy Minister
• Opening Remarks by H.E. Naci Koru, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey at the International Junior Diplomats Training Program

Excellencies, Dear Colleagues, Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to start by welcoming our young colleagues who have travelled a long way to take part in the “Training Program for International Junior Diplomats”. I would also like to congratulate our Diplomatic Academy for organizing this program. Since its inception in 1992, approximately 900 diplomats from five continents and over 100 countries have participated in this program. Like previous years, the Diplomatic Academy has prepared a comprehensive program for you. During the program, I hope that you will increase your knowledge about Turkey and its foreign policy in particular; regional and global politics in general. You will have lectures from well-known Turkish academics and senior diplomats of the Ministry. They will share their knowledge and experience with you. We also expect to learn from you. Your questions, comments and observations are valuable to us. During your stay in our country, you will also have the chance to visit historical and cultural sites of Turkey. I suggest that you take full advantage of this unique program. I am confident that your efforts will be paid off to further enrich your knowledge and experience and contribute to your future diplomatic career. Dear Colleagues, Opening speeches are supposed to be the first lecture of the program. In that context I would like to say a few words about diplomacy, changes in the global politics and the Turkish foreign policy You all know that the world has been changing in an incredible speed for the last two decades. It has now become a global village, in which the fate of our societies and countries are bound together. Some people thought that, such an environment, advances in technology and transportation, the trend towards multilateralism, would lessen the demand for diplomats in the world. Nevertheless this hasn’t been the case at all. What we are all experiencing is that the world we are operating in is rapidly becoming more challenging. In fact, today’s diplomacy deals with a complex and interrelated set of global issues, ranging from stability and peace, international security and environmental issues, financial crises and international terrorism, and the list goes on. There is a far more dynamic and complex networks at play between states in terms of trade and foreign policy interests; and also a rich web of overlapping connections between peoples which affect decision makers. Working out how to navigate this much more complex landscape of a networked world; how to protect national interests; how to promote common values; and how to address threats and seek out opportunities are all becoming the tasks of diplomacy today. Diplomacy entails engaging in a dialogue aimed at reaching solutions, promoting good governance, effecting change through cooperation, improving the human dignity, using the international framework to influence other countries’ actions, and so on. Therefore, we need skilled diplomats on the ground in the places that matters and who are able to make a difference in the course of events. We need alert diplomats, particularly in the area of conflict prevention. We need visionary diplomats to tap into new opportunities for trade, commerce and development. We need effective diplomats who can build coalitions of different actors, namely the public, civil society, private sector and academia. It is clear that we need qualified diplomats that act in accordance with the idea that peace, stability and prosperity are truly indivisible. Thus, it is not easy being a diplomat in the current globalized world. Furthermore, there have been few periods of time in the history when international cooperation and dialogue has been needed more. We are witnessing historical transformations in many corners of the world. The Middle East and North Africa is engulfed with the winds of change for more democracy, freedom and dignity. Africa is making impressive achievement towards attaining sustainable development. Europe is at a crossroads in terms of the future of its integration. Asia is emerging as the new center of gravity in world economics and politics. Latin America is on the way to a continental shift towards more cooperation and prosperity. Power distribution in the international system is also shifting in multiple directions, from the West to the East, from governments to non-state actors, from large-scale international bodies to regional organizations and informal networks. Civil society organizations, business communities, academicians, think-tanks and universities have an increased role in the complex dynamics of international relations. In tune with this fast changing international environment, Turkey has pursued a radical transformation process within the last ten years, which has fundamentally changed the political, economic and social structures of our country. Thanks to this transformation, today Turkey has a strong economy and consolidated democracy. As an emerging power, Turkey is one of the fastest growing economies, aiming to be among top ten biggest economies in the world by 2023, at the 100th anniversary of the Republic. Though there is ample room for improvement, our democracy inspires many in our neighborhood and constitutes the backbone of our growing soft power. The economic and political transformation enabled Turkey to pursue a more active and dynamic foreign policy. As Turkish foreign policy geared toward creating a belt of security and prosperity in its neighborhood, first and foremost we intensified our relations with countries in our neighborhood by establishing High Level Cooperation Councils, signing Free Trade and Visa Exemption Agreements. Our trade volume with our neighbors has increased 6 times over the last 10 years, reaching 86 billion USD in 2012. We also intensified our relations with African, Asian and Latin American countries. In 2008, Turkey hosted the 1st Turkey-Africa Summit and established a strategic partnership with Africa. Since 2009, we have opened 22 new embassies in Africa alone. We have been increasing our profile in international organizations such as the UN by leading global initiatives such as the Alliance of Civilizations, Mediation for Peace and Global Counter-Terrorism Forum. In 2008, after almost half a century, Turkey was elected to the UN Security Council as a non-permanent member for the period of 2009-2010. We announced once again our candidacy for non-permanent membership in the UN Security Council for the period of 2015-2016. Our peace building efforts in countries such as Afghanistan and Somalia, our mediation endeavors between parties in the Middle East, the Balkans and the Horn of Africa are some of the examples. We are committed to upholding the fundamental rights of peoples in Syria and Palestine. Turkey is also an emerging donor country, since humanitarian and development assistance provided by Turkey was more than 2 billion Dollars last year. Dear Colleagues, We see this program as the beginning of a long professional, but also personal relationship. We believe that it is through such formal and informal people-to-people contacts that we will be able to advance cooperation and understanding between our countries. We have a lot that we can learn from each other and many areas in which we can work together, and we can collaborate even more closely in the years to come. I hope that your stay here will mark the beginning of a lasting relationship between us. I also hope that the knowledge you obtain and the skills you develop here will enhance your abilities to help your governments. It is our sincere desire that at the end of this program you can better represent your country’s interests both at bilateral and international levels. In concluding my remarks, I welcome you once again to Turkey and wish you a successful program and a pleasant stay in our country. Thank you.

