Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Customers find the writing quality brilliant and compelling to read. Opinions differ on the thought-provoking aspect, with some finding it interesting and worthwhile, while others say it's not captivating.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the writing quality brilliant and compelling to read.
"...The novel is brilliantly written and compelling to read but may have been even better had it been just a tad shorter...." Read more
"I want to start by saying I really like this book. It’s well written , it has an interesting spin on past events, and the story moves along nicely,..." Read more
" brilliant prose wasted on a journey I hated to an ending I was relieved ro reach." Read more
"The prose lays out psychosis so elegantly , it's hard to remember the insanity. Characters are engaging and infuriating at the same time...." Read more
Customers find the book thought-provoking, interesting, and well-written. They say it seamlessly blends fact and fiction and is a deep read. However, some readers feel the book is not captivating and not a fully immersive experience.
"...The book creates a lot of food for thought , particularly in today’s political climate, and is an excellent choice for a book club to read and discuss." Read more
"...that when the time is up, I’m pretty ready to stop like I said, interesting , thought-provoking, worthwhile, but not a fully immersive experience." Read more
"The prose lays out psychosis so elegantly, it's hard to remember the insanity . Characters are engaging and infuriating at the same time...." Read more
"Don't read book if you want a nice easy read. This is a deep book , something to ponder, not to relax with." Read more
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..
An editorially independent publication supported by the Simons Foundation.
Get the latest news delivered to your inbox.
Type search term(s) and press enter
September 16, 2024
Cells across the tree of life can swap short-lived messages encoded by RNA — missives that resemble a quick text rather than a formal memo on letterhead.
Nash Weerasekera for Quanta Magazine
For a molecule of RNA, the world is a dangerous place. Unlike DNA, which can persist for millions of years in its remarkably stable, double-stranded form, RNA isn’t built to last — not even within the cell that made it. Unless it’s protectively tethered to a larger molecule, RNA can degrade in minutes or less . And outside a cell? Forget about it. Voracious, RNA-destroying enzymes are everywhere, secreted by all forms of life as a defense against viruses that spell out their genetic identity in RNA code.
There is one way RNA can survive outside a cell unscathed: in a tiny, protective bubble. For decades, researchers have noticed cells releasing these bubbles of cell membrane, called extracellular vesicles (EVs), packed with degraded RNA, proteins and other molecules. But these sacs were considered little more than trash bags that whisk broken-down molecular junk out of a cell during routine decluttering.
Then, in the early 2000s, experiments led by Hadi Valadi , a molecular biologist at the University of Gothenburg, revealed that the RNA inside some EVs didn’t look like trash. The cocktail of RNA sequences was considerably different from those found inside the cell, and these sequences were intact and functional . When Valadi’s team exposed human cells to EVs from mouse cells, they were shocked to observe the human cells take in the RNA messages and “read” them to create functional proteins they otherwise wouldn’t have been able to make.
Valadi concluded that cells were packaging strands of RNA into the vesicles specifically to communicate with one another. “If I have been outside and see that it’s raining,” he said, “I can tell you: If you go out, take an umbrella with you.” In a similar way, he suggested, a cell could warn its neighbors about exposure to a pathogen or noxious chemical before they encountered the danger themselves.
Since then, a wealth of evidence has emerged supporting this theory, enabled by improvements in sequencing technology that allow scientists to detect and decode increasingly small RNA segments. Since Valadi published his experiments, other researchers have also seen EVs filled with complex RNA combinations. These RNA sequences can contain detailed information about the cell that authored them and trigger specific effects in recipient cells. The findings have led some researchers to suggest that RNA may be a molecular lingua franca that transcends traditional taxonomic boundaries and can therefore encode messages that remain intelligible across the tree of life.
In 2024, new studies have exposed additional layers of this story, showing, for example, that along with bacteria and eukaryotic cells, archaea also exchange vesicle-bound RNA, which confirms that the phenomenon is universal to all three domains of life. Another study has expanded our understanding of cross-kingdom cellular communication by showing that plants and infecting fungi can use packets of havoc-wreaking RNA as a form of coevolutionary information warfare: An enemy cell reads the RNA and builds self-harming proteins with its own molecular machinery.
“I’ve been in awe of what RNA can do,” said Amy Buck , an RNA biologist at the University of Edinburgh who was not involved with the new research. For her, understanding RNA as a means of communication “goes beyond appreciating the sophistication and the dynamic nature of RNA within the cell.” Transmitting information beyond the cell may be one of its innate roles.
The microbiologist Susanne Erdmann studies viral infections in Haloferax volcanii , a single-celled organism that thrives in unbelievably salty environments such as the Dead Sea or the Great Salt Lake. Single-celled bacteria are known to exchange EVs widely, but H. volcanii is not a bacterium — it’s an archaean , a member of the third evolutionary branch of life, which features cells built differently from bacteria or eukaryotes like us.
Because EVs are the same size and density as the virus particles Erdmann’s team studies at the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Germany, they “always pop up when you isolate and purify viruses,” she said. Eventually, her group got curious and decided to peek at what’s inside.
The microbiologist Susanne Erdmann recently found archaea enclosing RNA in cellular bubbles and dispatching it into the environment. Her discovery extended our knowledge of this messaging ability to all three domains of life.
Alina Esken/Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
“I was expecting DNA,” Erdmann recalled, following reports that other archaeal species pack DNA into EVs. Instead, her lab found a whole smorgasbord of RNA — specifically noncoding RNAs, mysterious stretches of nucleotides with no known function in archaea. These noncoding RNA sequences were much more abundant in the EVs than in the archaeal cells themselves. “It was the first time that we found RNA in EVs in archaea,” she said.
Erdmann wondered if there was a purpose to the archaean EVs. A cell can spontaneously make vesicles when its membrane pinches in on itself to form a little bubble that then detaches. However, other mechanisms involve more active and deliberate processes, similar to the ones that move molecules around inside the cell. Erdmann’s group identified an archaeal protein that was essential for producing RNA-containing EVs.
That suggested to her that the RNA wasn’t ending up in the EVs by chance, and that the process wasn’t just waste disposal. “It’s very likely that [archaea] use them for cell-to-cell communication,” she said. “Why else would you invest so much energy in throwing out random RNA in vesicles?”
Erdmann isn’t sure why the Haloferax microbes pack their vesicles with RNA while other archaeal species prefer DNA. But she suspects it has to do with how time sensitive the molecular message is. “RNA is a different language than DNA,” she said, and it serves a fundamentally different purpose both inside and outside cells.
Mark Belan for Quanta Magazine
An organism’s DNA should be stable and relatively unchanging over the course of its life. It may pick up spontaneous mutations or even extra genes, but it takes generations of natural selection for temporary changes in DNA sequences to take hold in a population. RNA, on the other hand, is constantly in flux, responding to dynamic conditions inside and outside the cell. RNA signals don’t last long, but they don’t need to, since they can so quickly become irrelevant.
As a message, RNA is transient. This is a feature, not a bug: It can have only short-term effects on other cells before it degrades. And since the RNA inside a cell is constantly changing, “the message that you can send to your neighboring cell” can also change very quickly, Erdmann said. In that sense, it’s more like a quick text message or email meant to communicate timely information than, say, runes etched in stone or a formal memo on letterhead.
While it seems that neighboring archaea are taking up and internalizing EVs from their fellow cells, it’s not clear yet whether the messages affect them. Erdmann is also already wondering what happens to these vesicles in the wild, where many different organisms could be within earshot of the messages they carry.
“How many other different organisms in the same environment could take up this message?” she asked. “And do they just eat it and use the RNA as food, or do they actually detect the signal?”
While that may still be a mystery for Haloferax , other researchers have demonstrated that cells across species, kingdoms and even domains of life can send and receive remarkably pointed molecular missives.