About  Search

Lyndon B. Johnson

Remarks of welcome to the chiefs of mission of the diplomatic corps.

Your Excellencies:

It gives me great pleasure to welcome you again to this house.

As you know, the President of the United States bears, under our Constitution, a very direct and immediate responsibility for the conduct of all of our foreign affairs. Therefore, I come to you today to speak to you as a working colleague.

We live at a time when foreign affairs go beyond their traditional scope; they now have strong new ties with the domestic life of each of our countries.

These new ties come as a result of modern communications which bring instantly to the homes of the citizens of every country events from around the world; they come from modern weapons which can make the threat of war anywhere a life and death issue for every nation; and from the fact that we are all engaged in vast historical changes which are reshaping the political life of the planet.

I have in mind the change from the colonial era to an era when scores of new nations claim new responsibilities on the world scene. The change from traditional ways to modern societies which bring to their peoples all the advantages of modern science and technology. The change in Western Europe, and Japan, and elsewhere from a heavy postwar dependence upon the United States to now one of partnership in the great affairs of the planet. A role which their traditions and history demand and their resources permit. And a change, that we hope, from dangerous cold war to a more stable and a more peaceful world.

None of these changes is automatic. All will take time. All can be upset. All can bring threats to peace. None will succeed if we do not accept the fact of our profound interdependence--an interdependence that's made tragically and humanly real to us all by the death of President Kennedy.

And right here now I want to tell all of you, on behalf of all of the American people, how deeply touched we have been by the flood of expressions of sympathy which have poured in on us--from Kings and Presidents, from Parliaments and citizens throughout the world. It is clear that President Kennedy, by his work and by his acts, became a symbol of hope and a promise of progress, progress for freedom, and peace, and a better life for all. As we face the day-to-day tasks before us, this outpouring of sympathy will be to us a renewed dedication. All of us have our parts to play, to make these great historical changes take place in a setting of peace. We must talk to one another with candor. We must try to understand what the other man's problems are--and communicate that understanding to each other and do it with integrity. We must be alert to the points of danger, but we must be equally alert for the points of common interest. In great matters and in small matters, we must move forward together. There is no other way for us all, on this small planet.