Although RNA is short-lived, it has revealed itself to be a shape-shifting molecular marvel. It’s best known for helping cells produce new proteins by copying DNA instructions (as messenger RNA, or mRNA) and delivering them to the ribosome for construction. However, its flexible backbone lets RNA fold into a number of shapes that can impact cell biology. It can act as an enzyme to accelerate chemical reactions within cells. It can bind to DNA to activate or silence the expression of genes. And competing strands of RNA can tangle up mRNA instructions in a process called RNA interference that prevents the production of new proteins.
As researchers increasingly appreciate the ways RNA changes cell activity, they’ve studied strategies to use this mutable little molecule as an experimental tool, a disease treatment, and even the basis for the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine . All of these applications require transferring RNA into cells, but it seems that evolution has beaten us to it: EVs transmit RNA even to cells that may not want to get the message.
About 10 years ago, the molecular geneticist Hailing Jin and her lab at the University of California, Riverside discovered that two organisms from different kingdoms — a plant and a fungus — exchange RNA as a form of warfare. Jin was studying Botrytis cinerea , a fuzzy gray mold that ravages crops such as strawberries and tomatoes, when she saw it swap RNA with the plant Arabidopsis (thale-cress) during infection. The Botrytis fungus delivered RNA that interfered with the plant’s ability to fight the infection. Later work showed that the plant cells could respond with their own volley of RNA that damaged the fungus.
In this “coevolutionary arms race,” as Jin described it, both organisms used EVs as vehicles for these delicate but damaging RNA messages. Previously, scientists interested in host-pathogen dynamics mainly focused on proteins and metabolites, Jin said, because those molecules can be easier to study. But it makes sense for organisms to have multiple ways of resisting environmental challenges, she said, including using RNA to interact with distant evolutionary relatives.
Over the last decade, more scientists have discovered examples of cross-kingdom RNA exchange as an offensive strategy during infection. Parasitic worms living in mouse intestines release RNA in EVs that shut down the host’s defensive immune proteins. Bacteria can shoot messages to human cells that tamp down antibacterial immune responses . The fungus Candida albicans has even learned to twist a message from human EVs to its own advantage: It uses human RNA to promote its own growth .
Cross-kingdom correspondence isn’t always hate mail. These interactions have also been seen in friendly (or neutral) relationships, Jin said. For example, bacteria that live symbiotically in the roots of legumes send RNA messages to promote nodulation — the growth of little bumps where the bacteria live and fix nitrogen for the plant.
How can RNA from one branch of the tree of life be understood by organisms on another? It’s a common language, Buck said. RNA has most likely been around since the very beginning of life. While organisms have evolved and diversified, their RNA-reading machinery has largely stayed the same. “RNA already has a meaning in every cell,” Buck said. “And it’s a pretty simple code.”
So simple, in fact, that a recipient cell can open and interpret the message before realizing it could be dangerous, the way we might instinctively click a link in an email before noticing the sender’s suspicious address. Indeed, earlier this year, Jin’s lab showed that Arabidopsis plant cells can send seemingly innocuous RNA instructions that have a surprise impact on an enemy fungus. In experiments, Jin’s team saw the Botrytis fungus read the invading mRNA along with its own molecules and unwittingly create proteins that damaged its infectious abilities.
It’s almost as if the plants were creating a “pseudo-virus,” Jin said — little packets of RNA that infect a cell and then use that cell’s machinery to churn out proteins.
“This is a pretty powerful mechanism,” she said. “One mRNA can be translated into many, many copies of proteins. … It’s much more effective than transporting the protein itself.”
To her knowledge, Jin said, this is the first time she’s seen evidence of organisms across kingdoms exchanging mRNA messages and reading them into proteins. But she thinks it’s likely to be seen in lots of other systems, once people start looking for it.
The field feels young, Buck said, which is exciting. There’s still a lot to learn: for example, whether the other molecules packaged in EVs help deliver the RNA message. “It’s a fun challenge to unravel all of that,” she said. “We should be inspired with how incredibly powerful and dynamic RNA is, and how we’re still discovering all the ways that it shapes and regulates life.”