So I welcome you. I am delighted to greet you all, as messengers of understanding, and to tell each of you and through you, your people, that we in this country will go our full share of the way toward peace, and toward good will, and toward progress.

History will remember how we lived here and what we did here. And the great challenge to you is the challenge that I face and all responsible leaders of the world face in this hour. Our achievements in science are many and varied. Our social progress is great. The improvements in man's life are many. But we still, each of us in our own respective land, all face the one challenge of our time, the one great problem for us all. And unless we can, working together, trusting each other, believing in the brotherhood of man, unless we can find the answer to that problem, then all will have been in vain.

And what is that problem? It's not the problem of missiles or satellites or conquering armies or education for our children or even improved health. The one uppermost problem is first how can we live in this world with each other, together, without living like savages or criminals or murderers or without taking the lives of each other.

I want you to know when you return to your home as the spokesman of your people that my people want to go down any road that leads to peace; that to you and your country and your people, any of them who want our cooperation, they must know that we welcome it; that they will find our agreements honorable; that we are constantly going down this road and that road and yonder road searching for the answer of how to live peaceably together.

And we believe that you have the same problem and together we share the responsibility for finding the answer. So that when we are gone, those who point to the period of our work and say, "What did he do? What did he leave us?" they can say, "He left us with the answer on how to live together. And the tensions have been relieved, the strains that once existed are not there, and new confidence is abroad and new hope is there." And ultimately by following the Golden Rule, doing unto others as you would have them do unto you, putting yourself in the other man's position, trying to understand the problems that confront him as well as to solve the problems that confront you, together as human beings we can find a better, and a richer, and a fuller life for all humanity whatever spot on the globe they occupy.

Yours is a noble calling and you are engaged in a great adventure, one of trying to find the answer of how to live together. And with the help of God and the diligence of each of us, maybe during our time we will find that answer and then what a wonderful world it will be for all of us.

Note: The President spoke at noon in the State Dining Room at the White House. Dr. Guillermo Sevilla-Sacasa, Ambassador to the United States from Nicaragua and dean of the diplomatic corps, responded as follows:

"Mr. President:

"On behalf of the chiefs of the diplomatic missions, it is an honor and a privilege for me to tell you how pleased we were to receive your kind invitation to meet here this afternoon. We are deeply grateful for your hospitality. We are honored by your cordial welcome and our duties are enhanced by the fact that you refer to yourself as our colleague.

"In allying your own work with ours, you not only exemplify modern statesmanship, but you also make evident your high ideals and the excellent capabilities you possess, thus justifying the high concept in which you are held in your country and all over the world.

"The position that you take gratifies us, because we know that fellowship gives rise to the most satisfactory relations, and that through this fellowship we shall be able to reach our common goals.

"Indeed, history has changed the nature of foreign relations, and they are now an integral part of the domestic life of our countries. That you yourself have noted this change is to your credit. We understand the way in which diplomacy has evolved over centuries; and the principles of international peace and harmony are based on that understanding. Modern diplomacy does not deprive the diplomat of his personal heritage as a man of integrity. The shrewdness of yesteryear has now been replaced by good faith and gentlemanly behavior. The diplomat knows that the essential object of his ministry is to cultivate harmony between nations, to conciliate their opposing interests, to prevent conflicts, and to work for the security of universal freedom and peace.

"In the past, diplomatic law was based on the concept of divine right; today, it is based on the principle of the sovereignty of the people. The modern diplomat must facilitate international relations, and, without neglecting the interests of his own country, contribute to the progress of humanity.

"The old-fashioned diplomat was perhaps a fawning courtier; present-day circumstances and the evolution of diplomacy require that the modern diplomat be an honorable person, who represents the culture of the state that accredits him abroad.

"I am sure that the nations here represented share the ideal that you expressed in your warm message this historic afternoon. Just as we shall be alert to dangerous situations, we shall join you in the aim to bring about understanding of the problems of our people. We commend you for the significance of your message. We applaud the clear meaning of your reasoning. Time will surely confirm it. Your words are sure to have the support of the people who love peace and venerate freedom.