Get highlights of the most important news delivered to your email inbox
Comment on this article.
Quanta Magazine moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.
Use your social network.
Forgot your password ?
We’ll email you instructions to reset your password
Enter your new password
Elon Musk drew fierce backlash on his own X (formerly Twitter) platform for what was slammed as an “appalling and indefensible” response to an apparent second attempt on the life of former President Donald Trump, the current GOP presidential nominee.
Per the FBI, Trump was the subject of “what appears to be an attempted assassination” at his golf club in Florida on Sunday, some nine weeks after he was injured when shots were fired during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Musk posted: “And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/Kamala.”
The billionaire, who has 197 million followers, added a thinking-face emoji.
The criticism came fast as Musk — who has endorsed Trump’s 2024 campaign — was accused of stoking division and inflaming tensions.
Musk later deleted the post.
He explained, “Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on X.”
Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on 𝕏 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 16, 2024
“Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text,” he added.
Musk did not elaborate on who was in the group that he initially told the “joke” to and who he said had found it “hilarious.”
Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 16, 2024
Musk’s explanation went down as badly as his alleged “joke” did.
Here’s how commenters responded to the initial comment:
Elon Musk just tweeted this and this is okay? https://t.co/X1qNnisj59 — Jvy_almighty (@JvyAlmighty) September 16, 2024
This is a dangerous and disturbing provocation. https://t.co/1xPdcBcPHD — Marc Lamont Hill (@marclamonthill) September 16, 2024
If you or I said this, the FBI would be at our door tomorrow and hauling us away for questioning. https://t.co/adLDboTtsY — A.J. Delgado (@AJDelgado13) September 16, 2024
and they say this site has advertising problems https://t.co/nhO3ulEIOm — Dave Itzkoff (@ditzkoff) September 16, 2024
Another example of why your children hate you. — Billy Baldwin (@BillyBaldwin) September 16, 2024
This is literally incitement. — DemsMight 🇺🇸 (@demsmight) September 16, 2024
Hello @DOJCrimDiv and @SecretService . Whenever a US citizen infers that people should consider assassinating @POTUS or @VP , I believe it should be taken very seriously. Please take @elonmusk 's statement here under serious consideration. https://t.co/70yrmGXuUN — Matthew Podszus (@matthew_podszus) September 16, 2024
this is a defense contractor @FBI @SecretService @CIA https://t.co/uyIEZVLR91 — hasanabi (@hasanthehun) September 16, 2024
This is actually crazy. You’ve officially lost it dude and it’s sad to see. A lot of people look up to you but you’re being super irresponsible all because you crave attention https://t.co/REYfWEWJia — Jonathan Morrison 🙋🏻♂️ (@tldtoday) September 16, 2024
WTF??? @SecretService you may want to pay this guy a visit. He ain’t right in the head! https://t.co/kZ5oaWD73U — MazJobrani (@MazJobrani) September 16, 2024
This is appalling and indefensible. https://t.co/QXAHfOdTnS — Jonah Goldberg (@JonahDispatch) September 16, 2024
this guy is out of control https://t.co/9DQOPeKn3w — David Kaye (@davidakaye) September 16, 2024
Imagine being the richest man in the world and buying a powerful social media platform, and this (among other outrageously irresponsible tweets) is what you do with it. https://t.co/6WKPTWMDqW — Jon Ralston (@RalstonReports) September 16, 2024
Hey, richest man in the world with incalculable power and influence, please don’t say things like this https://t.co/yUanxcCyaq — Preston Moore, M.A. (@prestoncmoore) September 16, 2024
When it comes to murder, suddenly @elonmusk is a big fan of diversity equity & inclusion Seems about right . https://t.co/9namrPJZGB — Michael Harriot (@michaelharriot) September 16, 2024
I had a security clearance for most of my adult life. If I had said something like this, I would’ve lost it instantly. And yet this guy is still a major government contractor. https://t.co/exrI8VYsa7 — Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) September 16, 2024
And here’s how they reacted to his explainer:
Nothing is funny about sending a tweet about assassinating the President and Vice President. He deleted his tweet, but the targeted audience received the message. He knows exactly what he’s doing. — 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐢 (@ChidiNwatu) September 16, 2024
if you have to explain your joke it is not funny — Mantis (@mantis) September 16, 2024
tee-hee i was just joking about killing the president hehe im da joker baby! pic.twitter.com/zDIPU7eaSU — Jules Suzdaltsev (@jules_su) September 16, 2024
Maggie Haberman Explains Why Trump Is Keeping Laura Loomer Close
Tim Walz Wallops Trump With A Teaching-Inspired Zinger
Trump’s Ranting Review Of Kamala Harris At Debate Has Many People Saying Same Thing
Karl Rove Flips Donald Trump's Insult For Kamala Harris On Ex-President
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Biography of X is a 2023 alternative history novel by American writer Catherine Lacey published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux. The novel purports to be a 2005 biography of the musician and artist X, written by her widow, C.M. Lucca, as a response to an unauthorized and apparently inaccurate biography of her wife written after her death. ...
The narrator of "Biography of X," the new Catherine Lacey novel, is a journalist named C.M. Lucca who worked for a Village Voice-like newspaper in New York City during the 1980s. C.M. has a ...
Real-life figures also trespass onto the pages of this biography to interact with X — who, I must remind you, is a made-up character. Among X's friends are Patti Smith, the former Weather ...
Biography of X is a profound novel about love and what it can license, about the toll―and maybe the con―of genius. Only Catherine Lacey could have written it." ― Garth Greenwell, author of Cleanness and What Belongs to You " Biography of X is the most ambitious book I've ever read from a writer of my own generation. Epic world-building ...
When X—an iconoclastic artist, writer, and polarizing shape-shifter—falls dead in her office, her widow, CM, wild with grief and refusing everyone's good advice, hurls herself into writing a biography of the woman she deified. Though X was recognized as a crucial creative force of her era, she kept a tight grip on her life story.
Biography of X is a profound novel about love and what it can license, about the toll―and maybe the con―of genius. Only Catherine Lacey could have written it." ― Garth Greenwell, author of Cleanness and What Belongs to You " Biography of X is the most ambitious book I've ever read from a writer of my own generation. Epic world-building ...
When X—an iconoclastic artist, writer, and polarizing shape-shifter—falls dead in her office, her widow, CM, wild with grief and refusing everyone's good advice, hurls herself into writing a biography of the woman she deified. Though X was recognized as a crucial creative force of her era, she kept a tight grip on her life story.
Biography of X is a profound novel about love and what it can license, about the toll―and maybe the con―of genius. Only Catherine Lacey could have written it. Sara Nović, author of True Biz. Biography of X is a triumphant high-wire act: all the breadth of a 19th century classic with the propulsiveness of a psychological thriller. I stayed ...
When X—an iconoclastic artist, writer, and polarizing shape-shifter—falls dead in her office, her widow, wild with grief and refusing everyone's good advice, hurls herself into writing a biography of the woman she deified. Though X was recognized as a crucial creative force of her era, she kept a tight grip on her life story.
Pulsing with suspense and intellect while blending nonfiction and fiction, Biography of X is a roaring epic that plumbs the depths of grief, art, and love. In her most ambitious novel yet, Catherine Lacey pushes her craft to its highest level, introducing us to an unforgettable character who, in her tantalizing mystery, shows us the fallibility ...
When X―an iconoclastic artist, writer, and polarizing shape-shifter―falls dead in her office, her widow, CM, wild with grief and refusing everyone's good advice, hurls herself into writing a biography of the woman she deified. Though X was recognized as a crucial creative force of her era, she kept a tight grip on her life story.
Catherine Lacey's brilliant, astonishing new novel, "Biography of X," is presented to the reader as a book by a fictional character, a journalist named C.M. Lucca.More than a year after the ...