"This meeting, taking place under the same roof that sheltered the noble figure of President Kennedy, is, even in this atmosphere of sorrow and mourning caused by his departure, an important occasion, because it sets the guidelines for an enduring venture.

"In thanking you once again for your invitation, we extend our heartfelt wishes for your personal happiness and that of your worthy spouse, Mrs. Johnson, your faithful companion, who loyally shares your generous endeavors; for the well-being of your children, who are your pride and joy; sincere wishes, Mr. President, for the increasing prosperity of your great country, for the continued success of your illustrious Government, and that your good intentions may always find an echo in the farthest reaches of the world."

Excerpts of the President's remarks were released by the White House. The complete text is printed above as transcribed from a tape recording.

Lyndon B. Johnson, Remarks of Welcome to the Chiefs of Mission of the Diplomatic Corps Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/239304

Filed Under

Simple Search of Our Archives

Report a typo.

Israel News

Israel news features every important moment from the Jewish State involving politics, celebrities, and innovation. This is the hard hitting, fast paced news that represents the Jewish nation in an un bias frame so that truth about Israel is represented in the media. There is no other substitute for the best Israel news on the web...

Israel Politics

Israel sports, israel culture, benjamin netanyahu, defense news, crime in israel.

Grapevine August 4, 2024: Love conquers all

Conspiracy theories flood the internet after Israeli flag appears tied up at Olympic medal ceremony

Former NBA player Eddy Curry 'adopts' baby hostage Kfir Bibas for awareness campaign

Grapevine, August 3, 2024: Happy 104th, Roz!

Historic olympic shabbat: israel wins three medals in a day in france, including one gold, israel police arrest al-aqsa sheikh for incitement after eulogizing ismail haniyeh.

Since October 7, 140 indictments have been filed against those accused of inciting and supporting terrorism in the Jerusalem area.

'Secret arms embargo’: UK stalls military sales to Israel

The pause also prevents military radios and body armor from being sent to Israel at a time when Iran's attack is considered imminent.

Neither Netanyahu nor Gantz: Who do Israelis think should be the new prime minister?

After a dramatic week in the political and security spheres, Maariv conducted a poll to understand the fluctuations and possible ramifications on Knesset seat counts.

Israelis identify total war as top tactic for ending the Hezbollah conflict in the North

Amid increasing tensions with Hezbollah, a recent poll was conducted amongst Israelis in an attempt to identify a preferred course of action. An all-out war was chosen.

Netanyahu considered dismissing Defense Minister Gallant after US trip

According to sources, Netanyahu initially wanted to dismiss Gallant but delayed the plan due to the ongoing security situation in Israel.

Senate Republicans allege Biden 'deliberately withholding' defense materials from Israel

The Republican's letter on Friday alleged the White House deliberately withheld 120 mm tank ammunition, 120 mm mortar ammunition, light tactical vehicles, air-to-air missiles, and more.

Grapevine August 2, 2024: Women at the helm

Movers and shakers in Israeli society.

Ten years without Hadar: A conversation with hostage mother Leah Goldin

One of the family’s sayings for years now has been “whoever abandons the dead will abandon the injured, and eventually will abandon the living,” said Goldin.

Israel's Raz Hershko takes Women's Judo heavyweight silver medal at the Olympics

Hershko has become 3rd Israeli medal winner at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games, with all of them in judo.

Thailand suspends the arrival of thousands of workers to Israel following Iranian threats

Thai laborers began returning to Israel in May, seven months after many left following the Hamas attack on October 7.

By subscribing I accept the terms of use and privacy policy

'Highest price ever for killing one person': Houthis celebrate strike as Yemenis suffer

'Dismantling Hamas from within': IDF uncovers trove of Hamas secrets

Voight: My daughter Angelina Jolie was influenced by antisemitic people - regarding Gaza

Iran has something to fear: Israeli strike on Yemen shows IAF can reach Tehran

Operation 'Outstretched Arm' demonstrates Israel's F-35's stealth striking capabilities