C.M. Lucca is a former crime reporter who resents the inaccuracies printed in the only biography of her wife, X, a famous performance artist who has recently died. Determined to correct the record, C.M. begins reporting on her wife's mysterious origins and career as a shape-shifting provocateur. "When she died, all I knew about X's distant past ...
From one of our fiercest stylists, a roaring epic chronicling the life, times, and secrets of a notorious artist. When X--an iconoclastic artist, writer, and polarizing shape-shifter--falls dead in her office, her widow, CM, wild with grief and refusing everyone's good advice, hurls herself into writing a biography of the woman she deified.
Biography of X is the most ambitious book I've ever read from a writer of my own generation. Epic world-building revealed through intimate emotion and dangerously honed sentences; a story that mixes fact and fiction to create a new register of truth, a register that belongs entirely to Catherine Lacey. I'm awed - Torrey Peters, author of ...
The following is from Catherine Lacey's Biography of X.Lacey is the author of the novels Nobody Is Ever Missing, The Answers, and Pew, and the short story collection Certain American States. She has received a Guggenheim Fellowship, a Whiting Award, the New York Public Library's Young Lions Fiction Award, and a New York Foundation for the Arts fellowship.
Recommendations from our site. "The book I've been jabbering about to anyone who will listen is Catherine Lacey's new novel Biography of X, which is a tricksy, intriguing book comprising a faux biography set in a contemporary, but counterfactual United States. It's at once moving and bewildering, and terribly clever—quite extraordinary.
Biography of X is a meticulously assembled work, complete with fictional footnotes for invented interviews, apparent photographs of X in her youth and extracts of her miscellaneous correspondence ...
Catherine Lacey's Biography of X is a daring reimagining of 20th century America where the Vietnam War never happened, Bernie Sanders was President, and an enigmatic multi-hyphenate artist named ...
Biography of X [Catherine Lacey] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Biography of X
NBC's Tom Winter joins TODAY with details about 58-year-old Ryan Wesley Routh, the suspect arrested in an apparent assassination attempt on Donald Trump at h...
Ryan Wesley Routh put his enmity toward Donald Trump - the man he once supported but then dismissed as an "idiot," a "buffoon" and a "fool" - at the center of a rambling and ...
Following a second attempt on his life, former President Donald Trump spoke about the events that transpired on Sunday. Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:53:16 GMT (1726537996934) Story Infinite Scroll - News3 ...
When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, doctors warned that women would die, but lawmakers who passed state abortion bans didn't listen. The worst consequences are now becoming clear.
Biography of X is a profound novel about love and what it can license, about the toll―and maybe the con―of genius. Only Catherine Lacey could have written it." ― Garth Greenwell, author of Cleanness and What Belongs to You " Biography of X is the most ambitious book I've ever read from a writer of my own generation. Epic world-building ...
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declared "we must stop" the "extreme MAGA Republicans" as news spread about the second likely assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump.
VALDOSTA, Ga. (WALB/Gray News) - A UPS driver who helped save a grandmother passed out in her driveway says he has forged a lifelong connection with her, visiting her in the hospital weekly and thinking of her as his own family. UPS driver Raheem Cooper was on his normal route in August when he ...
When X—an iconoclastic artist and shape-shifter—falls dead in her office, her widow CM, wild with grief, hurls herself into writing X's biography. Though X was recognized as a crucial creative force of her era, she kept a tight grip on her life story. In CM's quest to unravel it, she opens a Pandora's box of secrets and destruction.
In 2024, new studies have exposed additional layers of this story, showing, for example, that along with bacteria and eukaryotic cells, archaea also exchange vesicle-bound RNA, which confirms that the phenomenon is universal to all three domains of life. Another study has expanded our understanding of cross-kingdom cellular communication by showing that plants and infecting fungi can use ...
Elon Musk drew fierce backlash on his own X (formerly Twitter) platform for what was slammed as an "appalling and indefensible" response to an apparent second attempt on the life of former ...